| Literature DB >> 33181984 |
Xiaoyu Cheng1, Yuan Yun2, Hongmei Wang3, Liyuan Ma1, Wen Tian1, Baiying Man4, Chaoyang Liu1.
Abstract
Structure and assembly processes of soil bacterial communities under different land use at karst areas remained poorly understood to date. To address this issue, soil samples from arable land and pristine forest over a karst cave, located in the acid rain impacted area, Hubei province, were collected and subjected to high-throughput sequencing and multivariate statistical analysis. Bacterial communities and functions remarkably distinguished between soils under different land use. Both edaphic properties (the content of SO42-, C/N, pH, TN) and weathering processes, such as Si concentration, Mg/Al and Ca/Al, significantly impacted on soil bacterial community structures. Variable selections were predominant ecological processes, and pH and SO42- concentration were of significance in community assembly. Random molecular ecological network analysis revealed a more stable and complex microbial network in the forest ecosystem, which can quickly response to environmental change. Forest soil bacteria were mainly phototrophs, involving in C and N cycles, whereas those in arable soils were mainly chemoheterotrophs, capable of degrading organic fertilizers due to anthropogenic activities as confirmed by the analysis of keystone taxa, indicators and functional prediction. These results reveal that land use constructed soil bacterial communities in different aspects such as the structure, potential functions, microbial interactions and correlations with environmental variables. To our knowledge, this is the first report on bacterial community assembly in karst soils under different land use which enhances our understanding about how land use impact on microbial interaction and community assembly processes.Entities:
Keywords: Bacterial communities; Community assembly; Karst area; Land use; Random molecular ecological network (MENs); Weathering indices
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33181984 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142263
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Total Environ ISSN: 0048-9697 Impact factor: 7.963