| Literature DB >> 33182677 |
Andreea-Ioana Ștefan1, Andra Piciu2, Simona Sorana Căinap3, Katalin Gabora1, Doina Piciu1,4.
Abstract
Pediatric thyroid carcinoma is a current area of interest, because there are few studies in this field; the current classification and treatment guidelines are extrapolated from adults, sometimes leading to overly aggressive treatments or incomplete treatment of the disease. The purpose of this retrospective study is to analyze the presentation, diagnosis, treatment, complications, and outcome of children diagnosed with thyroid cancer in the last two decades (2000-2018) at the Oncological Institute "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuță" Cluj-Napoca (IOCN) Romania, a tertiary center in a region with environmental influences from both the nuclear fallout of the Chernobyl accident and from iodine deficiency. The results were compared with those obtained in a previous study carried out in the same institution between 1991-2010, and with those obtained in a similar study carried out in Netherlands between 1970-2013, a cohort of children not exposed to the post-Chernobyl fallout. We statistically analyzed 62 patients. Papillary form was present in the majority of cases, and we highlighted the occurrence of thyroid microcarcinoma in children. A total of 85.4% of patients received radioiodine, the total activity being significantly lower compared with the data from literature. In our study, the prognosis of the disease was excellent, with 100% overall survival.Entities:
Keywords: pediatric differentiated thyroid cancer
Year: 2020 PMID: 33182677 PMCID: PMC7696674 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9113617
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241
Figure 1Topographic distribution of thyroid cancer cases in children treated at the Oncological Institute “Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuță” Cluj-Napoca (IOCN) from 2000–2018. * The case from Bucharest comes, in fact, from the Republic of Moldova; the patient was diagnosed in a medical center in Chisinau. There the therapy was initiated, and later the family decided to move to Romania, with an official address in Bucharest, and went to IOCN to continue specific treatment.
Figure 2Patient selection criteria.
Baseline characteristics.
| Variable | All Patients | 0–10 y | 11–14 y | 15–18 y | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.655 | ||||
| Male | 12 (19.3) | 0 | 5 (21.7) | 7 (21.2) | |
| Female | 50 (80.6) | 6 (100) | 18 (78.2) | 26 (78.7) | |
|
| n.a. | ||||
| Median (range) | 13.1 (8.2–18) | 9.6 (8.2–10.8) | 13.6 (11.7–14.9) | 16.5 (15.1–18) | |
|
| 0.540 | ||||
| Papillary | 56 (90.3) | 5 (83.3) | 22 (95.6) | 29 (87.8) | |
| Follicular | 6 (9.6) | 1 (16.6) | 1 (4.3) | 4 (12.1) | |
|
| 0.587 | ||||
| Median (range) | 2.15 (0.15–6.4) | 1.9 (0.4–3) | 2.1 (0.6–4.5) | 2.14 (0.15–6.4) | |
|
| 0.422 | ||||
| Unilateral | 45 (72.5) | 4 (66.6) | 14 (60.8) | 27 (81.8) | |
| RTL | 27 (43.5) | 2 (33.3) | 9 (39.1) | 16 (48.4) | |
| LTL | 15 (24.1) | 2 (33.3) | 4 (17.3) | 9 (27.2) | |
