| Literature DB >> 33178281 |
Zulipiya Maimaiti1,2, Ablajan Turak1,3, Qing Ling Ma1,3, Geyu Liu1,3, Haji Akbar Aisa1,3.
Abstract
In traditional Chinese medicine, the seeds of Vernonia anthelmintica (L.) Willd. have been widely used for treatment of cough, skin diseases, diarrhea, fever, schistosomiasis, amoebic dysentery, and gastrointestinal problems, especially in the treatment of vitiligo for thousands of years in China. In this study, an effective, reliable, and accurate high-performance liquid chromatography diode array detector (HPLC-DAD) method was developed for quantitative analysis of 3 marker bioactive compounds and chemical fingerprint of the seeds of V. anthelmintica. Data corresponding to common peak areas and HPLC chromatographic fingerprints were analyzed by exploratory hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) and principal component analysis (PCA) to extract information of the most significant variables contributing to characterization and classification of the analyzed samples. Based on variety and origin, the high-performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) method validated the chemical fingerprint results used to screen the in vitro antioxidant activity of V. anthelmintica. The results show that the developed method has potential application values for the quality consistency evaluation and identification of similar instant V. anthelmintica samples. When considered collectively, this research results provide a scientific basis for the improvement of standardization and specification of V. anthelmintica medicinal materials and provide a pathway for the development and utilization of references for the identification of V. anthelmintica herbs.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33178281 PMCID: PMC7647787 DOI: 10.1155/2020/8859425
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Anal Chem ISSN: 1687-8760 Impact factor: 1.885
Figure 1HPLC chromatogram: (a) standard and (b) sample (Peak 1: 3,4-CQA, Peak 2: 3,5-CQA, and Peak 3: 4,5-CQA).
Raw material samples: geographical origin and acquisition time.
| Sample | Cultivation area | Time |
|---|---|---|
| S1 | Hotan | 2015 |
| S2 | Aksu | 2015 |
| S3 | Pakistan | 2015 |
| S4 | Hotan | 2016 |
| S5 | Hotan | 2017 |
| S6 | Hotan | 2018 |
| S7 | Aksu | 2018 |
| S8 | Pakistan | 2018 |
| S9 | Hotan A1 | 2017 |
| S10 | Hotan A2 | 2017 |
| S11 | Hotan A3 | 2017 |
| S12 | Hotan A4 | 2017 |
| S13 | Hotan A5 | 2017 |
| S14 | Hotan A6 | 2017 |
| S15 | Hotan A7 | 2017 |
| S16 | Hotan A8 | 2017 |
| S17 | Hotan A9 | 2017 |
| S18 | Hotan A10 | 2017 |
| S19 | Hotan A11 | 2017 |
| S20 | Hotan A12 | 2017 |
| S21 | Hotan A13 | 2017 |
| S22 | Hotan A14 | 2017 |
| S23 | Hotan A15 | 2017 |
| S24 | Hotan A16 | 2017 |
| S25 | Hotan A17 | 2017 |
| S26 | Hotan A18 | 2017 |
A1 to A18 denote different bathes of samples.
Figure 2Results of HCA of 26 instant V. anthelmintica samples.
Retention time, regression equation, and linear range of three marker compounds.
| Compounds |
| Regression equation | Linear range ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3,4-CQA | 23.92 |
| 0.011–0.110 | 0.9999 |
| 3,5-CQA | 26.92 |
| 0.137–1.365 | 0.9999 |
| 4,5-CQA | 36.91 |
| 0.033–0.325 | 0.9999 |
Analytical results of precision, stability, and reproducibility test of three marker compounds.
