Risk factors for the development of hospital-acquired pediatric venous thromboembolism-Dealing with potentially causal and confounding risk factors using a directed acyclic graph (DAG) analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism (HA-VTE) in children comprises multiple risk factors that should not be evaluated separately due to collinearity and multiple cause and effect relationships. This is one of the first case-control study of pediatric HA-VTE risk factors using a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) analysis.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective, case-control study with 22 cases of objectively confirmed HA-VTE and 76 controls matched by age, sex, unit of admission, and period of hospitalization. Descriptive statistics were used to define distributions of continuous variables, frequencies, and proportions of categorical variables, comparing cases and controls. Due to many potential risk factors of HA-VTE, a directed acyclic graph (DAG) model was created to identify confounding, reduce bias, and increase precision on the analysis. The final model consisted of a DAG-informed conditional logistic regression.
RESULTS: In the initial conventional univariable model, the following variables were selected as potential risk factors for HA-VTE: length of stay (LOS, days), immobility, ICU admission in the last 30 days, LOS in ICU, infection, central venous catheter (CVC), number of CVCs placed, L-asparaginase, heart failure, liver failure, and nephrotic syndrome. The final model using the set of variables selected by DAG analysis revealed LOS (OR = 1.106, 95%CI = 1.021-1.198, p = 0.013), L-asparaginase (OR = 26.463, 95%CI = 1.609-435.342, p = 0.022), and nephrotic syndrome (OR = 29.127, 95%CI = 1.044-812.508, p = 0.004) as independent risk factors for HA-VTE.
CONCLUSION: The DAG-based approach was useful to clarify the influence of confounders and multiple causalities of HA-VTE. Interestingly, CVC placement-a known thrombotic risk factor highlighted in several studies-was considered a confounder, while LOS, L-asparaginase use and nephrotic syndrome were confirmed as risk factors to HA-VTE. Large confidence intervals are related to the sample size; however, the results were significant.

Introduction

In the past two decades, venous thromboembolism (VTE) has been recognized as an essential complication in pediatric patients. In the last ten years, VTE incidence has reached 42–58 cases of venous thromboembolism (VTE) for every 100,000 children admitted, according to information from the database of pediatric patients admitted to hospitals in the United States of America (USA). This same database showed that VTE incidence is much higher in hospitalized children (40.2/10,000 versus 7.8/10,000 outpatients). Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is currently considered the second leading cause of preventable harm in hospitalized patients, according to a study conducted in 80 pediatric hospitals in the USA [1-3]. The clinical consequences of DVT in children are significant since it is estimated that around 25% of children with DVT in the extremities develop signs and/or symptoms of chronic venous insufficiency (known as a post-thrombotic syndrome) [4] and 16–20% evolve with confirmed pulmonary embolism (PE) with a mortality rate of 2–9% in these patients [5, 6].

Hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism (HA-VTE) comprises multiple risk factors that should not be evaluated separately due to collinearity and multiple cause and effect relationships [7]. For this reason, a novel method that allows a visual representation of theoretical assumptions of a process understudy that is easily interpreted by the reader, encouraging an iterative process of updating and revising theories about causal relationships, helping researchers in avoiding unintentional confounds and colliders (a common effect of two variables (i.e., exposure and an outcome) could be useful. Thus, the present study aims to improve the identification of risk factors for HA-VTE development in children using a novel approach, the directed acyclic graph (DAG), that seems to gather these necessary features [8] to deal with confounding factors of real-life.

Material and methods

Study design

We conducted an observational, case-control study to evaluate risk factors for the development of hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism (HA-VTE) in children.

Ethics and IRB approval

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (CAAE 58056516.0.0000.5264).

Subjects

Children (newborn to 16 years old) hospitalized from May 24th, 2012 to August 31st, 2018, who developed hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism (cases) and randomized controls on a ratio of 1:3, matched by age (range), sex, unit of admission, and period of hospitalization (up to a 6-month interval). The study was held at a university hospital in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (Instituto de Puericultura e Pediatria Martagão Gesteira, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro), a 65-bed, tertiary care hospital (46 nursery beds, eight intensive care unit, and 11 emergency beds), with 25 pediatric subspecialties.

Sample size

For the case-control study, 22 cases and 76 controls were selected on a ratio of 1:3 after statistical power calculation considering previous studies.

