Literature DB >> 33188412

Personalized Reference Intervals in Laboratory Medicine: A New Model Based on Within-Subject Biological Variation.

Abdurrahman Coşkun1,2, Sverre Sandberg3,4,5, Ibrahim Unsal1, Coskun Cavusoglu1, Mustafa Serteser1,2, Meltem Kilercik1,2, Aasne K Aarsand4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The concept of personalized medicine has received widespread attention in the last decade. However, personalized medicine depends on correct diagnosis and monitoring of patients, for which personalized reference intervals for laboratory tests may be beneficial. In this study, we propose a simple model to generate personalized reference intervals based on historical, previously analyzed results, and data on analytical and within-subject biological variation.
METHODS: A model using estimates of analytical and within-subject biological variation and previous test results was developed. We modeled the effect of adding an increasing number of measurement results on the estimation of the personal reference interval. We then used laboratory test results from 784 adult patients (>18 years) considered to be in a steady-state condition to calculate personalized reference intervals for 27 commonly requested clinical chemistry and hematology measurands.
RESULTS: Increasing the number of measurements had little impact on the total variation around the true homeostatic set point and using ≥3 previous measurement results delivered robust personalized reference intervals. The personalized reference intervals of the study participants were different from one another and, as expected, located within the common reference interval. However, in general they made up only a small proportion of the population-based reference interval.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that, if using results from patients in steady state, only a few previous test results and reliable estimates of within-subject biological variation are required to calculate personalized reference intervals. This may be highly valuable for diagnosing patients as well as for follow-up and treatment. © American Association for Clinical Chemistry 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  analytical variation; biological variation; reference interval

Year:  2020        PMID: 33188412     DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  1 in total

1.  European Kidney Function Consortium Equation vs. Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) Refit Equations for Estimating Glomerular Filtration Rate: Comparison with CKD-EPI Equations in the Korean Population.

Authors:  Hanah Kim; Mina Hur; Seungho Lee; Gun-Hyuk Lee; Hee-Won Moon; Yeo-Min Yun
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 4.964

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.