Literature DB >> 33178808

Carotid artery stenosis and inflammatory biomarkers: the role of inflammation-induced immunological responses affecting the vascular systems.

Tissa Wijeratne1,2,3, Rohit Menon4, Carmela Sales4, Leila Karimi5,6, Sheila Crewther5.   

Abstract

The death, disability and economic cost of stroke are enormous. Indeed, among the 16 million people worldwide who suffer a stroke' annually, nearly six million die, and another five million are left permanently disabled making prevention of stroke one of the most important priorities in healthcare. Currently carotid artery stenosis (CS) or narrowing of the common carotid artery (CCA) or internal carotid artery (ICA) due to atherosclerotic plaque, accounts for 20-30% of all ischemic strokes. Atherosclerosis is now regarded as a chronic inflammatory disease in response to vascular compromise especially from hypertension. This has long been known to lead to inflammation and atherosclerotic plaque formation in the blood vessels. This mini-review aims to highlight the role of inflammation and neuro-immunological processes in carotid artery disease. Various cellular elements of inflammation and advanced imaging techniques have been identified as potential markers of plaque progression. Therapies related to decreasing and modulating immune-responsive inflammation in the carotid vessels have been shown to translate into decreased occurrence of acute neurologic events and improvement of clinical outcomes. 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carotid artery stenosis (CS); Stroke; atherosclerosis; biomarkers; hypertension; inflammation; stroke prevention

Year:  2020        PMID: 33178808      PMCID: PMC7607082          DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-4388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN: 2305-5839


Introduction

Stroke is the second leading cause of mortality and a leading cause of adult disability in the world (1-7). The majority of strokes are of the ischaemic subtype, with 20–40% suffering from intracranial atherosclerotic disease (8). An estimate of 20–30% of all strokes are attributed to extracranial carotid artery stenosis (CS), most frequently occurring at the bifurcation of the internal and external carotid artery (9). The prevalence of CS in individuals over 80 years of age is approximately 5–7% in women and 9–12% in men, with 1% and 3% respectively having high-grade CS (defined as 70% stenosis or reduction of diameter of >70%) (10,11). Hypertension is an important risk factor for the development of atherosclerosis and inflammation (12). Other risk factors for atherosclerosis includes unhealthy blood cholesterol levels, diabetes, overweight/obesity, unhealthy diet (food that are high in trans-fat and saturated fat, cholesterol and sodium), smoking, insulin resistance, older age (men the risk increases after age of 45 years, women risk increases after the age of 55 years), family history of lipid disorders, sleep apnoea, stress and age-related inflammation is emerging as a specific risk factor for atherosclerosis.

Inflammation and plaque atherogenesis: the role of acute and chronic inflammatory processes

