Literature DB >> 33187671

Sex differences in cardiovascular morbidity associated with familial hypercholesterolaemia: A retrospective cohort study of the UK Simon Broome register linked to national hospital records.

Barbara Iyen1, Nadeem Qureshi2, Stephen Weng2, Paul Roderick3, Joe Kai2, Nigel Capps4, Paul N Durrington5, Ian Fw McDowell6, Handrean Soran7, Andrew Neil8, Steve E Humphries9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The UK Simon Broome (SB) familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) register previously reported 3-fold higher standardised mortality ratio for cardiovascular disease (CVD) in women compared to men from 2009 to 2015. Here we examined sex differences in CVD morbidity in FH by national linkage of the SB register with Hospital Episode Statistics (HES).
METHODS: Of 3553 FH individuals in the SB register (aged 20-79 years at registration), 2988 (52.5% women) had linked HES records. Standardised Morbidity Ratios (SMbR) compared to an age and sex-matched UK general practice population were calculated [95% confidence intervals] for first CVD hospitalisation in HES (a composite of coronary heart disease (CHD), myocardial infarction (MI), stable or unstable angina, stroke, TIA, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), heart failure, coronary revascularisation interventions).
RESULTS: At registration, men had significantly (p < 0.001) higher prevalence of previous CHD (24.8% vs 17.6%), previous MI (13.2% vs 6.3%), and were commenced on lipid-lowering treatment at a younger age than women (37.5 years vs 42.3 years). The SMbR for composite CVD was 6.83 (6.33-7.37) in men and 7.55 (6.99-8.15) in women. In individuals aged 30-50 years, SMbR in women was 50% higher than in men (15.04 [12.98-17.42] vs 10.03 [9.01-11.17]). In individuals >50 years, SMbR was 33% higher in women than men (6.11 [5.57-6.70] vs 4.59 [4.08-5.15]).
CONCLUSIONS: Excess CVD morbidity due to FH remains markedly elevated in women at all ages, but especially those aged 30-50 years. This highlights the need for earlier diagnosis and optimisation of lipid-lowering risk factor management for all FH patients, with particular attention to young women with FH.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular disease; Gender; Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33187671      PMCID: PMC7754706          DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2020.10.895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atherosclerosis        ISSN: 0021-9150            Impact factor:   5.162


  25 in total

1.  Long-Term Risk of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in US Adults With the Familial Hypercholesterolemia Phenotype.

Authors:  Amanda M Perak; Hongyan Ning; Sarah D de Ferranti; Holly C Gooding; John T Wilkins; Donald M Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge.

Authors:  W T Friedewald; R I Levy; D S Fredrickson
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  Non-coronary heart disease mortality and risk of fatal cancer in patients with treated heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: a prospective registry study.

Authors:  H A W Neil; M M Hawkins; P N Durrington; D J Betteridge; N E Capps; S E Humphries
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2004-12-08       Impact factor: 5.162

4.  Gender differences in coronary heart disease.

Authors:  A H E M Maas; Y E A Appelman
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 5.  Sex differences in lipid and lipoprotein metabolism: it's not just about sex hormones.

Authors:  Xuewen Wang; Faidon Magkos; Bettina Mittendorfer
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 6.  A review on the diagnosis, natural history, and treatment of familial hypercholesterolaemia.

Authors:  Dalya Marks; Margaret Thorogood; H Andrew W Neil; Steve E Humphries
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.162

Review 7.  Genetic causes of monogenic heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: a HuGE prevalence review.

Authors:  Melissa A Austin; Carolyn M Hutter; Ron L Zimmern; Steve E Humphries
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Characteristic features of long-living patients with familial hypercholesterolemia in Japan.

Authors:  S Murano; M Shinomiya; K Shirai; Y Saito; S Yoshida
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Sex differences in cholesterol levels from birth to 19 years of age may lead to increased cholesterol burden in females with FH.

Authors:  Kirsten B Holven; Ingunn Narverud; Jeanine Roeters van Lennep; Jorie Versmissen; Linn K L Øyri; Annette Galema-Boers; Gisle Langslet; Stine M Ulven; Marit B Veierød; Kjetil Retterstøl; Martin P Bogsrud
Journal:  J Clin Lipidol       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 4.766

10.  Time trends in the prescription of statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in the United Kingdom: a cohort study using The Health Improvement Network primary care data.

Authors:  Aidan G O'Keeffe; Irwin Nazareth; Irene Petersen
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 4.790

View more
  2 in total

1.  Case-finding and genetic testing for familial hypercholesterolaemia in primary care.

Authors:  Nadeem Qureshi; Ralph Kwame Akyea; Stephen F Weng; Joe Kai; Brittany Dutton; Steve E Humphries; Hasidah Abdul Hamid; Laura Condon
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Cost-Effectiveness of Screening Algorithms for Familial Hypercholesterolaemia in Primary Care.

Authors:  Matthew Jones; Ralph K Akyea; Katherine Payne; Steve E Humphries; Hasidah Abdul-Hamid; Stephen Weng; Nadeem Qureshi
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-02-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.