Literature DB >> 33192143

Iron islands in the Amazon: investigating plant beta diversity of canga outcrops.

Caroline Oliveira Andrino1,2, Rafael Gomes Barbosa-Silva1,2, Juliana Lovo1,2, Pedro Lage Viana2, Marcelo Freire Moro3, Daniela Cristina Zappi1,2.   

Abstract

The world's largest mineral iron province, Serra dos Carajás, is home to an open vegetation known as canga, found on top of isolated outcrops rising out of the Amazon rainforest. Over one thousand vascular plants species have been recorded in these canga sites, including 38 edaphic endemics. A new survey adds to our investigation of biogeographic relationships between sixteen canga outcrops and the effect of the distance between site pairs on the number of shared species, regional species turnover and species distribution patterns. Plant collecting expeditions to the westernmost site, the Serra de Campos of São Félix do Xingu (SFX), were carried out followed by the identification of all collected specimens and the creation of a species database, built to perform biogeographical analyses. Floristic relationships among the sites were investigated regarding their similarity, using multivariate analyses. The correlation between canga areas and species richness was tested, as well as the geographical distance between pairs of outcrops and their shared species. Vascular plants at SFX total 254 species including 17 edaphic endemics. All canga sites are grouped with 25% of minimum similarity, and the SFX falls within a large subgroup of outcrops. The total species number shared between site pairs does not change significantly with geographical distance but is positively correlated with the area of each outcrop. Meanwhile, shared endemic species numbers between site pairs decline when geographical distance increases, possibly imposed by the barrier of the rainforest. Our data suggest higher shared similarity between the largest and species-richest sites as opposed to geographically nearby sites, and provide useful insight for drafting conservation and compensation measures for canga locations. The size of the canga outcrops is associated to higher floristic diversity but connectivity among islands also plays a role in their similarity. Caroline Oliveira Andrino, Rafael Gomes Barbosa-Silva, Juliana Lovo, Pedro Lage Viana, Marcelo Freire Moro, Daniela Cristina Zappi.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Neotropical mountains; campo rupestre; edaphic endemism; island-like habitats; plant species diversity; rainforest; vascular plant survey

Year:  2020        PMID: 33192143      PMCID: PMC7642173          DOI: 10.3897/phytokeys.165.54819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PhytoKeys        ISSN: 1314-2003            Impact factor:   1.635


Introduction

Mountaintops are often compared to sky-islands, as their vegetation is often distinct from the surrounding lowlands (Alves and Kolbek 2010; Barres et al. 2019). Montane habitats have been scrutinized due to their high species richness and complexity (Särkinen et al. 2012; Antonelli 2015; Kok et al. 2017), arousing scientific interest and have been featured since the first biogeographic studies (Humboldt 1805). In the Amazonian context, open vegetation predominates on exposed rocky surfaces on mountaintops, as opposed to the surrounding lowland rainforest. This vegetation may occur on isolated granite and gneiss inselbergs and quartzitic tepuis, usually above 900 m a.s.l. (Prance 1996; Riina et al. 2019), or over iron-ore conglomerates in the campo rupestre on canga (CRC), found between 600 and 800 m a.s.l. (Viana et al. 2016; Mota et al. 2018; Zappi et al. 2019). There are also island-like lowland ecosystems, such as white sand campinaranas, savannas, and low elevation granitic domes or inselbergs, associated with arenitic and often waterlogged soil in the Amazon region (Gröger and Huber 2007; Adeney et al. 2016; Costa et al. 2019; Henneron et al. 2019; Devecchi et al. 2020). Canga is the lateritic duricrust that covers a supergene iron ore, with poorly developed soil and moderately hard rocks that are very resistant to erosion and permeable (Gagen et al. 2019). The iron-rich canga presents a series of restrictions to plant establishment, including shallow and rocky soils, high insolation levels, elevated temperatures at ground level, extreme water regime – waterlogged soil alternating with up to five months of drought, added to the presence of metals at potentially toxic concentrations (Schettini et al. 2018). The vegetation in the canga has specific strategies to survive in these stressful edaphic conditions (Gagen et al. 2019), and these conditions have favoured the diversification of edaphic endemic species that are exclusive to the CRC associated with the iron-rich substrate (Giulietti et al. 2019). Species isolation caused by environmental conditions contrasting with the surrounding forests and associated with the mosaic of different geomorphological situations in the canga creates also an abundance of micro-habitats (Jacobi et al. 2007; Mota et al. 2015; Silva et al. 2020). It is known that such micro-habitats may be linked to multiple speciation events, and the occurrence of endemism (Bonatelli et al. 2014; Leal et al. 2016; Fiorini et al. 2019; Perrigo et al. 2019; Mota et al. 2020). The first botanical studies on the iron islands of the Serra dos Carajás began in the late 1960s. However, the floristic knowledge was not synthetized and organized until the Flora of the canga of the Serra de Carajás (FCC) project was completed in 2018 (Viana et al. 2016; Mota et al. 2018). This recent flora increased the number of recorded species to 1042 vascular plants (Mota et al. 2018; Salino et al. 2018), and a number of species were confirmed as endemic to the local canga habitat, with 38 species occurring exclusively on this substrate in an area of occupancy of less than 150 km2 (Giulietti et al. 2019). In terms of phytophysiognomies, three major groups were defined by Mota et al. (2015) for Carajás: canga vegetation (scrub, bare slab, nodular canga and low forest grove), hydromorphic vegetation (bogs, temporary lagoons, permanent lakes, temporary streams, buriti palm lakes, swampy forest) and other associated forests (mostly at the edge of canga outcrops). Due to historic reasons, collection efforts of the FCC project prioritized some areas of canga, while others still lack in-depth studies. For instance, a research in the canga of the Serra Arqueada (SA) in the municipality of Ourilândia do Norte has recently been completed (Fonseca-da-Silva et al. 2020), while the outcrops located within the recently created Parque Nacional dos Campos Ferruginosos (PNCF) are still in need of further investigation (Zappi et al. 2019). Giulietti et al. (2019) mentioned the existence of an interesting, isolated area of canga located c. 160 km southwest of the area studied by the FCC known as Serra de Campos, in the municipality of São Félix do Xingu (SFX). This study aims to investigate plant distribution and biogeographical patterns that connect the island-like habitats of canga outcrops isolated within an Amazonian rainforest matrix. We evaluated species distribution in the different sites in order to observe whether canga vegetation has elevated levels of beta diversity and whether the flora of each outcrop will be more dissimilar to other outcrops as the geographical distance increases. We provided the first checklist of vascular plants growing on canga at the Serra de Campos of São Félix do Xingu (SFX), to add to the dataset we built to investigate the floristic relationship between canga areas, aiming to improve our understanding of the rich and diverse flora of the region.

Methods

Characterization of the overall study area

The CRC are found in the region of Carajás, located in the southeast part the State of Pará (Viana et al. 2016; Zappi et al. 2019), one of the largest mineral provinces in the world (Ab’saber 1986). At the Serra dos Carajás, the CRC appears atop a series of outcrops that form discontinuous island-like habitats of open, shrubby or grassy vegetation within a dense matrix of rainforest in the southeastern Amazon basin (Mota et al. 2018). Most of the ferruginous island complex in the southeastern Amazon is within areas protected at different levels. The Serra Norte (SN1, SN2, SN3, SN4, SN5, SN6, SN7, SN8), the Serra Sul (S11A, S11B, S11CS11D) are located in the Floresta Nacional de Carajás, which is an area of sustainable use and thus subject to anthropogenic pressures, and iron ore mining currently occurs in areas SN4, SN5 and S11D. The Serra da Bocaina and Serra do Tarzan are the only fully protected areas, and are both inserted within the Parque Nacional dos Campos Ferruginosos (PNCF). However, the Serra Arqueada and Serra de Campos of São Félix do Xingu have no legal protection.

