| Literature DB >> 33182570 |
Ruizhen Li1,2, Hanyang Chen1, Jianrong Xiong1, Xiaoying Xu1, Jiajia Cheng1, Xingyong Liu3, Guo Liu2,4.
Abstract
Recently, the bismuth-based (Bi-based) Z-scheme photocatalysts have been paid great attention due to their good solar energy utilization capacity, the high separation rate of their photogenerated hole-electron pairs, and strong redox ability. They are considerably more promising materials than single semiconductors for alleviating the energy crisis and environmental deterioration by efficiently utilizing sunlight to motivate various photocatalytic reactions for energy production and pollutant removal. In this review, the traits and recent research progress of Bi-based semiconductors and recent achievements in the synthesis methods of Bi-based direct Z-scheme heterojunction photocatalysts are explored. The recent photocatalytic applications development of Bi-based Z-scheme heterojunction photocatalysts in environmental pollutants removal and detection, water splitting, CO2 reduction, and air (NOx) purification are also described concisely. The challenges and future perspective in the studies of Bi-based Z-scheme heterojunction photocatalysts are discussed and summarized in the conclusion of this mini review.Entities:
Keywords: Z-scheme photocatalysts; bismuth-based semiconductors; energy production; environmental remediation; photocatalytic applications
Year: 2020 PMID: 33182570 PMCID: PMC7697340 DOI: 10.3390/ma13225057
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1The bandgap structure of part of representative Bi-based semiconductors.
Figure 2The schematic diagram of (a) surface decorated structure; (b) Janus structure; and (c) core-shell structure.
Comparison of extensively used synthesis methods of direct Z-scheme photocatalysts.
| Synthesis Method | Advantages | Shortcomings | Interfacial Properties of the Prepared Z-Scheme Hetero- | Geometrical Configurations of the Prepared Z-Scheme Heterojunction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hydrothermal and Solvothermal Method | Controllable Size, High Crystallinity, Low Cost, Simple Operation, One-Pot Synthesis without Need of Post Annealing | High Requirements in Temperature, Pressure and Corrosion Resistance for Equipment, Required High Temperature | Strong Interaction and Intimate Interface | Surface-Decorated Structure |
| Solid-State Synthesis | High Synthetic Efficiency, Simple and Solvent-Free Synthetic Process | High Energy Consumption, High Cost, Required High Temperature | Strong Interaction and Tight-Contact Interface | Surface-Decorated Structure |
| Deposition- | Narrow Size Distributions of Products, Good Thermal Stability of Products | Poor Reproducibility, Uncontrollable Deposition Location and Nucleation Site | Strong Interaction and Intimate Interface | Surface-Decorated Structure |
| Cation Exchange Method | Relatively Rapid Reaction Rate, Well-Preserved Initial Morphology, Size and Compositional Interfaces, High-Quality Nanocrystal, Simple and Flexible Method | Required Post Calcination Treatment | Strong Interaction, High-Quality and Atomic- | Janus, Surface-Decorated or more Complex Custom Structure Including Multicomponent Z-Scheme Heterojunction Structure |
| Electro- | Facile and Simple Method, Simple Setup, Large Surface Area of Products | Low Synthetic Efficiency, High Cost, Required Post-Heating Treatment | Strong Interaction and Intimate Interface | Surface-Decorated Structure |
| Self- | Mild Operation Conditions, Controllable Morphology and Size, Highly Ordered and Dispersive Products | Low Yield, Poor Stability of Products | Moderate Interaction | Core-Shell, Surface-Decorated Structure |
| Mechanical Agitation Method | Simple Setup, Straightforward Method, Avoiding the Use of Complex and Tedious Chemical and Thermal Treatments | Wide Size Distributions of Products, Poor Reproducibility, Uncontrollable Size | No Intimate Interface, Having Easily Detachable Components of Heterojunction, Low Crystallinity | Surface-Decorated Structure |
| Ultrasonic Chemical Method | Narrow Size Distributions of Products, Rapid Reaction Rate, Controllable Morphology and Size | High Cost, Hard to Scaling Up | Strong Interaction and Intimate Interface | Surface-Decorated or Core-Shell Structure |
Research progress on Bi-based Z-Scheme photocatalysts applied in photocatalytic degradation.