Atherosclerosis is central to the pathogenesis of CS. Hansson et al. describes this process as a long-standing, maladaptive disease which is anchored on the principles of the Virchow’s triad: (I) stasis, (II) hypercoagulability, and (III) endothelial dysfunction (13). The simple view of atherosclerosis as a disorder of abnormal lipid deposition is redefined by complex, chronic, infllammatory process. This maladaptive, non resolving process occurs at sites of blood flow disturbance. Subendothelial retention of cholesterol containing lipoproteins and flow mediated inflammatory changes within the endothelial cells trigger the process of atherogenesis (13). Monocyte derived macrophages, T cells interspersed with lipids and debris from dead cells can be found in these lesions. Cells of these lesions demonstrate on going features of inflammation with T cells, macrophages, proinflammatory cytokines with pro and anti-inflammatory signals (5,6,13). Jonasson et al. noted the important interactions between smooth muscle cells and blood born cells in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis (14). Additionally, soluble Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule (sVCAM-1), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) have also been demonstrated to be present ubiquitously whenever high cholesterol-laden plasma lipoproteins are present in blood (15,16). Interestingly, pathologic studies of carotid plaques also validated the presence of Chlamydia pneumoniae which has been associated with increased levels of high sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and IL-6, both linked to acute coronary and vascular events (17). Various authors have proposed that the presence of this organism incites plaque progression (presence of Chlamydia in blood will have the same effect) in coronary and carotid specimens which results in prolonged arterial wall infection (17,18). Despite an ongoing inflammation present in its core, the plaque is made stable largely due to the presence of an overlying intact endothelium which may remain for years without any overt clinical manifestations highlighting the potential time for treatment of high lipid levels and clinical signs of compromise (19). Various morphological features differentiate symptomatic from asymptomatic CS. Histopathological evaluation of endarterectomy specimens show that plaque rupture, fibrous cap thinning, and fibrous cap foam-cell infiltration was strikingly more prominent (20). Biomarkers such as monocyte chemotactic protein, which is essential in the transmigration of monocytes and macrophages across the endothelium has been shown to be higher in patients with symptomatic CS (21,22). Compared to their asymptomatic counterparts, patients with symptomatic CS also have higher white blood cell and neutrophil count, and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (23). NLR represents the rise in the level of neutrophil, a marker of any type of acute inflammation coupled with the decrease in the lymphocyte count which is more related to persistent physiological stress (24) or low-level chronic inflammation (25). The same trend was observed by Varim et al. with regards to platelet to lymphocyte ratio among patients with severe CS. This increase is likely attributed to megakaryocytic proliferation mediated by the inflammatory mediators, IL-1 and IL-6 (26). Another marker which has been shown to be increased in patients with symptomatic CS is the Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor (suPAR) which is ubiquitous in various cells involved in atherogenesis such as monocytes, neutrophils, activated T-lymphocytes, macrophages, endothelial cells, and smooth muscle cells (27). Circulating suPAR levels are elevated in various medical conditions associated with inflammation such as kidney disease, increasing age, diabetes, atherosclerosis, heart failure, sepsis, human immunodeficiency virus, autoimmune diseases, and smoking (28,29).

Inflammatory markers associated with carotid stenosis

The presence of atherosclerotic lesions in carotid arteries has been linked with hypertension and increased serum levels of inflammatory markers leading to induced oxidative stress in the walls of the vascular system (12). The cells of atherosclerotic plaque are a secondary source of cytokines which have both local and systemic actions causing further inflammatory processes. This leads to the development of plaques that protrude into the arterial lumen as they progress, causing arterial stenoses and eventually occlusions (30). Debing et al. 2008, compared 180 gender age-matched controls and 180 patients with stenosis of the internal carotid artery (ICA), and noted higher levels of hsCRP, (sVCAM, IL-6 in the carotid endarterectomy (CEA) group (30) and proposed that these inflammatory markers could serve as biomarkers for CS. The best validated of these markers (for CS) are hsCRP (16,31,32), IL-6 and (33). Osteopontin (OPN), an integrin-binding ligand has a role in atherosclerosis as it increases the inflammation in the atherosclerotic plaque (34). Patients with CS (n=40) showed a two fold increase in OPN levels with positive correlations with intraplaque count of total neutrophils, macrophages and MMP-9 content in both symptomatic (n=40) and asymptomatic (n=185) patients (35). OPN promises to be a clinical as well as therapeutic tool for atherosclerosis and carotid stenosis with immense research interest for the future. Carotid intima-medial thickness (c-IMT), (thickness of the carotid arteries), has also been used as a surrogate marker for the extent of carotid atherosclerosis by Ammirati and colleagues who associated greater progression of cIMT with high levels of inflammatory markers (10). In addition, Puz et al. demonstrated a link between increased inflammatory markers and destabilisation of plaques (32). While fluctuations in the level of these biomarkers may indicate changes in the level of stenosis and likelihood of having an unstable plaque, a causal relationship between inflammatory biomarkers and the actual existing degree of carotid stenosis is yet to be established (10,32,36). Rather it is highly likely that any type of inflammation induces higher levels of cytokines and if persistent will induce permanent vascular compromise (37). Other examples of potential biomarkers for CS include serum amyloid A (SAA), lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2), matrix metallo-proteinases (MMP), IL-1B, IL-10 and sVCAM, adiponectin, CD40 ligand, Leptin, infectious agents such as Chlamydia pneumonia, Helicobacter pylori, cytomegalovirus seropositivity (16,38).