Floristic list of Serra de Campos

The Serra de Campos (SFX) is a canga outcrop found in the municipality of São Félix do Xingu, southeastern Pará state, Brazilian Amazon. It represents the westernmost limit of the Serra dos Carajás, a complex of ferruginous highland outcrops that extends eastwards to the Municipality of Curionópolis, totalling 126 km2. The plateaus previously studied in the scope of the FCC project (Viana et al. 2016) are found in the Municipalities of Parauapebas (Serra Norte – SN1 to SN8), and Canaã dos Carajás (Serra Sul – S11, Serra do Tarzan – ST and Serra da Bocaina – SB). The SFX comprises two plateaus measuring c. 9 km2, distant about 1 km from each other, known as SFX1 and SFX2 (Fig. 1). The largest of the two plateaus, known as SFX2, extends for 8.5 km and covers an area of 7.6 km2, while SFX1 is 2.5 km long, measuring 1.4 km2. The plateaus are located at , with altitudes ranging from 580 to 730 m. a.s.l. (Fig. 1). Distant about 80 km west from SA, the SFX can be accessed through the Municipality of São Felix do Xingu first by crossing the Rio Fresco then taking a road that goes through farmland, leading, after a steep climb, to the canga plateaus.
Figure 1.

a Geographic location of the present study site at SFX and the other study areas from Carajás complex b aerial view of an island of canga vegetation surrounding by the rainforest (Photo: Leonardo Vianna) cSerra de Campos of São Félix do Xingu (SFX) phytophysiognomy with shrubby and grassy vegetation.

a Geographic location of the present study site at SFX and the other study areas from Carajás complex b aerial view of an island of canga vegetation surrounding by the rainforest (Photo: Leonardo Vianna) cSerra de Campos of São Félix do Xingu (SFX) phytophysiognomy with shrubby and grassy vegetation. Botanical specimens from SFX deposited in herbaria prior to this study were located through an online search at the Herbarium of the Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi (MG) and Herbário Ezechias Paulo Heringer (HEPH) (acronyms according to Thiers, continuously updated). Prior to our expeditions, specimens at MG were collected in the 1990´s by João Batista Fernandes da Silva and include the type of A.S.L. Silva & Secco and several gatherings of , while HEPH currently holds collections made by Annajulia Elizabeth Heringer Salles and J.B.F. Silva in 2001. All materials available in these collections were analyzed and included in this study. Four plant collecting expeditions were carried out between 2016 and 2019 (May 2016, April 2017, March 2018, October 2019), aiming to collect fertile material of all vascular species. Collecting method followed Filgueiras et al. (1994) with random walks covering the accessible parts of both plateaus, attempting to stop every 1 km to sample the vegetation and collect fertile specimens. We aimed to visit diverse vegetation types, including open canga slabs, nodular canga, canga scrub, palm swamps (buritizais) and temporary lagoons (Mota et al. 2015) The samples collected were identified to species by comparing their macroscopic and microscopic morphological features with available bibliography, against herbarium collections (physically and on-line) and also consulting key family specialists. Voucher specimens were deposited at MG. Only one collection number per taxon is cited in the present floristic list. A full specimen list is provided in supplement S1. Species names follow Flora do Brasil online (Flora do Brasil under construction), family delimitation followed APG IV (Angiosperm Phylogeny Group 2016) and author abbreviations follow IPNI (2019).

Database of the distribution of the flora of Serra dos Carajás

Seed plant species distribution data were assembled from the FCC project (Mota et al. 2018), with the compilation of a database comprising 3228 occurrences of 823 species (Zappi et al. 2019). The updates included 23 recent new occurrences for SN1, SN4, SN5, SN7, S11D, and the Serra da Bocaina based on recently collected herbarium material; 149 species for SA (Fonseca-da-Silva et al. 2020); and the newly prepared dataset of SFX. The assembled database comprises 909 seed plant species recorded in CRC at the Carajás complex, including 16 sites (SN1, SN2, SN3, SN4, SN5, SN6, SN7, SN8, S11A, S11B, S11C, S11D, ST, SB, SA and SFX). For the purpose of our analyses, exotic, invasive and weedy species were removed from the dataset as identified in (Giulietti et al. 2018), resulting in 893 species analysed. The code assigned for each site is found in Table 2.
Table 2.

Areas compared by this study, respective area codes used in the multivariate analysis and number of angiosperms species recorded for each area. Serra de Campos of São Félix do Xingu (SFX) data is produced by this study, ARQ-CAN data is available in Fonseca-da-Silva et al. (2020) and Flora of the canga of the Serra de Carajás (FCC) data is available in Mota et al. (2018).

Area codeAreaSpeciesCumulative species
ARQSerra Arqueada149149
S11A Serra dos Carajás – Serra Sul 11A230535
S11B Serra dos Carajás – Serra Sul 11B201
S11C Serra dos Carajás – Serra Sul 11C180
S11D Serra dos Carajás – Serra Sul 11D428
SN1 Serra dos Carajás – Serra Norte 1383643
SN2 Serra dos Carajás – Serra Norte 2125
SN3 Serra dos Carajás – Serra Norte 3218
SN4 Serra dos Carajás – Serra Norte 4308
SN5 Serra dos Carajás – Serra Norte 5293
SN6 Serra dos Carajás – Serra Norte 699
SN7 Serra dos Carajás – Serra Norte 7112
SN8 Serra dos Carajás – Serra Norte 8101
SB Serra dos Carajás – Serra da Bocaina223336
ST Serra dos Carajás – Serra do Tarzan211
SFX Serra de Campos – São Félix do Xingu248248

Biogeographical analyses of the flora of canga sites in the Carajás complex

To perform the biogeographical analysis of the CRC of the Carajás complex, the species database was used to investigate the floristic similarity and shared endemicity between different mountaintops across canga sites. Invasive exotic species recorded in each site were excluded from this analysis, as well as specimens with imprecise identification, Lycophytes, and Monilophytes. Floristic similarity between sites was calculated using a presence-absence Matrix (S2, Suppl. material 1) to perform multivariate analysis using ordination and group multivariate methods using the Vegan package in R (Oksanen et al. 2010). We constructed a matrix showing the presence of each species in each site and subjected it to ordination and grouping analyses using a Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling (NMDS) and Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic mean (UPGMA), respectively. Both analyses used Sorensen (Bray-Curtis) index (Legendre and Legendre 2012) to reflect beta diversity between sites. To investigate the floristic richness of sites in relation to the size of each outcrop we used the species count for each canga outcrop and, employing GIS, we calculated the area of each outcrop in square kilometres. A linear model of the recorded richness versus area of each outcrop using the ‘glm’ function with Gaussian model was prepared in R. Because the outcrops were subjected to a large collecting effort during the ‘Flora of Carajás’ Project, we assumed that they were adequately sampled. We also evaluated whether the total number of species and of endemic species shared between sites were significantly related with the geographical distance between them. We computed the centroid of each outcrop using GIS and calculated the geographical distance between the centroids of all outcrop pairs. We tested the normality of the residuals of the models with the Shapiro-Wilk test to see whether the residuals significantly departed from normality. If these did not significantly differ from normality, we accepted the p value of the model. If the residuals differed from normality, we analysed the data using non parametric Spearman’s correlation to evaluate if the correlation was significant.

