| Literature DB >> 33180784 |
Kavitha Kannan1, Rebecca John1, Debasree Kundu1, Divya Dayanand1, Kundavaram P P Abhilash2, Alice Joan Mathuram3, Anand Zachariah3, Sowmya Sathyendra3, Samuel G Hansdak3, O C Abraham3, Karthik Gunasekaran3, Ramya Iyadurai3, Asha M Abraham4, John Antony Jude Prakash5, Binesh Lal Yesudhason5, Balaji Veeraraghavan5, M L Kavitha6, Linda R Jose7, M N Sumana7, Kavitha Saravu8, George M Varghese1.
Abstract
Diagnosis of scrub typhus, caused by the bacterium Orientia tsutsugamushi, is challenging because of the overlap of its non-specific symptoms with other infections coupled with the lack of sufficient data on the performance of diagnostic tests. Early diagnosis of scrub typhus is crucial to improve outcomes and this study evaluates the diagnostic performance of various tests. The present study aims at assessing the accuracy of various rapid diagnostic tests, serologic tests, and nucleic acid amplification methods on well-characterized patient samples. Adult patients with acute febrile illness and manifestations suggestive of scrub typhus confirmed by positive PCR in the blood, eschar or tissue were characterized as cases. Patients with acute febrile illness and a confirmed alternate etiology such as culture-confirmed typhoid, smear/PCR positive for malaria, PCR/NS1 antigen positive for dengue, PCR positive for influenza, PCR/MAT positive for leptospirosis, PCR positive for spotted fever were characterized as controls with other infections. The healthy controls consisted of subjects from the same geographic region. We performed the following tests on blood samples for scrub typhus and calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value: (1) Quantitative real time PCR using 47kDa gene (qPCR); (2) Conventional PCR using 56kDa gene (cPCR); (3) Loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay (LAMP assay); (4) Immunofluorescence assay (IFA); (5) Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA); (6) Weil-Felix test(WF test); and (7) Immunochromatographic Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT).Among the 316 participants, 158 had confirmed scrub typhus (cases) and 158 were controls. ELISA and RDT detecting Orientia tsutsugamushi specific IgM antibodies had excellent discriminative potential with sensitivities and specificities of 92%, 94% and 92%, 92% respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of IFA were found to be 95% and 74% respectively. IgM serology had a false positivity rate of 8% with other acute febrile illnesses such as dengue, leptospirosis and spotted fever due to the nonspecific binding of the pentavalent IgM. LAMP assay had 91.7% sensitivity and 77.2% specificity while qPCR provided excellent sensitivity (97%) and perfect specificity. In conclusion, ELISA and RDT detecting Orientia tsutsugamushi specific IgM antibodies have excellent sensitivity and specificity while the accuracy of IFA is suboptimal for the diagnosis of scrub typhus. Given its perfect specificity and superior sensitivity, qPCR is preferred for diagnostic confirmation in reference laboratories particularly for diagnosis of early disease with less than 7 days duration. This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of all currently available diagnostic tests for scrub typhus.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33180784 PMCID: PMC7660479 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008747
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Primers used for the Scrub typhus.
| Name | Length (bp) | Tm | Sequence 5'—3' |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5′-AATTGCTAGTGCAATGTCTG-3 | |||
| 5′-GGCATTATAGTAGGCTGAG-3′ | |||
| 5’- AACTGATTTTATTCAAACTAATGCTGCT-3’ | |||
| 5’-TATGCCTGAGTAAGATACRTGAATRGAATT-3’ | |||
| 5’-FAM-TGGGTAGCTTTGGTGGACCGATGTTTAATCT-TAMRA-3’. | |||
| 21 | 55.1 | TGACCGYGGATATATATCACA | |
| 20 | 55.5 | CAATGCRGTAAGAGCTTCTC | |
| 23–22 | 56.3–60.1 | GCACTGTAGATACCTTCTGATCCAATACTTTGCAACRAATCGTGAA | |
| 20–20 | 55.6–61.8 | CCACTKGTTCCTGTGCTTGACGTCTACATCATCAGCAATCA | |
| 26 | 58.5 | GGATTTTCAAATTCRGTAATCATCTT | |
| 20 | 59.8 | CTCAYACTGGCAAGCCATTA | |
Patient characteristics.