Comparison of the effects of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) surgery

Inflammatory biomarkers have been shown to be useful in carotid revascularization procedures. By looking at the serum S100 protein levels, which is a marker of cerebral injury, it has been demonstrated patients with vulnerable plaques have higher blood levels of the former and was more pronounced in patients undergoing CAS (39). A prospective cohort including 225 patients with severe CS undergoing CAS also showed that elevated TNF levels correlated with the occurrence of new DWI lesions post-surgery (40). The higher serum TNF-α levels noted to be associated with higher likelihood of new DWI lesions after CAS and the presence of intraplaque haemorrhage (IPH) (40). Zuniga and colleagues also showed that inflammatory biomarkers such as IL-12p40, SDF1-α and TNF correlated with the occurrence of cognitive dysfunction after CEA or CAS (41). When compared with carotid stenting (55 patients), endarterectomy (43 patients) demonstrated postoperative improvement in cognition at one and six months compared with the baseline. Carotid stenting and age older than 80 years were associated with significant long-term cognitive impairment. Moreover, multiple inflammatory cytokines such as IL-12p, Stromal cell-derived factor 1 alpha (SDF-1α), TNF- α was associated with a higher risk of significant cognitive impairment at one month. SDF-1α, TNF- α were independent predictors of cognitive impairment while IL-6 showed cognitive protective effects at six months after the revascularization procedure (41).

Inflammatory processes in symptomatic and asymptomatic CS

Imaging biomarkers of inflammation

Apart from systemic biomarkers, molecular imaging has been shown to correlate significantly with carotid plaque inflammation. Fundamental to this is the use of PET with F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose and 18F-Fluorocholine (18F-FDG) which reflect the degree of macrophage infiltration (42-44). Patients with symptomatic CAS have been shown to have greater uptake or “hot spots”, particularly in macrophage-rich areas of the plaque which also translates to greater plaque vulnerability (43). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has also been employed in the identification of inflammation by using gadolinium to track kinetic changes with respect to phagocyte activation and mobilization (45). In the ATHEROMA trial, ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO)-enhanced carotid MRI has been shown to correlate significantly with carotid plaque inflammation (46). BIOVASC (Biomarkers/Imaging Vulnerable Atherosclerosis in Symptomatic Carotid disease), a multicentre cohort study (n=109, 14 recurrent strokes) showed that plaque inflammation related to 18F-FDG uptake was able to predict future recurrent stroke post-PET (47). Detection of active inflammation within a plaque is a major feature of a high-risk vulnerable plaque and vulnerable patient (48,49).

Vulnerable plaque and acute inflammatory processes resulting in plaque rupture

Prior to the occurrence of a vascular event affecting the eye or the brain, various inflammatory processes come into play in a carotid atheroma making it susceptible to ulceration and subsequent rupture (50). Hence, it is important to identify features of plaque vulnerability in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic CS to identify patient groups who are likely to benefit from urgent treatment. An unstable plaque is pathologically characterized by the presence of a thin fibrous cap, a large lipid core, the presence of intraplaque hemorrhage and the infiltration of various inflammatory cells such as monocyte-derived macrophages and activated smooth muscle cells (13,51). Carr and colleagues have demonstrated that macrophages and T-lymphocytes expressing HLA-DR were predominant in endarterectomy specimens with evidence of plaque rupture (20). Proteolytic enzymes such MMPs and cathepsin cysteine proteases (CCP’s), along with the depletion of their inhibitors promotes the process of plaque ulceration and subsequent rupture (45,52). There is mounting evidence that the proteolytic enzyme MMP-9, a substance released by activated macrophages and capable of degrading the extracellular matrix, is more abundant in vulnerable plaques (52,53). In addition, biomarkers which have been shown to be elevated in patients with high risk plaques include sCD40L, hs-CRP, TIMP-1, and TIMP-2 (53,54). The concept of angiogenesis is also essential to understanding of the patho-mechanisms of plaque vulnerability as it plays a role in enhancing vascular leakage and permeability (55,56). Research has shown that vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a dual role of being an angiogenic and inflammatory cytokine in patients with highly susceptible plaques (56). Multimodal imaging of features such as the degree of inflammation, haemorrhage, neovascularity and the richness of the necrotic core by MRI has also been found to be useful in assessing the vulnerability of plaques (57). Techniques such as PET/CT have the advantage of being sensitive to the assessment of degree of inflammation in vulnerable plaques but are outweighed by MRI for their relative inability to assess anatomy, haemorrhage, and ulceration (51,57). The degree of echolucency in carotid ultrasound is also related to elevated levels of macrophages and lipid which also translates to plaque vulnerability (58).