Results

Plant species in canga vegetation at Serra de Campos

This study recorded a total of 254 species, of which 248 are seed plants, five ferns and one lycophyte in the SFX (Table 1). The richest families recorded are (22 species), (21 spp.), (15 spp.), (12 spp.) and (12 spp.). The five richest genera are (), with 5 species, and (), with 4 species each, and () and (), with 3 species each. Thirty-seven species are new records for the CRC of the Carajás complex. From these new records, seven belong to the family , five are new records of , three , and three . A yet undescribed species of was found in SFX, belonging to the genus ( (Mart.) Nees – PLV 6100, Table 1; Fig. 2).
Table 1.

Vascular plant species from Serra de Campos of São Félix do Xingu (SFX), discriminated by novelties for Flora of the canga of Carajás according to Mota et al. (2018) and Fonseca-da-Silva et al. (2020) endemism in canga outcrops according to Giulietti et al. (2019); endemism in Serra de Campos, and life form and voucher information for each species. Collectors: AHS: Anajulia Heringer Salles; BF: Bruno Fernandes Falcão; COA: Caroline Oliveira Andrino; DCZ: Daniela Cristina Zappi; JBFS: João Batista da Silva; MN: Matheus Nogueira; MP: Mayara Pastore; PLV: Pedro Lage Viana. *Invasive exotic species.

