| Literature DB >> 33187145 |
Fang Dubois1, Corentin Musa1, Benoit Duponchel2, Lucette Tidahy1, Xavier Sécordel3, Isabelle Mallard1, François Delattre1.
Abstract
We discussed about the influence of extraction mode on the flaxseed gums composition and their thermal stabilities. In order to do so, flaxseed gum was extracted by both classical magnetic stirring method and ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE). As a function of time, protein content, gum yield, pH values were evaluated and samples were characterized by 1H and 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiments as well as scanning electron microscopy (SEM), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA). The flaxseed gum extracted in aqueous solution correspond to a mixture of different components, including polysaccharides, proteins and sometimes lignan derivatives. It is found that the protein and gum contents increase with the extraction duration for both the ultrasonic assisted and the traditional extraction while the pH decreases at the same time. As expected, compared to traditional magnetic stirring method, ultrasonic assisted extraction method can significantly enhance the yield of polysaccharides, lignans and proteins. The variation of pH is correlated to the increase of lignan molecules in the extracted samples. For thermic methods, SEM experiments showed that lignan derivatives which ester-bonded to polysaccharides associated to proteins are responsible to the formation of globular aggregates. Supplementary rod-like molecular organization were obtained from UAE and questions on the nature of the amphiphilic mesogen carbohydrate structures.Entities:
Keywords: flaxseed gum; polysaccharide; ultrasonic-assisted extraction
Year: 2020 PMID: 33187145 PMCID: PMC7697610 DOI: 10.3390/polym12112654
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Yield (%), protein content (%) and pH values of flaxseed extracted from traditional stirring extraction.
| Extraction Time (h) | Yield of Total Dry Mass (%) | Protein Content (%) | pH | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 °C | 40 °C | 70 °C | 25 °C | 40 °C | 70 °C | 25 °C | 40 °C | 70 °C | |
|
| 3.2 ± 0.1 | 3.9 ± 0.2 | 8.4 ± 0.5 | 7.0 ± 0.3 | 9.4 ± 1.2 | 10.2 ± 0.2 | 10.1 ± 0.2 | 9.9 ± 0.1 | 7.8 ± 0.4 |
|
| 3.5 ± 0.2 | 4.7 ± 0.4 | 10.5 ± 0.7 | 7.4 ± 1.0 | 10.4 ± 0.3 | 15.0 ± 0.8 | 10.1 ± 0.1 | 9.5 ± 0.3 | 7.0 ± 0.1 |
|
| 4.0 ± 0.3 | 5.7 ± 0.3 | 10.9 ± 0.9 | 9.8 ± 1.6 | 12.8 ± 0.6 | 16.2 ± 0.7 | 8.0 ± 0.1 | 5.7 ± 0.2 | 6.9 ± 0.4 |
|
| 5.8 ± 0.2 | 8.7 ± 0.6 | 11.8 ± 0.6 | 12.3 ± 0.3 | 16.1 ± 1.9 | 12.9 ± 0.6 | 6.7 ± 0.2 | 5.4 ± 0.2 | 6.6 ± 0.3 |
|
| 6.4 ± 0.4 | 19.9 ± 1.3 | 12.3 ± 1.1 | 20.3 ± 2.8 | 16.1 ± 0.6 | 17.6 ± 1.2 | 7.1 ± 0.1 | 4.8 ± 0.1 | 6.3 ± 0.2 |
Yield (%), protein content (%) and pH values of flaxseed gum from ultrasonic-assisted extraction.
| Extraction Period (min) | N of Successive Extraction | Yield of Total Dry Mass (%) | Protein Content (%) | pH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 | 1 | 7.5 ± 0.3 | 10.5 ± 1.2 | 8.9 |
| 2 | 6.7 ± 0.3 | 20.3 ± 1.4 | 7.9 | |
| 75 | 1 | 10.9 ± 0.6 | 20.3 ± 2.2 | 6.8 |
| 2 | 4.9 ± 0.1 | 31.2 ± 1.1 | 7.8 |
Acidic and neutral sugar contents of the selected extraction samples.
| Extraction Mode | Extraction Time (h) | Acidic Fraction (AF) | Neutral Fraction (NF) | NF/AF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 °C | 1 | 16.3 | 61.2 | 3.8 |
| 20 | 15.3 | 60.6 | 4.0 | |
| 48 | 14.3 | 46.7 | 3.3 | |
| 40 °C | 1 | 16.1 | 54.4 | 3.4 |
| 20 | 10.5 | 41.3 | 3.9 | |
| 48 | 8.4 | 24.4 | 2.9 | |
| 70 °C | 1 | 8.9 | 42.8 | 4.8 |
| 20 | 9.9 | 56.4 | 5.7 | |
| 48 | 9.0 | 45.2 | 5.0 | |
| UAE | 0.5 | 19.3 | 38.9 | 2.0 |
| 2 * 0.5 | 9.4 | 34.8 | 3.7 | |
| 1.25 | 15.7 | 39.6 | 2.5 | |
| 2 * 1.25 | 8.9 | 36.4 | 4.1 |
* indicates a successive extraction.
