Literature DB >> 33185725

Prevalence and risk factors of scapular stress fracture after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a multicentric retrospective study.

O Verstraete1, B Van der Mast2, A Van Tongel3, A Karelse3, H Van der Bracht4, B Berghs5, T Van Isacker5, P Verniers4, L De Wilde3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Scapular stress fracture (sSF) is a difficult complication to treat after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). The aim of this study was to identify the prevalence and possible risk factors in a large population.
METHODS: A total of 2165 RSAs that were implanted between January 2006 and October 2017 in five hospitals were evaluated. Within this cohort, sSF was radiologically confirmed. Age, gender, surgical indication and hospital of treatment were determined for the entire cohort. A matched 3:1 case-control study was then performed to investigate several clinical and surgical variables.
RESULTS: sSF occurred in 3.1% (63 patients), with a median time interval of five months post-operative [IQR = 9, range: (1-79)]. Within the entire cohort, females (OR = 2.99) and rotator cuff arthropathy (RCA) (OR = 2.79) were more prone to this complication. Age had little influence (OR = 1.03). After exclusion, fifty-five eligible cases were matched to 165 controls based on hospital, gender, age and surgical indication. After univariable analysis, significance was obtained for osteopenia (P = 0.037), osteoporosis (P = 0.032), surgical approach (P = 0.002) and peri-operative acromioclavicular (AC) joint surgery (P = 0.035). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that osteopenia (OR = 3.94), osteoporosis (OR = 2.85) and a deltopectoral approach (OR = 3.70) were independent risk factors.
CONCLUSION: According to our findings, older women with poor bone quality and a history of RCA suffered more frequently from sSF. Anterolateral approach during surgery was a surgical protective factor, possibly due to the mobilization of the acromioclavicular joint. Although this study indicates who is at risk for sSF, further investigation for prevention of sSF in these patients is necessary.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acromion; Complication; Reverse shoulder arthroplasty; Risk factors; Scapula; Stress fracture

Year:  2020        PMID: 33185725     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-020-04849-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  4 in total

1.  Acromial and scapular spine fractures after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ian P Mayne; Simon N Bell; Warwick Wright; Jennifer A Coghlan
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-01-25

Review 2.  Surgical technique: the anterosuperior approach for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Daniel Molé; Frank Wein; Charles Dézaly; Philippe Valenti; François Sirveaux
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Scapula fractures after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: classification and treatment.

Authors:  Lynn A Crosby; Adam Hamilton; Todd Twiss
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Classification of postoperative acromial fractures following reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jonathan C Levy; Christopher Anderson; Anil Samson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.284

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.