Literature DB >> 33185136

Not just an information-delivery tool. An ethnographic study exploring Danish GPs' perspectives on and experiences with the relational potential of email consultation.

Elisabeth Assing Hvidt1,2, Jens Søndergaard1, Maja Klausen2, Anette Grønning2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore GPs' perspectives on and daily experiences with the relational potential of email consultations.
DESIGN: Qualitative study with data from participant observation and semi-structured interviews.
SETTING: General practice setting in Denmark.
SUBJECTS: Practice personnel from four clinics were observed and 16 GPs (seven women and nine men, between 35 and 70 years of age) interviewed. Field notes and interview data were analysed using an inductive thematic analysis approach. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Main themes and subthemes reporting GPs' perspectives on and experiences with the relational potential of email consultations.
RESULTS: The analyses showed that due to perceived interpretational shortcomings, the GPs generally experienced email consultation as unsuitable for communication about relational, socio-emotional and sensitive matters. In doctor-patient relationships founded on mutual knowledge and trust, the email consultation was however used as a supportive communication channel, as a way for the patient to express emotions and affect and for the GP to proactively show interest and compassion towards the patient.
CONCLUSION: Email consultations were highly context-variant. Within continuing relationships and in conjunction with face-to-face consultations, email consultation was used for supportive communication holding the potential for maintaining, strengthening and/or dissolving the GP-patient relationship. Therefore, email consultation is not simply an information-delivery tool but also holds more explicit relational potentials. KEY POINTS Overall, the GPs perceived email consultation as unsuitable for non-medical, relationship-oriented purposes. Nonetheless, the GPs experienced that email consultations oftentimes comprised communication about relational and socio-emotional issues. Knowledge of the patient was a vital factor for the GP's comfort in and acceptability of relational functions of email consultation. Email consultation is not simply an information-delivery tool as it holds the potential for maintaining, strengthening and/or dissolving the GP-patient relationship.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Denmark; Email consultation; doctor–patient relationship; general practice; interactive health communication

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33185136      PMCID: PMC7782285          DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2020.1843939

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care        ISSN: 0281-3432            Impact factor:   2.581


  16 in total

Review 1.  Email consultations in health care: 1--scope and effectiveness.

Authors:  Josip Car; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-08-21

2.  Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power.

Authors:  Kirsti Malterud; Volkert Dirk Siersma; Ann Dorrit Guassora
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2016-07-10

3.  Patients who use e-mediated communication with their doctor: new constructions of trust in the patient-doctor relationship.

Authors:  Hege K Andreassen; Marianne Trondsen; Per Egil Kummervold; Deede Gammon; Per Hjortdahl
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2006-02

4.  The practice of medical technology.

Authors:  Stefan Timmermans; Marc Berg
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2003

Review 5.  The impact of patient-physician web messaging on healthcare service provision.

Authors:  David McGeady; Jaakko Kujala; Karita Ilvonen
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 4.046

6.  Preparing residents for future practice: report of a curriculum for electronic patient-doctor communication.

Authors:  Bradley H Crotty; Arash Mostaghimi; Bruce E Landon
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 2.401

7.  Can e-mail messages between patients and physicians be patient-centered?

Authors:  Debra L Roter; Susan Larson; Daniel Z Sands; Daniel E Ford; Thomas Houston
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2008

8.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Doctors who are using e-mail with their patients: a qualitative exploration.

Authors:  Madhavi R Patt; Thomas K Houston; Mollie W Jenckes; Daniel Z Sands; Daniel E Ford
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2003 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  How do patients and general practitioners in Denmark perceive the communicative advantages and disadvantages of access via email consultations? A media-theoretical qualitative study.

Authors:  Anette Grønning; Elisabeth Assing Hvidt; Matilde Nisbeth Brøgger; Antoinette Fage-Butler
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  2 in total

1.  General Practitioners' Experiences of Professional Uncertainties Emerging from the Introduction of Video Consultations in General Practice: Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Maja Nordtug; Elisabeth Assing Hvidt; Elle Christine Lüchau; Anette Grønning
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-06-14

2.  Telemedicine consultations with physicians in Swedish primary care: a mixed methods study of users' experiences and care patterns.

Authors:  Felicia Gabrielsson-Järhult; Sofia Kjellström; Kristina Areskoug Josefsson
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 2.581

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.