| RTL + Isthmus | 1 (1.6) | 0 | 1 (4.34) | 0 | |
| LTL + Isthmus | 2 (3.2) | 0 | 0 | 2 (6.06) | |
| Bilateral | 12 (19.3) | 1 (16.6) | 6 (26) | 5 (15.1) | |
| Other b | |||||
| Isthmus | 1 (1.6) | 0 | 1 (4.3) | 0 | |
| Thyroglossal duct | 2 (3.2) | 1 (16.6) | 1 (4.3) | 0 | |
| Unknown | 2 (3.2) | 0 | 1 (4.3) | 1 (3.03) | |
|
| 0.218 | ||||
| No | 37 (59.6) | 3 (50) | 11 (47.8) | 23 (69.6) | |
| Yes | 25 (40.3) | 3 (50) | 12 (52.1) | 10 (30.3) | |
|
| 0.856 | ||||
|
| |||||
| T1–T2 | 39 (62.9) | 3 (50) | 15 (65.2) | 21 (63.6) | |
| T3–T4 | 23 (37) | 3 (50) | 8 (34.7) | 12 (36.3) | |
|
| 0.390 | ||||
| N0 | 26 (41.9) | 1 (16.6) | 8 (34.7) | 17 (51.5) | |
| N1a–N1b | 22 (35.4) | 2 (33.3) | 11 (47.8) | 9 (27.2) | |
| N | 14 (22.5) | 3 (50) | 4 (17.3) | 7 (21.2) | |
|
| 0.448 | ||||
| M0 | 56 (90.3) | 5 (83.3) | 20 (86.9) | 31 (93.9) | |
| M1 c | 6 (9.6) | 1 (16.6) | 3 (13) | 2 (6) | |
| Lung | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | |
| Bone | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| n.a. | ||||
| Total thyroidectomy | 27 + 26 = 53 | 2 + 4 = 6 | 10 + 10 = 20 | 15 + 12 = 27 | |
| (S1 + S2) | (85.4) | (100) | (86.9) | (81.8) | |
|
| 0.183 | ||||
| None | 40 (64.5) | 3 (50) | 15 (65.2) | 22 (66.6) | |
| Central LND | 3 (4.8) | 2 (33.3) | 1 (4.3) | 0 | |
| LND incl. | 15 (24.1) | 1 (16.6) | 6 (26) | 8 (24.2) | |
| Unknown | 4 (6.4) | 0 | 1 (4.34) | 3 (9.09) |
Abbreviations: LND, lymph node dissection; n.a., not applicable; S1, first surgery; S2, second surgery; RTL, right thyroid lobe; LTL, left thyroid lobe. a Differences tested between the three age groups. Missing or unknown values were excluded from statistical testing. b The x indicates that there has been no assessment of that tumor characteristic, or information about that characteristic was not available. c Summarized as one variable for statistical testing.
Figure 3Types of the first surgical intervention in differentiated thyroid cancer.
Surgical complications.
| Hypoparathyroidism, n (%) | Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injury, n (%) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | Present * | n.a. | Left | Right | Bilateral | n.a. | ||
| All patients ( | 10 (16.1) | 52 (83.8) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 59 (95.10) | 0.047 | |
| T1–T2 ( | 6 (15.3) | 33 (84.6) | 0.596 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 39 (100.00) | |
| T3–T4 ( | 4 (17.3) | 19 (82.6) | 1 (4.34) | 1 (4.34) | 1 (4.34) | 20 (8.69) | ||
| No LND ( | 5 (12.5) | 35 (87.5) | 0.102 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 (100.00) | 0.025 |
| LND ( | 4 (22.2) | 14 (77.7) | 1 (5.55) | 1 (5.55) | 1 (5.55) | 16 (88.80) | ||
| LND unknown ( | 1 (25.0) | 3 (75.0) | 0 | 0 | 1 (25.00) | 3 (75.00) | ||
* We cannot assess from the information in the file if the hypoparathyroidism was transient or permanent, so we only evaluated the presence of hypoparathyroidism. Abbreviations: LND, lymph node dissection; n.a., not applicable. a Differences tested between T1–T2 and T3–T4, with no LND. Missing or unknown values were excluded from statistical testing.
