The evaluation of the autonomic cardiac functions may be performed through the analysis of the heart rate variability. Heart rate variability is defined as the fluctuations in the heart rhythm or rate, and represents a useful tool in the evaluation of the autonomic nervous system through the sympathetic and parasympathetic components, as well as its balance and its reflexes on the cardiorespiratory control system. Fetal electrocardiography provides important information regarding the well-being of the fetus since, in human fetuses, there are changes in the behavior of the fetal heart rate during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy due to an increase in parasympathetic activity. Therefore, considering the importance of evaluating fetal viability, this study aims at evaluating the behavior of fetal heart rate and heart rate variability in Dorper sheep, as well as the activity of the autonomic nervous system during fetal life and in newborn lambs. The species is often used in experimental studies and autonomic nervous system activity is a prognostic index, therefore, the diagnosis of modifications in the sympathovagal balance may represent an early index for fetal viability and well-being in lambs. The analyses were performed in 10 Dorper sheep during pregnancy and in 10 lambs after birth until 120 days of age. There was a decrease in the fetal heart rate and heart rate variability indexes during the fifth month of pregnancy, but without statistical significance for the period evaluated. The heart rate of the lambs decreased gradually until they were 21 days old. The indexes SDNN (standard deviation of RR intervals) and RMSSD (square root of the mean of successive differences between adjacent RR intervals) diverged according to age, being high at day 60. Fetal viability is relevant in sheep fetuses to avoid losses during pregnancy and risks to the health of the mother. In the species, there seems to be a predominance of parasympathetic activity starting from the 21st day of age. Heart rate variability may be employed as a tool in the evaluation of the fetus and development of lambs, since changes in its behavior may represent an adverse effect to fetal and neonatal health.
The evaluation of the autonomic cardiac functions may be performed through the analysis of the heart rate variability. Heart rate variability is defined as the fluctuations in the heart rhythm or rate, and represents a useful tool in the evaluation of the autonomic nervous system through the sympathetic and parasympathetic components, as well as its balance and its reflexes on the cardiorespiratory control system. Fetal electrocardiography provides important information regarding the well-being of the fetus since, in human fetuses, there are changes in the behavior of the fetal heart rate during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy due to an increase in parasympathetic activity. Therefore, considering the importance of evaluating fetal viability, this study aims at evaluating the behavior of fetal heart rate and heart rate variability in Dorper sheep, as well as the activity of the autonomic nervous system during fetal life and in newborn lambs. The species is often used in experimental studies and autonomic nervous system activity is a prognostic index, therefore, the diagnosis of modifications in the sympathovagal balance may represent an early index for fetal viability and well-being in lambs. The analyses were performed in 10 Dorper sheep during pregnancy and in 10 lambs after birth until 120 days of age. There was a decrease in the fetal heart rate and heart rate variability indexes during the fifth month of pregnancy, but without statistical significance for the period evaluated. The heart rate of the lambs decreased gradually until they were 21 days old. The indexes SDNN (standard deviation of RR intervals) and RMSSD (square root of the mean of successive differences between adjacent RR intervals) diverged according to age, being high at day 60. Fetal viability is relevant in sheep fetuses to avoid losses during pregnancy and risks to the health of the mother. In the species, there seems to be a predominance of parasympathetic activity starting from the 21st day of age. Heart rate variability may be employed as a tool in the evaluation of the fetus and development of lambs, since changes in its behavior may represent an adverse effect to fetal and neonatal health.
The monitoring of the FHR (fetal heart rate) has been used since the 1970 and has become a standard component when evaluating the fetal well-being [17]. One of the objectives of monitoring the FHR is to avoid fetal asphyxia and acidosis, as well as any long-term adverse
effects on the neurological development [41]. In human fetuses, there are changes in the behavior of the FHR during the
second and third trimesters of pregnancy, with a decrease from 175 beats per minute (bpm) to 140 bpm from the ninth week until the end of the pregnancy [42]. It is believed that this reduction is mediated by an increase in parasympathetic activity that voids the influence of the
sympathetic tone. The alterations in vagal function may, in addition, lead to an increase in heart rate variability (HRV) [3].Several physiological modifications happen during pregnancy to facilitate the supply of maternal oxygen and nutrients to the growing fetus while maintain a reserve
large enough for the mother [8]. During labor, the fetus may be exposed to acute hypoxia during some uterine contractions or
intrapartum insults [13] and has compensatory cardiovascular defense mechanisms to ideally prevent hypoxic-ischemic
encephalopathy. Reduced variability or lack of variability in the FHR with deceleration is the most consistent predictor for neonatal acidemia with unfavorable
outcomes [8, 9]. The degree of FHR deceleration is usually proportional to the force of
the associated uterine contraction. It is believed that the initial decelerations compress the head of the fetus, altering the blood flow to the brain and leading
to a decrease in FHR due to the vagal reflex [25].The use of instrumented fetal sheep models at the end of pregnancy provided important information regarding fetal physiology [32] that are otherwise limited in human fetuses, allowing a detailed analysis of the fetal cardiovascular function over long periods of time [33]. Using these models, studies have shown that acute hypoxia activates both branches of the Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) that
control the FHR with a vagal dominance [27], and that the activation of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) is key to
rapidly provide support and increase the peripheral vascular resistance of the fetus and stabilize the arterial blood pressure in spite of the decrease in FHR. In
addition, the progression of the pregnancy and prenatal therapy with glucocorticoids interferes in the magnitude and pattern of the FHR response to hypoxia and in
