Michal Bláha1, Václav Valeš1, Zdeněk Bastl1, Martin Kalbáč1, Hidetsugu Shiozawa1,2. 1. J. Heyrovský Institute of Physical Chemistry, Czech Academy of Sciences, Dolejškova 2155/3, CZ-182 23 Prague 8, Czech Republic. 2. Faculty of Physics, University of Vienna, Boltzmanngasse 5, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Abstract
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) represent a class of porous materials whose properties can be altered by doping with redox-active molecules. Despite advanced properties such as enhanced electrical conduction that doped MOFs exhibit, understanding physical mechanisms remains challenging because of their heterogeneous nature hindering experimental observations of host-guest interactions. Here, we show a study of charge transfer between Mn-MOF-74 and electron acceptors, 7,7,8,8-tetracyanoquinodimethane (TCNQ) and XeF2, employing selective enhancement of Raman scattering of different moieties under various optical-resonance conditions. We identify Raman modes of molecular components and elucidate that TCNQ gets oxidized into dicyano-p-toluoyl cyanide (DCTC-) while XeF2 fluorinates the MOF upon infiltration. The framework's linker in both cases acts as an electron donor as deduced from blue shifts of the C-O stretching mode accompanied by the emergence of a quinone-like mode. This work demonstrates a generally applicable methodology for investigating charge transfer in various donor-acceptor systems by means of resonance Raman spectroscopy.
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) represent a class of porous materials whose properties can be altered by doping with redox-active molecules. Despite advanced properties such as enhanced electrical conduction that doped MOFs exhibit, understanding physical mechanisms remains challenging because of their heterogeneous nature hindering experimental observations of host-guest interactions. Here, we show a study of charge transfer between Mn-MOF-74 and electron acceptors, 7,7,8,8-tetracyanoquinodimethane (TCNQ) and XeF2, employing selective enhancement of Raman scattering of different moieties under various optical-resonance conditions. We identify Raman modes of molecular components and elucidate that TCNQ gets oxidized into dicyano-p-toluoyl cyanide (DCTC-) while XeF2 fluorinates the MOF upon infiltration. The framework's linker in both cases acts as an electron donor as deduced from blue shifts of the C-O stretching mode accompanied by the emergence of a quinone-like mode. This work demonstrates a generally applicable methodology for investigating charge transfer in various donor-acceptor systems by means of resonance Raman spectroscopy.
Metal–organic
frameworks (MOFs) are a group of porous materials
composed of metal nodes and organic linkers. High porosity and low
density constitute MOFs’ excellent applicability in gas storage,
separation, and catalysis. Because of the demands of semiconductor
industries, MOFs are considered as materials for electronic devices,
such as field effect transistors, photodetectors, radiation detectors,
solar cells, supercapacitors, or chemical sensors.[1−9] Various synthetic design strategies were developed in the last decade
in order to produce frameworks with permanent porosity and long-range
charge transport. Whereas intrinsically conducting MOFs can be prepared
using a limited number of specific linkers containing sulfur atoms,
quinone groups, or aromatic amines,[5−7,9] another strategy consists in doping of nonconducting MOFs with redox-active
conjugated guest molecules.The host–guest interaction
is in specific cases accompanied
by a formation of donor–acceptor pair between the MOFs’
linker and the guest molecule, which may result in guest-induced emergent
properties of newly formed materials.[10] It was reported that the electrical conductivity of HKUST-1 can
