| Literature DB >> 33181657 |
Zongyu Yang1, Fei Liu, Liang Cui, Heda Liu, Junshui Zuo, Lin Liu, Sentian Li.
Abstract
Peroneus longus and peroneus brevis tendon grafts have been frequently used to reconstruct the lateral ankle ligaments. However, there is no literature comparing the effect of the 2 methods. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of 2 autologous tendon transplants on ankle joint activity.This retrospective study included 100 adult patients with chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI) who underwent surgery from January 2014 to December 2017. Group A (50 patients): Reconstruction of the lateral ankle ligaments using the anterior half of peroneus longus tendon graft; Group B (50 patients): Using the anterior half of peroneus brevis tendon graft. Outcomes were assessed by comparing pre- and postoperative AOFAS scores, VAS pain scores, and Karlsson scores, and the radiographic assessment included talar tilt and anterior talar translation. A sensitive dynamometer was used before and after surgery to assess inversion, valgus, plantarflexion, and dorsiflexion strength to evaluate changes in muscle strength in the patients feet.Postoperatively, 88 patients were followed up for 12 to 24 months, including 46 cases in group A and 42 in group B. No severe complications were recorded in the 2 groups. There were significant pre- to post-operative differences between the groups. No significant differences were observed in the postoperative scores and muscle strength changes between the groups. However, the number of patients with decreased valgus strength in group B was statistically significant compared with group A.Both methods can improve the stability of the ankle joint, but the peroneus longus tendon has little effect on the postoperative muscle strength of the foot and should be used as the preferred surgical treatment for the treatment of CLAI.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33181657 PMCID: PMC7668510 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022912
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Inclusion and exclusion criteria.
| Inclusion Criteria |
| Patients diagnosed with CLAI |
| Failure of conservative treatment more than 6months |
| Ankle pain and swelling |
| giving way sensation |
| evidence of ankle instability on clinical or radiography examination (positive anterior drawer and talus tilt |
| Exclusion Criteria |
| Any history of surgery treatment for ankle |
| Medial (deltoid ligament) instability |
| Local infection of the foot |
| Deformity of foot and ankle (flatfoot, clubfoot, tarsal coalition, etc.) |
| Body weight over 120Kg |
| Severe medical department diseases (lesions affecting liver and kidney function, severe diabetes and heart disease, central nervous system diseases) |
Clinical rating scale for postoperative ankle reconstruction[.
| Rating | Description |
| Excellent | Full range of motion equal to the contralateral ankle without pain. Able to return to the preinjury level and unrestricted work or sports activity |
| Good | Functional range of motion and stable ankle. Able to return to the preinjury level with minimal pain with work or sport activity |
| Fair | Functional range of motion, good stability, moderate level of pain, and/or stiffness with activities of daily living and sports activity. |
| Poor | Persistent instability or pain, the same or worse than before surgery. |
Figure 1Talus varus stress test and anterior drawer test. Preoperative stress radiographs of a patient: the talar tilt angle was 17.9°; the anterior talar translation was 16.5 mm.
Figure 2Surgical procedure for reconstructing the lateral ligament of the ankle with the peroneus brevis tendon.
Figure 3Avulsion fracture of calcaneal anterior tubercle.
Subjective satisfaction score in 2 Groups.
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
| A (n = 46) | 40 (87.0%) | 2 (4.3%) | 2 (4.3%) | 2 (4.3%) |
| B (n = 42) | 35 (83.3%) | 4 (9.5%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (7.1%) |
Preoperative and final follow-up values of the assessed variables.
| Preoperative | Last follow-up | Test statistic | ||
| AOFAS (points) | ||||
| Group A | 56.7 ± 7.2 | 91.3 ± 5.1 | −23.131 | |
| Group B | 57.9 ± 6.4 | 90.7 ± 6.2 | −19.927 | |
| VAS (points) | ||||
| Group A | 6.8 ± 0.9 | 1.4 ± 0.5 | 8.256 | |
| Group B | 6.4 ± 1.0 | 1.1 ± 0.9 | 7.115 | |
| Karlsson (points) | ||||
| Group A | 60.2 ± 5.7 | 89.2 ± 4.4 | −19.185 | |
| Group B | 58.4 ± 6.9 | 86.4 ± 6.0 | −20.375 | |
| Anterior displacement (mm‘ x ± s) | ||||
| Group A | 14.8 ± 3.4 | 2.9 ± 1.7 | 14.859 | |
| Group B | 15.0 ± 2.5 | 3.0 ± 0.7 | 13.294 | |
| Talar tilt (° | ||||
| Group A | 13.7 ± 2.6 | 2.7 ± 1.6 | 12.729 | |
| Group B | 12.8 ± 2.9 | 2.3 ± 1.9 | 16.648 | |
The changes in muscle strength of the foot.
| The affected foot pre- and postoperative | The affected foot postoperative and the normal foot | |||
| Valgus | Inversion | Valgus | Inversion | |
| -∞ - -5N (Weaken) | ||||
| Group A | 5 | 1 | 15 | 1 |
| Group B | 25 | 2 | 30 | 2 |
| -5N - +5N (No change) | ||||
| Group A | 38 | 42 | 30 | 2 |
| Group B | 15 | 38 | 12 | 40 |
| +5N - +∞ (Enhance) | ||||
| Group A | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
| Group B | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |