Literature DB >> 33180641

Anatomical variability in the upper tracheobronchial tree: sex-based differences and implications for personalized inhalation therapies.

Simoni Christou1, Thanasis Chatziathanasiou1, Stelios Angeli2, Pantelis Koullapis1, Fotos Stylianou1, Josué Sznitman3, Haiwei Henry Guo4, Stavros C Kassinos1.   

Abstract

The morphometry of the large conducting airways is presumed to have a strong effect on the regional deposition of inhaled aerosol particles. Nevertheless, sex-based differences have not been fully quantified and are still largely ignored in designing inhalation therapies. To this end, we retrospectively analyzed high-resolution computed tomography scans for 185 individuals (90 women, 95 men) in the age range of 12-89 yr to determine airway luminal areas, airway lengths, and bifurcation angles. Only subjects free of chronic airway disease were considered. In men, luminal areas of the upper conducting airways were, on average, ∼30%-50% larger when compared with those in women, with the largest differences found in the trachea (289.72 ± 54.25 vs. 193.50 ± 42.37 mm2 for men and women, respectively). The ratio of the largest luminal area in men to the smallest luminal area in women (in any given segment) ranged between 4.5 and 8.6, the largest differences being found in the lobar bronchi. Sex-based differences were minor in the case of bifurcation angles (e.g., average main bifurcation angle: 93.04 ± 9.58° vs. 91.03 ± 9.81° for men and women, respectively), but large intersubject variability was found irrespective of sex (e.g., range of main bifurcation angle: 65.04°-122.01° vs. 69.46°-113.94° for men and women, respectively). Bronchial segments were shorter by ∼5%-20% in women relative to men, the largest differences being located in the upper lobes. False discovery rate analysis revealed statistically significant associations among morphometric measures of the right lung in women (but not in men), suggesting two phenotypes among women that we attribute to the smaller female thoracic volume.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We found significant sex-based morphometric differences in the central airways of healthy men and women that were only mildly attenuated in subsets matched for lung volume. Lumen areas were significantly larger in men (∼30%-50%). Large variability (∼75%-87%) in airway bifurcation angles (60°-122°) was found irrespective of sex. The branching pattern of the right main and right upper bronchi in women (but not in men) follows two phenotypes modulated by lung volume.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anatomy; morphometry; population study; sex-based differences; upper airways

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33180641     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00144.2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  8 in total

1.  A computed tomography imaging-based subject-specific whole-lung deposition model.

Authors:  Xuan Zhang; Frank Li; Prathish K Rajaraman; Jiwoong Choi; Alejandro P Comellas; Eric A Hoffman; Benjamin M Smith; Ching-Long Lin
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 5.112

Review 2.  iBCS: 1. Principles and Framework of an Inhalation-Based Biopharmaceutics Classification System.

Authors:  Jayne E Hastedt; Per Bäckman; Antonio Cabal; Andy Clark; Carsten Ehrhardt; Ben Forbes; Anthony J Hickey; Guenther Hochhaus; Wenlei Jiang; Stavros Kassinos; Philip J Kuehl; David Prime; Yoen-Ju Son; Simon Teague; Ulrika Tehler; Jennifer Wylie
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 3.  Evaluation of sex-based differences in airway size and the physiological implications.

Authors:  Leah M Mann; Sarah A Angus; Connor J Doherty; Paolo B Dominelli
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Gender modifies the effect of body mass index on lung function decline in mild-to-moderate COPD patients: a pooled analysis.

Authors:  Wenjia Chen; Mohsen Sadatsafavi; J Mark FitzGerald; Larry D Lynd; Don D Sin
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2021-02-18

Review 5.  Anatomical Engineering and 3D Printing for Surgery and Medical Devices: International Review and Future Exponential Innovations.

Authors:  José Cornejo; Jorge A Cornejo-Aguilar; Mariela Vargas; Carlos G Helguero; Rafhael Milanezi de Andrade; Sebastian Torres-Montoya; Javier Asensio-Salazar; Alvaro Rivero Calle; Jaime Martínez Santos; Aaron Damon; Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa; Miguel D Quintero-Consuegra; Juan Pablo Umaña; Sebastian Gallo-Bernal; Manolo Briceño; Paolo Tripodi; Raul Sebastian; Paul Perales-Villarroel; Gabriel De la Cruz-Ku; Travis Mckenzie; Victor Sebastian Arruarana; Jiakai Ji; Laura Zuluaga; Daniela A Haehn; Albit Paoli; Jordan C Villa; Roxana Martinez; Cristians Gonzalez; Rafael J Grossmann; Gabriel Escalona; Ilaria Cinelli; Thais Russomano
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Sex differences in the ventilatory responses to exercise in mild to moderate obesity.

Authors:  Dharini M Bhammar; Bryce N Balmain; Tony G Babb; Vipa Bernhardt
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2022-07-17       Impact factor: 2.858

7.  iBCS: 2. Mechanistic Modeling of Pulmonary Availability of Inhaled Drugs versus Critical Product Attributes.

Authors:  Per Bäckman; Antonio Cabal; Andy Clark; Carsten Ehrhardt; Ben Forbes; Jayne Hastedt; Anthony Hickey; Guenther Hochhaus; Wenlei Jiang; Stavros Kassinos; Philip J Kuehl; David Prime; Yoen-Ju Son; Simon P Teague; Ulrika Tehler; Jennifer Wylie
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 8.  The physics of respiratory particle generation, fate in the air, and inhalation.

Authors:  Lidia Morawska; Giorgio Buonanno; Alex Mikszewski; Luca Stabile
Journal:  Nat Rev Phys       Date:  2022-08-31
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.