| Literature DB >> 33191365 |
Makoto Fujita1, Hiroyasu Yamamoto1, Nao Yoshida1, Runa Ono1, Tetsuro Matsuoka2, Shinji Kihara1.
Abstract
AIM: Adiponectin (APN) exhibits different atheroprotective effects, and we have previously reported that APN function is modulated by its binding proteins, E-selectin ligand 1, Mac-2 binding protein, and cystatin C. In the present study, we aimed to identify a novel atheroprotective mechanism of APN via C-C motif chemokine 2 (CCL2).Entities:
Keywords: Adiponectin; CCL2; MAP kinase; Monocyte
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33191365 PMCID: PMC8592692 DOI: 10.5551/jat.58875
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Atheroscler Thromb ISSN: 1340-3478 Impact factor: 4.928
Clinical and plaque characteristics of the enrolled patients
| mean±SD | range | |
|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 70±10 | 37−88 |
| BMI (kg/m 2 ) | 24.6±3.3 | 16.0−34.5 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 134±17 | 92−171 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 78±12 | 56−104 |
| Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) | 6.11±1.89 | 4.00−13.60 |
| HbA1c (%) | 6.5±1.1 | 4.9−10.2 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 167.6±34.0 | 106−310 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 144.4±84.5 | 37−465 |
| HDL-C (mg/dL) | 41.7±9.3 | 23−80 |
| cLDL-C (mg/dL) | 98.2±28.2 | 46−210 |
| hsCRP (mg/L) | 3.06±6.10 | <0.10−43.40 |
| eGFR (mL/min/ 1.73 m 2 ) | 65.9±18.9 | 27.3−127.9 |
| APN (mg/mL) | 10.4±5.9 | 2.5−34.2 |
| CCL2 (pg/mL) | 240.8±169.0 | 73.8−1716.9 |
| IVUS | ||
| %Plaque | 66.4±5.4 | 55.1−78.7 |
| %Fibrotic | 53.2±12.1 | 22.1−86.6 |
| %Lipidic | 11.7±2.9 | 4.5−20.2 |
| %Necrotic | 32.4±10.2 | 8.6−58.2 |
| %Calcified | 3.2±2.4 | 0.2−11.8 |
| %Lipidic plus Necrotic | 44.0±11.6 | 13.1−74.6 |
DATA are expressed as mean±standard deviation (SD).
cLDL-C, calculated LDL-C; hsCRP, high sensitive C-reactive protein
Fig.3. APN prevents CCL2-induced MAP kinase activation in THP-1 cellsAfter 24 h serum starvation, the THP-1 cells were stimulated for 1 min with 100 ng/mL CCL2 with or without 1.5 µg/mL APN. Those cell lysates were analyzed by western blot using the antibodies against ERK and phospho-ERK (left lower panels), JNK and phospho-JNK (middle lower panels), and p38-MAPK and phospho-p38-MAPK (right lower panels). Representative figures are shown.
Data in the bar graphs (upper panels) are mean±SEM of two independent measurements; n =5–6, * p <0.05.
Medication of the patients
| number (%) | |
|---|---|
| Anti-diabetic agents | 46 (41.4%) |
| Insulin only | 7 (6.3%) |
| Oral hypoglycemic agents (OHA) only | 30 (27.0%) |
| Insulin+OHA | 9 (8.1%) |
| Anti-hypertensive agents | 81 (73.0%) |
Correlation between serum APN, CCL2 levels and clinical parameters or plaque characteristics
| APN | CCL2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ρ |
| ρ |
| |
| Age | 0.246 | <0.01 | 0.178 | 0.062 |
| BMI | −0.363 | <0.0001 | 0.145 | n.s. |
| Systolic blood pressure | 0.199 | n.s. | 0.061 | n.s. |
| Diastolic blood pressure | −0.125 | n.s. | −0.175 | n.s. |
| Fasting plasma glucose | −0.104 | n.s. | −0.032 | n.s. |
| HbA1c | −0.002 | n.s. | 0.180 | 0.059 |
| Total cholesterol | −0.086 | n.s. | −0.027 | n.s. |
| Triglycerides | −0.418 | <0.0001 | 0.170 | n.s. |
| HDL-C | 0.139 | n.s. | −0.236 | <0.05 |
| cLDL-C | −0.045 | n.s. | −0.068 | n.s. |
| eGFR | 0.002 | n.s. | −0.028 | n.s. |
| hsCRP | −0.129 | n.s. | 0.112 | n.s. |
| CCL2 | −0.111 | n.s. | ||
| IVUS | ||||
| %Plaque | −0.280 | <0.005 | 0.277 | <0.005 |
| %Fibrotic | −0.096 | n.s. | −0.074 | n.s. |
| %Lipidic | 0.059 | n.s. | 0.051 | n.s. |
| %Necrotic | 0.089 | n.s. | 0.082 | n.s. |
| %Calcified | 0.072 | n.s. | 0.014 | n.s. |
| %Lipidic plus Necrotic | 0.068 | n.s. | 0.089 | n.s. |
cLDL-C, calculated LDL-C; hsCRP, high sensitive C-reactive protein