Inclusion and selection criteria

Cases were defined as patients who developed hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism (HA-VTE) according to the International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) [9] criteria set as i) signs, symptoms, or radiological diagnosis of venous thromboembolism (VTE): deep venous thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism no sooner than two days of hospital admission; ii) Absence of documentation of signs or symptoms consistent with VTE in the admission history and physical exam; iii) Length of hospitalization of at least two days; iv) Diagnosis of VTE less than two days of hospital admission but a previous history of hospitalization in the last 30 days; v) Cases were classified as HA-VTE radiologically proved. Radiological diagnosis of VTE was confirmed using compression ultrasonography with Doppler imaging for objective confirmation of extremity DVT, with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for suspected extension into deep pelvic or abdominal veins, and spiral CT for pulmonary embolism (PE) confirmation. The Doppler ultrasound exam was registered in a separate file and not always was attached to the patient chart, so we revised it separately. Cases were selected using four different strategies: i) Pharmacy software (disposal of anticoagulants); ii) International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) codes for VTE; iii) Radiology report; iv) Active screening by medical students (only for the prospective phase of the study for one year, from August 1st, 2017 to August 31st, 2018. Controls were defined as hospitalized patients (for more than two days) and lack of history, signs, or symptoms of thrombotic events after evaluating patients charts and radiological records. Each case had an identification number, and three controls were selected using our institution software database according to the following matching characteristics: i) Age group (0-1y; 1-5y; 6-10y; 11-15y); ii) Sex (male; female); iii) Unit of admission (Emergency, Nursery, and Pediatric Intensive Care Unit); iv) Period of hospitalization (from the onset of signs, symptoms or radiological diagnosis of VTE in the cases, what came first, to 180 days after discharge). If more than three controls were found, web-based randomization was performed (http://www.random.org). Cases and controls criteria were confirmed by two independent reviewers (MP and LRC).

Exclusion criteria

Cases that only had thrombotic events other than VTE (deep venous thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism) such as isolated superficial venous thrombosis, isolated thrombotic microangiopathy, and isolated arterial thrombosis were excluded from the study.

Missing data criteria

Patients (cases or controls) that did not have adequate chart information during data collection were excluded.

Data collection

Variables were categorized in baseline, follow-up, and outcome. Baseline variables evaluated in cases were case selection strategy (pharmacy, ICD-10, radiology report, or active screening), case thrombotic event (DVT, PE, superficial venous thrombosis, arterial thrombosis, and thrombotic microangiopathy), vessel involved in VTE by radiological reports (upper and lower limbs, pulmonary, intra-abdominal and central nervous system). Variables evaluated in both cases and controls included: demographic variables (age, gender, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), date of VTE diagnosis, length of stay, hospital unit location, and comorbidity using ICD-10 codes), clinical data on VTE prophylaxis (heparin, vitamin K antagonists, pneumatic compression devices, early mobilization, and physiotherapy), putative risk factors (prematurity, obesity according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definition [10, 11], surgery, immobilization for more than 72 hours, reason for immobilization (critical patient, post-operative, physical disability, plaster), ICU admission, length of stay in ICU, mechanical ventilation, days on mechanical ventilation, trauma, trauma on the site of VTE, central venous catheterization (information regarding type, location, unsuccessful previous attempt), drugs (L-asparaginase and corticosteroids), heart failure, inflammatory/autoimmune disease, liver failure, nephrotic syndrome, thrombophilia, family history of thrombosis, dehydration, polycythemia, and cancer. Follow-up variables for cases were the type of VTE therapy (heparin, vitamin K antagonist, vena cava filter, thrombolysis), the dosage of anticoagulant used, bleeding and its classification (according to ISTH [12]), and laboratory test used for anticoagulation monitoring: International Normalized Ratio (INR), Partial Thromboplastin Time (TTP), and anti-factor Xa. Outcome variables were death (cases and controls), pulmonary embolism (for patients with previous DVT), the extension of the VTE (radiology proved), and the transformation from non-occlusive to occlusive VTE.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to define distributions of continuous variables, frequencies, and proportions of categorical variables, which were then compared between cases and controls using Mann-Whitney U and χ2 tests. Fisher’s exact test was used in place of χ2 in instances of a two-by-two table with a five or under frequency value in at least one cell. Results were expressed as odds ratios (ORs), with accompanying 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) calculated by the Wald method. To evaluate the trend rate of HA-VTE incidence in the last years, we implemented a temporal series analysis with data from 2012 to 2017. The Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) was adopted. The cases were divided into three different age categories: all ages, less than six years, and 6 to 15 years old. The linear correlation between the HA-VTE rate and the years was evaluated by R-square (coefficient of determination).

