| Literature DB >> 33184622 |
Anh N Nguyen1,2, Astrid W B van Langeveld3, Jeanne H M de Vries3, M Arfan Ikram1, Cees de Graaf3, Monica Mars3, Trudy Voortman1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Taste preference is an important determinant of dietary intake and is influenced by taste exposure in early life. However, data on dietary taste patterns in early childhood are scarce.Entities:
Keywords: child nutrition; dietary patterns; infancy; infant diet; population-based; taste; tracking
Year: 2021 PMID: 33184622 PMCID: PMC7779211 DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa296
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Clin Nutr ISSN: 0002-9165 Impact factor: 8.472
General characteristics of the study population[1]
| Characteristic | |
|---|---|
| Maternal characteristics | |
| Age at enrollment, y | 31.4 ± 4.6 |
| Dutch ethnic background | 65.4 |
| Higher educational level | 62.8 |
| BMI at enrollment, kg/m2 | 23.5 (18.8–35.4) |
| Child characteristics | |
| Girls | 51.0 |
| Age at 1-y FFQ, mo | 12.9 (12.2–19.0) |
| Total energy intake at 1-y FFQ, kcal | 1270 (663–2279) |
| Breastfeeding duration, mo | 3.5 (0.5–12.0) |
| Breastfeeding in the first 4 mo | |
| Never | 12.8 |
| Partial | 59.4 |
| Exclusive | 27.8 |
| Introduction of complementary feeding | |
| After 6 mo | 37.9 |
| 3–6 mo | 56.4 |
| 0–3 mo | 5.7 |
| BMI at around age 1 y, kg/m2 | 17.1 ± 1.3 |
n = 3629. Values are means ± SDs for continuous variables with a normal distribution, medians (95% range) for continuous variables with a skewed distribution, and percentages for categorical variables. Values are based on imputed data (m = 10 imputations).
FIGURE 1Percentage energy intake from each taste pattern in children at the ages of 1 y (n = 3629) and 2 y (n = 844).
Tracking of dietary taste patterns between ages 1 and 2 y[1]
| Correlations | Cross-classifications[ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taste cluster | Correlation coefficient[ | % Same tertile | % Opposite tertile | κ (95% CI) |
| Neutral | 0.28 (0.21, 0.34)* | 42 | 16 | 0.17 (0.12, 0.23)* |
| Sweet and sour | 0.20 (0.13, 0.27)* | 42 | 17 | 0.15 (0.09, 0.21)* |
| Sweet and fat | 0.23 (0.16, 0.30)* | 40 | 17 | 0.14 (0.08, 0.20)* |
| Fat | 0.40 (0.34, 0.46)* | 48 | 12 | 0.28 (0.22, 0.33)* |
| Salt, umami, and fat | 0.25 (0.18, 0.31)* | 41 | 16 | 0.16 (0.10, 0.21)* |
n = 777. *P < 0.001.
Cross-classification into tertiles.
Pearson's correlation coefficient for the neutral taste cluster, Spearman's rank correlation coefficients for the other taste clusters.
Associations of maternal and child characteristics with %E from each taste cluster at the age of 1 y[1]
| Neutral β (95% CI) | Sweet and sour β (95% CI) | Sweet and fat β (95% CI) | Fat β (95% CI) | Salt, umami, and fat β (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal characteristics | |||||
| Maternal age, y | |||||
| Model 1 | 0.40 (0.30, 0.49)* | −0.04 (−0.10, 0.02) | −0.15 (−0.19, −0.12)* | −0.07 (−0.10, −0.04)* | −0.13 (−0.18, −0.09)* |
| Model 2 | 0.35 (0.25, 0.44)* | −0.09 (−0.15, −0.03) | −0.10 (−0.14, −0.06)* | −0.05 (−0.08, −0.01)* | −0.11 (−0.16, −0.07)* |
| Educational level | |||||
| Lower | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