Therapeutic potentials

Over the years, the annual risk of stroke and transient ischemic stroke associated with carotid stenosis has decreased. Presumably because there have been major strides in scientific understanding of the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and underlying inflammation which can lead to carotid stenosis. Such knowledge has led to both increased clinician awareness of biological risk factors and earlier diagnosis and more rigorous management and to public health awareness of diet and exercise routines (59). The management of carotid stenosis includes reduction of risk factors with lifestyle modification, pharmacological and/or surgical management, which may include CEA or CAS (60-63) and development of new therapeutic tools (64). In practice, pharmacological therapy should be instituted and optimised in all patients with carotid stenosis of higher risk requiring additional management beyond lifestyle modification. Modern intensive medical therapy is much safer than operative management, and surgical management is usually reserved for a subset of high-risk patients (61-63). A focus on a number of agents with anti-inflammatory properties has been reviewed (65). Lipid-lowering therapy such as statins are extensively used in the prevention of atherosclerosis. In addition to its lipid-lowering mechanism of action, statins have anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties effective in reducing cardiovascular risk as demonstrated in numerous randomised double-blind controlled trials (66-68). Research validates that they prevent the increasing thickness of the carotid arteries (c-IMT) which has been used as a marker of the extent of atherosclerosis (58,64,69) although this has many unfortunate side effects on cell membrane integrity in muscle and presumably elsewhere particularly brain where >60% of weight is lipoprotein in cell membranes. It is noteworthy to remember the fact that healthy lipids such as omega-3s and omega-6s, are vital for overall brain and general health. Healthy lipids are important to stabilize the neuronal cell’s structure in the brain. It can also reduce the inflammation and helps the immune system to function properly (70). Research dictates that aspirin, an extensively used antiplatelet agent, has anti-inflammatory properties conferring a benefit in atherosclerosis management in addition to its other mechanisms of action (66,67,71,72). Huo and colleagues demonstrated an association between folic acid (vitamin B9) and a reduction in both homocysteine levels (73) and the risk of stroke in a randomised trial involving 20,000 individuals (71). Herbs including turmeric, ginger and garlic and natural plants such as green tea have been postulated to have anti-inflammatory actions which may be beneficial in the prevention of atherosclerosis, however there have been no definitive clinical trials demonstrating this yet (74,75). Other drugs with anti-cytokine mechanisms typically used in other conditions have also been investigated. Colchicine is known to have anti-inflammatory actions and inhibits neutrophil function (76-79). It is widely used in the management of other inflammatory diseases such as gout and Behcet’s disease which fuelled the rationale to investigate the potential role of colchicine in improving cardiovascular outcomes. The LoDoCo trial demonstrated colchicine prevented recurrent cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary artery disease in addition to high dose statins (76-78). A drawback to colchicine is its narrow therapeutic index and many participants reported numerous intolerances. The COLCOT trial involving 4,745 individuals, concluded that low-dose colchicine significantly reduced ischaemic cardiovascular events (77,78). Moving forward, the LoDoCo2 trial aims to further validate the role of colchicine and results of this have yet to be published (77,79). Methotrexate widely used in management of rheumatoid arthritis, has an anti-inflammatory action against TNF, IL-6, and CRP. The CIRT trial aimed to investigate-the role of methotrexate and its action against these (TNF, IL-r, and CRP) inflammatory markers and in resulting cardiovascular outcomes (79). There was however no reduction in cardiovascular events and inflammatory markers IL-1b, IL-6 or CRP with low-dose methotrexate compared to placebo (79). Interest in the potential role of monoclonal human antibodies in preventing atherosclerosis has been the basis of a few clinical trials. Tocilizumab, a human monoclonal antibody against IL-6 receptor and etanercept, a TNF receptor antagonist, studied in ENTRACTE trial did not demonstrate a significant difference in cardiovascular outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis patients (80). The CANTOS trial involving 10,061 individuals compared canakinumab, an antibody against IL-1B with placebo. Findings showed that 3-monthly canakinumab led to significantly lower rates of cardiovascular events compared to placebo (81). The findings of upcoming clinical trials currently underway will provide more insights into the relationship between inflammation and atherosclerosis. It is promising that anti-inflammatory therapy may be beneficial in reducing atherosclerotic risk though, the consequences of interfering with immunity and host defence mechanisms across the whole body and with relation to the brain are still not fully understood. Careful consideration is required as these anti-inflammatory agents may potentiate the risk of infections. Whilst lifestyle modification remains a fundamental part of management, the availability of new pharmacological approaches enables us to expand our array of treatment strategies. The identification of sensitive and specific biomarkers for atherosclerosis will also further guide individualised therapy and achieve the goal of precision medicine.