Due to a large number of potential variables that could confound or mediate the causal effect of the exposure (risk factors of HA-VTE) on the outcome (VTE), a directed acyclic graph (DAG) model was created to reduce bias, improve transparency, and increase precision on the analysis.

Variables included in DAG were clustered in four different groups: (1) exposure variables (mechanical ventilation, liver failure, ICU admission, catheter, heart failure, obesity, and length of stay), (2) forced-variables (heart failure, obesity, and liver failure–not linked to other risk factors in the model), (3) non-forced variables (immobilization, local trauma, nephrotic syndrome, surgery, infection, hematologic malignancies, L-asparaginase, autoimmune/inflammatory disease, corticosteroids, and venous thromboembolism) and (4) non-observed variables (dehydration, first-degree family history of thrombosis, and thrombophilia–variables with missing data not included in the statistical analysis). We selected eight main exposure variables: central venous catheter, intensive care unit stay, mechanical ventilation, and length of stay were based on the systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors and risk-assessment models published by Mahajerin A et al. [7]. Other risk factors comprised in DAG such as liver failure, heart failure, immobilization, local trauma, nephrotic syndrome, surgery, infection, hematologic malignancies, L-asparaginase, autoimmune/inflammatory disease, and corticosteroids were also included based on our assumption that diseases work as leading players on the development of VTE and are usually connected with other risk factors. One example is that we typically do not see children with infection alone having VTE. Obesity was also included because it was one of our hypotheses as a risk factor for pediatric VTE, and it is not yet fully explored in other studies. After selecting the exposure variables, we created directed paths using a browser-based software DAGitty (http://www.dagitty.net) (Fig 1). Variables were represented according to the software pattern (Fig 2). A family history of thrombosis and thrombophilia are described as unobserved variables because we intended to collect it, but essential information was lacking during data analysis.

Fig 1

Directed acyclic graph (DAG) model of hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism (HA-VTE) in children.

Fig 2

Representation of the variables using DAGitty software.

We used the algorithm proposed by Greenland et al. [13-16] to control potential confounders in the context of rare outcomes, data sparsity, and multicollinearity. It is especially useful when the number of covariates is significant to the study size. Therefore, we implemented the following steps: (1) selection of the variables that are appropriate to include using a causal directed acyclic graph (DAG) to exhibit theorized causal relations among variables; (2) division of the variables into three classes: (i) the main exposure X; (ii) forced-in variables (e.g., age, sex) (iii) the non-forced variables which will be candidates for deletion; (3) building a Full Model, through conditional logistic regression model, including all main exposure terms, forced-in variables, and non-forced variables. The next step was to select which variables of the Full Model would be included in the final parsimonious adjusted model (Final Model). We applied three methods to obtain this Final Model to validate the results of each modeling process: (1) assess, and thereby minimize, mean squared error (MSE) using forward selection strategy, as we indicated sparse-data bias; (2) usual forward method, using the likelihood ratio stepwise selection from the variables presented in the Full Model; (3) usual backward deletion method, using likelihood ratio stepwise selection with a previous traditional multicollinearity analysis from the variables presented in the Full Model. The first method was implemented in Microsoft Excel® (2016) software, and the two last traditional methods, using SPSS Statistics® (version 25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.) Interestingly, all methods resulted in the same Final Model (Table 3).

Table 3

Multivariate regression models.

FINAL MODEL
	ORb (95%CIa)	p
Length of stay	1.108 (1.024–1.199)	0.011
L-asparaginase	27.184 (1.639–450.982)	0.021
Nephrotic syndrome	31.481 (1.182–838.706)	0.039
Mechanical ventilation	0.18 (0–1.318)	0.067

aC.I: confidence interval;

bOR: odds-ratio

Statistical significant differences are in bold.

