Literature DB >> 33183864

Forensic 3D printing from micro-CT for court use- process validation.

Waltraud Baier1, Danielle G Norman2, Michael J Donnelly2, Mark A Williams2.   

Abstract

Forensic application of 3D scanning and printing technology is gaining momentum with 3D printed evidence starting to be produced for court. However, the processes for creating these forensic 3D models requires still rigorous assessment to ensure they adhere to the relevant legal standards. Although, previous work has examined the accuracy of 3D prints created from medical grade Computed Tomography (CT), no such assessment has been carried out for Micro Computed Tomography (micro-CT) which offers superior resolution and the ability to capture forensically relevant injuries. This study aimed to quantify the error rates associated with forensic 3D printed models and toolmarks, created using three different printing technologies, based on micro-CT data. Overall, 3D printed models, based on micro-CT scans, replicate bone surface geometry to sub-millimetre accuracy (<0.62mm for overall shape and <0.36mm for toolmarks). However, there were significant differences between the printing technology employed (mean errors of -0.3%, -0.8%, and 0.7% for shape geometry and -0.8%, 14.1%, and 0.7% for toolmark geometry for Printers 1-3 respectively). Where possible, the authors recommend micro-CT imaging for producing forensic 3D printed bone models particularly when injuries are present.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  3D printing; Additive manufacturing; Forensic evidence; Micro-CT; Surface comparison

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33183864     DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  3 in total

Review 1.  A review of visualization techniques of post-mortem computed tomography data for forensic death investigations.

Authors:  Lars Christian Ebert; Sabine Franckenberg; Till Sieberth; Wolf Schweitzer; Michael Thali; Jonathan Ford; Summer Decker
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  A multi-method assessment of 3D printed micromorphological osteological features.

Authors:  Rachael M Carew; Francesco Iacoviello; Carolyn Rando; Robert M Moss; Robert Speller; James French; Ruth M Morgan
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 2.791

3.  A survey of case studies on the use of forensic three-dimensional printing in England and Wales.

Authors:  D Errickson; R M Carew; A J Collings; M J P Biggs; P Haig; H O'Hora; N Marsh; J Roberts
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 2.791

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.