| Literature DB >> 33192455 |
Chunyan Ye1, Yanrong Zhang1, Sumei Luo1, Yanan Cao1, Feng Gao2, E Wang1,3.
Abstract
Background: The mechanism underlying delirium, a common acute fluctuating mental state, may be related to the activation of a neuroinflammatory response. In this study, we attempted to investigate whether plasma inflammatory response markers, vascular and cerebrovascular injury-related markers, and neurodegeneration-associated markers were associated with emergence delirium (ED).Entities:
Keywords: BACE1; biomarker; delirium; emergence; general anesthesia
Year: 2020 PMID: 33192455 PMCID: PMC7655534 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.555594
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Aging Neurosci ISSN: 1663-4365 Impact factor: 5.750
Figure 1Flow diagram.
Main characteristics of the study participants.
| Emergence delirium | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic | Overall ( | Yes ( | Non ( | |
| Age (Y) | 63.69 ± 7.21 | 63.46 ± 8.10 | 63.91 ± 6.35 | 0.754 |
| Male sex, | 68 (65.4%) | 31 (62.00%) | 37 (68.51%) | 0.623 |
| BMI, (kg/m2) | 22.46 ± 3.19 | 21.83 ± 3.16 | 23.04 ± 3.14 | 0.053 |
| ASA physical status, | 0.771 | |||
| II | 38 (36.54%) | 19 (31.00%) | 19 (35.19%) | - |
| III | 66 (63.46%) | 31 (62.00%) | 35 (64.81%) | - |
| Preoperative MMSE (score) | 27.00 (3.0) | 27.00 (2.00) | 28.00 (3.00) | 0.135 |
| Duration of education (Y) | 9.00 (6.00) | 8.00 (5.50) | 9.00 (6.00) | 0.292 |
| Smoker, | 45 (43.27%) | 21 (42.00%) | 24 (44.44%) | 0.958 |
| Preoperative comorbidities, | ||||
| Hypertension | 38 (36.54%) | 20 (40.00%) | 18 (33.33%) | 0.616 |
| Diabetes | 20 (19.23%) | 9 (18.00%) | 11 (10.58) | 0.954 |
| History of myocardial infarct | 5 (4.80%) | 4 (8.00%) | 1 (1.90%) | 0.315 |
| Duration of anesthesiaa (min) | 267.26 ± 84.24 | 274.82 ± 85.79 | 260.26 ± 82.96 | 0.381 |
| Duration of surgeryb (min) | 195.28 ± 73.50 | 200.92 ± 76.23 | 190.06 ± 71.19 | 0.454 |
.
The laboratory indexes of patients with or without ED.
| Variables | ED ( | Non-ED ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Log IL-6 (pg/ml) | 1.67 ± 0.42 | 1.47 ± 0.51 | 0.039a |
| Log CHI3L1 (pg/ml) | 4.81 ± 0.47 | 4.61 ± 0.50 | 0.041a |
| Log S100B (pg/ml) | 2.59 (0.64) | 2.09 ± 0.52 | 0.008a |
| Log Lp-PLA2 (pg/ml) | 5.07 ± 0.21 | 5.04 ± 0.25 | 0.445 |
| Log MIF (pg/ml) | 3.68 ± 0.38 | 3.60 ± 0.29 | 0.217 |
| Log ICAM1 (pg/ml) | 5.41 ± 0.30 | 5.44 ± 0.37 | 0.661 |
| Log VACM1 (pg/ml) | 6.07 ± 0.19 | 6.04 ± 0.26 | 0.529 |
| Log α-Syn (pg/ml) | 2.61 ± 0.11 | 2.64 ± 0.12 | 0.222 |
| Log BACE1 (μg/ml) | 1.16 ± 0.17 | 1.01 ± 0.14 | <0.000a |
.
Figure 2Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the diagnostic value of plasma IL-6, S100B, and BACEl for ED.
Diagnostic capability of IL-6, S100B, and BACE1.
| Biomarker | Optimal cut-off value | Se (%) | Sp (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | AUC | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL-6 (pg/ml) | 40.05 | 58.00 | 66.67 | 61.70 | 63.16 | 0.62 | 0.51–0.73 | 0.041a |
| S100B (pg/ml) | 263.68 | 64.00 | 75.93 | 71.11 | 69.49 | 0.65 | 0.54–0.76 | 0.008a |
| BACE1 (μg/ml) | 12.68 | 70.00 | 77.78 | 74.47 | 73.68 | 0.75 | 0.66–0.85 | <0.000a |
.