Ethics statement

This study was carried out in strict accordance with resolution 466 of the National Commission of Ethics Research of National Health Council of the Brazilian Ministry of Health. The protocol was approved by the Instituto de Puericultura e Pediatria Martagão Gesteira (IPPMG) of Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Review Board (CAAE 58056516.0.0000.5264). Because of the study’s ambidirectional design, in the retrospective arm, the requirement to obtain informed consent from the legal persons responsible for the individuals under study was waived by our institutional review board. In the prospective arm, the written parental or guardians informed consent, and the child assent was obtained. It is a merely observational and descriptive analysis, and it does not offer physical and/or biological risk. The researchers assured the confidentiality of individuals identification, and the data were delinked entirely from any personal identifiers before they were analyzed to ensure confidentiality.

Results and discussion

Given the 6,295 hospitalizations during six years of the study, this yielded an average HA-VTE of 5.73 per 10,000 hospitalized children per year. Twenty-six cases of hospital-associated venous thromboembolism (HA-VTE) were diagnosed during the six years of observation. However, only 22 cases were enrolled after applying the validation criteria for venous thromboembolism (VTE) cases selection and loss due to missing data (Fig 3). The flowchart represented in Fig 3 shows that of 24 HA-VTE that met the inclusion criteria, two patients were lost due to difficulty accessing the medical record (one case), and another patient was hospitalized when the study ended.

Fig 3

Flow diagram showing the inclusion, exclusion, and missing data criteria for the selection of case subjects.

Most cases (86.36%; n = 19/22) were found using data bank of the pharmacy sector stored in MV 2000® software (Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil). The remaining three cases (13.63%) that were not anticoagulated were detected by active screening (13.63%; n = 3/22) and Radiology report (9.09%; n = 2/22). These twenty-two cases were matched to 76 randomly selected controls. There was no difference in VTE’s frequency between cases and controls regarding sex, age, and unit of admission as expected due to matching (Table 1). We did not observe peak VTE in infancy due to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and Adolescent ward’s absence in the hospital.

Table 1

Matching characteristics of cases versus controls.

Matching variables	N (%)
	CASES (22)	CONTROLS (76)	p
Sex
Male	11 (50%)	39 (51.31%)	0.9113
Female	11(50%)	37 (48.68%)
Age at admission
Median (IQRa)	7.85 (7.76)	5.26 (7.68)	0.133
0–1 y	3 (13.63%)	15 (19.73%)	0.636
1–5 y	6 (27.27%)	27 (35.5%)
6–10 y	7 (31.81%)	21 (27.63%)
11–15 y	6 (27.27%)	13 (17.10%)
Unit of admission
Intensive Care Unit	7 (31.81%)	21 (27.63%)
Emergency Room	0	2 (2.63%)	ns
Nursery	15 (68.18%)	53 (69.73%)
aIQR, interquartile range

Four patients (4/22; 18.2%) presented with VTE signs and symptoms less than 48 hours of admission and were previously hospitalized in the last 30 days. Regarding the VTE site, two patients (2/22; 9%) had a pulmonary embolism (PE), including one associated with deep venous thrombosis (DVT). One patient (1/22; 4.5%) had superficial venous thrombosis (SVT) associated with DVT, and two patients (2/22; 9%) had thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) associated with DVT.

The median time from hospital admission to VTE diagnosis was 28.5 days (IQR 32 days), and the most frequently associated signs and symptoms of DVT were edema (19/22; 86.3%), pain (6/22; 27.3%), discoloration of the limb (5/22; 22.3%) and warmness (2/22; 9%). Two patients (2/22; 9%) had PE and presented with the following symptoms: one with cough and hemoptysis and the other with dyspnea, tachypnea, cough, and tachycardia. Only one patient had cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) and presented with seizures. He had a diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and was treated with L-asparaginase. DVT cases were diagnosed using Doppler ultrasound and PE with a CT scan. The 22 patients had 42 sites of VTE (Fig 4) which included lower limbs (26/42; 61.90%); intra-abdominal (4/42; 9.52%)–inferior vena cava (2/4; 50%), hepatic vein (1/4; 25%) and renal vein thrombosis(1/4; 25%); central nervous system (3/42; 7.14%), upper limbs (3/42; 7.14%) and pulmonary arteries (2/42; 4.76%).

Fig 4

Distribution of VTE sites.

