Literature DB >> 33187403

Polarizable and non-polarizable force fields: Protein folding, unfolding, and misfolding.

Anna S Kamenik1, Philip H Handle1, Florian Hofer1, Ursula Kahler1, Johannes Kraml1, Klaus R Liedl1.   

Abstract

Molecular dynamics simulations are an invaluable tool to characterize the dynamic motions of proteins in atomistic detail. However, the accuracy of models derived from simulations inevitably relies on the quality of the underlying force field. Here, we present an evaluation of current non-polarizable and polarizable force fields (AMBER ff14SB, CHARMM 36m, GROMOS 54A7, and Drude 2013) based on the long-standing biophysical challenge of protein folding. We quantify the thermodynamics and kinetics of the β-hairpin formation using Markov state models of the fast-folding mini-protein CLN025. Furthermore, we study the (partial) folding dynamics of two more complex systems, a villin headpiece variant and a WW domain. Surprisingly, the polarizable force field in our set, Drude 2013, consistently leads to destabilization of the native state, regardless of the secondary structure element present. All non-polarizable force fields, on the other hand, stably characterize the native state ensembles in most cases even when starting from a partially unfolded conformation. Focusing on CLN025, we find that the conformational space captured with AMBER ff14SB and CHARMM 36m is comparable, but the ensembles from CHARMM 36m simulations are clearly shifted toward disordered conformations. While the AMBER ff14SB ensemble overstabilizes the native fold, CHARMM 36m and GROMOS 54A7 ensembles both agree remarkably well with experimental state populations. In addition, GROMOS 54A7 also reproduces experimental folding times most accurately. Our results further indicate an over-stabilization of helical structures with AMBER ff14SB. Nevertheless, the presented investigations strongly imply that reliable (un)folding dynamics of small proteins can be captured in feasible computational time with current additive force fields.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33187403     DOI: 10.1063/5.0022135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  7 in total

1.  Harnessing Deep Learning for Optimization of Lennard-Jones Parameters for the Polarizable Classical Drude Oscillator Force Field.

Authors:  Payal Chatterjee; Mert Y Sengul; Anmol Kumar; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 6.578

2.  Computational Modeling of the Thermodynamics of the Mesophilic and Thermophilic Mutants of Trp-Cage Miniprotein.

Authors:  Leonardo Bò; Edoardo Milanetti; Cheng Giuseppe Chen; Giancarlo Ruocco; Andrea Amadei; Marco D'Abramo
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-04-12

3.  A discrete-to-continuum model of protein complexes.

Authors:  Paolo Maria Mariano; Marco Bacci
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2022-03-25

Review 4.  Advanced Sampling Methods for Multiscale Simulation of Disordered Proteins and Dynamic Interactions.

Authors:  Xiping Gong; Yumeng Zhang; Jianhan Chen
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-09-28

5.  Granger Causality Analysis of Chignolin Folding.

Authors:  Marcin Sobieraj; Piotr Setny
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  Computational-Driven Epitope Verification and Affinity Maturation of TLR4-Targeting Antibodies.

Authors:  Bilal Ahmad; Maria Batool; Moon-Suk Kim; Sangdun Choi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Molecular dynamics study on the effects of charged amino acid distribution under low pH condition to the unfolding of hen egg white lysozyme and formation of beta strands.

Authors:  Husnul Fuad Zein; Ibrar Alam; Piyapong Asanithi; Thana Sutthibutpong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.