TaxaNew for Carajás FloraEndemic cangaEndemic SFXLife formVoucher
Lycophyte
Selaginellaceae
Selaginella radiata (Aubl.) Spring.HerbDCZ 4055
Monilophytes
Dennstaedtiaceae
Pteridium arachnoideum (Kauf.) MaxonHerbDCZ 4002
Polypodiaceae
Microgramma persicariifolia (Schrad.) C.PreslHerbDCZ 4066
Pleopeltis polypodioides (L.) Andrews & WindhamHerbDCZ 3922
Serpocaulon triseriale (Sw.) A.R.Sm.HerbDCZ 4037
Pteridaceae
Doryopteris collina (Raddi) J.Sm.HerbDCZ 4040
Spermathophytes
Acanthaceae
Justicia birae A.S.Reis, F.A.Silva, A.Gil & KameyamaHerbMP 600
Alismataceae
Helanthium tenellum (Mart. ex Schult & Schult.f.) BrittonHerbMP 613
Limnocharis flava (L.) BuchenauXHerbPLV 6149
Anacardiaceae
Anacardium occidentale L.TreeletDCZ 3923
Spondias mombin L.XTreeletDCZ 3921
Annonaceae
Annona sericea DunalXShrubDCZ 4051
Annona exsucca DC.TreeCOA 658
Guatteria procera R.E.Fr.XTreeDCZ 4050
Xylopia aromatica (Lam.) Mart.TreeletDCZ 3970
Apocynaceae
Himatanthus cf. articulatus (Vahl) WoodsonTreeCOA 676
Mandevilla scabra (Hoffmanns. ex Roem. & Schult.) K. Schum.LianaDCZ 3880
Mandevilla tenuifolia (J.C. Mikan) WoodsonHerbDCZ 3885
Matelea microphylla MorilloXHerbDCZ 3942
Tabernaemontana flavicans Willd. ex Roem. & Schult.TreeletCOA 613
Tabernaemontana macrocalyx Müll. Arg.TreeletCOA 605
Araceae
Anthurium gracile (Rudge) Lindl.HerbDCZ 5017
Anthurium sp.1XHerbDCZ 3898
Arecaceae
Mauritia flexuosa Mart.PalmDCZ 3961
Mauritiella armata (Mart.) BurretPalmDCZ 3960
Oenocarpus distichus Mart.PalmDCZ 3948
Syagrus cocoides Mart.PalmDCZ 3892
Asteraceae
Emilia fosbergii NicolsonHerbDCZ 4046
Ichthyothere terminalis (Spreng.) S.F. BlakeShrubDCZ 3868
Monogereion carajensis G.M. Barroso & R.M. KingXHerbDCZ 3861
Riencourtia pedunculosa (Rich.) PruskiHerbDCZ 3924
Tilesia baccata (L.f.) PruskiHerbDCZ 3980
Unxia camphorata L.f.HerbDCZ 3941
Begoniaceae
Begonia humilis DryandHerbDCZ 3973
Bignoniaceae
Adenocalymma schomburgkii (DC.) L.G.LohmannLianaCOA 611
Amphilophium mansoanum (DC.) L.G.LohmannLianaDCZ 4025
Anemopaegma carajasense A.H. Gentry ex Firetti-Leggieri & L.G. LohmannXShrubDCZ 3914
Anemopaegma longipetiolatum SpragueLianaDCZ 3867
Jacaranda ulei Bureau & K.Schum.ShrubDCZ 3945
Pachyptera incarnata (Aubl.) Francisco & L.G. LohmannLianaDCZ 4061
Pleonotoma melioides (S.Moore) A.H.GentryLianaCOA 638
Pleonotoma orientalis SandwithLianaDCZ 3883
Bixaceae
Cochlospermum orinocense (Kunth) Steud.TreeletDCZ 3875
Boraginaceae
Cordia nodosa Lam.TreeCOA 641
Bromeliaceae
Aechmea castelnavii BakerHerbCOA 670
Aechmea mertensii (G.Mey.) Schult. & Schult.f.HerbCOA 673
Aechmea tocantina BakerHerbAHS 2194
Ananas ananassoides (Baker) L.B. Sm.HerbDCZ 3891
Dyckia duckei L.B.Sm.HerbDCZ 3872
Tillandsia adpressiflora MezXHerbDCZ 4034
Burmanniaceae
Burmannia capitata (Walter ex J.F.Gmel.) Mart.HerbMP 644
Burmannia flava Mart.HerbDCZ 3903
Cabombaceae
Cabomba furcata Schult. & Schult.f.HerbDCZ 3963
Commelinaceae
Commelina erecta L.HerbDCZ 4058
Dichorisandra hexandra (Aubl.) C.B. ClarkeLianaDCZ 3858
Connaraceae
Rourea ligulata BakerShrubCOA 666
Convolvulaceae
Distimake macrocalyx (Ruiz & Pav.) A.R. Simões & StaplesXLianaMP 660
Ipomoea decora Meisn.LianaDCZ 4057
Ipomoea marabaensis D.F.Austin & SeccoLianaDCZ 3873
Ipomoea rubens ChoisyXLianaMP 672
Cucurbitaceae
Gurania sinuata (Benth.) Cogn.HerbAHS 2167
Cyperaceae
Bulbostylis conifera (Kunth) C.B. ClarkeHerbCOA 624
Cyperus aggregatus (Willd.) Endl.HerbDCZ 3865
Cyperus laxus Lam.HerbDCZ 3957
Cyperus sesquiflorus (Torr.) Mattf. & Kük.HerbDCZ 4031
Cyperus sphacelatus Rottb.HerbDCZ 4042
Diplasia karatifolia Rich. in Pers.XHerbDCZ 4032
Eleocharis flavescens (Poir.) Urb.HerbMP 627
Eleocharis pedrovianae C.S. Nunes, R. Trevis. & A. GilXHerbDCZ 4027
Eleocharis plicarhachis (Griseb.) SvensonHerbCOA 678
Rhynchospora barbata (Vahl) KunthHerbCOA 657
Rhynchospora filiformis VahlHerbDCZ 3930
Rhynchospora holoschoenoides (Rich.) HerterHerbMP 608
Rhynchospora seccoi C.S.Nunes, P.J.S. Silva Filho & A.GilHerbDCZ 3905
Scleria cyperina Willd. ex KunthHerbDCZ 3925
Scleria microcarpa Nees ex KunthHerbCOA 650
Dioscoreaceae
Dioscorea piperifolia Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd.LianaDCZ 3884
Dioscorea trilinguis Griseb.XLianaDCZ 3934
Eriocaulaceae
Eriocaulon carajense MoldenkeXHerbDCZ 3936
Eriocaulon cinereum R.Br.HerbDCZ 4049
Paepalanthus fasciculoides HensoldHerbDCZ 3878
Syngonanthus discretifolius (Moldenke) M.T.C. WatanabeXHerbPLV 6119
Syngonanthus heteropeplus (Körn.) RuhlandHerbMP 659
Erythroxylaceae
Erythroxylum nelson-rosae PlowmanXShrubCOA 672
Erythroxylum rufum Cav.ShrubCOA 637
Euphorbiaceae
Alchornea discolor PoeppigShrubDCZ 3886
Aparisthmium cordatum (A. Juss.) Baill.TreeDCZ 3997
Astraea lobata (L.) KlotzschShrubDCZ 3955
Mabea angustifolia Spruce ex Benth.ShrubDCZ 3987
Manihot quinquepartita Huber ex D.J.RogersShrubDCZ 3954
Manihot tristis Müll.Arg.ShrubMP 666
Maprounea brasiliensis A.St.-Hil.XShrubDCZ 3991
Fabaceae
Abrus melanospermus Hassk.LianaDCZ 3912
Aeschynomene sensistiva var. hispidula (Kunth) RuddSubshrubDCZ 4024
Bauhinia pulchella Benth.ShrubDCZ 3869
Camptosema ellipticum (Desv.) BurkartShrubDCZ 3907
Centrosema carajasense CavalcanteHerb/LianaDCZ 4007
Chamaecrista desvauxii (Collad.) KillipSubshrubDCZ 3946
Clitoria falcata Lam.LianaDCZ 3917
Crotalaria maypurensis KunthShrubDCZ 3881
Dioclea apurensis KunthLianaDCZ 3919
Inga calantha DuckeXTreeCOA 600
Inga heterophylla WilldXTreeDCZ 4036
Inga leiocalycina Benth.XTreeMP 598
Mimosa dasilvae A.S.L. Silva & SeccoXXXSubshrubCOA 622
Mimosa guilandinae var. spruceana (Benth.) BarnebyShrubCOA 668
Mimosa skinneri Benth. var. carajarum BarnebyXHerbDCZ 3860
Mimosa somnians Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd.SubshrubDCZ 3876
Mimosa xanthocentra Mart.TreePLV 6158
Parkia platycephala Benth.ShrubDCZ 4013
Periandra mediterranea (Vell.) Taub.ShrubDCZ 3902
Senegalia multipinnata (Ducke) Seigler & EbingerTreeletCOA 603
Stylosanthes capitata VogelSubshrubDCZ 3977
Tachigali vulgaris L.F.G.Silva & H.C.LimaTreeCOA 655
Gentianaceae
Schultesia benthamiana Klotzsch ex Griseb.HerbDCZ 3928
Heliconiaceae
Heliconia psittacorum L.f.XHerbMP 671
Hypericaceae
Vismia gracilis HieronTreeletCOA 654
Iridaceae
Cipura xanthomelas Maxim. ex KlattHerbDCZ 3899
Lamiaceae
Amasonia lasiocaulos Mart. & Schau ex Schau.SubshrubDCZ 3947
Hyptis atrorubens Poit.HerbDCZ 3981
Mesosphaerum pectinatum (L.) KuntzeHerbMN 697
Mesosphaerum suaveolens (L.) KuntzeHerbDCZ 4048
Vitex panshiniana MoldenkeXTreeDCZ 4053
Lauraceae
Cassytha filiformis L.ParasiteDCZ 3874
