| Literature DB >> 33187296 |
Bénédicte Suybeng1, Edward Charmley2, Christopher P Gardiner1, Bunmi S Malau-Aduli3, Aduli E O Malau-Aduli1.
Abstract
The main objective of this study was to investigate the effect of supplementing beef cattle with incremental levels of Desmanthus leptophyllus cv. JCU1 and Desmanthus bicornutus cv. JCU4 on in vivo methane (CH4) emissions and the role of tannins in rumen fermentation. Fourteen yearling Droughtmaster steers were allocated to each of the two Desmanthus species and offered a basal diet of Rhodes grass (Chloris gayana) hay plus fresh Desmanthus at 0%, 15%, 22%, and 31% of dry matter intake (DMI). The 15% and 31% Desmanthus periods lasted 21 days and the 22 and 0% Desmanthus periods, 14 days. Methane production was measured by open-circuit gas exchange in the last two days of each period. The results showed a linear increase in DMI and reduction in CH4 yield with the increasing level of Desmanthus and subsequently condensed tannins in the diet. The added tannin binder polyethylene glycol-4000 did not affect CH4 yield but increased rumen NH3-N and iso-acid concentrations. Therefore, on a low-quality diet, Desmanthus has the potential to increase intake and reduce CH4 emissions. Even though its tannins can bind rumen proteins, the beef cattle anti-methanogenic response to supplementation with Desmanthus may be a combination of rumen fermentation and tannin effects.Entities:
Keywords: Desmanthus bicornutus; Desmanthus leptophyllus; greenhouse gas; legumes; methane emission; mitigation; phenolics; polyethylene glycol; tannins; tropical beef cattle
Year: 2020 PMID: 33187296 PMCID: PMC7698017 DOI: 10.3390/ani10112097
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Chemical composition (means ± s.e.) of the Rhodes grass hay and the two cultivars of Desmanthus (JCU1 and JCU4).
| Variable | Hay | JCU1 | JCU4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry matter (%) | 90.9 ± 0.247 | 54.1 ± 1.99 | 42.5 ± 1.39 |
| Crude protein (% DM) | 8.2 ± 0.162 | 11.0 ± 0.378 | 14.6 ± 0.727 |
| Acid detergent fibre (% DM) | 45.0 ± 0.170 | 46.3 ± 0.467 | 36.8 ± 0.912 |
| Neutral detergent fibre (% DM) | 76.2 ± 0.266 | 67.4 ± 0.410 | 58.3 ± 0.886 |
| Metabolizable energy (MJ/kg DM) 1 | 6.4 ± 0.0212 | 6.5 ± 0.0711 | 7.3 ± 0.0893 |
| Total phenolics (% DM as catechin equivalent) | 0.34 ± 0.0271 | 1.7 ± 0.118 | 2.3 ± 0.187 |
| Condensed tannins (% DM) | ND | 3.5 ± 0.194 | 3.7 ± 0.301 |
Estimated from in vitro true digestibility as DM digestibility × 0.172 − 1.707 [23], DM = dry matter, MJ = megajoules, ND = not detected.
Figure 1Variation in (a) condensed tannins (% dry matter) and (b) total phenolics (% dry matter as catechin equivalent) throughout the feeding period.
Nutritive value (means ± s.e.) of the treatments (JCU1 and JCU4) in the four diet levels (0, 15, 22 and 31% Desmanthus in the diet).
| Variable | % | Species | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 15 | 22 | 31 | |||
|
| JCU1 | 8.7 ± 0.155 a | 8.5 ± 0.0336 a | 9.9 ± 0.522 ac | 9.2 ± 0.523 a | 0.0077 |
| JCU4 | 8.6 ± 0.159 a | 8.8 ± 0.228 a | 11.5 ± 0.669 bc | 11.8 ± 0.351 b | ||
|
| JCU1 | 47.1 ± 0.501 ab | 47.3 ± 0.615 ab | 46.8 ± 0.714 ab | 49.6 ± 0.594 a | 0.037 |
| JCU4 | 46.7 ± 0.602 b | 46.5 ± 0.707 b | 46.1 ± 0.741 b | 47.8 ± 0.424 ab | ||
|
| JCU1 | 76.6 ± 0.574 a | 76.9 ± 0.757 a | 73.5 ± 0.483 b | 74.9 ± 0.733 ab | NS |
| JCU4 | 76.1 ± 0.688 a | 77.1 ± 0.929 a | 75.7 ± 0.510 ab | 77.4 ± 0.576 a | ||
|
| JCU1 | 6.2 ± 0.0365 a | 6.1 ± 0.0590 a | 6.3 ± 0.0722 a | 7.5 ± 1.01 a | NS |
| JCU4 | 6.2 ± 0.0460 a | 6.1 ± 0.0675 a | 6.3 ± 0.0530 a | 8.2 ± 1.34 a | ||
|
| JCU1 | 0 a | 0.53 ± 0.00855 b | 1.1 ± 0.0148 c | 0.92 ± 0.117 c | NS |
| JCU4 | 0 a | 0.40 ± 0.0308 b | 1.1 ± 0.157 c | 0.87 ± 0.0207 c | ||
1 Estimated from in vitro true digestibility as DM digestibility × 0.172 – 1.707 [19], DM = dry matter. Means between columns and species within the same variable without the same alphabetical characters (a, b, c) represent statistical differences (p < 0.05). Comparisons between species (JCU1 and JCU4) for each variable are declared NS, not significant when p > 0.05.