be increased by six orders of magnitude to 7 S/m by doping with 7,7,8,8-tetracyanoquinodimethane
(TCNQ), a redox-active organic molecule.[11] Since this pioneering work, much effort has been devoted to the
investigation of emergent properties of TCNQ-doped HKUST-1[10,12−21] and some other MOFs[22−24] including Co-MOF-74.[25,26] Regarding
the principles governing charge transport in TCNQ-doped HKUST-1, superexchange
electron transport was suggested to explain the low activation energy.[13]M-MOF-74 (M = Mg, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co,
Ni, Cu, or Zn), also known
as M2(DOBDC) or CPO-27-M, is a MOF with honeycomb pores
composed of metal and 2,5-dihydroxyterephthalic acid. One coordination
site of the metal remains unoccupied and can interact with other ligands.[27] Host–guest interaction of M-MOF-74 with
various molecules has been previously investigated,[28−36] including molecular doping with TCNQ[25,26] or tetrathiafulvalene.[26] It was shown that the Co-MOF-74 changes its
physical properties by accommodating TCNQ; strong intermolecular charge
transfer reduces the optical band gap down to 1.5 eV of divalent TCNQ
and enhances the electrical conduction, which allowed the Co-MOF-74
to be utilized for resistive gas- and photo-sensing.[25,26]In this contribution, Mn-MOF-74 is doped with two different
electron
acceptors: TCNQ and xenon difluoride (XeF2). Resonance
Raman spectroscopy using multiple laser lines elucidates the presence
of dicyano-p-toluoyl cyanide (DCTC–), an oxidation product of TCNQ2–, in Mn-MOF-74,
while exposure to vapors of XeF2, a powerful oxidative
fluorinating agent,[37] leads to fluorination
of Mn-MOF-74 (see Figure ). Both TCNQ-doped and fluorinated Mn-MOF-74 are found to
exhibit consistent changes in the Raman modes of the hosting network,
which can be attributed to oxidation of the linker. The methodology
for the identification of charge states of MOFs’ linkers and
molecular dopants by means of resonance Raman spectroscopy provides
the basis for a better understanding of physical properties of doped
MOFs such as enhanced conductivity.
Figure 1
Schematics for DCTC–-doped and fluorinated Mn-MOF-74.
Schematics for DCTC–-doped and fluorinated Mn-MOF-74.
Results
and Discussion
The UV–visible absorption spectra of
as-prepared nanocrystalline
Mn-MOF-74, TCNQ-infiltrated Mn-MOF-74, and neat TCNQ films are presented
in Figure . X-ray
diffraction analysis confirms the Mn-MOF-74 structure unchanged by
the infiltration. See Figure S1 in the Supporting Information. The spectrum of TCNQ shows intense absorption
bands at 356, 423, and 603 nm. The bands at 356 and 423 nm can be
of TCNQ0, while the band at 603 nm can be assigned to the
TCNQ– dimer.[38] The spectrum
of Mn-MOF-74 (Figure ) exhibits a strong absorption band at 417 nm. In turn, the spectrum
of TCNQ-doped Mn-MOF-74 exhibits bands at 424, 480, and 500 nm. Whereas
the broad band absorption in the region around 424 nm can be a superposition
of the band of Mn-MOF-74 at 417 nm and those of neutral TCNQ, the
emerging absorption bands at 480 and 500 nm indicate that TCNQ acts
as an electron acceptor in the TCNQ-doped Mn-MOF-74 system. According
to the literature, trianion TCNQ3– was reported
to exhibit absorption bands in this wavelength region.[39] Another candidate species is dicyano-p-toluoyl cyanide (DCTC–), an oxidation
product of TCNQ2– (Scheme ), exhibiting a broad absorption around 480
nm.[40,41] Note that in the previous report,[25] TCNQ-doped Co-MOF-74 nanocrystals in toluene
showed an intense absorption response at 660 nm that was attributed
to TCNQ2– of disproportionated TCNQ– dimer. In our case, no such absorption is observed in the respective
wavelength range.
Figure 2
UV–visible absorption spectra of as-prepared Mn-MOF-74,
TCNQ-infiltrated Mn-MOF-74, XeF2-altered Mn-MOF-74, and
neat TCNQ. Recorded for films on glass slides.