Conclusions

The evidence reviewed here supports the concept of chronic inflammation as a contributory factor in atherosclerosis. Several studies have noted that better understanding of the biological control of biomarkers of inflammation are likely to predict potential impact of future vascular events. C-reactive protein measured as well as hsCRP, IL-6, IL-1 are among the front line of such potential biomarker lists. Greater awareness of NLR (82-85) and PLR (85-90) have the potential to play more active roles in diagnosis and prognosis in the setting of symptomatic CS and are well worth exploring further in clinical and translational research. Lastly better understanding of the therapeutic potential of immunomodulation in CS is an even more exciting treatment strategy. The promising results of the CANTOS trial are raising hopes of better therapeutic management of CS, i.e., potential for better management of one of the leading causes of death and disability worldwide. The article’s supplementary files as
  89 in total

Review 1.  Advanced carotid plaque imaging.

Authors:  L Hermus; G M van Dam; C J Zeebregts
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 7.069

Review 2.  Imaging of high-risk carotid artery plaques: current status and future directions.

Authors:  J Kevin DeMarco; John Huston
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.047

3.  Using serum s100-β protein as a biomarker for comparing silent brain injury in carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Ayman H Alserr; Hussein Elwan; Constantine N Antonopoulos; Amr Abdelreheem; Hossam Elmahdy; Ahmed Sayed; Ahmed Taha; Eirini Maratou; Elias Brountzos; Hussein Khairy; Christos D Liapis
Journal:  Int Angiol       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 4.  Inflammation as a marker for the prediction of internal carotid artery restenosis following eversion endarterectomy--evidence from clinical studies.

Authors:  Slobodan Tanaskovic; Esma R Isenovic; Djordje Radak
Journal:  Angiology       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 3.619

5.  Combined Effects of Inflammatory Status and Carotid Atherosclerosis: A 12-Year Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Florian J Mayer; Christoph J Binder; Oswald F Wagner; Martin Schillinger; Erich Minar; Wolfgang Mlekusch; Dimitris Tsiantoulas; Georg Goliasch; Matthias Hoke
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Efficacy of folic acid therapy in primary prevention of stroke among adults with hypertension in China: the CSPPT randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Yong Huo; Jianping Li; Xianhui Qin; Yining Huang; Xiaobin Wang; Rebecca F Gottesman; Genfu Tang; Binyan Wang; Dafang Chen; Mingli He; Jia Fu; Yefeng Cai; Xiuli Shi; Yan Zhang; Yimin Cui; Ningling Sun; Xiaoying Li; Xiaoshu Cheng; Jian'an Wang; Xinchun Yang; Tianlun Yang; Chuanshi Xiao; Gang Zhao; Qiang Dong; Dingliang Zhu; Xian Wang; Junbo Ge; Lianyou Zhao; Dayi Hu; Lisheng Liu; Fan Fan Hou
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Low-dose colchicine for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Stefan M Nidorf; John W Eikelboom; Charley A Budgeon; Peter L Thompson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 8.  Spices and Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Pi-Fen Tsui; Chin-Sheng Lin; Ling-Jun Ho; Jenn-Haung Lai
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Global, Regional, and Country-Specific Lifetime Risks of Stroke, 1990 and 2016.