the endocrine and metabolic compensation of the fetus, both of which contribute towards alterations in the variability of FHR [35].In premature human newborns, the ANS is immature and is unable to deal with demands of the cardiorespiratory transition upon birth [43]. About 25% of all premature babies develop a brain injury that may compromise even further the maturation and function of the ANS [19]. The function of the ANS may be measure non-invasively through the behavior of the heart rate (HR) [15], respiratory rate (RR) and arterial blood pressure (ABP). The heart rate variability or the time fluctuation between successive beats (RR
intervals) [1, 16], provides a measure of sympathetic and parasympathetic function and,
therefore, of the maturation of the ANS. As the ANS matures, there should be an increase in parasympathetic function [44].The cardiovascular system is widely controlled by the ANS, with the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems responsible for increases and decreases in
heart rate and arterial blood pressure [29, 30]. The autonomic control of the
cardiovascular system is developed during the fetal life, but the sympathetic and parasympathetic branches develop differently [39]. The sympathetic branch seems to develop quickly during the first trimester of pregnancy in humans, continuing to develop slowly after that. On the
other hand, the parasympathetic or vagal control becomes dominant later during the development of the fetus, around the 25th or 30th week of pregnancy. The ANS
control over the cardiovascular parameters involves a complex interaction between the two branches, and the result of this interaction reflects the sympathovagal
balance [6, 15].Therefore, considering the importance of evaluating fetal and neonatal viability, this study aims at assessing the behavior of fetal HR and HRV in Dorper sheep
fetuses, as well as evaluate ANS activity during fetal and neonatal life, considering that the specie is used in experimental studies and that ANS activity
represents a prognostic index. Therefore, the diagnosis of modifications in the sympathovagal balance may represent an early index for fetal viability, fetal
well-being and the physiological condition in lambs, which may contribute towards translational research and reduce the neonatal mortality rates.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study location
This study was conducted according to the animal well-being guidelines and approved by the Ethics Commission on Animal Use (CEUA, Comissão de Ética no
Uso de Animais) of the School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science at Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”,
Botucatu Campus, under protocol CEUA-0174/2016. The owners of the animals consented to the experimental plan and to the procedures performed.The study was conducted in a property located in the city of Botucatu, State of São Paulo, Brazil, in the Rubião Júnior District, latitude S-22.902107 and
longitude W-48.516534, from July 2017 to April 2018.
Animals
Ten Dorper Sheep (Ovis aries) were evaluated during pregnancy (152 days, or approximately 5 months). The sheep underwent a general clinical
examination and animals with any abnormalities in the results or in the body condition score were excluded from the study. Vaccination and deworming protocols
were performed by the veterinarian responsible for the location.The sheep were kept in semi-confined and received animal feed twice a day and water ad libitum. In addition, they received a mineral mixture
composed of 65% ground corn, 10% corn bran, 20% soy bran and 5% NC (nucleus) for sheep. The basic composition of the NC was: calcium (minimum) 120.0 g/kg;
calcium (maximum) 220 g/kg; phosphorus (minimum) 18.0 g/kg; sodium (minimum) 78.0 g/kg; magnesium (minimum) 7,700.0 mg/kg; potassium (minimum) 10.0 g/kg; iron
(minimum) 250.0 mg/kg; zinc (minimum) 1,870.0 mg/kg; manganese (minimum) 650.0 mg/kg; iodine (minimum) 30 mg/kg; selenium (minimum) 8.00 mg/kg; cobalt (minimum)
20.00 mg/kg; monensin 600.00 mg/kg.
Fetal heart rate variability
The fetal ECG records were compiled using a Televet 100 system (Kruuse®, version 4.1.3, Marslev, Denmark) [22]. This device uses an electrocardiogram (ECG) filter that enables the visualization and analysis of the maternal and fetal HR, both together and
separately, by amplifying the fetal signal. The filter used to obtain the fetal RR intervals in Televet was 50 Hz, as described and proposed by the
manufacturer. For the correction of artifacts (noise) we also use the artifact correction tool of the software itself to obtain the results, where the Smooyhn
priors filter was used for further analysis.The fetal ECG records were obtained by placing the adhesive hydrogel electrodes on the pregnant sheep, as recommended by Nagel et al. [21]: the green electrode was placed on the right side of the neck; the yellow electrode was placed on the left flank,
approximately at the height of the hips; the black electrode (neutral) was placed on the left lumbar region of the sheep (Fig. 1); and the red electrode was placed on the right side of the abdomen, at the height of the knees (Fig. 2).
Fig. 1.
Position of the electrodes (left side) for registering the Fetal heart rate variability in Dorper sheep.
Fig. 2.
Position of the electrodes (right side) for registering the Fetal heart rate variability in Dorper sheep.
Position of the electrodes (left side) for registering the Fetal heart rate variability in Dorper sheep.Position of the electrodes (right side) for registering the Fetal heart rate variability in Dorper sheep.
Neonatal heart rate variability
The same system was used to record the neonatal ECG, but the positions of the electrodes was changed as follows: the green electrode was placed three
centimeters from the sternum; the yellow and black electrodes were placed 20 and 30 cm below the withers on the left side of the thorax; and the red electrode
was placed similarly to the yellow one, but on the right side of the thorax [12] (Fig.
3). The data was registered during eight min and transferred to a computer via Bluetooth technology.
Fig. 3.
Recommended position of the electrodes for conventional heart rate variability record in Dorper lambs.
Recommended position of the electrodes for conventional heart rate variability record in Dorper lambs.
Heart rate variability analysis
The analysis of the heart rate variability was performed using the software Kubios (Biomedical Signal Analysis Group, Applied Physics Department, University of
Kuopio, Finland). Before being input in the software, the data was manually corrected in an Excel spreadsheet due to the possibility of there being artefacts
that could compromise the analysis, as explained by Jonckheer-Sheehy et al. (2012) [14].The HR and the HRV parameters were obtained from all ECG records taken for an individual sheep and the fetal records were obtained. Based on the registered RR
intervals, the HRV indexes SDNN (Standard Deviation of RR Intervals) and RMSSD (square root of the mean of successive differences between adjacent RR intervals)
[38] were calculated. The time-domain index PNN50% (proportion of differences between successive RR intervals exceeding
50 msec) was also recorded.In the frequency domain, spectral analysis was conducted through the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) algorithm and the following indexes were compiled and
expressed in normalized units (n.u.): the high frequency component (HF) varying between 0.15 and 0.4 Hz; and the low frequency component (LF), varying between
0.04 and 0.15 Hz.