| Photo- | Synthesis Method | Light Source | Catalyst | Pollutants | Photocatalytic Efficiency | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bi2WO6/CuBi2O4 | Hydro- | 300 W Xe Lamp | 0.5 mg/mL | Tetracycline (15 mg/L, 100 mL) | 0.0393 min−1 | [ |
| BiOI | In situ Reduction and Oxidiza- | 60 W LED (Light Emitting Diode) Lamp | 3.33 mg/mL | Phenol (100 mg/L, 15 mL) | 60% (BiOI 20%) | [ |
| CdS/BiOI | Hydro- | 300 W Xe Lamp | 0.2 mg/mL | RhB (20 mg/L, 100 mL) | 0.03945 min−1 (BiOI 0.00398 min−1) | [ |
| BiOBr/ | Co-Precipitation | 300 W Xe Lamp | 0.2 mg/mL | Cipro- | 84.63% (Bi2MoO6 15.21%); 0.37613 min−1 (Bi2MoO6 0.00689 min−1) | [ |
| Bi2O3/g–C3N4 | Solid- | 500 W Xe Lamp (λ > 400 nm) | 1.0 mg/mL | MB (1.1 × 10−5 mol/L, 300 mL); RhB (1.0 × 10−5 mol/L, 300 mL) | 0.0253 min−1 (g–C3N4 0.0074 min−1); 0.0101 min−1 (g–C3N4 0.002 min−1) | [ |
| Bi2Fe4O9/Bi2WO6 | Hydro- | 300 W Xe lamp | 0.3 mg/mL | RhB (10 mg/L, 100 mL) | 0.0380 min−1 (Bi2Fe4O9 0.0015 min−1) | [ |
| AgI/Bi5O7I | Ion Exchange | 350 W Xe lamp | 1.0 mg/mL | RhB (10 mg/L, 100 mL) | 0.046 min−1 | [ |
| AgI/Bi2WO6 | Precipitation | 300 W Xe lamp | 0.3 mg/mL | Tetracycline (20 mg/L, 100 mL) | 0.075 min−1 | [ |
| AgBr/CuBi2O4 | Precipitation | 300 W Xe lamp | 0.5 mg/mL | Tetracycline (10 mg/L, 100 mL) | 0.03551 min−1 | [ |
| TCPP/rGO/Bi2WO6 | Ultrasonic Chemical | 300 W Xe lamp | 0.3 mg/mL | Tetracycline (15 mg/L, 100 mL) | 83.60% (Bi2WO6 48.61%) | [ |
| Ag3PO4/CuBi2O4 | Precipitation | 300 W Xe lamp | 0.5 mg/mL | Tetracycline (10 mg/L, 100 mL) | 0.0201 min−1 (CuBi2O4 0.0072 min−1) | [ |
| Porous g–C3N4/BiOI | Hydro- | 50 W 410 nm LED light arrays | 1 mg/mL | MB (20 mg/L, 30 mL) | 0.0160 min−1 | [ |
| CdS/Bi3O4Cl | Hydro- | 250 W Xe lamp | 0.5 mg/mL | Tetracycline (10 mg/L, 100 mL). | 0.0643 min−1 (Bi3O4Cl 0.0148 min−1). | [ |
| Cu2O/Bi5O7I | Glucose | 500 W Xe lamp | 1 mg/mL | RhB (10 mg/L, 100 mL) | 0.0233 min−1 (Bi5O7I 0.00736 min−1) | [ |
| CuInS2/Bi2WO6 | Hydro- | 300 W Xe lamp | 0.3 mg/mL | Tetracycline Hydrochloride | 0.0176 min−1 | [ |
| MoO3/Bi2O4 | Hydro- | 100 W LED lamp | 0.5 mg/mL | RhB (10 mg/L, 100 mL) | 99.6% | [ |
| BiOI/Bi2O4 | Ultrasonic Chemical | 100 W LED lamp | 0.5 mg/mL | RhB (10 mg/L, 100 mL) | 0.090 min−1 | [ |
| Bi2MoO6/TiO2 | Hydro- | 800 W Xe lamp | 0.6 mg/mL | 4-Nitrophenol | 95.3% | [ |
| Bi2WO6 | Ultrasonic Chemical | 500 W Wolfram lamp (λ ≥ 420 nm) | 0.5 mg/mL | RhB (10 mg/L, 100 mL) | 0.043 min−1 | [ |
| Bi2WO6/BiOI | Hydrothermal | 500 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 1 mg/mL | RhB (10 mg/L, 40 mL) | 0.03 min−1 | [ |
| Ag3PO4/Bi2WO6 | Precipitation | 50 W LED lamp | 1 mg/mL | MB (20 mg/L, 30 mL) | 0.61 min−1 | [ |
| g–C3N4/BiVO4 | Hydrothermal | 250 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm) | 0.2 mg/mL | MO (20 mg/L, 50 mL) | 0.09672 min−1 (BiVO4 0.01101 min−1) | [ |
Figure 3(a) Scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of CdS/Bi3O4Cl-50 heterostructure; (b) the transient photocurrent response of the bare CdS, Bi3O4Cl and Z-Scheme CdS/Bi3O4Cl-50 heterostructure; (c) possible photocatalytic mechanism of Z-scheme CdS/Bi3O4Cl photocatalyst for antibiotic treatment under visible light irradiation; CdS/Bi3O4Cl-50: mass ratio of Bi3O4Cl to CdS is 50. Reproduced with permission from [75]. Copyright Elsevier, 2018.