Authors:  Valery L Feigin; Grant Nguyen; Kelly Cercy; Catherine O Johnson; Tahiya Alam; Priyakumari G Parmar; Amanuel A Abajobir; Kalkidan H Abate; Foad Abd-Allah; Ayenew N Abejie; Gebre Y Abyu; Zanfina Ademi; Gina Agarwal; Muktar B Ahmed; Rufus O Akinyemi; Rajaa Al-Raddadi; Leopold N Aminde; Catherine Amlie-Lefond; Hossein Ansari; Hamid Asayesh; Solomon W Asgedom; Tesfay M Atey; Henok T Ayele; Maciej Banach; Amitava Banerjee; Aleksandra Barac; Suzanne L Barker-Collo; Till Bärnighausen; Lars Barregard; Sanjay Basu; Neeraj Bedi; Masoud Behzadifar; Yannick Béjot; Derrick A Bennett; Isabela M Bensenor; Derbew F Berhe; Dube J Boneya; Michael Brainin; Ismael R Campos-Nonato; Valeria Caso; Carlos A Castañeda-Orjuela; Jacquelin C Rivas; Ferrán Catalá-López; Hanne Christensen; Michael H Criqui; Albertino Damasceno; Lalit Dandona; Rakhi Dandona; Kairat Davletov; Barbora de Courten; Gabrielle deVeber; Klara Dokova; Dumessa Edessa; Matthias Endres; Emerito J A Faraon; Maryam S Farvid; Florian Fischer; Kyle Foreman; Mohammad H Forouzanfar; Seana L Gall; Tsegaye T Gebrehiwot; Johanna M Geleijnse; Richard F Gillum; Maurice Giroud; Alessandra C Goulart; Rahul Gupta; Rajeev Gupta; Vladimir Hachinski; Randah R Hamadeh; Graeme J Hankey; Habtamu A Hareri; Rasmus Havmoeller; Simon I Hay; Mohamed I Hegazy; Desalegn T Hibstu; Spencer L James; Panniyammakal Jeemon; Denny John; Jost B Jonas; Jacek Jóźwiak; Rizwan Kalani; Amit Kandel; Amir Kasaeian; Andre P Kengne; Yousef S Khader; Abdur R Khan; Young-Ho Khang; Jagdish Khubchandani; Daniel Kim; Yun J Kim; Mika Kivimaki; Yoshihiro Kokubo; Dhaval Kolte; Jacek A Kopec; Soewarta Kosen; Michael Kravchenko; Rita Krishnamurthi; G Anil Kumar; Alessandra Lafranconi; Pablo M Lavados; Yirga Legesse; Yongmei Li; Xiaofeng Liang; Warren D Lo; Stefan Lorkowski; Paulo A Lotufo; Clement T Loy; Mark T Mackay; Hassan Magdy Abd El Razek; Mahdi Mahdavi; Azeem Majeed; Reza Malekzadeh; Deborah C Malta; Abdullah A Mamun; Lorenzo G Mantovani; Sheila C O Martins; Kedar K Mate; Mohsen Mazidi; Suresh Mehata; Toni Meier; Yohannes A Melaku; Walter Mendoza; George A Mensah; Atte Meretoja; Haftay B Mezgebe; Tomasz Miazgowski; Ted R Miller; Norlinah M Ibrahim; Shafiu Mohammed; Ali H Mokdad; Mahmood Moosazadeh; Andrew E Moran; Kamarul I Musa; Ruxandra I Negoi; Minh Nguyen; Quyen L Nguyen; Trang H Nguyen; Tung T Tran; Thanh T Nguyen; Dina Nur Anggraini Ningrum; Bo Norrving; Jean J Noubiap; Martin J O’Donnell; Andrew T Olagunju; Oyere K Onuma; Mayowa O Owolabi; Mahboubeh Parsaeian; George C Patton; Michael Piradov; Martin A Pletcher; Farshad Pourmalek; V Prakash; Mostafa Qorbani; Mahfuzar Rahman; Muhammad A Rahman; Rajesh K Rai; Annemarei Ranta; David Rawaf; Salman Rawaf; Andre MN Renzaho; Stephen R Robinson; Ramesh Sahathevan; Amirhossein Sahebkar; Joshua A Salomon; Paola Santalucia; Itamar S Santos; Benn Sartorius; Aletta E Schutte; Sadaf G Sepanlou; Azadeh Shafieesabet; Masood A Shaikh; Morteza Shamsizadeh; Kevin N Sheth; Mekonnen Sisay; Min-Jeong Shin; Ivy Shiue; Diego A S Silva; Eugene Sobngwi; Michael Soljak; Reed J D Sorensen; Luciano A Sposato; Saverio Stranges; Rizwan A Suliankatchi; Rafael Tabarés-Seisdedos; David Tanne; Cuong Tat Nguyen; J S Thakur; Amanda G Thrift; David L Tirschwell; Roman Topor-Madry; Bach X Tran; Luong T Nguyen; Thomas Truelsen; Nikolaos Tsilimparis; Stefanos Tyrovolas; Kingsley N Ukwaja; Olalekan A Uthman; Yuri Varakin; Tommi Vasankari; Narayanaswamy Venketasubramanian; Vasiliy V Vlassov; Wenzhi Wang; Andrea Werdecker; Charles D A Wolfe; Gelin Xu; Yuichiro Yano; Naohiro Yonemoto; Chuanhua Yu; Zoubida Zaidi; Maysaa El Sayed Zaki; Maigeng Zhou; Boback Ziaeian; Ben Zipkin; Theo Vos; Mohsen Naghavi; Christopher J L Murray; Gregory A Roth
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Immune-Mediated Inflammation in Vulnerable Atherosclerotic Plaques.

