| Literature DB >> 33178129 |
Naoir Zaher1,2, Alexandra Urban1,2, Arun Antony1,2, Cheryl Plummer2, Anto Bagić1,2, R Mark Richardson3,4, Vasileios Kokkinos3,4.
Abstract
Background: Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LiTT) has emerged as a minimally invasive option for surgical treatment of refractory epilepsy. However, LiTT of the mesial temporal (MT) structures is still inferior to anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) in terms of postoperative outcome. In this pilot study, we identify intracranial EEG (iEEG) biomarkers that distinguish patients with favorable outcome from those with poor outcome after MT LiTT.Entities:
Keywords: epilepsy; epilepsy surgery; laser abaltion; seizure onset pattern; temporal lobe epilepsy
Year: 2020 PMID: 33178129 PMCID: PMC7593673 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.595454
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Figure 1Laser ablation after sEEG investigation. (A) Post-operative MRI of patient 2 showing three electrodes covering the head, the body and the tail of the hippocampus. From each electrode lead, two contacts are recording from hippocampal parenchyma. (B) Post-ablation MRI of the same patient, showing the extent of the lesion across the MT longitudinal axis.
Patient demographic and clinical data.
| 1 | F | 26 | Normal | LMTa | LMTd | 1 | 5 | RMT | 4–7, | IIIA at 16 months | |
| 2 | F | 48 | Normal | LMTa | BMTd | 3 | 6 | LMT | n/a | 4–7, | IVB at 19 months |
| 3 | F | 36 | Normal | LMTa | LMTd | 12 | 4 | LMT | 4–7, | IVB at 29 months | |
| 4 | F | 38 | RMTa | LMTa | RMTd | 5 | 4 | RMT | n/a | IA at 19 months | |
| 5 | F | 51 | RMTa | RMTa | BMTd | 10 | 4 | RMT | n/a | ID at 27 months | |
| 6 | F | 24 | Normal | Normal | RMTd | 3 | 5 | RMT | n/a | IB at 26 months | |
| 7 | M | 40 | Normal | n/a | LMTd | 27 | 2 | LMT | 1–3, 4–7 | IV at 21 months | |
| 8 | F | 42 | Normal | Normal | RMTd | 6 | 5 | RMT | IIIA at 25 months | ||
| 9 | M | 28 | Normal | n/a | LMTd | 7 | 4 | LMT | n/a | IA at 16 months |
The ictal iEEG patterns observed sustained in the specified band limits for more than 3 s in the 5-s window of the seizure onset are in bold fonts; transient non-sustained rhythmic activity observed in the respective sites appears in plain fonts. RMT, right mesio-temporal; LMT, left mesio-temporal; L/RMTa, left/right mesio-temporal abnormality; L/R/BMTd, left/right/bilateral mesio-temporal dysfunction; n/a, not available or no rhythmic activity observed.
Figure 2Raw iEEG (left, A-D) from the MT contacts and respective time-frequency analysis (right, A-D) of seizure onsets in patients with favorable outcome. (A,A) Patient 4 with Engel Class IA outcome. (B,B) Patient 6 with Engel Class IB outcome. (C,C) Patient 5 with Engel Class ID outcome. (D,D) Patient 9 with Engel Class IA outcome. Notice that for all four patients, ictal frequency progressively declines following ictal onset (time = 0).
Figure 3Raw iEEG (left, A-E) from the MT contacts and respective time-frequency analysis (right, A-E) of seizure onsets in patients with poor outcome. (A,A) Patient 1 with Engel Class IIIA outcome. (B,B) Patient 2 with Engel Class IVB outcome. (C,C) Patient 3 with Engel Class IVB outcome. (D,D) Patient 7 with Engel Class IVB outcome. (E,E) Patient 8 with Engel Class IIIA outcome. Notice the rise in frequency content with a peak indicated by asterisks, following ictal onset (at time = 0).