Weiyi Tan1, Adam Small2, Roberto Gallotti3, Jeremy Moore4, Jamil Aboulhosn5. 1. Ahmanson/UCLA Adult Congenital Heart Disease Center, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America. Electronic address: weiyitan@mednet.ucla.edu. 2. Adult Congenital Heart Disease, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States of America; Ahmanson/UCLA Adult Congenital Heart Disease Center, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America. 3. Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America. 4. Ahmanson/UCLA Adult Congenital Heart Disease Center, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America; Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America. 5. Ahmanson/UCLA Adult Congenital Heart Disease Center, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with the Fontan circulation lack a subpulmonary ventricular pump and thus the main driver for pulmonary blood flow is a high central venous pressure. Peripheral venous pressure (PVP) measurement has been shown to be a reproducible and fairly accurate surrogate for central venous pressure (CVP), but not specifically for the adult Fontan circulation. This study aims to determine the relationship of PVP to CVP in adult Fontan patients. METHODS: All adult patients (≥18 yo) with a Fontan circulation undergoing cardiac catheterization were included. Both CVP and PVP were measured during the catheterization. The relationship between the peripheral venous and central venous pressures was assessed using simple linear regression and the Bland-Altman plot analysis for differences. RESULTS: Thirty-eight adult Fontan patients (mean age 30.7 ± 8.5, range 18-52 years) undergoing 43 cardiac catheterizations were analyzed. The mean CVP was 17.3 +/- 4.7 mmHg. The mean PVP was 18.4 +/- 5 mmHg. CVP and PVP were highly correlated, with an R2 value of 0.83 (p < 0.001). The CVP can be estimated with PVP measurements using the formula CVP = (0.86 * PVP) + 1.3. A Bland-Altman plot for PVP and CVP demonstrated that the PVP overestimated CVP by a mean of 1.2 mmHg, with a 95% limit of agreement of -5.2 mmHg to 2.8 mmHg. CONCLUSIONS: In adult Fontan patients, measuring PVP is a reliable, less-invasive, and accurate method of estimating the CVP during cardiac catheterization procedures. These findings may enable outpatient monitoring of Fontan hemodynamics.
BACKGROUND:Patients with the Fontan circulation lack a subpulmonary ventricular pump and thus the main driver for pulmonary blood flow is a high central venous pressure. Peripheral venous pressure (PVP) measurement has been shown to be a reproducible and fairly accurate surrogate for central venous pressure (CVP), but not specifically for the adult Fontan circulation. This study aims to determine the relationship of PVP to CVP in adult Fontan patients. METHODS: All adult patients (≥18 yo) with a Fontan circulation undergoing cardiac catheterization were included. Both CVP and PVP were measured during the catheterization. The relationship between the peripheral venous and central venous pressures was assessed using simple linear regression and the Bland-Altman plot analysis for differences. RESULTS: Thirty-eight adult Fontan patients (mean age 30.7 ± 8.5, range 18-52 years) undergoing 43 cardiac catheterizations were analyzed. The mean CVP was 17.3 +/- 4.7 mmHg. The mean PVP was 18.4 +/- 5 mmHg. CVP and PVP were highly correlated, with an R2 value of 0.83 (p < 0.001). The CVP can be estimated with PVP measurements using the formula CVP = (0.86 * PVP) + 1.3. A Bland-Altman plot for PVP and CVP demonstrated that the PVP overestimated CVP by a mean of 1.2 mmHg, with a 95% limit of agreement of -5.2 mmHg to 2.8 mmHg. CONCLUSIONS: In adult Fontan patients, measuring PVP is a reliable, less-invasive, and accurate method of estimating the CVP during cardiac catheterization procedures. These findings may enable outpatient monitoring of Fontan hemodynamics.