Authors:  Harald Mangge; Gunter Almer
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 4.411

View more
  5 in total

1.  Systemic immune inflammation index and system inflammation response index are potential biomarkers of atrial fibrillation among the patients presenting with ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Kai-Bin Lin; Feng-Hua Fan; Ming-Qi Cai; Yin Yu; Chuan-Liang Fu; Lu-Yue Ding; Yu-Dong Sun; Jia-Wen Sun; Yong-Wang Shi; Zhi-Feng Dong; Min-Jie Yuan; Shuai Li; Yan-Peng Wang; Kan-Kai Chen; Ji-Ni Zhu; Xin-Wei Guo; Xue Zhang; Yu-Wu Zhao; Jing-Bo Li; Dong Huang
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Identification of Biomarkers of Autophagy-Related Genes Between Early and Advanced Carotid Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Zhang; He Zhang
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-05-31

3.  COVID-19 Pathophysiology Predicts That Ischemic Stroke Occurrence Is an Expectation, Not an Exception-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Tissa Wijeratne; Sheila Gillard Crewther; Carmela Sales; Leila Karimi
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  Vulnerable Plaque Is More Prevalent in Male Individuals at High Risk of Stroke: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.

Authors:  Jie Li; Lijie Gao; Ping Zhang; Yingying Liu; Ju Zhou; Xingyang Yi; Chun Wang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Neurological Manifestations in a Cohort of Egyptian Patients with COVID-19: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study.

Authors:  Doaa A Mekkawy; Sherif Hamdy; Maged Abdel-Naseer; Hatem S Shehata; Ahmed Al Halfawy; Nevin M Shalaby; Ghaydaa A Shehata; Anwar M Ali; Alaa Elmazny; Sandra M Ahmed; Jumana H Ismail; Aml Ibraheim; Hoda M Abdel-Hamid; Rehab Magdy; Younan Kabara Ayoub; Ahmed E Taha; Nahla Merghany; Nourhan M Soliman; Haidy Elshebawy; Samar E S Abdelal; Lobna El-Ghoneimy; Aussan Al-Athwari; Nirmeen A Kishk; Mona A F Nada; Marwa Farghaly; Amr Hassan; Mohamed I Hegazy; Ahmed Abdelalim; Husam S Mourad; Amira Hassouna; Alshimaa S Othman; Tissa Wijeratne
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-01-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.