| Higher | |||||
| Model 1 | 2.30 (1.31, 3.30)* | 0.64 (0.08, 1.19)* | −1.61 (−2.05, −1.16)* | −0.70 (−1.00, −0.40)* | −0.64 (−1.08, −0.20)* |
| Model 2 | 0.97 (−0.04, 1.99) | 0.51 (−0.09, 1.11) | −0.85 (−1.32, −0.37)* | −0.47 (−0.80, −0.15)* | −0.16 (−0.64, 0.31) |
| Maternal BMI, kg/m2 | |||||
| Model 1 | −0.24 (−0.34, −0.13)* | 0.02 (−0.04, 0.08) | 0.15 (0.10, 0.19)* | 0.04 (0.00, 0.07)* | 0.04 (−0.01, 0.09) |
| Model 2 | −0.20 (−0.30, −0.10)* | 0.04 (−0.02, 0.11) | 0.12 (0.07, 0.16)* | 0.03 (−0.01, 0.06) | 0.02 (−0.03, 0.07) |
| Ethnic background | |||||
| Dutch | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
| Non-Dutch | |||||
| Model 1 | 1.40 (0.49, 2.31)* | −2.92 (−3.46, −2.38)* | 0.78 (0.40, 1.16)* | 0.35 (0.06, 0.63)* | 0.39 (−0.04, 0.82) |
| Model 2 | 2.34 (1.42, 3.26)* | −2.93 (−3.50, −2.36)* | 0.31 (−0.08, 0.69) | 0.13 (−0.16, 0.43) | 0.15 (−0.29, 0.60) |
| Child characteristics | |||||
| Sex | |||||
| Boy | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
| Girl | |||||
| Model 1 | 0.58 (−0.28, 1.44) | 0.14 (−0.38, 0.66) | −0.26 (−0.62, 0.10) | −0.37 (−0.64, −0.10)* | −0.09 (−0.50, 0.31) |
| Model 2 | 0.29 (−0.54, 1.12) | 0.33 (−0.18, 0.85) | −0.29 (−0.64, 0.06) | −0.38 (−0.65, −0.11)* | 0.04 (−0.36, 0.45) |
| Child age at taste exposure assessment, mo | |||||
| Model 1 | −1.84 (−2.07, −1.61)* | 0.40 (0.26, 0.55)* | 0.57 (0.48, 0.67)* | 0.28 (0.21, 0.36)* | 0.58 (0.47, 0.68)* |
| Model 2 | −1.82 (−2.04, −1.60)* | 0.39 (0.25, 0.53)* | 0.58 (0.48, 0.67)* | 0.28 (0.21, 0.35)* | 0.57 (0.47, 0.68)* |
| Child BMI (SDS) | |||||
| Model 1 | −0.32 (−0.67, 0.04) | 0.18 (−0.03, 0.39) | −0.06 (−0.21, 0.08) | −0.03 (−0.14, 0.08) | 0.23 (0.07, 0.39)* |
| Model 2 | −0.19 (−0.54, 0.16) | 0.16 (−0.05, 0.38) | −0.13 (−0.28, 0.02) | −0.06 (−0.17, 0.05) | 0.22 (0.06, 0.38)* |
| Breastfeeding duration in infancy, mo | |||||
| Model 1 | 0.44 (0.32, 0.56)* | −0.22 (−0.29, −0.15)* | −0.12 (−0.17, −0.08)* | 0.00 (−0.04, 0.03) | −0.09 (−0.15, −0.03)* |
| Model 2 | 0.31 (0.19, 0.43)* | −0.20 (−0.27, −0.13)* | −0.07 (−0.12, −0.02)* | 0.02 (−0.02, 0.06) | −0.06 (−0.12, 0.00) |
| Timing of introduction of complementary feeding | |||||
| After 6 mo | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
| 3–6 mo | |||||
| Model 1 | −1.82 (−2.75, −0.90)* | 0.50 (−0.06, 1.06) | 0.67 (0.29, 1.04)* | 0.18 (−0.10, 0.47) | 0.47 (0.04, 0.90)* |
| Model 2 | −1.24 (−2.15, −0.34)* | 0.31 (−0.25, 0.86) | 0.46 (0.09, 0.83)* | 0.15 (−0.14, 0.43) | 0.33 (−0.10, 0.76) |
| 0–3 mo | |||||
| Model 1 | −3.16 (−5.18, −1.14)* | −0.87 (−2.08, 0.35) | 1.96 (1.15, 2.78)* | 0.85 (0.24, 1.46)* | 1.21 (0.28, 2.15)* |
| Model 2 | −2.25 (−4.22, −0.28)* | −0.79 (−1.97, 0.39) | 1.45 (0.65, 2.25)* | 0.68 (0.07, 1.30)* | 0.91 (−0.03, 1.85) |
n = 3629. Values are regression coefficients and 95% CIs from linear regression analyses and reflect differences in %E intake for each taste cluster. *Statistically significant at P < 0.05. Model 1 is univariable. Model 2 adjusted for all other maternal and child characteristics that were examined, i.e., obtained from a single model including all factors presented in the table. SDS, standard deviation score; %E, percentage energy.