Figure 4Schematic diagram of photocatalytic hydrogen production principle of photocatalyst dispersed in electrolyte (a), schematic diagram of hydrogen production principle in a photoelectrocatalytic system composed of a n-type semiconductor as photoanode (b), and a p-type semiconductor as photocathode (c), respectively.
Research progress of Bi-based Z-Scheme photocatalyst applied in solar-water splitting.
| Photo- | Co- | Synthesis Method | Experimental Conditions | Products and Yields | AQY | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BiPO4/SnS2 | No | Hydrothermal | Visible light irradiation | H2: 303 μmol h−1·g−1 | – | [ |
| Bi/Bi5O7I/Sn3O4 | Bi | Hydrothermal | 300 W Xe Lamp (λ > 400 nm). | H2: 325.9 μmol h−1·g−1 | – | [ |
| Cu3P/Bi2WO6 | No | Mechanical Agitation | Xe lamp (AM | H2: 4.65 μmol h−1·g−1 | – | [ |
| BiVO4 | 5 wt% Co3O4 | Self-Assembly | 320 W Xenon Lamp (λ > 420 nm). | H2: 160 μmol h−1·g−1 | 0.89% at 420 nm | [ |
| Bi2O2.33/Bi2S3 | 1 wt% Pt | Wet Chemistry | 500 W Xenon Lamp; | H2: 62.61 μmol h−1 | – | [ |
| g–C3N4 /BiFeO3 | No | Solid-State | Three 125 W Medium Pressure Hg Lamps (UV). | H2: 160.75 μmol h−1·g−1 | – | [ |
| CdS/BiVO4 | 2 wt% Pt | Solvothermal | 300 W Xe Lamp (λ ≥ 420 nm); | H2: 1153 μmol h−1 | – | [ |
| Bi2S3/MoS2/TiO2 | No | Microwave- Assisted Hydrothermal | 250 W Xe Lamp (λ ≥ 420 nm); | H2: 2195 μmol h−1·g−1 | – | [ |
| Cs2O/Bi2O3/ZnO | No | Solution Combustion Method | Xe Lamp (AM 1.5 G); | H2: 149.5 μmol h−1·g−1 | 1.68% at 365 nm | [ |
| ZnIn2S4/RGO/BiVO4 | 1 wt% Pt | Hydrothermal | 350 W Xe Lamp (λ > 420 nm); | H2: 1687 μmol h−1·g−1 | 22.91% | [ |
| RGO–Cu2O/Bi2WO6 | No | Solvothermal | Xe Lamp (λ > 420 nm); | H2:1.80 μmol h−1·g−1 | – | [ |
| Cu2O/RGO/BiVO4 | – | Solvothermal | 300 W Xenon Arc Lamp (λ > 420 nm); TC Solution | H2: 5.90 μmol h−1·g−1 | – | [ |
Figure 5(a) Effects of different organic compounds on hydrogen production in ZnIn2S4/RGO/BiVO4 photocatalyst. Reproduced with permission from [106]. Copyright Elsevier, 2019; (b) Photocatalytic H2 generation rates of different mass ratios CdS/BiVO4 in lactic acid solution with or without 2 wt.% Pt under visible light irradiation. Reproduced with permission from [103]. Copyright Elsevier, 2017.