Scheme 1
Reduction of TCNQ to TCNQ2– Followed by Oxidation
to DCTC–
UV–visible absorption spectra of as-prepared Mn-MOF-74,
TCNQ-infiltrated Mn-MOF-74, XeF2-altered Mn-MOF-74, and
neat TCNQ. Recorded for films on glass slides.Raman spectra of TCNQ-doped Mn-MOF-74 recorded at excitation wavelengths
λexc = 458, 488, 514.5, 568, and 633 nm are plotted
in Figure (see the
full-range spectra in Figure S8 in the Supporting Information) together with those of Mn-MOF-74 and TCNQ recorded
at λexc = 633 nm. TCNQ has four intense Raman modes
at 1207, 1455, 1602, and 2227 cm–1, which can be
assigned to C–H bending (in-plane-deformation), exocyclic C=C
stretching, ring C=C stretching, and C≡N stretching
modes,[42] respectively. The two most intense
bands of Mn-MOF-74 located at 1275 and 1404 cm–1 can be assigned to the C–O stretching[29,36,43] and O–C–O symmetric stretching[29,36,43−45] modes of the
linker (2,5-dihydroxyterephthalic acid), respectively. In addition,
three bands are discerned at 1499, 1556, and 1613 cm–1. The band at 1499 cm–1 belongs to the O–C–O
asymmetric stretching mode of the carboxylate group,[36,43,45] and the bands at 1556 and 1613
cm–1 belong to the benzene ring-stretching vibrations
of the linker.[43,45] All these modes of TCNQ and Mn-MOF-74
are invisible or largely shifted in the spectra of TCNQ-doped Mn-MOF-74.
The band located in the range 1183–1193 cm–1, depending on the laser wavelength, can be assigned to the C–H
bending mode of TCNQ[42] red-shifted from
1207 cm–1 by 10–20 cm–1, which is toward the frequency range typical of C–H bending
in a benzenoid ring.[46] Multiple bands are
observed at frequencies marked by the vertical bars in the range 1600–1650
cm–1 (for peak analysis, see Figures S12–S16
in the Supporting Information). These bands
can be associated with the C=C ring-stretching modes of TCNQ[42] blue-shifted and split into two components.
Note that these modes overlap with the benzene ring-stretching modes
of the linker in Mn-MOF-74[43,45] observed at 1613 cm–1.
Figure 3
Raman spectra of TCNQ-doped Mn-MOF-74 recorded with excitation
wavelengths λexc = 458, 488, 514.5, 568, and 633
nm. The spectra of as-prepared Mn-MOF-74 and TCNQ recorded with λexc = 633 nm are presented for comparison.
Raman spectra of TCNQ-doped Mn-MOF-74 recorded with excitation
wavelengths λexc = 458, 488, 514.5, 568, and 633
nm. The spectra of as-prepared Mn-MOF-74 and TCNQ recorded with λexc = 633 nm are presented for comparison.In the frequency range between the C–O stretching and O–C–O
symmetric stretching of Mn-MOF-74, 1275–1404 cm–1, multiple modes are distinguished at various frequencies (marked
by the vertical bars in Figure ) depending largely on the laser wavelength (for peak analysis,
see Figure S17–S21 in the Supporting Information). Two possible candidates for the origin of these bands are a blue-shifted
C–O stretching of the linker and a red-shifted exocyclic C=C
stretching mode of TCNQ. The lowest-frequency mode around 1285 cm–1 could be of the former. This point will be discussed
later in conjunction with results for fluorinated Mn-MOF-74. The exocyclic
C=C stretching mode of TCNQ, located at 1454 cm–1 for TCNQ0, is known to be susceptible to the charge state
of TCNQ. Hence, all these modes in the range 1275–1404 cm–1 can be attributed to the exocyclic C=C stretching
mode of TCNQ molecules at different charge states. The resonance enhancement
in Raman spectroscopy is so strong that even a small amount of minor
species can be observed as major Raman bands when the laser energy
matches their absorption band. The major absorption bands unique to
TCNQ-doped Mn-MOF-74, not observed for neat TCNQ and nondoped Mn-MOF-74,
are those located at 480 and 500 nm, attributed to DCTC– or trianion TCNQ3– (Figure ). This means that the Raman spectra measured
at λexc = 458, 488, and 514.5 nm represent the TCNQ
encapsulated in the MOF. They all exhibit two major Raman bands within
the range of interest: one at about 1285 cm–1 and
the other at about 1330 cm–1. First of all, they
do not correspond to those of TCNQ3–[39] or A1g Raman modes of any TCNQ species
in D4 symmetry.[47,48] According to the literature,[40,49−51] these peaks can be assigned to nonsymmetric B1g modes
of DCTC–, the oxidation product of TCNQ2–. The red-shifted C–H bending mode is also characteristic