Only one patient (1/22; 4.55%) developed VTE while on the prophylactic use of subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in a dosage of 1 mg/kg, once daily, on day 30. She was a 15-years old adolescent with encephalitis admitted in the ICU with several risk factors, including immobilization (30 days), mechanical ventilation (14 days), and catheter on the same site of VTE (right common femoral vein). Another patient developed recurrent VTE even on therapeutic LMWH. She was a 3-year old patient with Down syndrome with several risk factors, including high-risk ALL treated with L-asparaginase and corticosteroids, gastrointestinal infection and febrile neutropenia, obesity, and thrombophilia (combined heterozygosity for methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase and factor V Leiden). DVT occurred on the left femoral common vein with previous attempting of catheter insertion. In our cohort, there were no cases or controls diagnosed with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC).

The risk factors for HA-VTE among cases versus controls are presented in Table 2. The median length of stay was higher in cases (39 days–IQR: 39) than controls (6.5 days–IQR: 11). Central venous catheter (CVC) use was higher in cases (81.81%) than controls (46.05%). Long-term CVCs were identified in 16.66% of catheterized patients, with the remainder (83.33%) having short-term CVCs (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter [PICC] lines, temporary jugular, subclavian or femoral lines). ICU admission in the last 30 days was seen more frequently in cases (13/22; 59.09%) than controls (25/76; 32.89%). Infection was also more frequent in cases (17/22; 77.27%) than controls (33/76; 43.42%) with no difference between local or systemic ones. L-asparaginase use was higher in cases (6/22; 27.27%) than controls (2/76; 2.63%). Heart and liver failure were more common in cases (3/22; 16.63% and 3/22; 13.63%, respectively) than controls (1/76; 1.32% and 2/76; 2.63%, respectively). Nephrotic syndrome was seen in 22.72% (5/22) of cases compared to 1.32% (1/76) of controls. We did not observe any difference between cases and controls regarding obesity, surgery, mechanical ventilation, length of mechanical ventilation, trauma, corticosteroid use, inflammation/autoimmune disease, or neoplasia.

Table 2

Univariate analysis to identify potential risk factors for HA-VTE among cases versus controls.

Risk factors for HA-VTE	N (%)
	CASES (24)	CONTROLS (76)	OR	p-Value
Length of stay (days)
Median (IQRa)	39 (39)	6.5 (11)	1.054 (1.018–1.092)	0.003
More than 7 days
Yes	21	34	25.94 (3.32–202.81)	<0.001
No	1	42
Nutritional status	N = 22	N = 73
Obese	5 (22.72%)	9 (11.84%)	2.19 (0.65–7.34)	0.198
Non-obese	17 (77.27%)	67 (88.15%)
Surgery
Yes	5 (22.72%)	23 (30.26%)	0.678 (0.223–2.058)	0.491
No	17 (77.27%)	53 (69.74%)
Immobility
Yes	13 (59.09%)	38 (50%)	1.444 (0.552–3.778)	0.452
No	9 (40.90%)	38 (50%)
ICU admissions last 30 days
Yes	13 (59.09%)	25 (32.89%)	2.947 (1.111–7.815)	0.003
No	9 (40.90%)	51 (67.11%)
Length of stay in ICU
Median (IQRa)	8.5 (55)	5.5 (5)	1.059 (0.98–1.43)	0.147
Mechanical ventilation
Yes	6 (27.27%)	19 (25.00%)	1.125 (0.385–3.288)	0.829
No	16 (72.72%)	57 (75.00%)
Length of mechanical ventilation
Median (IQRa)	10.5 (23)	4 (8)	1.201 (0.880–1.638)	0.249
Infection
Yes	17 (77.27%)	33 (43.42%)	4.430 (1.481–13.249)	0.005
No	5 (22.72%)	43 (56.58%)
Catheter
Yes	18 (81.81%)	35 (46.05%)	5.271 (1.630–17.045)	0.003
No	4 (18.18%)	41 (53.95%)
L-asparaginase
Yes	6 (27.27%)	2 (2.63%)	13.875 (2.562–75.128)	<0.001
No	16 (72.72%)	74 (97.37%)
Corticosteroids
Yes	14 (63.63%)	32 (42.11%)	2.406 (0.902–6.416)	0.074
No	8 (36.36%)	44 (57.89%)
Heart failure
Yes	3 (13.63%)	1 (1.32%)	11.842 (1.165–120.32)	0.010
No	19 (86.36%)	75 (98.68%)
Inflammatory/autoimmune disease
Yes	3 (13.63%)	6 (7.89%)	1.842 (0.421–8.058)	0.411
No	19 (86.36%)	70 (92.11%)
Liver failure
Yes	3 (13.63%)	2 (2.63%)	5.842 (0.910–37.486)	0.038
No	19 (86.36%)	74 (97.37%)
Nephrotic syndrome
Yes	5 (22.72%)	1 (1.32%)	22.059 (2.418–201.219)	<0.001
No	17 (77.27%)	75 (98.68%)
Neoplasia
Yes	6 (27.27%)	15 (19.74%)	1.525 (0.510–4.559)	0.448
No	16 (72.72%)	61 (80.26%)