Administration of 131-I.
| Group | Cumulative 131-I Activity | 131-I Therapeutic Administrations, | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mCi | GBq | ||||
| All patients | 186.68 | 6.90 | 2.38 (1–9) | ||
| T1–T2 | 100.34 | 3.71 | 0.001 | 1.65 (1–5) | 0.005 |
| T3–T4 | 295.54 | 10.9 | 3.30 (1–9) | ||
| N0 ( | 88.85 | 3.28 | ˂0.001 | 1.57 (1–5) | 0.005 |
| N1a–N1b | 344.35 | 12.74 | 3.54 (1–9) | ||
| N | 105.46 | 3.90 | 1.85 (1–3) | ||
| M0 ( | 153.88 | 5.69 | 0.022 | 2.15 (1–6) | 0.059 |
| M1 ( | 438.14 | 16.21 | 4.16 (1–9) | ||
| 0–10 y ( | 79.42 (30.0–200.7) | 2.93 (1.11–7.42) | 0.066 | 1.66 (1–3) | 0.217 |
| 11–14 y ( | 258.02 (17.88–990.15) | 9.54 (0.66–36.63) | 3.04 (1–9) | ||
| 15–18 y ( | 152.35 (50–629.99) | 5.63 (1.85–23.30) | 2 (1–6) | ||
All data expressed as median (range). a Differences tested between T1–T2 and T3–T4, N0 and N1a–N1b, M0 and M1, and age groups. Tx, Nx, and Mx were excluded from statistical testing. b Administered 131-I activity for one case was registered for the treatment of the recurrence; the initial treatment in the moment of diagnosis was not at the IOCN. Eight patients did not receive 131-I treatment; administered 131-I activity was unknown in one patient. Therefore, n = 52 instead of n = 62.
Patients with persistent disease.
| Sex and Age at Diagnosis, y | Follow-up, y | Histology, TNM * | Initial Treatment | Evidence of Disease | Localization of Disease |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F, 15.1 | 2.1 | FTC, T3aN0M0 | TT, 131-I | Scintigraphy | Thyroid bed |
| F, 14.9 | 5.1 | PTC, T3N1bM0 | TT, LND, 131-I | PET–CT | Thyroid bed |
| F, 16.8 | 8.9 | PTC, T4N1bM0 | TT, LND, 131-I | WBS, PET–CT, histology | Thyroid bed, cervical lymph node |
| F, 14.0 | 3.4 | PTC, T4aN1bM1 | TT, LND, 131-I | WBS, PET-CT, CT | Cervical lymph node |
| F, 8.2 | 5 | PTC, T2NxM0 | TT, 131-I | WBS | Thyroid bed |
| F, 15.7 | 7.2 | PTC, T3N1bM1 | TT, 131-I | WBS | Cervical lymph node, thyroid bed, lung |
| M, 13.8 | 5.8 | PTC, T3N1bM1 | TT, LND, 131-I | WBS | Cervical lymph node, mediastinum, lung |
| F, 14.3 | 10.6 | PTC, T4N1bM1 | TT, LND, 131-I | WBS | Cervical lymph node, lung |
| F, 12.0 | 9.4 | PTC, T3N1M0 | TT, LND, 131-I | WBS | Cervical lymph node |
| F, 14.7 | 4.9 | PTC, T3N1bM0 | TT, 131-I | WBS | Thyroid bed |
| F, 15.9 | 2.4 | PTC, T2N0M0 | STT | Biochemical ** | |
| F, 17.3 | 0.9 | PTC, T1aN0M0 | TT | Biochemical | |
| F, 8.5 | 4.4 | PTC, T3N1bM0 | TT, LND, 131-I | Biochemical | |
| M, 15.2 | 4.2 | PTC, T1bN1bM0 | TT, LND, 131-I | Biochemical | |
| F, 10.5 | 7.6 | PTC, T1aNxM0 | TT, 131-I | Biochemical | |
| F, 15.5 | 12.3 | PTC, T2N0M0 | TT, 131-I | Biochemical | |
| M, 12.2 | 11.8 | PTC, T1N1aM0 | TT, 131-I | Biochemical | |
| F, 14.0 | 10.1 | PTC, T2N1M0 | TT, LND, 131-I | Biochemical | |
| F, 12.0 | 14.9 | PTC, T4N1M0 | TT, LND, 131-I | Biochemical | |
| F, 12.8 | 10.7 | PTC, T2aNxM0 | TT, 131-I | Biochemical | |
| F, 16.0 | 7.8 | PTC, T2NxM0 | TT, 131-I | Biochemical | |
| F, 17.8 | 7.7 | FTC, T2N0M0 | TT, LND, 131-I | Biochemical | |
| F, 13.3 | 18.4 | PTC, T2N0M0 | TT, 131-I | Biochemical | |
| F, 18.0 | 17.4 | PTC, T2N0M0 | TT, LND, 131-I | Biochemical | |
| M, 15.2 | 8.8 | PTC, T1N0M0 | STT, 131-I | Biochemical | |
| M, 14.8 | 7.1 | PTC, T3N1bM0 | TT, LND, 131-I | Biochemical |
* Initial TNM classification; ** Tg, anti-Tg. Abbreviations: TT, total thyroidectomy; STT, subtotal thyroidectomy.
