| Literature DB >> 33192481 |
Chunlin Yue1, Qian Yu2, Yanjie Zhang2, Fabian Herold3, Jian Mei1, Zhaowei Kong4, Stephane Perrey5, Jiao Liu6, Notger G Müller3, Zonghao Zhang1, Yuliu Tao1, Arthur Kramer7,8, Benjamin Becker9, Liye Zou2,10.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The current study aimed at comparing the effects of Tai Chi (a motor-cognitive exercise) with walking (an exercise without cognitive demands) on cognitive performance, brain structure, and brain function in the elderly.Entities:
Keywords: Tai Chi; delayed memory; gray matter density; regional homogeneity; walking
Year: 2020 PMID: 33192481 PMCID: PMC7658399 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.586770
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Aging Neurosci ISSN: 1663-4365 Impact factor: 5.750
Characteristics of the participants in TCG and WG.
| TCG ( | WG ( | |||
| Age (year) | 62.90 ± 2.40 | 63.27 ± 3.60 | –0.393 | 0.193 |
| Education (year) | 9.05 ± 1.80 | 8.86 ± 2.74 | 0.188 | 0.074 |
| Handedness (left/right) | 0/20 | 0/22 | – | – |
| Year of practice | 16.58 ± 7.33 | 14.95 ± 5.94 | 0.823 | 0.42 |
| Amount of exercise (h/week) | 9.91 ± 3.04 | 10.87 ± 2.06 | –1.26 | 0.20 |
| MOCA | 28.40 ± 1.50 | 27.50 ± 1.50 | 1.94 | 0.83 |
| CSF (cm3) | 356.30 ± 142.11 | 327.36 ± 103.56 | 0.74 | 0.46 |
| GMV (cm3) | 560.45 ± 61.73 | 533.91 ± 45.08 | 1.56 | 0.13 |
| WM (cm3) | 483.50 ± 64.27 | 462.27 ± 41.53 | 1.25 | 0.22 |
| TIV (cm3) | 1400.35 ± 15.10 | 1323.77 ± 142.53 | 1.43 | 0.16 |
| GM/TIV | 0.40 ± 0.04 | 0.41 ± 0.03 | –0.16 | 0.87 |
| GM + WM (cm3) | 1043.95 ± 119.27 | 996.18 ± 78.81 | 1.51 | 0.14 |
| GM/GM + WM | 0.54 ± 0.02 | 0.54 ± 0.02 | 0.25 | 0.81 |
Comparisons of cognitive domains of the MOCA between TCG and WG.
| TCG ( | WG ( | Cohen’s d | ||
| MOCA | 28.4 ± 1.5 | 27.5 ± 1.5 | 0.83a | 0.600 |
| Visuospatial | 1.6 ± 0.60 | 1.82 ± 0.39 | 0.167a | –0.435 |
| Draw the clock | 2.7 ± 0.47 | 2.86 ± 0.35 | 0.213a | –0.386 |
| Naming | 3 ± 0 | 2.64 ± 0.73 | 0.029a | 0.674 |
| Attention | 5.4 ± 0.68 | 5.5 ± 0.67 | 0.635a | –0.148 |
| Repeat sentence | 1.7 ± 0.57 | 1.82 ± 0.39 | 0.445a | –0.246 |
| Verbal fluency | 1 ± 0 | 1 ± 0 | ||
| Abstract ability | 1.9 ± 0.31 | 1.82 ± 0.39 | 0.456a | 0.227 |
| Delayed recall | 4.45 ± 0.89 | 3.32 ± 1.25 | 0.002a* | 1.041 |
| Orientation | 5.85 ± 0.37 | 5.95 ± 0.21 | 0.273a | –0.332 |
Brain regions with higher gray matter density in TCG as compared to WG.
| Brain Region | MNI coordinates, mm | Voxels, n | Zpeak | ||||
| x | y | z | |||||
| Cerebelum_8_L | –34.5 | –61.5 | –49.5 | 310 | 4.26 | 0.001 | 0.01 |
| ITG_R | 51.5 | –5.5 | –27.5 | 204 | 4.05 | 0.001 | 0.01 |
| HIP_L/PHG_L | –26.5 | –35.5 | –7.5 | 197 | 4.13 | 0.001 | 0.01 |
FIGURE 1Regional gray matter differences as determined by VBM between the TCG and WG group. (A) The threshold for significant changes was set to p < 0.01 cluster mass-level GFR corrected with a cluster building threshold of p = 0.001 uncorrected on voxel level. The warm color indicates that the GMV of the TCG was greater than that of WG. (B) Bar plots showed the mean gray matter density signal in these ROIs for the TCG and WG group. The independent sample t-test was used to compare the effects of two groups. ***means p < 0.001. Cerebelum_8_L, left inferior cerebellum; ITG_R, right inferior temporal gyrus; HIP_L, left hippocampus; PHG_L, left parahippocampal gyrus.
Brain regions with different ReHo in TCG and WG.
| Brain regions | MNI coordinates,mm | Voxel, n | Zpeak | ||||
| HIP _L/PHG_L/FG_L | –27 | –33 | –3 | 280 | 5.34 | 0.001 | 0.01 |
FIGURE 2Regional differences in ReHo between TCG and WG. (A) ReHo analysis showed that the ReHo activations of the left hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, and fusiform in the participants who practiced Tai Chi were higher than those in the WG. The threshold for significant changes was set to p < 0.01 cluster mass-level GFR corrected with a cluster building threshold of p = 0.001 uncorrected on voxel level. (B) Bar plots showed the mean ReHo signal in these ROIs for the TCG and WG group. The independent sample t-test was used to compare the effects of two groups. ***means p < 0.001. HIP_L, left hippocampus; PHG_L, left parahippocampal gyrus; FG_L, left fusiform.
FIGURE 3Correlation between gray matter density of the left hippocampal and delayed memory.
FIGURE 4Correlation between ReHo of the left hippocampal and delayed memory.