Statistical analysis
The results are shown as the mean, standard deviation, and minimum/maximum values. The test employed to verify the normality of the data was the
Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, while the test employed to compare the proposed moments was Friedmann’s test, which was later employed to compare specific moments (24
hr after birth, and at 7, 14 and 21 days of age). All discussions considered a significance level of 5%.
RESULTS
The fetal heart rate variability indexes were recorded starting at the second month of pregnancy, but only from the fourth month onwards it was possible to
obtain them without a considerable number of artefacts. The data is represented in Table 1. Figure 4 shows the fetal electrocardiographic tracing obtained through the Televet 100® system on the fifth month of pregnancy. There were no
statistically significant differences for fetal heart rate and HRV indexes between the fourth and fifth months of pregnancy, but we observed that the mean and
maximum fetal heart rate decreased on the fifth month in comparison with the fourth. In addition, the HRV indexes PNN50 (proportion of differences between
successive RR intervals exceeding 50 msec) and high frequency (n.u.) were higher during this period.
Table 1.
Fetal heart rate variability indexes (mean, standard deviation, minimum, maximum) on the fourth and fifth months of pregnancy in Dorper sheep
Fetal HRV
4th month
5th month
P
HR Min
153.00 ± 11.20 (136;173)
153.00 ± 13.49 (136;183)
0.941
Mean
195.00 ± 12.00 (158;208)
191.00 ± 16.43 (159;220)
0.404
Max
258.00 ± 22.45 (169;270)
248.00 ± 23.44 (182;267)
0.184
RR (msec)
308.00 ± 21.18 (288;379)
315.00 ± 28.23 (272;376)
0.369
SDNN (msec)
6.00 ± 4.81 (2.3;23.3)
5.70 ± 2.68 (2.5;12.0)
0.843
RMSSD (msec)
4.26 ± 4.25 (1.2;18.6)
3.71 ± 2.30 (1.6;8.9)
0.643
PNN50 (%)
0.37 ± 1.63 (0;7.14)
0.60 ± 0.25 (0;1)
0.455
LF (n.u.)
59.17 ± 25.27 (13.22;93.15)
48.78 ± 29.71 (1.77;88.42)
0.271
HF (n.u.)
40.68 ± 25.18 (6.81;86.56)
50.97 ± 29.51 (11.57;98.08)
0.273
LF/HF
3.18 ± 3.66 (0.15;13.68)
1.96 ± 2.19 (0.01;7.64)
0.252
Comparison between moments: Friedmann’s Test; *significance P<0.05; n.u.=normalized units. HR: heart rate; Min: minimum; Max: maximum;
RR: RR intervals; SDNN: standard deviation of all RR intervals; RMSSD: square root of the mean of successive differences between adjacent RR intervals;
PNN50: proportion of differences between successive RR intervals exceeding 50 msec; HF: high frequency; LF: low frequency.
Fig. 4.
Fetal electrocardiographic tracing obtained through the Televet 100® system on the fifth month of pregnancy on Dorper sheep.
Comparison between moments: Friedmann’s Test; *significance P<0.05; n.u.=normalized units. HR: heart rate; Min: minimum; Max: maximum;
RR: RR intervals; SDNN: standard deviation of all RR intervals; RMSSD: square root of the mean of successive differences between adjacent RR intervals;
PNN50: proportion of differences between successive RR intervals exceeding 50 msec; HF: high frequency; LF: low frequency.Fetal electrocardiographic tracing obtained through the Televet 100® system on the fifth month of pregnancy on Dorper sheep.Table 2 shows the HRV indexes on lambs staring 24 hr after birth until 120 days of age. The heart rate decreased gradually as the animals developed,
decreasing more considerably starting at day 21. Minimum, mean and maximum HR diverged significantly between the moments, also decreasing starting at day 21.
There were also differences in the RR intervals, which presented increased durations starting at day 21.
Table 2.
Heart rate variability in Dorper lambs (mean, standard deviation, minimum, maximum) starting at 24 hr after birth until 120 days of age
HRV
24 hr
7 days
14 days
21 days
30 days
60 days
90 days
120 days
P
Min HR
178 ± 39.43a
165 ± 35.70ab
164 ± 26.93bc
137 ± 39.77 bc
134 ± 25
130 ± 21.88
140 ± 13.48
131 ± 18.18
*0.000
(120;246)
(110;221)
(136;219)
(82;227)
(100;197)
(86;173)
(107;157)
(105;158)
Mean HR
199 ± 38.71a
199 ± 37.74ab
179 ± 27.45bc
159 ± 40.57bc
149 ± 28.09
162 ± 25.03
154 ± 17.33
149 ± 17.53
*0.000
(134;255)
(148;247)
(144;230)
(102;253)
(107;222)
(106;198)
(110;175)
(123;175)
Max HR
239 ± 34.30a
245 ± 32.25ab
213 ± 38.70bc
205 ± 47.14bc
171 ± 31
217 ± 27.98
176 ± 22.07
199 ± 38.76
*0.000
(164;270)
(190;270)
(151;270)
(122;261)
(120;254)
(166;251)
(118;200)
(139;259)
RR (msec)
311 ± 62.64a
311 ± 61.30ab
340 ± 50.44bc
398 ± 98.18c
414 ± 70.85
380 ± 71.23
393 ± 53.38
405 ± 48.59
*0.000
(236;449)
(243;407)
(261;417)
(237;589)
(270;559)
(304;568)
(343;543)
(343;487)
SDNN (msec)
1.77 ± 1.39ac
3.19 ± 2.90ab
1.17 ± 1.75b
3.53 ± 4.15c
0.69 ± 0.14
3.83 ± 2.98
0.71 ± 0.09
3.14 ± 2.52
*0.000
(0.40;4.10)
(0.60;9.30)
(0.50;6.70)
(0.70; 15.20)
(0.60;1.10)
(0.90;11.30)
(0.60;0.90)
(0.90;7.60)
RMSSD (msec)
0.66 ± 0.44a
1.38 ± 1.22bc
0.56 ± 0.59a
1.45 ± 1.45c
0.52 ± 0.14
1.70 ± 1.07
0.48 ± 0.08
1.30 ± 0.84
*0.000
(0.20;1.40)
(0.30;4)
(0.20;2.40)
(0.40;5.50)
(0.30;0.80)
(0.60;3.50)
(0.40;0.70)
(0.50;3)
PNN50 (%)
0 ± 0
0.01 ± 0.04
0.01 ± 0.03
0 ± 0
0 ± 0
0.03 ± 0.07
0 ± 0
0.01 ± 0.04
0.474
(0;0)
(0;0.15)
(0;0.1)
(0;0)
(0;0)
(0;0.19)
(0;0)
(0;0.15)
LF (n.u.)
