| Literature DB >> 33177621 |
Sabina Luszczak1, Benjamin S Simpson1, Urszula Stopka-Farooqui1, Vignesh Krishna Sathyadevan1, Lina M Carmona Echeverria1, Christopher Kumar1, Helena Costa2, Aiman Haider2, Alex Freeman2, Charles Jameson2, Marzena Ratynska2, Imen Ben-Salha2, Ashwin Sridhar3, Greg Shaw3, John D Kelly3, Hayley Pye1, Kathy A Gately4, Hayley C Whitaker1, Susan Heavey5.
Abstract
An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33177621 PMCID: PMC7658353 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-76679-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1A correct version of the original Figure 1. A high proportion of patients may be sensitive to PI3K/PIM inhibition. (A) Venn diagrams demonstrate the percentage of the prostate cancer cohort (TCGA or Ross-Adams, non-metastatic radical prostatectomy patients) that exhibited overexpression of the PI3K pathway, PIM pathway, or both. (B) Disease free survival probability of patients with any pathway upregulation versus no upregulation (left) and after separation into specific pathways (right). P-value was obtained using a Mantel-Cox test. (C) Distribution of Gleason grades within patient population groups. A higher Gleason score (1–5) indicates less well-differentiated prostate tissue and more aggressive disease. A Gleason grade is obtained by adding the Gleason scores of the two most prevalent tissue types in the sample. P-value was obtained using a Chi-square method, and is plotted as a proportion of the patients within each Gleason sum group that fall into each expression group (PIM positive, PI3K positive, both positive or any positive), with colours corresponding to parts A and B.