Figure 6(a) The schematic diagram of Bi/Bi5O7I/Sn3O4 preparation process; (b) X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of Sn3O4 and Bi/Bi5O7I/Sn3O4 complexes (Bi/Bi5O7I/Sn3O4 samples doped 15 mg, 30 mg, and 45 mg Bi5O7I were labeled as SOB1, SOB2 and SOB3, respectively); (c) Average hydrogen production of Sn3O4 and SOB heterojunction within 5 h. Reproduced with permission from [99]. Copyright Elsevier, 2020; (d) Mechanism diagram of Z-scheme Bi2S3/MoS2/TiO2 heterojunction; (e) Comparison of H2 production performance of Bi2S3/MoS2/TiO2 (MBT) samples with different TiO2 contents. Reproduced with permission from [104]. Copyright Elsevier, 2020.
The research progress of Bi-based Z-scheme photocatalyst in CO2 reduction.
| Photo- | Co- | Synthesis Method | Conditions | Products and Yields | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CdS/BiVO4 | No | Deposition | 300 W Xenon Arc Lamp (λ > 400 nm). | CH4: 1.75 μmol h−1·g−1 | [ |
| BiOI/g–C3N4 | No | Deposition | 300 W Xenon Arc Lamp (λ > 400 nm); | CH4: 1.76 μmol h−1·g−1 | [ |
| Bi2WO6/TiO2 | No | Electrostatic Self- | 300 W Xenon Arc Lamp (780 nm > λ > 320 nm); | CH4: 10.8 μmol h−1·g−1 | [ |
| g–C3N4/ | No | Solid-State | 300 W Xe Lamp; | CO: 6.09 μmol h−1 | [ |
| Bi2WO6/g–C3N4 | No | Hydrothermal | 300 W Xenon Arc Lamp (λ > 420 nm); | CO: 5.19 μmol h−1·g−1 | [ |
| Bi4TaO8Cl | No | Solvothermal | 180 mW/cm2 Solar Light (λ < 780 nm); | CO: 23.42 μmol h−1·g−1 | [ |
| Bi2O2CO3/Bi/ | Bi | Solvothermal | 300 W Xe Lamp; | CH4: 2.54 μmol h−1·g−1 | [ |
| g–C3N4/BiOBr | Au | Water Bath | 300 W High Pressure Xenon Lamp. | CH4: 0.92 μmol h−1·g−1 | [ |
| Bi2WO6 | No | Hydrothermal | 300 W Xe Arc Lamp with a UV cut-off Filter of 420 nm; 50 mg of the Catalyst was Uniformly Distributed in the Photoreactor (250 mL); | CO: 15.96 μmol h−1·g−1 | [ |
| g–C3N4/Bi4O5I2 | No | Complex Precursor Method | 300 W High Pressure Xenon Lamp (λ > 400 nm); | CO: 45.6 μmol h−1·g−1 | [ |
| BiVO4/C/Cu2O | No | SILAR | 300 W Xe Lamp (λ > 420 nm); | CO: 3.01 μmol h−1·g−1 | [ |
Figure 7(a) The preparation process diagram of Bi4TaO8Cl/W18O49 heterojunction; (b) the amount of CO generated over different samples in the process of CO2 reduction under photocatalysis (PC, 298 K) and photothermocatalysis (PTC, 393 K); BiW-L, BiW-M, BiW-H mean the samples synthesized by adding the low, middle, and high content of WCl6 in the synthesis solution, respectively. (c) photothermal catalysis schematic diagram of Bi4TaO8Cl/W18O49 heterojunction. Reproduced with permission from [120]. Copyright Elsevier, 2020.
Figure 8(a) Transient photocurrent of different photocatalysts (a: BiOCl, b: BiOI, c: I–BiOCl, d–f: I–BiOCl/N–GQDs-x (x: the volume of nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dots (N–GQDs), x = 0.5, 1.0, 1.5)); (b) schematic diagram of the “signal-off” cathodic PEC sensor constructed by I–BiOCl/N–GQDs for selective detection of chlorpyrifos; (c) Photocurrent response of I–BiOCl/N–GQDs-0.5 in the presence of 0 ng·mL−1, 0.3 ng·mL−1, 0.5 ng·mL−1, 4 ng·mL−1, 10 ng·mL−1, 20 ng·mL−1, 30 ng·mL−1, 40 ng·mL−1, 50 ng·mL−1, 60 ng·mL−1, 70 ng·mL−1, 80 ng·mL−1 chlorpyrifos (from a to l); Insert is the corresponding linear relationship between the log Cchlorpyrifos and photocurrent. (d) PEC response of I–BiOCl/N–GQDs-0.5 to chlorpyrifos and other foreign impurities. Reprinted with permission from [139]. Copyright ACS, 2018.