Danyelle A Ferreira1, Yaman Tayyar1, Adi Idris2, Nigel A J McMillan1. 1. Menzies Health Institute Queensland, School of Medical Science, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia. 2. Menzies Health Institute Queensland, School of Medical Science, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia. Electronic address: a.idris@griffith.edu.au.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is well-known that certain cancers are caused by viruses. However, viral oncogenesis is complex and only a small fraction of the infected people develop cancer. Indeed, a number of environmental factors can contribute to virally infected cells developing cancer hallmarks, promoting tumorigenesis. SCOPE OF REVIEW: The hit-and-run theory proposes that viruses facilitate the accumulation of mutations and promote genomic instability until the virus becomes dispensable for tumour maintenance. Indeed, several studies have reported viral genome, episome and/or oncogene loss in tumour cells without losing malignant phenotype. MAJOR CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence supports the clear contribution of certain viruses to develop cancers. Importantly, the evidence supporting the sustained maintenance of malignancy after the loss of viral "presence" is sufficient to support the hit-and-run hypothesis of viral cancer development. Long-term tracking of vaccination outcome over the decades will test this theory. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: If the hit-and-run theory is true, viruses might cause more cancers than previously thought and will have implications in the prevention of many cancers through implementing vaccination programs.
BACKGROUND: It is well-known that certain cancers are caused by viruses. However, viral oncogenesis is complex and only a small fraction of the infectedpeople develop cancer. Indeed, a number of environmental factors can contribute to virally infected cells developing cancer hallmarks, promoting tumorigenesis. SCOPE OF REVIEW: The hit-and-run theory proposes that viruses facilitate the accumulation of mutations and promote genomic instability until the virus becomes dispensable for tumour maintenance. Indeed, several studies have reported viral genome, episome and/or oncogene loss in tumour cells without losing malignant phenotype. MAJOR CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence supports the clear contribution of certain viruses to develop cancers. Importantly, the evidence supporting the sustained maintenance of malignancy after the loss of viral "presence" is sufficient to support the hit-and-run hypothesis of viral cancer development. Long-term tracking of vaccination outcome over the decades will test this theory. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: If the hit-and-run theory is true, viruses might cause more cancers than previously thought and will have implications in the prevention of many cancers through implementing vaccination programs.
Authors: Chiara Mazziotta; Carmen Lanzillotti; Roberta Gafà; Antoine Touzé; Marie-Alice Durand; Fernanda Martini; John Charles Rotondo Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-03-08 Impact factor: 6.244