| Compounds | RSD of RRT (%) | RSD of RPA (%) | Recovery (%, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precision | Stability | Repeatability | Precision | Stability | Repeatability | Spiked ( | Original ( | Detected ( | Recovery (%) | RSD (%) | |
| 3,4-CQA | 0.16 | 0.73 | 0.94 | 0.21 | 0.28 | 0.96 | 14.53 | 16.05 | 30.52 | 99.60 | 1.69 |
| 3,5-CQA | 0.15 | 0.69 | 0.89 | 0.14 | 0.32 | 1.13 | 190.42 | 185.42 | 390.26 | 107.57 | 0.76 |
| 4,5-CQA | 0.14 | 0.74 | 0.95 | 0.22 | 0.25 | 0.87 | 44.34 | 43.18 | 88.01 | 101.10 | 1.11 |
Content and similarity of CQAs in 26 samples of V. anthelmintica.
| Sample no. | Content of CQA | Similarity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3,4-CQA | 3,5-CQA | 4,5-CQA | Total CQAa | ||
| S1 | 0.0378 | 1.1548 | 0.1477 | 1.3403 | 0.886 |
| S2 | 0.0569 | 0.6615 | 0.1530 | 0.8714 | 0.868 |
| S3 | 0.0587 | 0.8332 | 0.1609 | 1.0528 | 0.933 |
| S4 | 0.0348 | 0.9310 | 0.1264 | 1.0921 | 0.961 |
| S5 | 0.0423 | 0.9102 | 0.2614 | 1.2138 | 0.981 |
| S6 | 0.0388 | 0.8244 | 0.1712 | 1.0343 | 0.977 |
| S7 | 0.0559 | 0.8046 | 0.1921 | 1.0526 | 0.928 |
| S8 | 0.0493 | 0.8441 | 0.2528 | 1.1462 | 0.969 |
| S9 | 0.0399 | 0.8956 | 0.1776 | 1.1130 | 0.99 |
| S10 | 0.0400 | 0.8953 | 0.1832 | 1.1186 | 0.988 |
| S11 | 0.0405 | 0.8597 | 0.2150 | 1.1152 | 0.987 |
| S12 | 0.0427 | 0.9438 | 0.1909 | 1.1774 | 0.925 |
| S13 | 0.0402 | 0.8580 | 0.2009 | 1.0992 | 0.934 |
| S14 | 0.4161 | 0.9121 | 0.2097 | 1.5379 | 0.916 |
| S15 | 0.0412 | 0.9753 | 0.1881 | 1.2046 | 0.97 |
| S16 | 0.0372 | 0.8253 | 0.1944 | 1.0570 | 0.971 |
| S17 | 0.0403 | 0.8605 | 0.2113 | 1.1122 | 0.964 |
| S18 | 0.0367 | 0.8615 | 0.1616 | 1.0598 | 0.965 |
| S19 | 0.0348 | 0.8348 | 0.1823 | 1.0519 | 0.978 |
| S20 | 0.0368 | 0.9713 | 0.1822 | 1.1903 | 0.969 |
| S21 | 0.0355 | 1.0096 | 0.1645 | 1.2096 | 0.967 |
| S22 | 0.0356 | 0.9694 | 0.1706 | 1.1756 | 0.97 |
| S23 | 0.0379 | 1.0281 | 0.1769 | 1.2430 | 0.967 |
| S24 | 0.0368 | 1.0037 | 0.1759 | 1.2163 | 0.977 |
| S25 | 0.0382 | 1.0255 | 0.1905 | 1.2543 | 0.979 |
| S26 | 0.0383 | 1.0230 | 0.1797 | 1.2410 | 0.976 |
a: Total CQA = 3,4-CQA contents + 3,5-CQA contents + 4,5-CQA contents; b: For each constituent, the significant difference of mean content within the same column was less than 0.05 (p < 0.05).
Figure 3HPLC fingerprint of 26 batches of V. anthelmintica samples (a) and the reference fingerprint of V. anthelmintica. (b).
Figure 4The score plot of the PCA for the 26 samples (a) and the loadings plot of PCA for 26 characteristic peaks (b).
Figure 5Developed TLC plate of V. anthelmintica under UV 366 nm.
Figure 6HPTLC fingerprint profile of V. anthelmintica: (a) sample 1 and (b) sample 8.
Figure 7The free radical scavenging activity: (a) after dipping in ABTS∗+ solution and (b) after dipping in DPPH˙ solution; spot volumes 5 μL.