aIQR, interquartile range

For estimating the direct effect of the exposure variables (heart failure, ICU admission, length of stay, liver failure, mechanical ventilation, catheter, and obesity) on the outcome (venous thromboembolism), the software recommended an adjustment on corticosteroids, hematologic malignancies, immobilization, infection, L-asparaginase, local trauma, nephrotic syndrome, and surgery (S1 and S2 Tables). After that, we created two different multivariate regression models: (1) Full Model, utilizing all risk factors for VTE that were statistically significant, and a (2) Final Model after adjustment (Table 3). Length of stay (LOS), liver failure, L-asparaginase use, and nephrotic syndrome were independent risk factors for hospital-associated venous thromboembolism in children.

We found a significant increase in HA-VTE incidence across all age groups from 2012 to 2017, with a similar trend rate reported in a multicenter study in the United States [1]. To our knowledge, this is the first study of hospital-associated venous thromboembolism using a directed acyclic graph (DAG) to deal with multiple confounding risk factors.

The DAG is a visual representation of a process understudy’s theoretical assumptions that the reader quickly interprets, encouraging an iterative process of updating and revising theories about causal relationships. A DAG-informed approach helps researchers in avoiding unintentional confounds and colliders (a common effect of two variables (i.e., exposure and an outcome), that is represented in DAG by the two arrows pointing toward it [13], arousing from these variables). The DAG approach has limitations because it does not eliminate all sources of bias; it is time-consuming and requires a broad literature review and evidence-based understanding of causal relationships. It is also a pre-requisite to choose between minimally enough adjustment sets considering all variables that are well measured and well specified with little missing data. Likewise, as with any analytic approach, DAGs cannot account for unmeasured confounding or potential covariates not determined from the literature [17]. There is a robust literature supporting DAG theory and technique [8, 13, 18], but this approach has not yet been broadly adopted, although it has been highly recommended by experts in the field of biostatistics [15].

We found the length of stay (LOS), L-asparaginase use, and nephrotic syndrome to be independent risk factors for hospital-associated venous thromboembolism in children. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors and risk-assessment models by Mahajerin A et al. [7], a central venous catheter (CVC), intensive care unit stay, mechanical ventilation, and length of stay were identified as leading risk factors in the case-control studies. Most of these studies did not systematically evaluate the more common comorbidities. Besides mechanical ventilation, those factors were also considered risk factors (p<0.005) in univariate analysis in our study, but not all of them were maintained in the final multivariate model. This finding emphasizes the importance of considering the comorbidity as essential covariable to be included in VTE case-controls studies as interventions (i.e., catheter) occur in sick children.

Length of stay (LOS) has been a consistently identified risk factor, but the mechanism by which it increases VTE’s risk is not fully understood. It works as a proxy that also covers unknown risk factors not yet investigated. We postulate some theoretical relationships that were represented by DAG analysis (Fig 1). Length of stay (LOS) is a risk factor that remains in many case-control and non-case-control studies, suggesting that it acts as a proxy for known and unknown risk factors. Among the known risk factors, some are very insightful, such as length of stay in the ICU, trauma, immobilization, and surgery. In a scenario of multiple risk factors with numerous medical conditions and interventions, it is expected that a meticulous structured statistical model is needed, a good reason for using the DAG concept. Following DAG analysis, LOS persisted as a critical risk factor, suggesting that relevant factors are not yet considered in our theoretical model and, therefore, not controlled in multivariate analysis. One could argue that LOS’s persistence as a risk factor would be a small sample size issue. However, even larger studies [19, 20], including a recent comparative validation study of risk assessment models for pediatric hospital-acquired venous using the ’Children’s Hospital-Acquired Thrombosis (CHAT) registry [21], still confirm the importance of LOS. Another reason is those unknown elements, such as biological or biochemical factors involved in VTE’s genesis, are not yet understood, identified, or available in clinical studies. For this reason, we still do not have enough knowledge to explain all the relationships related to LOS and venous thromboembolism, an issue that requires further investigation.