75.45 ± 8.20ab
75.19 ± 16.44a
72.81 ± 9.48a
65.08 ± 15.68b
60.58 ± 16.47
53.73 ± 17.90
66.77 ± 6.94
62.86 ± 11.03
*0.008
(57.35;90.96)
(40.91;95.33)
(56.20;83.09)
(43.99;92.4)
(27.93;77.7)
(29.50;79.5)
(54.32;76.7)
(40.83;77)
HF (n.u.)
24.51 ± 8.19ab
24.75 ± 16.40a
27.14 ± 9.45a
34.81 ± 15.63b
39.35 ± 16.49
46.17 ± 17.90
34.50 ± 9.83
37.04 ± 10.98
*0.005
(9.01;42.61)
(4.66;58.91)
(16.87;43.77)
(7.47;55.65)
(25.68;49.4)
(20.44;70.4)
(23.19;58.4)
(22.93;58.8)
LF/HF
3.65 ± 2.20ab
5.12 ± 5.16a
3.10 ± 1.35a
3.07 ± 3.38b
1.93 ± 1.08
1.59 ± 1.26
5.49 ± 11.39
1.90 ± 0.78
*0.008
(1.35;10.10)
(0.69;20.44)
(1.28;4.93)
(0.79;12.37)
(0.39;3.50)
(0.42;3.89)
(1.21;41.59)
(0.69;3.36)
Normality test: Kolmogorov-Smirnov; * significance P<0.05; n.u.=normalized units. HR: heart rate; Min: minimum; Max: maximum; RR: RR
intervals; SDNN: standard deviation of all RR intervals; RMSSD: square root of the mean of successive differences between adjacent RR intervals; PNN50:
proportion of differences between successive RR intervals exceeding 50 msec; HF: high frequency; LF: low frequency; ab different lower case
letters superscripted on the same line indicate very significant differences (P<0.001) between moments of the neonatal period (24 hr
after birth until 21 days of age).
Normality test: Kolmogorov-Smirnov; * significance P<0.05; n.u.=normalized units. HR: heart rate; Min: minimum; Max: maximum; RR: RR
intervals; SDNN: standard deviation of all RR intervals; RMSSD: square root of the mean of successive differences between adjacent RR intervals; PNN50:
proportion of differences between successive RR intervals exceeding 50 msec; HF: high frequency; LF: low frequency; ab different lower case
letters superscripted on the same line indicate very significant differences (P<0.001) between moments of the neonatal period (24 hr
after birth until 21 days of age).The indexes SDNN (standard deviation of RR intervals) and RMSSD (square root of the mean of successive differences between adjacent RR intervals) diverged
significantly between the moments, peaking at day 60. There were also statistically significant differences between the moments for the indexes low frequency
(n.u.), which decreased starting at day 21; high frequency (n.u.), which increased starting at day 21; and also, in the LF/HF ratio.Friedmann’s statistical test was the applied to evaluate possible significant differences between specific moments for the HRV indexes, starting 24 hr after
birth until 21 days of age, which was when the start of the decrease in the heart rate was observed. There were very significant differences for the RR interval
when comparing 24 hr after birth with 14 and 21 days, and between 7 and 21 days. The same was observed in the aforementioned periods for minimum, mean and maximum
heart rate. The index SDNN diverged significantly when comparing the following moments: 24 hr and 14 days; 7 and 21 days; 14 and 21 days.The index RMSSD presented significant differences when comparing 24 hr after birth with 7 and 21 days, and between 7 days and 14 days, and 14 days and 21 days.
The indexes LF and HF (n.u.), as well as the LF/HF ratio, presented significant differences between 7 days and 21 days, and between 14 days and 21 days, as shown
in Table 2.Figure 5 shows the electrocardiographic tracings obtained through the Televet 100® method in Dorper lambs 24 hr after birth, and Fig. 6 shows the electrocardiographic tracings obtained through the Televet 100® method in Dorper lambs at 21 days of age.
Fig. 5.
Neonatal electrocardiographic tracing obtained through the Televet 100® method in Dorper lambs 24 hr after birth.
Fig. 6.
Neonatal electrocardiographic tracing obtained through the Televet 100® method in Dorper lambs at 21 days of age.
Neonatal electrocardiographic tracing obtained through the Televet 100® method in Dorper lambs 24 hr after birth.Neonatal electrocardiographic tracing obtained through the Televet 100® method in Dorper lambs at 21 days of age.Friedmann’s test was also applied to compared the HRV indexes between the fetal and neonatal periods. The fetal RR interval during the fourth month of pregnancy
presented significant differences with 30 days, 90 days and 120 days of age. Mean HR during the fourth month of pregnancy diverged with the mean HR at 30 days of
age. Maximum HR, SDNN and RMSSD presented differences between the fourth month of pregnancy and 14 days of age, fourth month and 30 days of age, and fourth month
and 90 days of age. The FHR was lower during the fourth month of pregnancy than 24 hr after birth and at 7 and 14 days of age. This is in line with the fetal
heart rate behavior observed through the HRV indexes that indicate parasympathetic activity (PNN50 and RMSSD in the time domain, and HF in the frequency domain),
which were high during this period. The same happened with the fetal heart rate during the fifth month of pregnancy. Table
3 shows the comparisons between the fetal period during the fourth month of pregnancy and neonatal period.
