| Literature DB >> 33178548 |
Alexander P Pospelov1, Victor I Belan2, Dmytro O Harbuz1,2, Volodymyr L Vakula2, Lyudmila V Kamarchuk3,4, Yuliya V Volkova5, Gennadii V Kamarchuk2.
Abstract
Of all modern nanosensors using the principle of measuring variations in electric conductance, point-contact sensors stand out in having a number of original sensor properties not manifested by their analogues. The nontrivial nature of point-contact sensors is based on the unique properties of Yanson point contacts used as the sensing elements. The quantum properties of Yanson point contacts enable the solution of some of the problems that could not be solved using conventional sensors measuring conductance. In the present paper, we demonstrate this by showing the potential of quantum point-contact sensors to selectively detect components of a gas mixture in real time. To demonstrate the high efficiency of the proposed approach, we analyze the human breath, which is the most complex of the currently known natural gas mixtures with extremely low concentrations of its components. Point-contact sensors allow us to obtain a spectroscopic profile of the mixture. This profile contains information about the complete set of energy interactions occurring in the point contact/breath system when the breath constituents adsorb to and desorb from the surface of the point-contact conduction channel. With this information we can unambiguously characterize the analyzed system, since knowing the energy parameters is key to successfully identifying and modeling the physicochemical properties of various quantum objects. Using the point-contact spectroscopic profile of a complex gas mixture it is possible to get a functional dependence of the concentration of particular breath components on the amplitude of the sensor output signal. To demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed approach, we analyze the point-contact profiles from the breath of several patients and compare them with the concentrations of serotonin and cortisol in the body of each patient. The obtained results demonstrate that the proposed methodology allows one to get an effective calibration function for a non-invasive analysis of the level of serotonin and cortisol in the human body using the point-contact breath test. The present study indicates some necessary prerequisites for the design of fast detection methods using differential sensor analysis in real time, which can be implemented in various areas of science and technology, among which medicine is one of the most important.Entities:
Keywords: Yanson point contacts; breath profile; cortisol; hormone detection; point contact; quantum sensor; selective detection; serotonin
Year: 2020 PMID: 33178548 PMCID: PMC7607434 DOI: 10.3762/bjnano.11.146
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Beilstein J Nanotechnol ISSN: 2190-4286 Impact factor: 3.649
Figure 1(a) Spectrum of the electron–phonon interaction in indium obtained using Yanson point contacts. V2 is the second derivative of the current–voltage characteristic of the point contact and Vpc is the decrease in contact voltage. (b) A typical time dependence of the point-contact sensor conductance based on TCNQ compounds as a result of its interaction with the human breath (i.e., the breath point-contact sensor profile). Vs is the voltage decrease that occurs in the sensor, t is the time, t1 is the exposure time, and t2 is the relaxation time.
Figure 2Temporal dependence of the absolute values of the correlation coefficient |r|. Here, r describes the correlation between the response voltage values of the breath tests of the patients and the concentration of serotonin (1, black curve) and cortisol (2, red curve) according to the medical tests.
Figure 3Dependence of the analytical concentration of serotonin Cser on the average response voltage in the area of the maximum correlation. Black dots correspond to the data from the medical tests and the red line is the result of the linear approximation, given by Equation 3.
Verification of the sensor model for the determination of serotonin concentration.
| Patient number | Average response voltage | Serotonin concentration, | ||
| Analysis data | Estimation from model ( | Model error | ||
| 1 | 0.253397 | 0.394 | 0.559 | −0.165 |
| 2 | 0.263031 | 0.451 | 0.536 | −0.085 |
| 3 | 0.281277 | 0.585 | 0.492 | 0.093 |
| 4 | 0.170466 | 0.733 | 0.759 | −0.026 |
Figure 4Dependence of the analytical concentration of cortisol Ccor on the average response voltage in the area of the maximum correlation. Black dots correspond to the data from the medical tests and the red line is the result of the linear approximation, given by Equation 4.
Verification of the sensor model for the determination of cortisol concentration.
| Patient number | Average response voltage | Cortisol concentration | ||
| Analysis data | Estimation from model ( | Model error | ||
| 1 | 0.365943 | 166.6 | 175.5 | −8.9 |
| 2 | 0.256083 | 300.0 | 352.7 | −52.7 |
| 3 | 0.156115 | 498.8 | 513.8 | −15.0 |
| 4 | 0.165320 | 570.3 | 499.0 | 71.3 |