Literature DB >> 33189789

Nanoparticle delivery improves the pharmacokinetic properties of cyclic dinucleotide STING agonists to open a therapeutic window for intravenous administration.

Mohamed Wehbe1, Lihong Wang-Bishop1, Kyle W Becker1, Daniel Shae1, Jessalyn J Baljon2, Xinyi He1, Plamen Christov3, Kelli L Boyd4, Justin M Balko5, John T Wilson6.   

Abstract

The stimulator of interferon genes (STING) pathway plays an important role in the immune surveillance of cancer and, accordingly, agonists of STING signaling have recently emerged as promising therapeutics for remodeling of the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) and enhancing response rates to immune checkpoint inhibitors. 2'3'-cyclic guanosine monophosphate-adenosine monophosphate (2'3'-cGAMP) is the endogenous ligand for STING, but is rapidly metabolized and poorly membrane permeable, restricting its use to intratumoral administration. Nanoencapsulation has been shown to allow for systemic administration of cGAMP and other cyclic dinucleotides (CDN), but little is known about how nanocarriers affect important pharmacological properties that impact the efficacy and safety of CDNs. Using STING-activating nanoparticles (STING-NPs) - a polymersome platform designed to enhance cGAMP delivery - we investigate the pharmacokinetic (PK)-pharmacodynamic (PD) relationships that underlie the ability of intravenously (i.v.) administered STING-NPs to induce STING activation and inhibit tumor growth. First, we demonstrate that nanoencapsulation improves the half-life of encapsulated cGAMP by 40-fold, allowing for sufficient accumulation of cGAMP in tumors and activation of the STING pathway in the TME as assessed by western blot analysis and gene expression profiling. Nanoparticle delivery also changes the biodistribution profile, resulting in increased cGAMP accumulation and STING activation in the liver and spleen, which we identify as dose limiting organs. As a consequence of STING activation in tumors, i.v. administered STING-NPs reprogram the TME towards a more immunogenic antitumor milieu, characterized by an influx of >20-fold more CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells. Consequently, STING-NPs increased response rates to αPD-L1 antibodies, resulting in significant improvements in median survival time in a B16-F10 melanoma model. Additionally, we confirmed STING-NP monotherapy in an additional melanoma (YUMM1.7) and breast adenocarcinoma (E0771) models leading to >50% and 80% reduction in tumor burden, respectively, and significant increases in median survival time. Collectively, this work provides an examination of the PK-PD relationship governing STING activation upon systemic delivery using STING-NPs, providing insight for future optimization for nanoparticle-based STING agonists and other immunomodulating nanomedicines.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Immune checkpoint blockade; Immunotherapy; Nanoparticle; Pharmacokinetics; Polymersome; cGAMP; cGAS-STING

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33189789      PMCID: PMC9008741          DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.11.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Control Release        ISSN: 0168-3659            Impact factor:   9.776


  68 in total

1.  Systemic clinical tumor regressions and potentiation of PD1 blockade with in situ vaccination.

Authors:  Linda Hammerich; Thomas U Marron; Ranjan Upadhyay; Judit Svensson-Arvelund; Maxime Dhainaut; Shafinaz Hussein; Yougen Zhan; Dana Ostrowski; Michael Yellin; Henry Marsh; Andres M Salazar; Adeeb H Rahman; Brian D Brown; Miriam Merad; Joshua D Brody
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  STING agonist formulated cancer vaccines can cure established tumors resistant to PD-1 blockade.

Authors:  Juan Fu; David B Kanne; Meredith Leong; Laura Hix Glickman; Sarah M McWhirter; Edward Lemmens; Ken Mechette; Justin J Leong; Peter Lauer; Weiqun Liu; Kelsey E Sivick; Qi Zeng; Kevin C Soares; Lei Zheng; Daniel A Portnoy; Joshua J Woodward; Drew M Pardoll; Thomas W Dubensky; Young Kim
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 3.  Survival of patients with advanced metastatic melanoma: the impact of novel therapies-update 2017.