Table 3.
Comparison between the heart rate variability indexes during the fetal period (4th month) and neonatal period in Dorper sheep
HRV
4th month
24 hr
7 days
14 days
21 days
30 days
60 days
90 days
120 days
Min HR
153 ± 11.20a
178 ± 39.43a
165 ± 35.70a
164 ± 26.93a
137 ± 39.77a
134 ± 25a
130 ± 21.88a
140 ± 13.48a
131 ± 18.18a
Mean HR
195 ± 12.00a
199 ± 38.71ac
199 ± 37.74ac
179 ± 27.45ac
159 ± 40.57ac
149 ± 28.09c
162 ± 25.03ac
154 ± 17.33ac
149 ± 17.53ac
Max HR
258 ± 22.45a
239 ± 34.30abcd
245 ± 32.25abcd
213 ± 38.70bcd
205 ± 47.14ab
171 ± 31bcd
217 ± 27.98abcd
176 ± 22.07bcd
199 ± 38.76abcd
RR (msec)
308 ± 21.18a
311 ± 62.64abcd
311 ± 61.30abcd
340 ± 50.44abcd
398 ± 98.18abcd
414 ± 70.85bcd
380 ± 71.23abcd
393 ± 53.38 bcd
405 ± 48.59 bcd
SDNN (msec)
6 ± 4.81a
1.77 ± 1.39abcd
3.19 ± 2.90abcd
1.17 ± 1.75bcd
3.53 ± 4.15ab
0.69 ± 0.14bcd
3.83 ± 2.98abcd
0.71 ± 0.09bcd
3.14 ± 2.52abcd
RMSSD (msec)
4.26 ± 4.25a
0.66 ± 0.44abcd
1.38 ± 1.22abcd
0.56 ± 0.59bcd
1.45 ± 1.45ab
0.52 ± 0.14bcd
1.70 ± 1.07abcd
0.48 ± 0.08bcd
1.30 ± 0.84abcd
PNN50 (%)
0.37 ± 1.63a
0 ± 0a
0.01 ± 0.04a
0.01 ± 0.03a
0 ± 0a
0 ± 0a
0.03 ± 0.07a
0 ± 0a
0.01 ± 0.04a
LF (n.u.)
59.17 ± 25.27a
75.45 ± 8.20a
75.19 ± 16.44a
72.81 ± 9.48a
65.08 ± 15.68a
60.58 ± 16.47a
53.73 ± 17.90a
66.77 ± 6.94a
62.86 ± 11.03a
HF (n.u.)
40.68 ± 25.18a
24.51 ± 8.19a
24.75 ± 16.40a
27.14 ± 9.45a
34.81 ± 15.63a
39.35 ± 16.49a
46.17 ± 17.90a
34.50 ± 9.83a
37.04 ± 10.98a
LF/HF
40.68 ± 25.18a
3.65 ± 2.20a
5.12 ± 5.16a
3.10 ± 1.35a
3.07 ± 3.38a
1.93 ± 1.08a
1.59 ± 1.26a
5.49 ± 11.39a
1.90 ± 0.78a
Comparison between moments: Friedmann’s test; n.u.=normalized units. HR: heart rate; Min: minimum; Max: maximum; RR: RR intervals; SDNN: standard deviation
of all RR intervals; RMSSD: square root of the mean of successive differences between adjacent RR intervals; PNN50: proportion of differences between
successive RR intervals exceeding 50 msec; HF: high frequency; LF: low frequency.
Comparison between moments: Friedmann’s test; n.u.=normalized units. HR: heart rate; Min: minimum; Max: maximum; RR: RR intervals; SDNN: standard deviation
of all RR intervals; RMSSD: square root of the mean of successive differences between adjacent RR intervals; PNN50: proportion of differences between
successive RR intervals exceeding 50 msec; HF: high frequency; LF: low frequency.The fetal RR interval at the fifth month of pregnancy presented significant differences with 30, 90 and 120 days of age. Mean and maximum HR presented
differences between the fifth month of pregnancy and 30 days of age. The time-domain index SDNN presented differences between the fifth month of pregnancy and 14,
30 and 90 days of age, while the index RMSSD presented differences between the fetal period and most moments evaluated, except for 21, 60 and 120 days of age. The
comparisons between the fifth month of pregnancy and the neonatal period are shown in Table 4.
Table 4.
Comparison between the heart rate variability indexes during the fetal period (5th month) and neonatal period in Dorper sheep
HRV
5th month
24 hr
7 days
14 days
21 days
30 days
60 days
90 days
120 days
Min HR
153 ± 13.49a
178 ± 39.43a
165 ± 35.70a
164 ± 26.93a
137 ± 39.77a
134 ± 25a
130 ± 21.88a
140 ± 13.48a
131 ± 18.18a
Mean HR
191 ± 16.43a
199 ± 38.71ab
199 ± 37.74ab
179 ± 27.45ab
159 ± 40.57ab
149 ± 28.09b
162 ± 25.03ab
154 ± 17.33ab
149 ± 17.53ab
Max HR
248 ± 23.44a
239 ± 34.30ab
245 ± 32.25ab
213 ± 38.70ab
205 ± 47.14ab
171 ± 31b
217 ± 27.98ab
176 ± 22.07ab
199 ± 38.76ab
RR (msec)
315 ± 28.23a
311 ± 62.64abcd
311 ± 61.30abcd
340 ± 50.44abcd
398 ± 98.18abcd
414 ± 70.85bcd
380 ± 71.23abcd
393 ± 53.38bcd
405 ± 48.59bcd
SDNN (msec)
5.7 ± 2.68a
1.77 ± 1.39abcd
3.19 ± 2.90abcd
1.17 ± 1.75bcd
3.53 ± 4.15abcd
0.69 ± 0.14bcd
3.83 ± 2.98abcd
0.71 ± 0.09bcd
3.14 ± 2.52bcd
RMSSD (msec)
3.71 ± 2.30a
0.66 ± 0.44b
1.38 ± 1.22b
0.56 ± 0.59b
1.45 ± 1.45a
0.52 ± 0.14b
1.70 ± 1.07a
0.48 ± 0.08b
1.30 ± 0.84a
PNN50 (%)
0.6 ± 0.25
0 ± 0
0.01 ± 0.04
0.01 ± 0.03
0 ± 0
0 ± 0
0.03 ± 0.07
0 ± 0
0.01 ± 0.04
LF (n.u.)