Dicypellium aff. caryophyllaceum (Mart.) NeesXXShrubPLV 6100
Mezilaurus itauba (Meisn.) Taub. ex MezShrubDCZ 4001
Rhodostemonodaphne praeclara (Sandwith) MadriñánXTreeDCZ 3983
Lentibulariaceae
Utricularia neottioides A.St-Hil & GirardHerbMP 664
Utricularia pusilla VahlHerbDCZ 3904
Utricularia subulata L.HerbPLV 6139
Loranthaceae
Passovia pedunculata (Jacq.) KuijtParasiteDCZ 3909
Psittacanthus eucalyptifolius (Kunth) G. DonParasiteDCZ 4056
Lythraceae
Cuphea annulata KoehneSubshrubDCZ 3864
Cuphea carajasensis LourteigXShrubCOA 616
Malpighiaceae
Banisteriopsis malifolia (Nees & Mart.) B.GatesShrubMN 743
Banisteriopsis stellaris (Griseb.) B.GatesLianaDCZ 3863
Byrsonima chrysophylla KunthShrubDCZ 3929
Heteropterys nervosa A.Juss.LianaCOA 645
Malvaceae
Waltheria indica L.XShrubDCZ 4064
Marantaceae
Monotagma plurispicatum (Körn.) K.Schum.HerbDCZ 4000
Marcgraviaceae
Norantea guianensis Aubl.ShrubDCZ 3887
Melastomataceae
Bellucia grossularioides (L.) TrianaXShrubDCZ 3995
Brasilianthus carajensis Almeda & MichelangeliHerbDCZ 3877
Clidemia capitellata (Bonpl.) D.DonShrubDCZ 4020
Miconia alternans NaudinShrubDCZ 4021
Miconia heliotropoides TrianaShrubDCZ 4008
Nepsera aquatica (Aubl.) NaudinHerbCOA 649
Pleroma carajasense K.Rocha, R.Goldenb. & F.S.MeyXShrubDCZ 3910
Pterolepis trichotoma (Rottb.) Cogn.HerbDCZ 4019
Tibouchina edmundoi BradeShrubDCZ 3932
Menispermaceae
Abuta grandifolia (Mart.) SandwithShrubCOA 646
Cissampelos andromorpha DC. .LianaCOA 663
Metteniusaceae
Emmotum nitens (Benth.) MiersShrubMP 601
Myrtaceae
Eugenia punicifolia (Kunth) DC.ShrubDCZ 3894
Myrcia cuprea (O.Berg.) Kiaersk.ShrubCOA 639
Myrcia splendens (Sw.) DC.ShrubDCZ 3965
Myrciaria floribunda (H.West ex Willd.) O.BergShrubDCZ 3915
Myrciaria glomerata O.BergXShrubDCZ 4010
Ochnaceae
Ouratea castaneifolia (DC.) Engl.TreeletDCZ 3920
Ouratea cearensis (Tiegh.) Sastre & OffroyXShrubCOA 604
Ouratea racemiformis UleShrubDCZ 4033
Onagraceae
Ludwigia cf. latifolia (Benth.) H.HaraXSubshrubDCZ 3967
Ludwigia nervosa (Poir.) H.HaraShrubCOA 674
Orchidaceae
Catasetum boyi Mansf.XHerbJBFS 648
Catasetum discolor (Lindl.) Lindl.HerbDCZ 4030
Cyrtopodium andersonii (Lamb. ex Andrews) R.Br.HerbCOA 643
Encyclia chloroleuca (Hook.) Neum.XHerbJBFS 540
Epidendrum strobiliferum Rchb.f.XHerbCOA 667
Erycina pusilla (L.) N.H.Williams & M.W.ChaseHerbJBFS 498
Habenaria nuda LindlHerbMP 609
Habenaria orchiocalcar HoehneXHerbJBFS 219
Polystachya concreta (Jacq.) Garay & H.R.SweetHerbCOA 669
Rodriguezia lanceolata Ruiz & Pav.XHerbCOA 665
Scaphyglottis cf. livida HerbCOA 671
Sobralia liliastrum Salzm. ex Lindl.HerbDCZ 3888
Orobanchaceae
Buchnera carajasensis Scatigna & N.MotaXHerbDCZ 3931
Passifloraceae
Passiflora ceratocarpa F. SilveiraLianaDCZ 4060
Passiflora picturata Ker Gawl.XLianaDCZ 3976
Passiflora tholozanii SaccoLianaCOA 612
Phyllanthaceae
Phyllanthus hyssopifolioides Kunth.HerbDCZ 4028
Phyllanthus minutulus Müll.Arg.HerbDCZ 4026
Phytolaccaceae
Phytolacca thyrsiflora Fenzl ex J. SchmidtHerbDCZ 4041
Piperaceae
Peperomia albopilosa D. MonteiroXHerbPLV 6169
Peperomia magnoliifolia (Jacq.) A.Dietr.HerbCOA 647
Plantaginaceae
Scoparia dulcis L.HerbDCZ 4065
Poaceae
Acroceras zizanioides (Kunth) DandyHerbDCZ 4022
Andropogon bicornis L.HerbDCZ 3950
Axonopus cf. longispicus (Döll) Kuhlm.HerbDCZ 4023
Axonopus rupestris DavidseHerbDCZ 3896
Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn.*HerbDCZ 4045
Hildaea parvispiculata C. Silva & R.P. OliveiraHerbPLV 6124
Ichnanthus calvescens (Nees ex Trin.) DöllHerbDCZ 4011
Luziola peruviana Juss. ex J.F.Gmel.HerbDCZ 3918
Melinis minutiflora P.Beauv.*HerbCOA 640
Mesosetum cayennense Steud.HerbPLV 6117
Oryza glumaepatula Steud.HerbBFF 634
Paspalum axillare SwallenHerbPLV 6130
Paspalum foliiforme S.DenhamHerbDCZ 3916
Paspalum reticulinerve RenvoizeHerbPLV 6166
Rhytachne gonzalezii DavidseHerbPLV 6127
Rugoloa pilosa (Sw.) ZuloagaHerbDCZ 3964
Steinchisma laxum (Sw.) ZuloagaHerbCOA 677
Taquara micrantha (Kunth) I.L.C.Oliveira & R.P.OliveiraHerbDCZ 3999
Trachypogon spicatus (L.f.) KuntzeHerbDCZ 3944
Trichanthecium cf. arctum (Swallen) Zuloaga & MorroneHerbDCZ 3913
Urochloa maxima (Jacq.) R.D. Webster*HerbDCZ 3951
Polygalaceae
Bredemeyera divaricata (DC.) J.F.B. PastoreShrubDCZ 3911
Caamembeca spectabilis (DC.) J.F.B. PastoreSubshrubCOA 642
Polygala adenophora DC.HerbDCZ 3900
Portulacaceae
Portulaca sedifolia N.E.Br.HerbDCZ 3862
Primulaceae
Cybianthus detergens Mart.ShrubDCZ 4062
Proteaceae
Roupala montana Aubl.ShrubDCZ 4063
Rhamnaceae
Gouania pyrifolia ReissekXLianaDCZ 3953
Rubiaceae
Alibertia edulis (Rich.) A. Rich. ex DC.ShrubDCZ 4035
Borreria alata (Aubl.) DC.HerbDCZ 3866
Borreria carajasensis E.L. Cabral & L.M. MiguelXSubshrubDCZ 3859
Borreria semiamplexicaulis E.L.CabralHerbDCZ 3938
Cordiera myrciifolia (K.Schum.) C.H.Perss. & DelpreteShrubDCZ 3971
Coutarea hexandra (Jacq.) K.Schum.XShrubCOA 610
Guettarda argentea Lam.ShrubCOA 602
Palicourea guianensis Aubl.TreeletDCZ 4052
Perama carajensis J.H. Kirkbr.XHerbDCZ 3879
Psychotria colorata (Willd. ex Schult.) Mull. Arg.HerbDCZ 4017
Psychotria hoffmannseggiana (Willd. ex Schult.) Mull. Arg.SubshrubCOA 601
Sabicea grisea Cham. & Schltdl.LianaDCZ 3901
Rutaceae
Dictyoloma vandellianum A. Juss.TreeletDCZ 3975
Ertela trifolia (L.) KuntzeSubshrubCOA 607
Pilocarpus microphyllus Stapf ex Wardlew.ShrubCOA 653
Salicaceae
Casearia arborea (Rich.) Urb.TreeDCZ 3982
Casearia javitensis KunthShrubDCZ 4014
Sapindaceae
Allophylus semidentatus (Miq.) Radlk.XShrubDCZ 3959
Paullinia stellata Radlk.XLianaDCZ 4044
Pseudima frutescens (Aubl.) Radlk.XShrubPLV 6151
Serjania lethalis A.St.-Hil.LianaDCZ 3996
Sapotaceae
Pouteria ramiflora (Mart.) Radlk.TreeletDCZ 3969
Simaroubaceae
Simaba guianensis Aubl.ShrubDCZ 3984
Simarouba amara Aubl.ShrubDCZ 3985
Siparunaceae
Siparuna ficoides S.S.Rener & HausnerTreeletCOA 660
Smilacaceae
Smilax irrorata Mart. ex GrisebLianaDCZ 3935
Solanaceae
Solanum americanum Mill.HerbDCZ 4059
Solanum crinitum Lam.TreeletCOA 623
Trigoniaceae
Trigonia nivea Cambess.LianaCOA 651
Turneraceae
Turnera glaziovii UrbShrubDCZ 4012
Turnera laciniata ArboHerbDCZ 3993
Turnera melochioides Cambess.ShrubPLV 6160
Urticaceae
Cecropia palmata Willd.TreeCOA 664
Velloziaceae
Vellozia glauca PohlHerbDCZ 3890
Verbenaceae
Lantana trifolia L.XShrubMN 755
Lippia grata SchauerShrubDCZ 3871
Stachytarpheta cayennensis (Rich.) VahlSubshrubCOA 608
Vitaceae
Cissus erosa Rich.LianaDCZ 3882
Vochysiaceae
Qualea parviflora Mart.TreeMP 624
Xyridaceae
Xyris brachysepala KralXHerbPLV 6125
SPECIES TOTAL (254) 36 17 2
Figure 2.

