Literature DB >> 33188796

Prediction of current and new development of atrial fibrillation on electrocardiogram with sinus rhythm in patients without structural heart disease.

Naomi Hirota1, Shinya Suzuki2, Takuto Arita2, Naoharu Yagi2, Takayuki Otsuka2, Mikio Kishi2, Hiroaki Semba2, Hiroto Kano2, Shunsuke Matsuno2, Yuko Kato2, Tokuhisa Uejima2, Yuji Oikawa2, Minoru Matsuhama3, Tatsuya Inoue3, Junji Yajima2, Takeshi Yamashita2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) based on electrocardiogram (ECG) with sinus rhythm remains a major challenge. Obtaining a panoramic view with hundreds of automatically measured ECG parameters at sinus rhythm on the predictive capability for AF would be informative.
METHODS: We used a single-center database of a specialist cardiovascular hospital (Shinken Database 2010-2017; n = 19,170). We analyzed 12,863 index ECGs with sinus rhythm after excluding those showing AF rhythm, other atrial tachyarrhythmia, pacing beat, or indeterminate axis, and those of patients with structural heart diseases. We used 438 automatically measured ECG parameters in the MUSE data management system. The predictive models were developed using random forest algorithm with the 10-fold cross-validation method.
RESULTS: In 12,863 index ECGs with sinus rhythm, a predictive capability for current paroxysmal AF (n = 1131) by c-statistics was 0.99981 ± 0.00037 for training dataset and 0.91337 ± 0.00087 for testing dataset, respectively. Excluding AF at baseline (n = 11,732), a predictive capability for newly developed AF (n = 98) by c-statistics was 0.99973 ± 0.00086 for training dataset and 0.99160 ± 0.00038 for testing dataset, respectively. The distribution of parameter importance was mostly similar among P, QRS, and ST-T segment for both current and newly developed AF.
CONCLUSIONS: This study intended to provide panoramic information in relation between ECG parameters and AF. The parameter importance of ECG parameters for predicting AF was mostly similar in P, QRS, and ST-T segment in models for both current and future AF.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; Electrocardiography; Prediction

Year:  2020        PMID: 33188796     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.11.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  4 in total

1.  Relationship between resting 12-lead electrocardiogram and all-cause death in patients without structural heart disease: Shinken Database analysis.

Authors:  Naomi Hirota; Shinya Suzuki; Takuto Arita; Naoharu Yagi; Takayuki Otsuka; Mikio Kishi; Hiroaki Semba; Hiroto Kano; Shunsuke Matsuno; Yuko Kato; Tokuhisa Uejima; Yuji Oikawa; Minoru Matsuhama; Mitsuru Iida; Tatsuya Inoue; Junji Yajima; Takeshi Yamashita
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.298

2.  Intelligent Algorithm-Based Electrocardiography to Predict Atrial Fibrillation after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in the Elderly.

Authors:  Tao Feng; Zhihua Deng
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 2.238

Review 3.  Is machine learning the future for atrial fibrillation screening?

Authors:  Pavidra Sivanandarajah; Huiyi Wu; Nikesh Bajaj; Sadia Khan; Fu Siong Ng
Journal:  Cardiovasc Digit Health J       Date:  2022-05-16

4.  Identifying patients with atrial fibrillation during sinus rhythm on ECG: Significance of the labeling in the artificial intelligence algorithm.

Authors:  Shinya Suzuki; Jun Motogi; Hiroshi Nakai; Wataru Matsuzawa; Tsuneo Takayanagi; Takuya Umemoto; Naomi Hirota; Akira Hyodo; Keiichi Satoh; Takayuki Otsuka; Takuto Arita; Naoharu Yagi; Takeshi Yamashita
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2022-01-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.