Xavier Carle1, Lauris Gastaud2, Julia Salleron3, Magali Pascale Tardy2, Jean-Pierre Caujolle4, Antoine Thyss2, Juliette Thariat5, Patrick Chevallier6. 1. University Hospital Archet 2, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, 151 Route de Saint-Antoine, 06200 Nice, France. 2. Antoine-Lacassagne Centre, Cancer Research Center, Department of Oncology, 133, avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice, France. 3. Lorraine Institute of Oncology, Department of Biostatistics, 6 avenue de Bourgogne, 54519 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France. 4. University Hospital Pasteur 2, Department of Ophtalmology, 30, voie Romaine, 06001 Nice, France. 5. Francois-Baclesse Centre, Cancer Research Center, Department of Oncology, 3, avenue du Général Harris, 14000 Caen, France. 6. University Hospital Archet 2, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, 151 Route de Saint-Antoine, 06200 Nice, France. Electronic address: chevallier.p@chu-nice.fr.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Patients with liver metastasis from uveal melanoma have a poor prognosis. Efficacy and safety of hepatic transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) using melphalan and microspheres was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Monocentric retrospective study of all consecutive patients treated by TACE using melphalan and 250μm calibrated microspheres between 2004 and 2016. Radiological response was assessed according to RECIST 1.1, modified (m)-RECIST and EASL on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Liver metastasis response, hepatic, extrahepatic and global progression free survival (PFS) complications were evaluated with the common terminology criteria for adverse events version 4.0 (CTCAE 4.0) and survival factors were secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients underwent 138 TACE (4; 4.1 sessions; range 1-9). Median OS was 16.5 months (mean 21.6 months). Liver metastasis response combining partial and complete response was 42.4%, 97%, 97% with RECIST 1.1, mRECIST, EASL, respectively. There were 58 severe (CTCAE≥3) but manageable complications in 28 patients, except for 1 toxic death. CONCLUSION: For patients with liver metastases from uveal melanoma ineligible for local treatments, TACE using melphalan may be performed as first line therapy in metastatic miliary disease from uveal melanomas with careful supportive care.
INTRODUCTION:Patients with liver metastasis from uveal melanoma have a poor prognosis. Efficacy and safety of hepatic transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) using melphalan and microspheres was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Monocentric retrospective study of all consecutive patients treated by TACE using melphalan and 250μm calibrated microspheres between 2004 and 2016. Radiological response was assessed according to RECIST 1.1, modified (m)-RECIST and EASL on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Liver metastasis response, hepatic, extrahepatic and global progression free survival (PFS) complications were evaluated with the common terminology criteria for adverse events version 4.0 (CTCAE 4.0) and survival factors were secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients underwent 138 TACE (4; 4.1 sessions; range 1-9). Median OS was 16.5 months (mean 21.6 months). Liver metastasis response combining partial and complete response was 42.4%, 97%, 97% with RECIST 1.1, mRECIST, EASL, respectively. There were 58 severe (CTCAE≥3) but manageable complications in 28 patients, except for 1 toxic death. CONCLUSION: For patients with liver metastases from uveal melanoma ineligible for local treatments, TACE using melphalan may be performed as first line therapy in metastatic miliary disease from uveal melanomas with careful supportive care.