of DCTC–. As observed in Figure , the ring C=C stretching mode of
DCTC– at about 1640 cm–1, the
higher component of the doublet, is resonance enhanced at λexc = 458, 488, and 514.5 nm. Note that the exocyclic C=C
stretching mode can also be red-shifted to frequencies as low as 1300
cm–1 because of the chemisorption of TCNQ onto a
metal atom or cluster.[52] One or two of
TCNQ’s four nitrogen atoms bound to a metal leads to a fractional
charge transfer smaller than one electron per TCNQ. However, a red
shift of the C≡N stretching mode because of chemisorption is
not observed in the present study.[52] Hence,
it is more likely that neutral TCNQ0 is reduced to TCNQ2– because of host–guest charge transfer, then
the TCNQ2– is oxidized to DCTC– by molecular oxygen present in the framework.The presence
of DCTC– means that electrons are
extracted from the framework. However, it is challenging to distinguish
Raman modes of the linker because of the strong optical resonance
of the TCNQ species as well as spectral overlaps and frequency shifts
as results of the charge transfer. In order to discuss the charge
state of the linker that is crucial for understanding electrical conduction
mechanisms in doped MOFs, we employ another acceptor molecule, XeF2, as an oxidative fluorination agent.[37,53] X-ray diffraction analysis confirms that the Mn-MOF-74 structure
is unchanged after exposure to XeF2 vapors. See Figure
S1 in the Supporting Information.Figure shows the
X-ray photoemission spectra of Mn-MOF-74 after exposure to XeF2 vapors measured in the F 1s region (left) and the Mn 2p region
(right). The Mn 2p spectral shape and binding energy are consistent
with the presence of Mn(II).[54−56] Fluorine is present in two chemical
states with F 1s binding energies of 685.0 and 687.9 eV. The dominating
(84%) lower binding energy component belongs to fluorine bound to
manganese, while the less-intense (16%) higher binding energy component
belongs to fluorine bound covalently to carbon (see the structure
model in Figure right).
The atomic concentration ratio, calculated from intensities of the
low binding energy component in the F 1s region and the Mn 2p spectrum,
is F/Mn = 1.0. This indicates that all manganese ions in the framework
are fluorinated.
Figure 4
X-ray photoemission spectra of XeF2-altered
Mn-MOF-74
in the F 1s region (left) and the Mn 2p region (right). The dashed
curves are the Shirley background profiles. The two Gaussian–Lorentzian
product components, peak 1 and peak 2, are plotted in the F 1s region.
X-ray photoemission spectra of XeF2-altered
Mn-MOF-74
in the F 1s region (left) and the Mn 2p region (right). The dashed
curves are the Shirley background profiles. The two Gaussian–Lorentzian
product components, peak 1 and peak 2, are plotted in the F 1s region.The Raman spectra of Mn-MOF-74 before and after
exposure to XeF2 vapors are presented in Figure (for full-range spectra at
λexc = 514.5 and 633 nm, see Figure S10 in the Supporting Information). No Raman modes of gaseous XeF2[37,57,58] are observed, indicating that
XeF2 has reacted to fluorinate the framework. We observe
three characteristic changes upon the fluorination: (1) The C–O
stretching mode[29,36,43] is blue-shifted from 1275 to 1283 cm–1 by +8 cm–1. (2) A band emerges at 1448 cm–1. (3) A broad intense band at 1608 cm–1 appears
and overlaps the band of benzene ring stretching vibrations[43] at 1613 cm–1. It was reported
that an oxidative chlorination of Mn-MOF-74 (or M2DOBDC)
with C6H5ICl2 yielded an oxidized
material Cl2M2DOBDC.[59] According to magnetic measurements, X-ray absorption, and infrared
spectroscopic data, it was proposed that the benzene-like linker of
a formal oxidation state −4 is oxidized to a quinone-like linker
of a formal oxidation state −2 through the chlorination of
the open-metal sites, while the manganese ions maintain a formal oxidation
state of +2. In our case, the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis
indicates that all manganese ions are divalent and fluorinated. The
emergent Raman band at 1608 cm–1 in Figure can be attributed to Raman-active
bands of the quinone-like linker as a result of the oxidation (for
peak analysis, see Figures S12–S16 in the Supporting Information).