| Patient Characteristics | Cases (N = 158) | Controls (N = 158) | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Years, Mean ± SD | 46·1 ± 15·0 | 40·3 ± 19·5 | 0.005 |
| Sex, Male | 79 (50) | 98 (62) | 0.041 |
| Occupation: Agriculture / daily labour | 65 (41) | 44 (28) | 0.342 |
| Duration of illness before admission (days) | 9 (3–20) | 6 (3–18) | 0.142 |
| Fever present at admission (%) | 157 (99·4) | 98/118 (83%) | <0.001 |
| Eschar present (%) | 125 (79·1) | 0 (0·0) | <0.001 |
| WBC Count, mean ± SD | 10175±4885 | 7314±5569 | <0.001 |
| Platelet Count, mean ± SD | 78562±65987 | 121608±125119 | 0.001 |
| Total Bilirubin, mg/dl, mean ± SD | 2·10±2·59 | 1·76±2·21 | 0.243 |
| Direct Bilirubin, mg/dl, mean ± SD | 1·51±2·32 | 0·87±1·52 | 0.04 |
| Total Protein, g/dl, mean ± SD | 6·44±0·97 | 6·57±0·81 | 0.483 |
| Albumin, g/dl, mean ± SD | 3±2·45 | 3·58±0·63 | <0.001 |
| AST, IU/ l, mean ± SD | 170·48±318·24 | 159·14±276·85 | <0.001 |
| ALT, IU/ l, mean ± SD | 101·12±129·41 | 118·50±334·15 | <0.001 |
| Alkaline Phosphatase, mean ± SD | 189·92±137·73 | 138·36±143·85 | <0.001 |
| Serum Creatinine, mg/dl, mean ± SD | 2·2±6·61 | 1·04±0·51 | 0.251 |
SD, standard deviation; N, sample size; AST, aspartate transaminase; ALT, alanine transaminase
Fig 1Schematic representation of the study. This figure details the patient enrolment, diagnostic test performed and positive results.
Fig 2Graphical representation of the sensitivity and specificity of the different diagnostic test performed.
Sensitivities and specificities of the molecular tests qPCR, cPCR and LAMP assay were found to be 97% & 100%, 75% & 100% and 92% & 77% respectively. The serological tests IFA assay, IgM ELISA and Weil Felix test have sensitivities and specificities of 95.6% & 74%, 94.2% & 93.67% and 15.82% & 96.6% respectively. Among the immunochromatographic RDTs Immune med, InBios and SD Bioline had sensitivities and specificities of 91.8% & 92.4%, 87.3% & 89.2% and 91.8 & 86.1% respectively.
Comparison of various diagnostic tests for scrub typhus.
| Diagnostic Test (N-316; Cases-158,Controls-158) | Sensitivity (95%CI) | Specificity (95%CI) | PPV (95%CI) | NPV (95%CI) | Accuracy | Likelihood Ratio (+VE) | Likelihood Ratio (-VE) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 75·32% (67.8–81.8) | 100% (95.4–100) | 100% (96.5–100) | 80·20% (73.9–85.5) | 87·66% (83.5–91.1) | - | 0·25 (0.19–0.32) | ||
| 97·47% (93.8–99.3) | 100% (96.5–100) | 100% (96.5–100) | 97·53% (93.6–99.3) | 98·73% (96.8–99.7) | - | 0·03 (0.01–0.07) | ||
| 91·77% (86.3–95.5) | 77·22% (69.9–83.5) | 80·11% (73.5–85.7) | 90·37% (84.1–94.8) | 84·49% (80.02–88.3) | 4·03 (3.09–5.39) | 0·11 (0.06–0.18) | ||
| 95·57% (91.1–98.2) | 74·05% (66.5–80.7) | 78·65% (72.2–84.2) | 94·35% (88.7–97.7) | 84·81% (80.4–88.6) | 3·68 (2.82–4.8) | 0·06 (0.03–0.12) | ||
| 92·41% (86.8–96) | 93·67% (88.7–96.9) | 93·59% (88.5–96.9) | 92·50% (87.3–96.1) | 93·04% (89.7–95.6) | 14·6 (8–26.6) | 0·08 (0.05–0.14) | ||
| 91·77% (86.3–95.5) | 86·08% (79.7–91.9) | 86·83% (80.7–91.6) | 91·28% (85.5–95.3) | 88·92% (84.9–92.2) | 6·59 (4.46–9.74) | 0·10 (0.06–0.16) | ||
| 87·34% (81.1–92.1) | 89·24% (83.3–93.6) | 89·03% (83–93.5) | 87·58% (81.5–92.2) | 88·29% (84.2–91.6) | 8·12 (5.16–12.77) | 0·14 (0.09–0.21) | ||
| 91·77% (86.4–95.6) | 92·41% (87–96) | 92·36% (87.1–96) | 91·82% (86.3–95.5) | 92·09% (88.5–94.8) | 12·08 (7–20.9) | 0·09 (0.05–0.15) | ||
| 15·82% (10.6–22.6) | 96·60% (91.8–98.7) | 83·33% (64.5–93.6) | 51·64% (45.5–57.6) | 54·75% (48.98–60.4) | 4·65 (1.83–11.83) | 0·87 (0.81–0.94) | ||
N, sample size; 95%CI, 95% confidence interval; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value. All the assays were performed on 158 cases and 158 controls except for Weil Felix test for which 158 cases and 147 controls were included.