Figure 4The distribution of the cumulative activity of 131-I administration (mCi/GBq).
Outcome.
| Group | Remission | Recurrence | Persistent Disease | Unknown | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All patients | 32 (51.6) | 1 (1.6) | 26 (41.9) | 3 (4.8) | |
| T1–T2 ( | 23 (58.9) | 14 (35.8) | 0.155 | 2 (5.1) | |
| T3–T4 ( | 9 (39.1) | 12 (52.1) | 1 (4.3) | ||
| Multifocality *Yes ( | 11 (50.0) | 11 (50) | 0.598 | 0 | |
| No ( | 20 (57.1) | 15 (42.9) | 3 (100.0) | ||
| Tumoral foci (cm) * | 5 (55.5) | 3 (33.3) | 0.092 | 1 (11.1) | |
| 1–2 cm ( | 13 (86.7) | 2 (13.3) | |||
| 2–3 cm ( | 6 (46.1) | 6 (46.1) | 1 (7.6) | ||
| 3–4 cm ( | 2 (28.6) | 5 (71.4) | 1 (12.5) | ||
| 4–5 cm ( | 1 (33.3) | 2 (66.7) | |||
| 5–6 cm ( | 0 | 0 | 1 (100.0) | ||
| 6–7 cm ( | 1 (100.0) | 0 | |||
| N0 ( | 17 (65.3) | 8 (30.7) | 0.020 | 1 (3.8) | |
| N1a–N1b ( | 6 (27.2) | 14 (63.6) | 1 (4.5) | ||
| N | 9 (64.2) | 4 (28.5) | 1 (7.14) | ||
| M1 ( | 2 (33.3) | 4 (66.6) | 0.393 | 0 | |
| M0 ( | 30 (53.5) | 22 (39.2) | 3 (5.3) | ||
| FTC ( | 4 (66.6) | 2 (33.3) | 0.55 | 0 | |
| PTC ( | 28 (50.0) | 24 (42.8) | 3 (5.35) | ||
| Age groups: | 3 (50.0) | 3 (50.0) | 0.425 | 0 | |
| 11–14 y ( | 10 (45.5) | 12 (54.5) | 1 (4.3) | ||
| 15–18 y ( | 19 (63.3) | 11 (36.7) | 2 (6.06) |
* Patients for whom there is no data on multifocality (one patient) or the exact size of the tumor focus (12 patients) were removed from the study. ** Only one patient had a recurrence of the disease after seven years from the initial diagnosis, established in another medical center with no medical record available, and it was not included in the subsequent statistical analysis.
Figure 5Incidence of pediatric differentiated thyroid carcinoma at “Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuţă” Institute of Oncology (IOCN) in 2000–2018.
Figure 6The distribution of the year of birth of the pediatric differentiated thyroid cancer cases in IOCN diagnosed in the period 2000–2018.