Representative species of canga in new dataset, SFXa (Döll) Kuhlm b (Mart.) Nees c Willd d Meisn e Morillo f A.S.L. Silva & Secco g (Aubl.) Naudin h (Tiegh.) Sastre & Offroy i (Aubl.) Francisco & L.G. Lohmann j Ker Gawl. k Mull.Arg. l Ruiz & Pav.

Vascular plant species from Serra de Campos of São Félix do Xingu (SFX), discriminated by novelties for Flora of the canga of Carajás according to Mota et al. (2018) and Fonseca-da-Silva et al. (2020) endemism in canga outcrops according to Giulietti et al. (2019); endemism in Serra de Campos, and life form and voucher information for each species. Collectors: AHS: Anajulia Heringer Salles; BF: Bruno Fernandes Falcão; COA: Caroline Oliveira Andrino; DCZ: Daniela Cristina Zappi; JBFS: João Batista da Silva; MN: Matheus Nogueira; MP: Mayara Pastore; PLV: Pedro Lage Viana. *Invasive exotic species. Representative species of canga in new dataset, SFXa (Döll) Kuhlm b (Mart.) Nees c Willd d Meisn e Morillo f A.S.L. Silva & Secco g (Aubl.) Naudin h (Tiegh.) Sastre & Offroy i (Aubl.) Francisco & L.G. Lohmann j Ker Gawl. k Mull.Arg. l Ruiz & Pav. Among the 38 edaphic endemic species of canga, defined according to Giulietti et al. (2019), 17 (c. 50%) were recorded in SFX. Two of these, Plowman () and Morillo () were not previously recorded for SFX in the list of endemic edaphic species of the canga of Carajás (Giulietti et al. 2019). One species, (), is only known to occur in SFX. Areas compared by this study, respective area codes used in the multivariate analysis and number of angiosperms species recorded for each area. Serra de Campos of São Félix do Xingu (SFX) data is produced by this study, ARQ-CAN data is available in Fonseca-da-Silva et al. (2020) and Flora of the canga of the Serra de Carajás (FCC) data is available in Mota et al. (2018). Around 25% (60) of the 248 angiosperms registered for SFX are restricted to the Amazonian Rainforest biome, but the majority of the flora is widely distributed in open habitats throughout South America.

The vegetation of the Serra de Campos

Regarding the phytophysiognomies listed by Mota et al. (2015) for the region, the canga vegetation of the SFX has a predominance of vast spreads of scrub composed of closely disposed treelets and shrubs. Amongst them, treelets and shrubs such as Kunth, (K.Schum.) C.H.Perss. & Delprete, A.H. Gentry ex Firetti-Leggieri & L.G. Lohmann*, Koehne, Schauer, Plowman*, Mart., as well as several species of and , the palm Mart. and scramblers and climbers such as Aubl., Rich., (Hoffmanns. ex Roem. & Schult.) K. Schum. and Mart. ex Griseb. On more exposed, bare canga slabs, the plants grow mostly in rock crevices with presence of monocots such as Pohl, Salzm. ex Lindl., L.B. Sm. and the tuberous, low growing (J.C. Mikan) Woodson, as well as the herbaceous E.L.Cabral, J.H.Kirk.*, Dryand and Almeda & Michelangeli*. The nodular canga has more or less continuous covering of grass and sedge, with occasional specimens of (Rich.) Prusky. During the expeditions we did not come across low forest groves, and our impression was that between the canga edge and the surrounding rainforest there was not much transition but a sharp substitution of the open vegetation by the associated forest types. Regarding the hydromorphic vegetation found in SFX, temporary shallow ponds with species, Mart., Schult. & Schult. f., (Poir.) Ruhland and Kral.* were visited. However, perennial, larger ponds of the magnitude found in the Serra Sul were lacking and temporary streams were not observed. There were also Palm swamps (buritizais), with margins occupied by Mart. and (Mart.) Burret, harbouring aquatic Steud., (Mart. ex Schult. & Schult.f.) Britton and spp. (edaphic endemic species marked with *).

Database of the flora of Serra dos Carajás complex

The biogeographical database from the CRC of the Carajás complex was updated by our study (see supplementary data) and includes now a total of 893 angiosperms distributed in 121 families and 441 genera. For the Carajás flora (FCC), was the most species-rich family (75 species in the FCC), followed by (66 spp.), (57 spp.), (49 spp.), and (40 spp.). The richest genera were (24 spp.), (18 spp.), and (17 spp. each), and (13 spp. each), while 64% (284 genera) were represented by only a single species. The inclusion of SFX in our database increased the number of known taxa by 18 genera and 37 species not previously recorded for the canga of Carajás.

Biogeography of the Campos Rupestres on Canga of the Carajás complex

The mean angiosperm species richness for each outcrop of the Serra dos Carajás was 218 species. The NMDS and UPGMA analyses included 3451 records of 893 species across 16 sites (Fig. 3a, b). The UPGMA analyses produced statistically significant clusters (Fig. 3b) with the same major groups found by Fonseca-da-Silva et al. (2020), one comprising four of the eight areas of the Serra Norte (SN2, SN6, SN7, and SN8), while the remaining four (SN1, SN3, SN4, and N5) appear closer to the areas of Serra Sul (S11A, S11B. S11C, S11D), along with SB and ST. SA also emerged as the least similar to the Carajás complex, and SFX was found to be more similar to the group comprising SB, ST, Serra Sul and the four most species rich sites in Serra Norte (SN1, SN3, SN4, and SN5). A similar result was obtained by the NMDS analysis (Fig. 3a), also showing SA as the most dissimilar from other areas.
Figure 3.

UPGMA (a) and NMDS (b) multivariate analysis clustering areas from FCC and SFX (see Table 2 for area codes). UPGMA cophenetic coefficient: 0.902. b. NMDS stress: 0.1859.

UPGMA (a) and NMDS (b) multivariate analysis clustering areas from FCC and SFX (see Table 2 for area codes). UPGMA cophenetic coefficient: 0.902. b. NMDS stress: 0.1859. Species richness was significantly correlated with site area (r = 0.806094, P = 0.001548). The larger the area of each individual mountaintop (site), the larger the number of species recorded. The total number of shared species between mountaintop outcrops did not differ significantly with geographical distance across sites (r = -0.16; P = 0.08). There was a tendency of distant sites to share less species, but this trend was not significant. When the residuals of this model were evaluated they significantly departed from normality. Spearman’s correlation was not significant either (p-value = 0.2972). However, when focusing on the number of shared endemic edaphic species versus the geographical distance between sites, we found a significant correlation, where closer sites shared more edaphic endemic species than with more distant sites (r = -0.45872; P = 1.37e-07) (Fig. 4).
Figure 4.

a Species richness plotted against area of Carajás. Pearson correlation coefficients: r = 0.806094, P = 0.001548 b the number of species shared between site pairs does not change significantly with geographical distance between regions. r = -0.16; P = 0.08 c the number of shared endemic species between site pairs declines with geographical distance between regions. r= -0.45872; P = 1.37e-07.

a Species richness plotted against area of Carajás. Pearson correlation coefficients: r = 0.806094, P = 0.001548 b the number of species shared between site pairs does not change significantly with geographical distance between regions. r = -0.16; P = 0.08 c the number of shared endemic species between site pairs declines with geographical distance between regions. r= -0.45872; P = 1.37e-07. Regarding the total of species of the canga, the Carajás iron islands share an average of 40% of their flora with each other. SFX has, on average, 30% of shared species with each other area. The percentage of similarity between sites was a minimum of 30% and a maximum of 55%.