Authors:  Selma Ugurel; Joachim Röhmel; Paolo A Ascierto; Keith T Flaherty; Jean Jacques Grob; Axel Hauschild; James Larkin; Georgina V Long; Paul Lorigan; Grant A McArthur; Antoni Ribas; Caroline Robert; Dirk Schadendorf; Claus Garbe
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 4.  STING pathway agonism as a cancer therapeutic.

Authors:  Blake A Flood; Emily F Higgs; Shuyin Li; Jason J Luke; Thomas F Gajewski
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 12.988

5.  PEG liposomalization of paclitaxel improved its in vivo disposition and anti-tumor efficacy.

Authors:  Yuta Yoshizawa; Yusuke Kono; Ken-ichi Ogawara; Toshikiro Kimura; Kazutaka Higaki
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 5.875

6.  Direct Activation of STING in the Tumor Microenvironment Leads to Potent and Systemic Tumor Regression and Immunity.

Authors:  Leticia Corrales; Laura Hix Glickman; Sarah M McWhirter; David B Kanne; Kelsey E Sivick; George E Katibah; Seng-Ryong Woo; Edward Lemmens; Tamara Banda; Justin J Leong; Ken Metchette; Thomas W Dubensky; Thomas F Gajewski
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 9.423

7.  Liposomes loaded with a STING pathway ligand, cyclic di-GMP, enhance cancer immunotherapy against metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Takashi Nakamura; Hiroko Miyabe; Mamoru Hyodo; Yusuke Sato; Yoshihiro Hayakawa; Hideyoshi Harashima
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 9.776

8.  Quantifying the Ligand-Coated Nanoparticle Delivery to Cancer Cells in Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Qin Dai; Stefan Wilhelm; Ding Ding; Abdullah Muhammad Syed; Shrey Sindhwani; Yuwei Zhang; Yih Yang Chen; Presley MacMillan; Warren C W Chan
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 9.  Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation.

Authors:  Douglas Hanahan; Robert A Weinberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 10.  STING: infection, inflammation and cancer.

Authors:  Glen N Barber
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 53.106

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Polyvalent design in the cGAS-STING pathway.

Authors:  Zachary T Bennett; Suxin Li; Baran D Sumer; Jinming Gao
Journal:  Semin Immunol       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 11.130

2.  Neoadjuvant STING Activation, Extended Half-life IL2, and Checkpoint Blockade Promote Metastasis Clearance via Sustained NK-cell Activation.

Authors:  Lauren E Milling; Daniel Garafola; Yash Agarwal; Shengwei Wu; Ayush Thomas; Nathan Donahue; Josetta Adams; Nikki Thai; Heikyung Suh; Darrell J Irvine
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Res       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 11.151

3.  STING agonist delivery by tumour-penetrating PEG-lipid nanodiscs primes robust anticancer immunity.

Authors:  Eric L Dane; Alexis Belessiotis-Richards; Coralie Backlund; Jianing Wang; Kousuke Hidaka; Lauren E Milling; Sachin Bhagchandani; Mariane B Melo; Shengwei Wu; Na Li; Nathan Donahue; Kaiyuan Ni; Leyuan Ma; Masanori Okaniwa; Molly M Stevens; Alfredo Alexander-Katz; Darrell J Irvine
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 47.656

Review 4.  Chemical and Biomolecular Strategies for STING Pathway Activation in Cancer Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Kyle M Garland; Taylor L Sheehy; John T Wilson
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 60.622

5.  Au naturale: use of biologically derived cyclic di-nucleotides for cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Christopher M Waters
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 6.411

6.  Polymersome-mediated cytosolic delivery of cyclic dinucleotide STING agonist enhances tumor immunotherapy.

Authors:  Huan Zheng; Beibei Guo; Xinyun Qiu; Yifeng Xia; Yan Qu; Liang Cheng; Fenghua Meng; Zhiyuan Zhong
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2022-03-04

Review 7.  STING and liver disease.

Authors:  Can Chen; Rui-Xia Yang; Hua-Guo Xu
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 7.527

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.