| Literature DB >> 33180857 |
Justyna Kujawska1, Małgorzata Pawłowska1.
Abstract
The most economical method of drill cuttings disposal may be their application in land reclamation which allows for the wastes recovery. However, the wastes application into the soil should ensure that the quality of the environment would not be deteriorated. These investigations were aimed at identifying the effect of drill cuttings, which were the mixture of different types of drilling wastes, on the physicochemical properties of acidic soil and growth of red clover (Trifolium pratense L.). The experimental design comprised 5 treatments, which differed in a dose of the drill cuttings: 0% (control), 2.5%, 5%, 10% and 15% of dry weight. A six-week pot experiment was conducted to determine the influence of the wastes on the plant growth. The results showed that the drill cuttings addition significantly changed the chemical and physicochemical properties of the soil, such as: electrical conductivity (EC), pH, base saturation, content of carbonate, alkaline cations (Ca2+, Na+, K+, Mg2+), organic matter, total organic carbon (TOC), and available phosphorus form. However, the most important factors that influenced the growth of red clover were pH, base saturation, content of Mg2+ and plant available phosphorus. The red clover biomass was increased from 1.5 to 2.5 times depending on the dose of wastes. We concluded that the examined wastes can be used for reclamation of the acid and unfertile degraded soils, but the amount of wastes should not exceed 5% of the soil, because the highest total clover biomass was observed just at this dose.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33180857 PMCID: PMC7660460 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242081
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Physicochemical properties of drill cuttings.
| Parameters | Drill cuttings |
|---|---|
| Granulometric composition | |
| • sand fraction [%] | 75±9 |
| • silt fraction [% of weight] | 18±8 |
| • clay fraction [% of weight] | 7±3 |
| Specific gravity [g/cm3] | 2.62±0.02 |
| Bulk density [g/cm3] | 1.02±0.09 |
| Porosity [%] | 60.68±2.76 |
| Carbonate content [%] | 36.22±3.60 |
| Total exchangeable bases–TEB [cmol(+)/kg] | 49.50±0.24 |
| Hydrolytic acidity–H [cmol(+)/kg] | 0.15±0.01 |
| Cation exchange capacity–CEC [cmol(+)/kg] | 49.65±1.74 |
| Organic matter [% of dry weight] | 11.52±0.21 |
| pH | 9.6±2.31 |
| Electrical conductivity (EC) [mS/m] | 40.1±2.68 |
| N tot. [% of dry weight] | 0.04±0.001 |
| TOC [% of dry weight] | 6.8±0.33 |
Composition of the soil substrates used in the pot experiment.
| Soil substrate | Share in the substrate | |
|---|---|---|
| (% of “air dried” mass) | ||
| Drill cuttings | Soil | |
| 0 | 100 | |
| 2.5 | 97.5 | |
| 5 | 95 | |
| 10 | 90 | |
| 15 | 85 | |
Physical properties of the soil and the mixtures (average value ± standard deviation).
| Soil substrate | Granulometric composition | Specific gravity | Bulk density | Porosity [%] | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [%] | ||||||
| Sand fraction | Silt fraction | Clay fraction | [g·cm-3] | [g·cm-3] | ||
| 23 | 71 | 6 | 2.57a ± 0.08 | 1.14a ± 0.01 | 55.45a | |
| 27 | 68 | 5 | 2.56a ± 0.01 | 1.13a ± 0.05 | 55.80a | |
| 30 | 65 | 5 | 2.61a ± 0.03 | 1.14a ± 0.01 | 56.30a | |
| 32 | 63 | 5 | 2.59a ± 0.02 | 1.20a ± 0.01 | 53.73a | |
| 52 | 42 | 6 | 2.73a ± 0.01 | 1.16a ± 0.01 | 57.69a | |
Selected chemical properties of the soils and the mixtures (average value ±standard deviation).
| Soil substrate | Carbonate | Organic matter | Total nitrogen | Total organic carbon | C/N | pH | EC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [%] | [mS cm-1] | ||||||
| 0.36c± 0.02 | 1.9b± 0.1 | 0.06a± 0.01 | 1.09a± 0.01 | 18.2 | 4.16d± 0.02 | 0.33e± 0.04 | |
| 0.9b± 0.05 | 2.0ab± 0.1 | 0.06a± 0.01 | 1.40a± 0.01 | 23.0 | 6.66c± 0.02 | 3.22d± 0.03 | |
| 1.39b± 0.28 | 2.2ab± 0.1 | 0.06a± 0.01 | 1.30a± 0.01 | 21.6 | 6.83c± 0.10 | 5.03c± 0.04 | |
| 3.44a± 1.28 | 2.3ab± 0.1 | 0.06a± 0.01 | 1.50a± 0.01 | 25.0 | 6.98b± 0.10 | 6.99b± 0.07 | |
| 3.67a± 0.9 | 2.6a± 0.1 | 0.06a± 0.01 | 1.50a± 0.01 | 25.0 | 7.09a± 0.05 | 9.93a± 0.02 | |
Fig 1Dendrogram of the HCA results for sorption properties (CEC, TEB, and V) of the examined soil substrates.