Discussion

Floristic composition of Serra de Campos × other canga outcrops

The most species-rich families and genera found in the SFX coincide with those found in the Flora das cangas de Carajás (Mota et al. 2018) and SA (Fonseca-da-Silva et al. 2020), where , , , and are among the richest plant families. Interestingly, SFX has a much higher number of species than other surveys of canga in the Amazon (Koch et al. 2018; Mota et al. 2018; Fonseca-da-Silva et al. 2020). The participation of botanical specialists during collecting expeditions enhances floristic studies in the Amazon (Medeiros et al. 2014) and elsewhere, and the high number of in SFX possibly reflects the specific search for this group by J.B. Silva in the region from the 1990’s onwards, which may have resulted in a greater sampling effort for this group when compared to other areas. There is a large turnover of species between outcrops (Zappi et al. 2019; Fonseca-da-Silva et al. 2020) and very few species are widely distributed across these disjunct, isolated habitats. Similar to what was found by (Costa et al. 2019) in Amazonian White Sand Campinas, the isolation of the patchy canga outcrops limits dispersal and increases floristic differentiation, and the adverse conditions, such as high temperature, extreme exposure to sunlight and winds, and a relatively well defined dry season represent ecological filters for the species that occupy the canga, partly explaining the high number of endemic species in the CRC of Carajás. As an example, only three species were recorded in all surveyed areas: the widely distributed , an common in open areas in the Amazon (Flora do Brasil under construction, Bringel 2014), and two species associated with Amazonian canga outcrops: and . is a confirmed canga edaphic endemic species, and has been collected also on granite, being locally endemic to Carajás, but not a canga edaphic endemic (Giulietti et al. 2019; Silva et al. 2020). Other four species also present wide occurrence across campos rupestres on canga of Carajás: (Kunth) C.B. Clarke, (Vahl) Kunth, C.S.Nunes et al., and (Moldenke) M.T.C. Watanabe were recorded for SFX and many other FCC areas, except for one of them missing in SN3, SN7, SN7 and SA, respectively. Their absence in these four sites may be related to the more modest canga surface found in these areas. Some widely distributed species from the canga of Carajás, found at more than 10 of the 16 sites surveyed, were not recorded at SFX. The absence of the common treelets Warm. and Barneby (Mota et al. 2015) at SFX may be partially explained by differences in the micro-habitats between SFX and the other canga outcrops considered here. For , distinct adaptive genetic clusters have been found in the SFX (see Silva et al. 2020), increasing the argument for the protection of the site. The canga is typically a mosaic of different vegetation types (Mota et al. 2015, Viana et al. 2016). Some of these vegetation types are infrequent in SFX, as for example low forest groves (Mota et al. 2015), and in consequence some of the species found in these groves elsewhere are absent at SFX: , , and (L.) Mill. Although forest groves are closely associated with the lower scrub vegetation, the latter is more abundant in the canga plateau of SFX than the former. In plateau SFX2 of SFX the shrubby vegetation is dominant, and there are large stands of Mart., a palm emerging from the impenetrable shrubbery. In the context of CRC of Carajás, this palm forms large populations only in SA and SFX. Despite having the lowest number of species registered in the FCC, the hydromorphic vegetation found atop the plateaus is the habitat with the highest proportion of exclusive species (Pereira et al. 2016; Mota et al. 2018). Seasonal lakes and palm lakes in the SFX ensure the presence of annual aquatic species such as Moldenke, Steud., (Poir.) Ruhland, and Kral. As a relatively large canga site isolated from the active iron mines further to the east, the SFX has been found to harbour a rich and unique vegetation, representing a suitable area for the implementation of conservation strategies. On the other hand, this canga outcrop is currently threatened by surrounding deforestation, land transformation and frequent fires, and is not included within any type of protected area.

Iron islands of Carajás and their floristic connections

The mosaic of landscapes typical of CRC of Carajás may also explain the low floristic similarity between the sites. The number of shared species represents less than half the local richness from each site separately. This brings attention to the high beta diversity among sites (Zappi et al. 2019), with a large species turnover across these disjunct outcrops. Habitat diversity associated with the size of the island-like habitats is also related to the beta diversity in French Guiana´s inselbergs (Henneron et al. 2019), similarly to what is found in Andean alpine flora (Sklenář et al. 2014) and South American tepuis (Riina et al. 2019). This confirms the association between area and habitat diversity found here for the canga vegetation as an important factor for determining plant biodiversity. The greater similarity between SFX, SB and ST, along with Serra Sul (S11A, S11B, S11C, and S11D) and SN1, SN3, SN4 and SN5 reflected in the UPGMA clustering patterns (Fig. 3b) suggests there is more similarity of species richness between the largest sites rather than among geographically closest areas, as observed by Fonseca-da-Silva et al. (2020) for SA. In fact, the correlation between the shared species of each canga site and their geographical distance was significant. Considering the size of each of these areas and their positive correlation with floristic richness (Fig. 4), we interpret the canga’s overall surface as being more important for floristic composition than the distance between sites in the Serra dos Carajás. Thus, the larger a canga outcrop is, the greater the number of micro-habitats it can harbour, reflecting an increased species richness and unique floristic composition of each canga site. On the other hand, that relationship (distance between areas vs shared flora) holds true when analysing shared endemic species, where shared endemic species decrease with distance at different rates (Fig. 4C). The low number of species restricted to the Amazon (25%) and the high number of species widely distributed in South America (75%) recorded at SFX, may explain the discrepancy in the correlation between shared species and distance being negative when all species are considered, whereas it is positive for endemic species only. On a macro-scale, the majority of the species recorded in SFX have a broad distribution, occurring beyond the Amazon Rainforest, and the distance factor between different outcrops may not matter so much. On the other hand, when observing only the species endemic to Carajás, and especially edaphic endemic species, the trend is the opposite, possibly due to the local scale of observation, as elsewhere the distance between areas tends to affect the floristic similarity between island vegetations (Sklenář et al. 2014; Schrader et al. 2020). A genomic study revealed that gene flow in two endemic species of Carajás is mainly influenced by geographic distance between mountain pairs, as the rainforest surrounding different mountaintops constitutes an important barrier (Carvalho et al. 2019). Therefore, gene flow also decreases with the increase of the barrier represented by the rainforest (Carvalho et al. 2019). Another factor that may have an impact on the contrasting effects of floristic similarity vs. distance from canga islands is the different environmental requirements of herbs, shrubs and trees, that shape their biogeographical patterns and affect species-area and richness-environment relationships (Schrader et al. 2020). Herbs, shrubs and trees have contrasting strategies in different environmental conditions with potential implications for community assemblage on islands. For example, herbs can form larger populations on small islands due to their smaller size, and as a result face less risk of extinction and greater dispersal capacity (Moles 2005; Thomson et al. 2010), while shrubs are associated with more stable environmental conditions, and therefore have more success on larger islands (Chiarucci et al. 2017). Recent analyses of open vegetation in the Amazon reinforce the insular character of Amazonian canga and their low similarity to other vegetation types in the Amazonian biome (Devecchi et al. 2020). While there is some evidence that canga in Southeastern Brazil may be influenced by the surrounding Atlantic Rainforest and Cerrado (Zappi et al. 2017) these biomes are known to have a more varied life-form balance (respectively 1: 4 and 1: 7 proportion of trees over other life forms) than the Amazon Rainforest, where the life form balance is less extreme (1: 2) (Brazil Flora Group [BFG] 2015), thus it may have less floristic influence over the open vegetation found in the CRC of Carajás (Zappi et al. 2019). Therefore, in order to colonize the Amazonian CRC, shrubby or herbaceous plant species may have to come from further afield through long distance dispersal, and, if established, they may remain genetically isolated from their original populations, leading over a period of time to the patterns of endemism observed today. Species richness of the iron islands outcrops of Carajás complex (bold diagonal) along with the number of shared species (above diagonal) and distance in kilometres (below diagonal) between the centroid sites; an estimated area for each site is provided. Different evolutionary processes of the species occurring in CRC may also have led to different floristic composition in the outcrops. Although evolutionary studies involving species of canga in the Brazilian Amazon are just beginning (Zappi et al. 2017), the phylogeography of a species of distributed in humid rock formations in the Cerrado reveals its recent expansion into CRC vegetation during the Pleistocene (Fiorini et al. 2020). Recent and rapid radiations have been observed in mountaintops ecosystems (Salerno et al. 2012; Pirie et al. 2016; Vasconcelos et al. 2020) but more phylogenetic and phylogeographic studies are necessary to establish dating for plants species groups found in the CRC in order to understand their diversification and colonization processes. Endemic edaphic species of the iron islands outcrops of Carajás complex (bold diagonal) along with the number of shared endemic species (above diagonal) and distance in kilometres (below diagonal) between the centroid sites.