Figure 11H (a) and 13C (b) NMR spectra of flaxseed mucilage extracted by magnetic stirring method depending on time and temperature.
Figure 21H (a) and 13C (b) NMR spectra of flaxseed mucilage extracted by UAE.
Figure 3SEM images of surface seeds; unsoaked (A) and after extraction during 1 h at 25 °C (B), 40 °C (C) and UAE75min-1 (D).
Figure 4SEM images of mucilage samples extracted at 25 °C over 1 h (A), at 40 °C over 48 h (B), at 70 °C over 48 h (C) and UAE30min-1 (D), UAE30min-2 (E).
Figure 5TGA/DTG thermograms of flaxseed gums extracted during 1 h and 48 h at 25 °C (a), at 40 °C (b), at 70 °C (c) and by UAE during 30min (d) and 75 min (e) for stages 1 and 2.
TGA/DTG data of flaxseed gums extracted by magnetic stirring methods.
| Extraction Temperature | Extraction Time (h) | N° of Decomposition Stage | Temperature Range (°C) | DTG Maxima (°C) | %wt. Loss | Activation Energy (kJ/mol) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 °C | 1 | 1 | 24.7–141.3 | 61.6 | 9.3 | - |
| 2 | 152.4–338.5 | 253.1 | 43.5 | 43.6 | ||
| 48 | 1 | 25.9–142.9 | 73.0 | 10.7 | - | |
| 2 | 161.9–357.2 | 259.3 | 46.9 | 38.0 | ||
| 40 °C | 1 | 1 | 24.7–132.0 | 64.9 | 8.4 | - |
| 2 | 151.4–357.2 | 261.5 | 48.0 | 45.9 | ||
| 48 | 1 | 24.7–126.8 | 65.2 | 5.7 | - | |
| 2 | 133.9–358.0 | 220.2; 260.7 | 51.7 | 23.9 | ||
| 70 °C | 1 | 1 | 27.5–130.4 | 69.2 | 5.3 | - |
| 2 | 146.9–370.3 | 257.7 | 52.0 | 36.1 | ||
| 48 | 1 | - | - | - | - | |
| 2 | 190.5–360.4 | 259.4 | 41.7 | 29.0 |
TGA/DTG data of flaxseed gums extracted by UAE.
| Extraction Time (min) | Extraction Stage | N° of Decomposition Stage | Temperature Range (°C) | DTG Maxima (°C) | %wt. Loss | Activation Energy (kJ/mol) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 | 1 | 1 | 24.7–143.3 | 59.2 | 8.7 | - |
| 2 | 152.2–379.4 | 266.3 | 52.9 | 40.7 | ||
| 2 | 1 | 28.3–160.3 | 135.7 | 8.4 | - | |
| 2 | 163.1–377.4 | 240.3 | 48.8 | 33.0 | ||
| 75 | 1 | 1 | 25.9–132.0 | 74.1 | 5.7 | - |
| 2 | 135.2–381.0 | 262.2 | 52.1 | 34.2 | ||
| 2 | 1 | 24.2–121.1 | 61.6 | 5.2 | - | |
| 2 | 135.2–390.3 | 255.4 | 52.3 | 33.8 |
Figure 6Thermal heating curves of the samples extracted by magnetic stirring mode during 1 h (a) and 48 h (b) and by UAE (c).
DSC characteristics of flaxseed gum extracted by magnetic stirring and UAE methods.
| Extraction Temperature | Extraction Time (h) | Temperature Range (°C) | Enthalpy (J/g) | UAE | Temperature Range (°C) | Enthalpy (J/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RT | 1 | 141.7–267.7 | +318.1 | 30-1 | 71.2–268.8 | +494.5 |
| 48 | 139.0–246.3 | +379.1 | 30-2 | 108.1–226.1 | +285.8 | |
| 40 °C | 1 | 114.5–250.9 | +385.2 | 75-1 | 88.1–243.4 | +318.7 |
| 48 | 114.5–250.9 | +333.4 | 75-2 | 88.1–243.4 | +170.1 | |
| 70 °C | 1 | 88.6–236.4 | +261.4 | |||
| 48 | 75.2–258.1 | +394.7 | ||||