Effect of drill cuttings on exchangeable cations content and the degree of base saturation in s soil and mixtures (average value ± standard deviation).
| Mixtures | Exchangeable cations | Base saturation | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca2+ | Mg2+ | Na+ | K+ | V | |
| [cmol (+)/kg] | [%] | ||||
| 1.17 ± 0.03 | 0.74 ± 0.05 | 0.001 | 0.21 ± 0.05 | 26.43a | |
| 11.44 ± 5.32 | 1.12 ± 0.14 | 0.26 ± 0.01 | 0.44 ± 0.03 | 97.07b | |
| 23.64 ± 4.68 | 1.14 ± 0.15 | 0.41 ± 0.03 | 0.69 ± 0.06 | 97.88b | |
| 43.73 ± 7.25 | 0.78 ± 0.02 | 0.84 ± 0.04 | 1.24 ± 0.14 | 97.48b | |
| 47.48 ±7.65 | 0.92 ± 0.09 | 1.14 ± 0.05 | 1.62 ± 0.17 | 97.71b | |
Available potassium and phosphorus in soil and the mixtures (average value ± standard deviation).
| Mixtures | Content of potassium | Content of phosphorus |
|---|---|---|
| [mg K2O 100 g-1 soil] | [mg P2O5 100 g-1 soil] | |
| Z–0 | 2.18a ±0.24 | 5.79a ± 0.98 |
| Z–2.5 | 5.11b ± 0.94 | 6.11b ± 0.17 |
| Z–5 | 9.21c ± 0.81 | 6.02b ± 0.61 |
| Z–10 | 16.85d ± 0.51 | 6.09b ± 0.97 |
| Z–15 | 22.6e ± 0.31 | 5.63a ± 0.23 |
Mean values (and the standard deviation) of red clover dry biomass obtained in the pot experiment conducted on soil and soil-waste mixtures.
| Mixtures | Biomass roots | Biomass shoot | Total biomass |
|---|---|---|---|
| [g] | |||
| 0.20a ± 0.08 | 0.16a ± 0.01 | 0.36a | |
| 0.23a ± 0.01 | 0.39b ± 0.02 | 0.62a | |
| 0.32a ± 0.09 | 0.55b ± 0.07 | 0.87b | |
| 0.25a ± 0.03 | 0.41b ± 0.05 | 0.66ab | |
| 0.28a ± 0.09 | 0.27c ± 0.04 | 0.55a | |
Correlations between the principal components and the analyzed variables (p < 0.002).
| No. | Variable | Principial component | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCA1 | PCA2 | ||
| 1 | Specific gravity | 0.69 | -0.46 |
| 2 | Bulk density | 0.54 | -0.28 |
| 3 | Porosity | 0.21 | -0.15 |
| 4 | Carbonate | -0.34 | |
| 5 | Organic matter | -0.40 | |
| 6 | Total nitrogen | 0.04 | -0.04 |
| 7 | Total organic carbon | 0.21 | |
| 8 | C/N | 0.69 | 0.17 |
| 9 | pH | 0.38 | |
| 10 | EC | 0.02 | |
| 11 | Ca2+ | -0.21 | |
| 12 | Mg2+ | 0.17 | |
| 13 | Na+ | -0.31 | |
| 14 | K+ | -0.34 | |
| 15 | Base saturation (V) | 0.49 | |
| 16 | Biomass of roots | 0.65 | 0.41 |
| 17 | Biomass of shoots | 0.42 | |
| 18 | Total biomass | 0.51 | |
| 19 | Available K (K2O) | -0.35 | |
| 20 | Available P (P2O5) | 0.06 | |
| Explained variance (%) | 53.13 | 21.36 | |
| Cumulative (%) | 53.13 | 74.49 | |
The highest contributions of variables are highlighted in bold.
Fig 2Projection of the variables of the factor plane.
The correlation matrix is singular, so the generalized reciprocal method is used.
Fig 3Projection of the cases on the factor plane.
The correlation matrix is singular, so the generalized reciprocal method is used.