Relationship between the dry matter intake (kg/day), DMI per kg LW (%), daily liveweight gain (kg), CH4 production (g/day), CH4 yield (g/kg DMI) and the percentage of Desmanthus DM in the diet (means ± s.e.).
| Variables | % | RMSE | Linear | R2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 15 | 22 | 31 | ||||
|
| 3.8 ± 0.189 | 3.6 ± 0.171 | 4.6 ± 0.285 | 4.7 ± 0.265 | 0.59 | 0.00013 | 0.49 |
|
| 1.3 ± 0.0451 | 1.2 ± 0.0497 | 1.5 ± 0.0759 | 1.6 ± 0.0637 | 1.89 | 0.0001 | 0.36 |
|
| 0.018 ± 0.181 | 0.12 ± 0.0700 | 0.29 ± 0.187 | 0.18 ± 0.0663 | 0.42 | NS | 0.033 |
|
| 76.5 ± 2.74 | 68.7 ± 3.25 | 85.6 ± 4.80 | 81.9 ± 4.52 | 9.65 | 0.030 | 0.50 |
|
| 19.1 ± 0.504 | 19.2 ± 0.943 | 18.9 ± 0.445 | 17.5 ± 0.572 | 2.09 | 0.009 | 0.20 |
DMI = dry matter intake, LW = liveweight, CH4 = methane, RMSE = root mean square error. Means between the percentage of Desmanthus level in the diet for each variable are declared NS, not significant when p > 0.05.
Figure 2The relationship between dry matter intake (kg /day) and CH4 production (g/day). The relationship can be described as CH4 production (g/day) = 26.11 + 12.39X, where X = dry matter intake (kg/day) R2 = 0.74, p < 0.0001.
Figure 3Relationship between CH4 yield (g/kg DMI) (y) and (a) percentage of Desmanthus in the diet (y = 19.92 − 0.066X, where X = percentage of Desmanthus in the diet, R2 = 0.20, p = 0.0097), (b) Desmanthus dry matter intake (kg/day) (y = 20.08 − 1.68X, where X = Desmanthus dry matter intake, R2 = 0.25, p = 0.00075), (c) percentage of condensed tannins in the diet (y = 19.67 − 1.49X, where X = percentage of condensed tannins in the diet, R2 = 0.15, p = 0.035).
Relationship between the products of rumen fermentation and the percentage of Desmanthus (on dry matter basis) in the diet.
| Variables | % | RMSE | Linear | R2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 15 | 22 | 31 | ||||
| Total VFA (mg/100dL) | 49.8 ± 1.38 | 68.8 ± 3.44 | 55.0 ± 2.77 | 74.3 ± 4.41 | 11.25 | 0.0001 | 0.36 |
| Acetate (molar %) | 70.6 ± 0.344 | 74.4 ± 0.447 | 71.9 ± 0.279 | 73.9 ± 0.142 | 1.74 | 0.00044 | 0.19 |
| Propionate (molar %) | 19.4 ± 0.217 | 16.4 ± 0.317 | 18.0 ± 0.193 | 16.5 ± 0.112 | 1.19 | 0.0001 | 0.30 |
| Acetate/Propionate ratio | 3.7 ± 0.0592 | 4.6 ± 0.124 | 4.0 ± 0.0586 | 4.5 ± 0.0374 | 0.40 | 0.00011 | 0.22 |
| Iso-butyrate (molar %) | 0.52 ± 0.0248 | 0.50 ± 0.0311 | 0.44 ± 0.0355 | 0.43 ± 0.0209 | 0.090 | 0.012 | 0.21 |
| n-butyrate (molar %) | 8.2 ± 0.19 | 7.3 ± 0.218 | 8.3 ± 0.136 | 7.7 ± 0.0943 | 0.70 | NS | 0.029 |
| Iso-valerate (molar %) | 0.66 ± 0.0469 | 0.64 ± 0.0481 | 0.51 ± 0.0525 | 0.58 ± 0.0418 | 0.13 | 0.039 | 0.32 |
| n-valerate (molar %) | 0.52 ± 0.0177 | 0.68 ± 0.0254 | 0.71 ± 0.0408 | 0.74 ± 0.0287 | 0.082 | 0.0001 | 0.51 |
| n-caproate (molar %) | 0.13 ± 0.00833 | 0.11 ± 0.0129 | 0.18 ± 0.00690 | 0.13 ± 0.00732 | 0.036 | NS | 0.13 |
| NH3-N (mg/dL) | 6.4 ± 0.550 | 6.6 ± 0.410 | 7.7 ± 1.29 | 8.0 ± 0.489 | 2.77 | 0.033 | 0.16 |
| pH | 7.0 ± 0.0607 | 6.9 ± 0.0583 | 7.1 ± 0.0696 | 6.9 ± 0.0470 | 0.20 | NS | 0.15 |
VFA = volatile fatty acids. Values are means ± s.e., RMSE = root mean square error. Means between the Desmanthus level in the diet for each variable are declared NS, not significant when p > 0.05.