Literature DB >> 33191281

The Performances of the ACR 1997, SLICC 2012, and EULAR/ACR 2019 Classification Criteria in Pediatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Ezgi D Batu1, Ummusen Kaya Akca1, Aysenur Pac Kısaarslan2, Erdal Sağ1, Ferhat Demir3, Selcan Demir1, Sümeyra Özdemir Çiçek2, Hakan Poyrazoglu2, Betül Sozeri3, Yelda Bilginer1, Seza Ozen4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease. The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1997, Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) 2012, and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/ACR 2019 SLE classification criteria are formed based on data mainly from adult patients. We aimed to test the performances of the SLE classification criteria among pediatric patients with SLE.
METHODS: Pediatric patients with SLE (n = 262; 80.9% female) were included from 3 different centers in Turkey. As controls, 174 children (60.9% female) with other diseases who had ANA (antinuclear antibody) test results were included. The gold standard for SLE diagnosis was expert opinion.
RESULTS: The sensitivities of the ACR 1997, SLICC 2012, and EULAR/ACR 2019 criteria were 68.7%, 95.4%, and 91.6%, respectively. The specificities of the ACR 1997, SLICC 2012, and EULAR/ACR 2019 criteria were 94.8%, 89.7%, and 88.5%, respectively. Eighteen patients with SLE met the SLICC 2012 but not the EULAR/ACR 2019 criteria. Among these, hematologic involvement was prominent (n = 13; 72.2%). Eight patients with SLE fulfilled the EULAR/ACR 2019 but not the SLICC 2012 criteria. Among these, joint involvement was prominent (n = 6; 75%).
CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the largest cohort study of pediatric SLE to test the performances of all 3 classification criteria. The SLICC 2012 criteria yielded the best sensitivity, whereas the ACR 1997 criteria had the best specificity. SLICC 2012 criteria performed better than EULAR/ACR 2019 criteria. Separation of different hematological manifestations in the SLICC 2012 criteria might have contributed to the higher performance of this criteria set.
Copyright © 2021 by the Journal of Rheumatology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  child; classification; diagnosis; systemic lupus erythematosus

Year:  2020        PMID: 33191281     DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.200871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of the 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus in children and adults.

Authors:  Sang Cheng; Huihua Ding; Haiyan Xue; Lanfang Cao
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.650

2.  Performance of the EULAR/ACR 2019 classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematous in monogenic lupus.

Authors:  Sulaiman M Al-Mayouf; Lujayn Akbar; Reem Abdwani; Giulia Ginesi; Stefano Volpi; Marco Gattorno; Reima Bakry; Samia AlHashim; Alhanouf Alsaleem
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 3.  A Contemporary Update on the Diagnosis of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Authors:  Xin Huang; Qing Zhang; Huilin Zhang; Qianjin Lu
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 8.667

4.  Comparison of the sensitivity of the EULAR / ACR 2019 and SLICC 2012 classification criteria in a Colombian population with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Diana Guavita-Navarro; Laura Gallego-Cardona; Ana María Arredondo; Hector Cubides; Jairo Cajamarca-Barón; Claudia Ibáñez; Alejandro Escobar; Adriana Rojas-Villarraga
Journal:  J Transl Autoimmun       Date:  2021-11-10

5.  CD4+ T-cell cooperation promoted pathogenic function of activated naïve B cells of patients with SLE.

Authors:  Kittikorn Wangriatisak; Piyawan Kochayoo; Pongsakorn Thawornpan; Chaniya Leepiyasakulchai; Thanitta Suangtamai; Pintip Ngamjanyaporn; Ladawan Khowawisetsut; Prasong Khaenam; Prapaporn Pisitkun; Patchanee Chootong
Journal:  Lupus Sci Med       Date:  2022-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.