48.78 ± 29.71
75.45 ± 8.20
75.19 ± 16.44
72.81 ± 9.48
65.08 ± 15.68
60.58 ± 16.47
53.73 ± 17.90
66.77 ± 6.94
62.86 ± 11.03
HF (n.u.)
50.97 ± 29.51
24.51 ± 8.19
24.75 ± 16.40
27.14 ± 9.45
34.81 ± 15.63
39.35 ± 16.49
46.17 ± 17.90
34.50 ± 9.83
37.04 ± 10.98
LF/HF
50.97 ± 29.51
3.65 ± 2.20
5.12 ± 5.16
3.10 ± 1.35
3.07 ± 3.38
1.93 ± 1.08
1.59 ± 1.26
5.49 ± 11.39
1.90 ± 0.78
Comparison between moments: Friedmann’s test; n.u.=normalized units. HR: heart rate; Min: minimum; Max: maximum; RR: RR intervals; SDNN: standard deviation
of all RR intervals; RMSSD: square root of the mean of successive differences between adjacent RR intervals; PNN50: proportion of differences between
successive RR intervals exceeding 50 msec; HF: high frequency; LF: low frequency.
Comparison between moments: Friedmann’s test; n.u.=normalized units. HR: heart rate; Min: minimum; Max: maximum; RR: RR intervals; SDNN: standard deviation
of all RR intervals; RMSSD: square root of the mean of successive differences between adjacent RR intervals; PNN50: proportion of differences between
successive RR intervals exceeding 50 msec; HF: high frequency; LF: low frequency.Figures 7,
8,
9 show, respectively, a schematic representation of the behavior of minimum, mean and maximum HR during the fetal and neonatal periods in Dorper lambs, while
Figs. 10 and 11 show, respectively, the behavior of frequency-domain HRV indexes LF (n.u.) and HF (n.u.) during the fetal and neonatal periods.
Fig. 7.
Schematic representation of minimum heart rate during the fetal and neonatal period in Dorper lambs (−5: 5th month of pregnancy; −4: 4th month of
pregnancy; 1: 24 hr old; 7, 14, 21, 30, 60, 90 and 120 days old).
Fig. 8.
Schematic representation of mean heart rate during the fetal and neonatal period in Dorper lambs (−5: 5th month of pregnancy; −4: 4th month of pregnancy;
1: 24 hr old; 7, 14, 21, 30, 60, 90 and 120 days old).
Fig. 9.
Schematic representation of maximum heart rate during the fetal and neonatal period in Dorper lambs (−5: 5th month of pregnancy; −4: 4th month of
pregnancy; 1: 24 hr old; 7, 14, 21, 30, 60, 90 and 120 days old).
Fig. 10.
Schematic representation of frequency-domain heart rate variability index LF (n.u.) during the fetal and neonatal period in Dorper lambs (−5: 5th month of
pregnancy; −4: 4th month of pregnancy; 1: 24 hr old; 7, 14, 21, 30, 60, 90 and 120 days old).
Fig. 11.
Schematic representation of frequency-domain heart rate variability index LF (n.u.) during the fetal and neonatal period in Dorper lambs (−5: 5th month of
pregnancy; −4: 4th month of pregnancy; 1: 24 hr old; 7, 14, 21, 30, 60, 90 and 120 days old).
Schematic representation of minimum heart rate during the fetal and neonatal period in Dorper lambs (−5: 5th month of pregnancy; −4: 4th month of
pregnancy; 1: 24 hr old; 7, 14, 21, 30, 60, 90 and 120 days old).Schematic representation of mean heart rate during the fetal and neonatal period in Dorper lambs (−5: 5th month of pregnancy; −4: 4th month of pregnancy;
1: 24 hr old; 7, 14, 21, 30, 60, 90 and 120 days old).Schematic representation of maximum heart rate during the fetal and neonatal period in Dorper lambs (−5: 5th month of pregnancy; −4: 4th month of
pregnancy; 1: 24 hr old; 7, 14, 21, 30, 60, 90 and 120 days old).Schematic representation of frequency-domain heart rate variability index LF (n.u.) during the fetal and neonatal period in Dorper lambs (−5: 5th month of
pregnancy; −4: 4th month of pregnancy; 1: 24 hr old; 7, 14, 21, 30, 60, 90 and 120 days old).Schematic representation of frequency-domain heart rate variability index LF (n.u.) during the fetal and neonatal period in Dorper lambs (−5: 5th month of
pregnancy; −4: 4th month of pregnancy; 1: 24 hr old; 7, 14, 21, 30, 60, 90 and 120 days old).The behavior of the HR and the HRV indexes during the fetal and neonatal periods are shown in Supplementary
Figs. 1–3. Maximum FHR was higher than the maximum HR observed in neonates. Mean HR remained similar in the fetal and neonatal phases, but at day 21 the
mean HR was lower than the values observed during the fetal phase. The LF index was higher in developing lambs than in fetuses. The HF index was lower in neonates
than in fetuses, but increased as the animal developed.
