M C Fahey1, M A Little2, R C Klesges2, G W Talcott2, P A Richey3, K Mehmet3, R A Krukowski3. 1. Department of Psychology, The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, USA. 2. Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA. 3. Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Approximately 17% of young adults currently use tobacco, most commonly cigarettes and/or electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes), followed by other products (i.e., cigarillos, pipe/hookah, smokeless tobacco). Cigarettes have been historically used to control weight. Little is known about use of non-cigarette products for weight control, particularly among non-college young adults. Tobacco use in the military is higher than civilians, and personnel have increased motivation for weight control due to military fitness standards. This population might be vulnerable to use tobacco for this purpose. Purpose: Exploring prevalence, as well as demographic and behavioral correlates, of using tobacco products for weight control, among a large, diverse sample of military young adults. Methods: U.S. Air Force recruits (N = 24,543) completed a questionnaire about tobacco use. Among users of tobacco products, recruits reported if they had ever used that product to maintain their weight. Results: Smokeless tobacco was most commonly used for weight control (12.2%), followed by cigarettes (7.3%), e-cigarettes (5.5%), cigarillos (3.3%), and hookah/pipe (3.2%). Using tobacco for weight control was associated with fewer harm beliefs and more regular use of that product. Among e-cigarette users, having a higher BMI and a lower educational background was associated with ever using this product for weight control. Conclusions: The belief that a tobacco product helps control one's weight might increase the prevalence, and frequency of use, of that product among military young adults. Tobacco cessation programs should assess for this motivation of use and provide education about tobacco harm and alternative strategies for weight maintenance.
BACKGROUND: Approximately 17% of young adults currently use tobacco, most commonly cigarettes and/or electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes), followed by other products (i.e., cigarillos, pipe/hookah, smokeless tobacco). Cigarettes have been historically used to control weight. Little is known about use of non-cigarette products for weight control, particularly among non-college young adults. Tobacco use in the military is higher than civilians, and personnel have increased motivation for weight control due to military fitness standards. This population might be vulnerable to use tobacco for this purpose. Purpose: Exploring prevalence, as well as demographic and behavioral correlates, of using tobacco products for weight control, among a large, diverse sample of military young adults. Methods: U.S. Air Force recruits (N = 24,543) completed a questionnaire about tobacco use. Among users of tobacco products, recruits reported if they had ever used that product to maintain their weight. Results: Smokeless tobacco was most commonly used for weight control (12.2%), followed by cigarettes (7.3%), e-cigarettes (5.5%), cigarillos (3.3%), and hookah/pipe (3.2%). Using tobacco for weight control was associated with fewer harm beliefs and more regular use of that product. Among e-cigarette users, having a higher BMI and a lower educational background was associated with ever using this product for weight control. Conclusions: The belief that a tobacco product helps control one's weight might increase the prevalence, and frequency of use, of that product among military young adults. Tobacco cessation programs should assess for this motivation of use and provide education about tobacco harm and alternative strategies for weight maintenance.
Authors: Robert C McMillen; Mark A Gottlieb; Regina M Whitmore Shaefer; Jonathan P Winickoff; Jonathan D Klein Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2014-11-06 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Sarah O Meadows; Charles C Engel; Rebecca L Collins; Robin L Beckman; Matthew Cefalu; Jennifer Hawes-Dawson; Molly Doyle; Amii M Kress; Lisa Sontag-Padilla; Rajeev Ramchand; Kayla M Williams Journal: Rand Health Q Date: 2018-10-11
Authors: Melissa A Little; Karen J Derefinko; Lauren Colvin; Jon O Ebbert; Zoran Bursac; Gerald W Talcott; Phyllis A Richey; Robert C Klesges Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2015-04-18 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Allison M Glasser; Lauren Collins; Jennifer L Pearson; Haneen Abudayyeh; Raymond S Niaura; David B Abrams; Andrea C Villanti Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2016-11-30 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Harkirat Singh; Ryan David Kennedy; Lisa P Lagasse; Lauren M Czaplicki; Joanna E Cohen Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2018-07-09 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Jennifer A Fidler; Lion Shahab; Oliver West; Martin J Jarvis; Andy McEwen; John A Stapleton; Eleni Vangeli; Robert West Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-06-18 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Sarah E Jackson; Jamie Brown; Paul Aveyard; Fiona Dobbie; Isabelle Uny; Robert West; Linda Bauld Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2019-04-06 Impact factor: 3.913