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common pediatric cancer and, therefore, the most frequent malignancy associated with VTE in childhood. The incidence of VTE ranges from 5 to 70% when imaging studies identify asymptomatic cases. Asparaginase is a crucial chemotherapy agent in the treatment of ALL and can induce an acquired deficiency of protein C, S, and antithrombin [22]. Most thrombotic events occur in the upper venous system and the central nervous system (CVST) [23] with a potential of severe consequences. Adult studies showed that prophylactic anticoagulation could be safely administered without increasing the number or severity of bleeding events, resulting in a reduction in VTE’s cumulative incidence [24] in ALL patients. Hence, VTE prophylaxis [25] or protein replacement with fresh frozen plasma [26] has recently been proposed in patients with ALL during the induction period with pediatric clinical trials ongoing. In our study, prophylactic anticoagulation in ALL was not employed.

Nephrotic syndrome is another prototype for pediatric VTE with multifactorial and complex pathophysiology. The nonselective proteinuria results in hemostatic abnormalities mainly due to loss of anticoagulant and fibrinolytic proteins (such as antithrombin III, plasminogen, protein S, and plasmin) and increase of prothrombotic substances (factor V, VIII, alpha-2 macroglobulin, thromboxane A2, and fibrinogen) produced by the liver to balance the loss of anticoagulant elements contributing to a procoaguable state [27]. Other reported risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in this population include infection, CVCs, diuretics, and intravascular volume depletion [28]. In our study, 5 of 6 (83.33%) patients with nephrotic syndrome developed VTE. Infection (60%), CVC (40%), and ICU admission (20%) were also seen in most patients. Our study showed a higher percentage (83.33%) of nephrotic patients with VTE, considering a recent cohort study of 370 children with nephrotic syndrome admitted to 17 pediatric hospitals across North America from 2010 to 2012, where only 11 (3%) of patients developed VTE [28].

Mechanical ventilation was not statistically significant in the final model but remained to adjust confounding factors.

The limitations of our study include the small sample size (as a result of single-center research) and the retrospective nature and the missing of some information on patient’s charts, i.e., lack of data on hypercoagulability, absence of radiological documentation of all VTE events—a real-life situation in underdeveloped countries. One of the reasons our sample was not larger was that our hospital does not admit patients with solid malignancies, does not perform cardiothoracic and orthopedic surgery, and the emergency department is referred only for patients who are attended in the outpatient clinic (i.e., not trauma patients). There are some explanations about why the findings in our study were different from other publications. Potential covariates, unmeasured confounding, and lower statistical power could be fundamental reasons that justify these differences. On the other hand, we evaluated the comorbidities in our DAG model, which could have lessened medical interventions’ significance as the leading risk factor of HA-VTE. We hope that the more extensive ongoing studies that will probably consider the role of comorbidities can establish the medical intervention’s real weight in HA-VTE in children.

Our study has some important strengths. To our knowledge, this is the first case-control study of pediatric HA-VTE using DAG analysis worldwide, and the first pediatric case-control HA-VTE study in Brazil. Our study’s DAG-based approach highlighted the importance of medical conditions, appeared as the most critical variables, and made us question if therapeutic interventions would be only triggers or proxies "tip of the iceberg" for the observed thrombosis. Researchers should consider medical conditions (i.e., nephrotic syndrome, ALL) in risk-assessment models besides directing spotlights to interventions (i.e., catheters).

Conclusions

We reported the importance of medical conditions on the genesis of HA-VTE using a DAG-based approach, which makes it possible to clarify the influence of confounders and multiple causalities, such as a catheter, a significant risk factor highlighted in several studies. This approach is rational since children that use intravenous devices are sick, so it is not reasonable to put all the weight on a catheter since other risk factors play an essential role in VTE. Besides that, we reported an increase of HA-VTE events along the years of the study, which suggests that educational actions should be performed to prepare the clinical team to deal with these patients and teach medical students and residents since it is a university hospital. Finally, an international effort should be made to increase the robustness of data and balance the different characteristics of pediatric hospitals globally to create offset risk-assessment models and, therefore, adequate protocols for HA-VTE prophylaxis in children. We suggest that the DAG methodology used in this article be applied in future HA-VTE multicenter studies.

DAG flowchart code.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.

Conditional independence and minimal sufficient adjustment proposed by the DAG model.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.