Figure 5
Raman spectra of as-prepared Mn-MOF-74
and XeF2-altered
Mn-MOF-74, recorded with λexc = 633 nm, and p-benzoquinone recorded with λexc = 514.5
nm.
Raman spectra of as-prepared Mn-MOF-74
and XeF2-altered
Mn-MOF-74, recorded with λexc = 633 nm, and p-benzoquinone recorded with λexc = 514.5
nm.Based on the above knowledge obtained
for the oxidized framework,
we now re-evaluate the resonance Raman data of the TCNQ@Mn-MOF-74
in Figure . The intense
peak of the TCNQ@Mn-MOF-74 located at 1605 cm–1 at
λexc = 633 nm (off resonance to DCTC–) can be attributed to the oxidized quinone-like linker. The C–O
stretching mode of the linker is hardly visible because of the overlap
with the intense DCTC– modes. The peak analysis
reveals a mode in the range 1284–1285 cm–1 (see Figures S20–S21 in the Supporting Information) that intensifies as λexc goes
from 568 to 633 nm toward the off resonance to DCTC–, that could be of the C–O stretching mode shifted by ca.
10 cm–1 from 1275 cm–1 for the
neutral TCNQ. This blue shift is slightly larger than +8 cm–1 observed upon the fluorination, indicating a charge transfer achieved
by the infiltration of the framework by TCNQ.
Conclusions
To
summarize, Mn-MOF-74 has been doped with TCNQ. The resonance
Raman spectroscopy has revealed the presence of DCTC–, an oxidation product of TCNQ2–, inside the framework,
that can be understood as a result of strong host–guest charge
transfer. The emergent quinone-like Raman mode at 1608 cm–1 and the blue-shifted C–O stretching mode at 1283 cm–1 can be associated with the quinone ring of the oxidized linker,
that is inline with the Raman response of the TCNQ@Mn-MOF-74 off the
resonance to the DCTC– at λexc =
633 nm. This work demonstrates that for the identification of the
local charge density in doped MOFs, the optical resonance effect in
Raman spectroscopy needs to be taken into account, and halogenated
MOFs exhibiting no resonance effect can be a good reference material.
Both the resonance Raman spectroscopy and halogenated MOFs are elemental
components for the study of charge transfer in molecule-doped MOFs.
Authors: Miguel Rivera-Torrente; Matthias Filez; Christian Schneider; Ewout C van der Feltz; Konrad Wolkersdörfer; Dereje H Taffa; Michael Wark; Roland A Fischer; Bert M Weckhuysen Journal: Phys Chem Chem Phys Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 3.676
Authors: Konrad Thürmer; Christian Schneider; Vitalie Stavila; Raymond W Friddle; François Léonard; Roland A Fischer; Mark D Allendorf; A Alec Talin Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2018-11-05 Impact factor: 9.229
Authors: Mark D Allendorf; Michael E Foster; François Léonard; Vitalie Stavila; Patrick L Feng; F Patrick Doty; Kirsty Leong; Eric Yue Ma; Scott R Johnston; A Alec Talin Journal: J Phys Chem Lett Date: 2015-03-19 Impact factor: 6.475
Authors: Anthony F Cozzolino; Carl K Brozek; Ryan D Palmer; Junko Yano; Minyuan Li; Mircea Dincă Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2014-02-21 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Christian Schneider; Dardan Ukaj; Raimund Koerver; A Alec Talin; Gregor Kieslich; Sidharam P Pujari; Han Zuilhof; Jürgen Janek; Mark D Allendorf; Roland A Fischer Journal: Chem Sci Date: 2018-08-08 Impact factor: 9.825