Conclusions

This is the most complete study analysing a database of canga outcrop islands in the Amazon thus far. Our data suggest higher shared similarity between largest sites and higher species richness. We show that species richness in these vegetation islands reveals complex biogeographic patterns and relatively high beta diversity. Outcrop size seemed to be more important than geographical proximity between outcrops, and this should be taken into account when drafting conservation and compensation measures for the canga. There are still inaccessible canga outcrops towards the north of the state of Pará that remain unexplored, and their study would certainly yield interesting information to be added to the present findings.
Table 3.

Species richness of the iron islands outcrops of Carajás complex (bold diagonal) along with the number of shared species (above diagonal) and distance in kilometres (below diagonal) between the centroid sites; an estimated area for each site is provided.

SitesArea (km2) SB ST ARQ S11A S11B S11C S11D SFX SN1 SN2 SN3 SN4 SN5 SN6 SN7 SN8
SB 19.98 221 10047798075135851244684108101565756
ST 8.324 209 48889080138841195987102105555953
ARQ1.27140116 149 52444580707530527762302932
S11A 15.27592492 228 139119170961435989116101565453
S11B 8.4454.630.8824.5 199 1071477712053819699495248
S11C 6.2652.528.885104.5 177 14083110467210191494150
S11D 16.414724.492.315.79.85.7 424 14122280134189168758072
SFX 9.0421719379.5158162165170 239 131488211195524451
SN1 11.815237.711137384042180 381 98154183174777178
SN2 0.8646.832.811336.837.139.3401845.18 124 697371403444
SN3 2.144.732117.540.240.14242.21888.13.8 217 129103716059
SN4 14.833825117.437.536.437.73718913.78.67.4 305 181746581
SN5 8.2632.3622.7512241394038.5319519.7814.612.46.2 289 635469
SN6 0.9735.2922.4611837.335.836.735.719016111034 99 4042
SN7 0.34331911735.733.83433.1190.5181413653 112 46
SN8 2.6930171193734.735331922217168.865.73.3 100
Table 4.

Endemic edaphic species of the iron islands outcrops of Carajás complex (bold diagonal) along with the number of shared endemic species (above diagonal) and distance in kilometres (below diagonal) between the centroid sites.

Sites SB ST ARQ S11A S11B S11C S11D SFX SN1 SN2 SN3 SN4 SN5 SN6 SN7 SN8
SB 20 15317151619111811151513111112
ST 24 16 214131415915912111191010
ARQ140116 7 5457563453224
S11A 592492 24 17212214211016171311912
S11B 54.630.8824.5 18 181910151414131210810
S11C 52.528.885104.5 21 2113111015151310912
S11D 4724.492.315.79.85.7 25 142111181914121214
SFX 21719379.5158162165170 17 13913128979
SN1 5237.711137384042180 29 15202219131216
SN2 46.832.811336.837.139.3401845.18 16 15141411812
SN3 44.732117.540.240.14242.21888.13.8 23 2015151215
SN4 3825117.437.536.437.73718913.78.67.4 24 18141217
SN5 32.3622.7512241394038.5319519.7814.612.46.2 20 11915
SN6 35.2922.4611837.335.836.735.719016111034 15 810
SN7 331911735.733.83433.1190.5181413653 14 10
SN8 30171193734.735331922217168.865.73.3 17
  12 in total

1.  Biodiversity: Multiple origins of mountain life.

Authors:  Alexandre Antonelli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  A brief history of seed size.

Authors:  Angela T Moles; David D Ackerly; Campbell O Webb; John C Tweddle; John B Dickie; Mark Westoby
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-01-28       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Ancient tepui summits harbor young rather than old lineages of endemic frogs.

Authors:  Patricia E Salerno; Santiago R Ron; J Celsa Señaris; Fernando J M Rojas-Runjaic; Brice P Noonan; David C Cannatella
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Fast diversification through a mosaic of evolutionary histories characterizes the endemic flora of ancient Neotropical mountains.

Authors:  Thais N C Vasconcelos; Suzana Alcantara; Caroline O Andrino; Félix Forest; Marcelo Reginato; Marcelo F Simon; José R Pirani
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The biodiversity hotspot as evolutionary hot-bed: spectacular radiation of Erica in the Cape Floristic Region.

Authors:  M D Pirie; E G H Oliver; A Mugrabi de Kuppler; B Gehrke; N C Le Maitre; M Kandziora; D U Bellstedt
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-09-17       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  Plant Biodiversity Drivers in Brazilian Campos Rupestres: Insights from Phylogenetic Structure.

Authors:  Daniela C Zappi; Marcelo F Moro; Thomas R Meagher; Eimear Nic Lughadha
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Plant recording across two centuries reveals dramatic changes in species diversity of a Mediterranean archipelago.

Authors:  Alessandro Chiarucci; Simone Fattorini; Bruno Foggi; Sara Landi; Lorenzo Lazzaro; János Podani; Daniel Simberloff
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Plotting a future for Amazonian canga vegetation in a campo rupestre context.

Authors:  Daniela C Zappi; Marcelo F Moro; Barnaby Walker; Thomas Meagher; Pedro L Viana; Nara F O Mota; Mauricio T C Watanabe; Eimear Nic Lughadha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Habitat Loss Does Not Always Entail Negative Genetic Consequences.

Authors:  Carolina S Carvalho; Éder C M Lanes; Amanda R Silva; Cecilio F Caldeira; Nelson Carvalho-Filho; Markus Gastauer; Vera L Imperatriz-Fonseca; Wilson Nascimento Júnior; Guilherme Oliveira; José O Siqueira; Pedro L Viana; Rodolfo Jaffé
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 4.599

View more
  2 in total

1.  Hidden biodiversity of Amazonian white-sand ecosystems: two distinctive new species of Utricularia (Lentibulariaceae) from Pará, Brazil.

Authors:  Paulo Minatel Gonella; Rafael Gomes Barbosa-Silva; Andreas S Fleischmann; Daniela C Zappi; Paulo Cesar Baleeiro; Caroline Oliveira Andrino
Journal:  PhytoKeys       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 1.635

2.  A wide range of South American inselberg floras reveal cohesive biome patterns.

Authors:  Rafael Gomes Barbosa-Silva; Caroline O Andrino; Luísa Azevedo; Luísa Lucresia; Juliana Lovo; Alice L Hiura; Pedro L Viana; Tereza C Giannini; Daniela Cristina Zappi
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 6.627

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.