Melitza S M Elizabeth1,2,3, Annemieke J M H Verkerk4, Anita C S Hokken-Koelega5,6,7, Joost A M Verlouw4, Jesús Argente8,9,10,11, Roland Pfaeffle12, Sebastian J C M M Neggers4, Jenny A Visser4, Laura C G de Graaff4,7. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. m.elizabeth@erasmusmc.nl. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Subdiv. Endocrinology, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. m.elizabeth@erasmusmc.nl. 3. Dutch Growth Research Foundation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. m.elizabeth@erasmusmc.nl. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Pediatrics, Subdiv. Endocrinology, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 6. Dutch Growth Research Foundation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 7. Academic Center for Rare Growth Disorders, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 8. Department of Endocrinology, Fundación Investigación Biomédica del Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica la Princesa, Madrid, Spain. 9. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Fisiología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBEROBN), Madrid, Spain. 10. IMDEA Food Institute, Campus of International Excellence (CEI) UAM + CSIC, Madrid, Spain. 11. Department of Pediatrics, University Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. 12. Hospital for Children and Adolescents, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Congenital hypopituitarism (CH) can cause significant morbidity or even mortality. In the majority of patients, the etiology of CH is unknown. Understanding the etiology of CH is important for anticipation of clinical problems and for genetic counselling. Our previous studies showed that only a small proportion of cases have mutations in the known 'CH genes'. In the current project, we present the results of SNP array based copy number variant analysis in a family with unexplained congenital hypopituitarism. METHODS: DNA samples of two affected brothers with idiopathic CH and their mother were simultaneously analyzed by SNP arrays for copy number variant analysis and Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) for mutation screening. DNA of the father was not available. RESULTS: We found a 6 Mb duplication including GPR101 and SOX3 on the X-chromosome (Xq26.2-q27.1) in the two siblings and their mother, leading to 2 copies of this region in the affected boys and 3 copies in the mother. Duplications of GPR101 are associated with X-linked acrogigantism (the phenotypic 'opposite' of the affected brothers), whereas alterations in SOX3 are associated with X-linked hypopituitarism. CONCLUSION: In our patients with hypopituitarism we found a 6 Mb duplication which includes GPR101, a gene associated with X- linked gigantism, and SOX3, a gene involved in early pituitary organogenesis that is associated with variable degrees of hypopituitarism. Our findings show that in duplications containing both GPR101 and SOX3, the growth hormone deficiency phenotype is dominant. This suggests that, if GPR101 is duplicated, it might not be expressed phenotypically when early patterning of the embryonic pituitary is affected due to SOX3 duplication. These results, together with the review of the literature, shed a new light on the role of GPR101 and SOX3 in pituitary function.
PURPOSE:Congenital hypopituitarism (CH) can cause significant morbidity or even mortality. In the majority of patients, the etiology of CH is unknown. Understanding the etiology of CH is important for anticipation of clinical problems and for genetic counselling. Our previous studies showed that only a small proportion of cases have mutations in the known 'CH genes'. In the current project, we present the results of SNP array based copy number variant analysis in a family with unexplained congenital hypopituitarism. METHODS: DNA samples of two affected brothers with idiopathic CH and their mother were simultaneously analyzed by SNP arrays for copy number variant analysis and Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) for mutation screening. DNA of the father was not available. RESULTS: We found a 6 Mb duplication including GPR101 and SOX3 on the X-chromosome (Xq26.2-q27.1) in the two siblings and their mother, leading to 2 copies of this region in the affected boys and 3 copies in the mother. Duplications of GPR101 are associated with X-linked acrogigantism (the phenotypic 'opposite' of the affected brothers), whereas alterations in SOX3 are associated with X-linked hypopituitarism. CONCLUSION: In our patients with hypopituitarism we found a 6 Mb duplication which includes GPR101, a gene associated with X- linked gigantism, and SOX3, a gene involved in early pituitary organogenesis that is associated with variable degrees of hypopituitarism. Our findings show that in duplications containing both GPR101 and SOX3, the growth hormone deficiency phenotype is dominant. This suggests that, if GPR101 is duplicated, it might not be expressed phenotypically when early patterning of the embryonic pituitary is affected due to SOX3 duplication. These results, together with the review of the literature, shed a new light on the role of GPR101 and SOX3 in pituitary function.
Authors: M Lagerström-Fermér; M Sundvall; E Johnsen; G L Warne; S M Forrest; J D Zajac; A Rickards; D Ravine; U Landegren; U Pettersson Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 1997-04 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Arnaud Uguen; Matthieu Talagas; Sylvia Quémener-Redon; Pascale Marcorelles; Marc De Braekeleer Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2015-04-21 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: Brian Bates; Lynn Zhang; Stan Nawoschik; Sreekumar Kodangattil; Eugene Tseng; David Kopsco; Angela Kramer; Qin Shan; Noël Taylor; Jeremy Johnson; Ying Sun; Hui Min Chen; Maria Blatcher; Janet E Paulsen; Mark H Pausch Journal: Brain Res Date: 2006-04-27 Impact factor: 3.252
Authors: D K Lee; T Nguyen; K R Lynch; R Cheng; W B Vanti; O Arkhitko; T Lewis; J F Evans; S R George; B F O'Dowd Journal: Gene Date: 2001-09-05 Impact factor: 3.688
Authors: Frédéric Laumonnier; Nathalie Ronce; Ben C J Hamel; Paul Thomas; James Lespinasse; Martine Raynaud; Christine Paringaux; Hans Van Bokhoven; Vera Kalscheuer; Jean-Pierre Fryns; Jamel Chelly; Claude Moraine; Sylvain Briault Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2002-11-08 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Edwina Sutton; James Hughes; Stefan White; Ryohei Sekido; Jacqueline Tan; Valerie Arboleda; Nicholas Rogers; Kevin Knower; Lynn Rowley; Helen Eyre; Karine Rizzoti; Dale McAninch; Joao Goncalves; Jennie Slee; Erin Turbitt; Damien Bruno; Henrik Bengtsson; Vincent Harley; Eric Vilain; Andrew Sinclair; Robin Lovell-Badge; Paul Thomas Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2010-12-22 Impact factor: 14.808