Literature DB >> 33181189

Disentangling top-down and bottom-up influences on blinks in the visual and auditory domain.

Mareike Brych1, Barbara Händel2.   

Abstract

Sensory input as well as cognitive factors can drive the modulation of blinking. Our aim was to dissociate sensory driven bottom-up from cognitive top-down influences on blinking behavior and compare these influences between the auditory and the visual domain. Using an oddball paradigm, we found a significant pre-stimulus decrease in blink probability for visual input compared to auditory input. Sensory input further led to an early post-stimulus blink increase in both modalities if a task demanded attention to the input. Only visual input caused a pronounced early increase without a task. In case of a target or the omission of a stimulus (as compared to standard input), an additional late increase in blink rate was found in the auditory and visual domain. This suggests that blink modulation must be based on the interpretation of the input, but does not need any sensory input at all to occur. Our results show a complex modulation of blinking based on top-down factors such as prediction and attention in addition to sensory-based influences. The magnitude of the modulation is mainly influenced by general attentional demands, while the latency of this modulation allows dissociating general from specific top-down influences that are independent of the sensory domain.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Attention; Auditory domain; Eye blinks; Oddball; Visual domain

Year:  2020        PMID: 33181189     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  1 in total

1.  Motor restrictions impair divergent thinking during walking and during sitting.

Authors:  Supriya Murali; Barbara Händel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-01-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.