DISCUSSION
We believe that, in this study, both the stage of the pregnancy and the development of the autonomic nervous system contributed towards acquiring higher quality
data during the last two months of pregnancy. The maturity of the autonomic nervous system is a factor that should be considered when collecting fetal data in
sheep, since the fetal heart rate was lower during the fifth month than in the fourth. The cardiac activity of the fetus depends on the stage of the pregnancy
and, therefore, on the maturation of the autonomic nervous system. During the pregnancy, the regulation of the cardiac activity of the fetus by the sympathetic
and parasympathetic nervous systems becomes progressively more complex [23], and the development of the autonomic ability
to adapt to the variable offers and demands in the organism is one of the key needs during the maturation of the fetus [37].According to the behavior of the fetal heart rate and heart rate variability observed in this study, we believe that there is predominantly parasympathetic
activity in sheep fetuses during the last month of pregnancy, but there were no significant differences between the periods studied, which could be a result of
the relatively small sample size. Garabedian et al. [7] conducted a study aiming to evaluate the fetal
heart rate variability indexes and whether the indexes high frequency and RMSSD, which are considered representative of parasympathetic activity, where reliable
in this representativeness. For this purpose, the authors administered propranolol (sympathetic activity blocker) and atropine (parasympatholytic) to sheep
fetuses. They observed that the spectral component high frequency and the index RMSSD decreased after atropine was administered, confirming that these indexes are
representative for activity of the parasympathetic nervous system.The LF/HF ratio did not present statistically significant differences between the fourth and fifth month of pregnancy in this study, but we observed that it
decreased slightly in the last month. Since the high frequency index represents parasympathetic activity, we believe that this decrease in the last month is a
consequence of an increase in parasympathetic activity. The predominance of parasympathetic activity during the last month of pregnancy, as well as the lower
fetal heart rate values observed in the fifth month, may be explained by the proximity of birth. There is a negative correlation between the progress of the
pregnancy and the fetal heart rate [21], which is interpreted as progressively more complex cardiac regulation by autonomic
nervous system towards the end of the pregnancy [24].In bovines, the release of cortisol by the fetus increases markedly during the last week of pregnancy [33]. This increase
coincides with changes in the heart rate variability of the full-term fetuses, apparently reflecting the final maturation of the regulation of the cardiac
function by the ANS. On the other hand, in equines, this marked increase in the release of cortisol happens only during the last two days before birth and is yet
to be associated with any increases in fetal heart rate variability [18].The evaluation of the fetal HRV during the second and third months of pregnancy was compromised in this study due to the presence of artefacts with encountered
in the species’ ECG, which may be explained by the body fat of the mother, since the Dorper breed is primarily a meat breed, and by the gastrointestinal tract of
the species. The artefacts may also be caused by the method employed to evaluate the HRV (Televet 100®), since the system is designed primarily for
equines. Further studies employing other methods to evaluate fetal HRV or other breeds (milk breeds, lower body weight) may reduce the interference of artefacts
and facilitate data collection, increasing our understanding regarding ANS activity during the fetal period.Trenk et al. [40], in a study with bovines, observed that only 50% of the recording time in cows provided
a constant and reliable signal that allowed the evaluation of fetal HR and HRV, and that this time increased to 60% in heifers. The authors believe that this is
probably caused by the smaller size of the mother and the improved access to the fetus, and that, although fetomaternal electrocardiography consistently allow the
detection of cardiac signals in bovines towards the end of the pregnancy, the technique was less reliable than in equines. According to the authors, in humans,
the fetal HRV increases markedly after the 30th week of pregnancy, reflecting the maturation of the ANS.In this study, data collection was considerably better during the fourth and fifth months of pregnancy, and, while it is possible to apply the method to sheep,
there are several limitations. In equines, transcutaneous fetal electrocardiography (ECG tc) may be used to assess fetal viability in pregnant mares starting at
the 150th day of pregnancy, but the acquisition and interpretation of the cardiac signals are compromised by artefacts caused by the position of the fetus, by the
more evident maternal ECG signal, which masks the fetal signal, and by electronic noise. The interpretation of the fetal electrocardiogram is also limited by the
small amplitude of the fetal ECG tc signal and by marked differences in HR on each fetus [20].For the time-domain HRV indexes analyzed in the lambs, the minimum, mean and maximum HR decreased starting at the 21st day, while the duration of the RR
intervals started increasing at the same time, which may reflect a balance between the ANS branches starting at this point. However, on the 60th day, mean and
maximum HR increased again. We believe that may happened due to handling, since, as the animals developed, the handling became more limited and they became more
agitated, exemplifying the limitation of working in the field.Chiacchio et al. [4], in a study aiming to assess the HRV in Ile de France lambs through the Holter exam
during the neonatal period, observed that the heart rate decreased progressively over the course of the study (from birth until 35 days old), and that the index
PNN50 increased during this period, highlighting the fact that the maturity of the parasympathetic nervous system progresses with the development of the animal.
On the other hand, Koether et al. [10], in a study aiming to assess the electrocardiographic parameters in
Bergamasca lambs during their development, also during the same period evaluated by Chiacchio et al., observed that the HR decreased and the RR
interval increased from birth until the 35th day, showing a negative correlation between age and HR.The HRV indexes SDNN (standard deviation of RR intervals) and RMSSD (square root of the mean of successive differences between adjacent RR intervals) presented
oscillations during the development of the animals, increasing and decreasing upon each period evaluated. Since the index SDNN (standard deviation of RR
intervals) reflects the activity of both branches of the ANS and the index RMSSD (square root of the mean of successive differences between adjacent RR intervals)
reflects parasympathetic activity [18], we believe that these oscillations are caused by the activity of both branches at
the same time, aiming to maintain the autonomic balance. We also observed that, during the same 60-day period during which the heart rate increases again, the
index RMSSD (square root of the mean of successive differences between adjacent RR intervals) also increased, revealing an increased parasympathetic activity
during the period, probably to counterbalance the sympathetic stimulus resulting from the agitation caused by handling.Starting at the 21st day, we observed that the index low frequency decreased while the index HF increased. This illustrates the fact that sympathetic activity
remains dominant until this time, when the parasympathetic nervous system started being more active, resulting in an autonomic balance at this age group. We
observed that the time-domain and frequency-domain indexes both presented significant differences between the 7th and 14th days, and between the 14th and 21st
days, while allows us to infer that, in this age group, there is a transition towards parasympathetic predominance.The more inadequate the function of the ANS, the more the organism tends to lose its chaotic behavior and default to linearity [11]. This also seems to be valid in newborns, particularly in those born before term, since the nervous system is not yet fully mature in this group.
