Literature DB >> 33181626

Comparison of rotational stability and repositioning rates of 2 presbyopia-correcting and 2 monofocal toric intraocular lenses.

Bryan S Lee1, Alex C Onishi, David F Chang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the rotational stability of 2 commonly used toric presbyopia-correcting (PC) intraocular lenses (IOLs) and their monofocal toric counterparts.
SETTING: Single 2-surgeon private practice.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
METHODS: This study included 2 cohorts: (1) all eyes receiving a toric ReSTOR (n = 61 eyes, 49 patients) or toric Symfony (n = 779 eyes, 520 patients) IOL from September 2016 to January 2019; and (2) all eyes receiving an AcrySof (n = 2 393) or TECNIS (n = 731) monofocal toric IOL (TIOL) from April 2015 to January 2019. Eyes were only excluded if digital marking could not be used. All patients had image-guided digital marking to verify TIOL position at the conclusion of surgery. Postoperative rotation was determined by dilated examination performed later on the day of surgery or the following morning.
RESULTS: The toric ReSTOR IOL was more likely to rotate 5 degrees or less than the toric Symfony IOL, 91.8% vs 79.0% (P = .01). This remained true for rotation of 10 degrees or less (100% vs 89.5%, P < 0.003). The mean rotation was 2.3 degrees for toric ReSTOR IOL compared with 4.5 for toric Symfony IOL (P = .01). Statistically significantly more eyes with toric Symfony IOL required a return to the operating room for repositioning (6.9% vs 0%, P < .03). More TECNIS monofocal TIOL eyes required surgical repositioning than AcrySof monofocal TIOL eyes (3.5% vs 1.2%, P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Between these PC-TIOLs, the Symfony IOL was more likely to rotate and to require surgical repositioning than the ReSTOR IOL. The TECNIS TIOL built on the same platform as the Symfony IOL was more likely to require surgical repositioning than that by the AcrySof TIOL. Despite comparable rotational stability between the Symfony and TECNIS monofocal TIOLs, the Symfony was twice as likely to require surgical repositioning.
Copyright © 2021 Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33181626     DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of the clinical outcomes of Eyecryl and Tecnis® toric intraocular lenses: A real-world study.

Authors:  Mithun Thulasidas; Ajita Sasidharan; Balam Pradeep
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 2.969

2.  Rotational stability of modified toric intraocular lens.

Authors:  Ryoko Osawa; Tetsuro Oshika; Masahiko Sano; Takuma Yuguchi; Tadayoshi Kaiya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Toric intraocular lenses: Evidence-based use.

Authors:  Michael Goggin
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-05-29       Impact factor: 4.383

4.  Comparison of the Visual Outcomes of an Extended Depth-of-Focus Lens and a Trifocal Lens.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; James Ellis; Daniel Beesley; Shannon E McCabe; Adam Lewis; William B West; Yasmyne Ronquillo; Phillip Hoopes
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.