Age has a influence over this balance between the sympathetic and parasympathetic systems, and the higher the age, the lower the HRV. This relationship, however,
inverts when considering young adults, probably due to the not fully developed ANS [34].In this study, we did evaluate the HR and the HRV indexes regarding the circadian rhythm, but we believe this rhythm somehow influences the oscillations observed
in the HRV and HR, as mentioned by Piccirillo et al. [28]. Kovács et al. [12], in a study assessing the behavior of the HRV indexes in bovines during the day and night periods, observed a predominance
of sympathetic activity during active periods (day) and also during the summer, when both the HR and the spectral parameters presented a circadian rhythm.In this study, the lambs were evaluated only during the summer and only during the day, so we believe that these factors, coupled with the high temperatures, may
have influenced our results, except for those obtained 24 hr after birth since the animals were evaluated both during the day and during the night. In addition,
as mentioned by Kovács et al. [12], environmental factors, diet and locomotor activity may have influenced
the results. Further studies are need to evaluate the circadian rhythm in lambs during their development, as well as assess the behavior of the HRV in lambs and
its relationship with the circadian rhythm.For the interpretation of our results, we want to stress the importance of considering the stress factor involved, particularly in respect to the HRV indexes and
the behavior of the HR. Vögeli et al. [41] studied the reactions of the sheep brain in the face positive
and negative stimuli. They observed that, during the transition from negative to positive situations, there was a reduction in the number of movements of the
sheep, in the rate of movements in the limbs, in the rate of asymmetric postures (reflecting behavioral changes), in the HR and RR (physiological changes), and
that the activation of the frontal cortex was less evident, associated with a displacement towards the activation of the left side of the brain. The authors
suggest that the emotional value should also be considered in farm animals, with this term meaning the emotional state attributed to a situation or stimulus
varying between negativity and positivity.The development of an artificial placenta has been the object of studies for over 50 years with limited success [33]. The
main challenges faced were congestive heart failure due to the imbalance between the preload and afterload imposed on the heart of the fetus by the resistance of
the oxygenator and by the circuits supported by the pump, as well as the use of open fluid incubators, resulting in contamination e fetal sepsis, and problems
related to the umbilical vascular access, resulting in spasms [2].Partridge et al. [26] have shown that premature-born lambs may be consistently supported by an
extracorporeal device for up to four weeks without apparent physiological disorders or organ failure, and with adequate nutritional support the lambs presented
normal somatic growth and pulmonary maturation, as well as adequate cerebral growth and myelination. Therefore, according to these results, translational research
employing the species have gained prominence and resulting in advancements in the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular afflictions, as well as serving as a
support for the artificial neonatal development, which results in improvements in the field of neonatology, promoting monitoring and early intervention for
possible occurrences that could limit the development and the health of the fetus.We have emphasized in this study the importance of performing the analysis of the fetal and neonatal HRV, since it has proven to be effective in the evaluation
of the behavior of the ANS. It may also be employed to assess fetal viability and in cases involving afflictions that could limit the development of the fetus or
neonate, considering the importance of providing assistance to the lambs during their development due to the series of physiological adaptations needed during the
fetal-neonatal transition. Rivolta et al. [31] conducted a study aiming to assess the behavior of the
fetal heart rate in cases of hypoxia and acidemia, observing that the higher the degree of acidemia, the more predominant the parasympathetic component of the
autonomic nervous system became. Frasch et al. [5] reported that, in pregnant sheep, the index RMSSD
(square root of the mean of successive differences between adjacent RR intervals) presented more marked alterations during acidemia, while Siira et
al. [36] reported that, during cases of acute hypoxia without acidemia there is more sympathetic activity, while
when there is acidemia, the vagal activity increases.The activation of the ANS by initial and acute hypoxia probably constitutes a first-line adaptive response and is the result of a marked fetal heart rate
modulation and increased cardiovascular response. In addition, the predominant involvement of the vagal tone has been associated to a more efficient modulation of
the ANS [39]. In the presence of acute hypoxia, the reduction in the fetal heart rate, which is mediated by chemoreceptors
through the parasympathetic branch, acts as a mechanism to protect the fetus, since it reduces the myocardial work and the consumption of oxygen. When the vagal
regulation becomes inadequate, some adaptive mechanisms (such as circulatory adaptation mediated by chemoreceptors) may fail, leading to brain damage and
ultimately death of the fetus [30].Some inherent limitations were observed in this study. The small sample size may have contributed towards the non-significant results. The manual restraint used
on lambs and mothers may have influenced the HRV indexes, since working on the field presents several limitations in data acquisition. Other methods of HRV
analysis may also contribute towards illustrating the activity of the ANS during fetal and neonatal life.In sheep, the maturation of the ANS appears to begin towards the end of the pregnancy, with a predominance of parasympathetic activity during this period.
Despite the presence of parasympathetic activity during the last month of pregnancy, the complex interactions between both branches of the ANS still require
further research. The HR decreases in lambs starting at the 21st day of life. These results show the importance of further researched regarding the activity of
the ANS, since the detection of autonomic imbalances through the HRV may allow the investigation of probable system alterations and an early intervention fetuses
and neonates, reducing the morbidity and mortality rates.