Literature DB >> 33177198

CD34+ Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell Subsets Exhibit Differential Ability To Maintain Human Cytomegalovirus Latency and Persistence.

Lindsey B Crawford1, Meaghan H Hancock1, Hillary M Struthers1, Daniel N Streblow1, Andrew D Yurochko2, Patrizia Caposio1, Felicia D Goodrum3, Jay A Nelson4.   

Abstract

In human cytomegalovirus (HCMV)-seropositive patients, CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) provide an important source of latent virus that reactivates following cellular differentiation into tissue macrophages. Multiple groups have used primary CD34+ HPCs to investigate mechanisms of viral latency. However, analyses of mechanisms of HCMV latency have been hampered by the genetic variability of CD34+ HPCs from different donors, availability of cells, and low frequency of reactivation. In addition, multiple progenitor cell types express surface CD34, and the frequencies of these populations differ depending on the tissue source of the cells and culture conditions in vitro In this study, we generated CD34+ progenitor cells from two different embryonic stem cell (ESC) lines, WA01 and WA09, to circumvent limitations associated with primary CD34+ HPCs. HCMV infection of CD34+ HPCs derived from either WA01 or WA09 ESCs supported HCMV latency and induced myelosuppression similar to infection of primary CD34+ HPCs. Analysis of HCMV-infected primary or ESC-derived CD34+ HPC subpopulations indicated that HCMV was able to establish latency and reactivate in CD38+ CD90+ and CD38+/low CD90- HPCs but persistently infected CD38- CD90+ cells to produce infectious virus. These results indicate that ESC-derived CD34+ HPCs can be used as a model for HCMV latency and that the virus either latently or persistently infects specific subpopulations of CD34+ cells.IMPORTANCE Human cytomegalovirus infection is associated with severe disease in transplant patients and understanding how latency and reactivation occur in stem cell populations is essential to understand disease. CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) are a critical viral reservoir; however, these cells are a heterogeneous pool with donor-to-donor variation in functional, genetic, and phenotypic characteristics. We generated a novel system using embryonic stem cell lines to model HCMV latency and reactivation in HPCs with a consistent cellular background. Our study defined three key stem cell subsets with differentially regulated latent and replicative states, which provide cellular candidates for isolation and treatment of transplant-mediated disease. This work provides a direction toward developing strategies to control the switch between latency and reactivation.
Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HCMV; herpesvirus latency; stem cells

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33177198      PMCID: PMC7925096          DOI: 10.1128/JVI.02105-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Virol        ISSN: 0022-538X            Impact factor:   5.103


  52 in total

Review 1.  Concise review: Induced pluripotent stem cells versus embryonic stem cells: close enough or yet too far apart?

Authors:  Josipa Bilic; Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 6.277

2.  ELDA: extreme limiting dilution analysis for comparing depleted and enriched populations in stem cell and other assays.

Authors:  Yifang Hu; Gordon K Smyth
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 3.  A review of the methods for human iPSC derivation.

Authors:  Nasir Malik; Mahendra S Rao
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2013

Review 4.  Concise review: Embryonic stem cells versus induced pluripotent stem cells: the game is on.

Authors:  Mira C Puri; Andras Nagy
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 6.277

5.  A myeloid progenitor cell line capable of supporting human cytomegalovirus latency and reactivation, resulting in infectious progeny.

Authors:  Christine M O'Connor; Eain A Murphy
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Transcriptome analysis reveals human cytomegalovirus reprograms monocyte differentiation toward an M1 macrophage.

Authors:  Gary Chan; Elizabeth R Bivins-Smith; M Shane Smith; Patrick M Smith; Andrew D Yurochko
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 5.422

7.  Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts.

Authors:  J A Thomson; J Itskovitz-Eldor; S S Shapiro; M A Waknitz; J J Swiergiel; V S Marshall; J M Jones
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-11-06       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Comparison of human fetal liver, umbilical cord blood, and adult blood hematopoietic stem cell engraftment in NOD-scid/gammac-/-, Balb/c-Rag1-/-gammac-/-, and C.B-17-scid/bg immunodeficient mice.

Authors:  Christin M Lepus; Thomas F Gibson; Scott A Gerber; Ivana Kawikova; Marian Szczepanik; Jaber Hossain; Vitaly Ablamunits; Nancy Kirkiles-Smith; Kevan C Herold; Ruben O Donis; Alfred L Bothwell; Jordan S Pober; Martha J Harding
Journal:  Hum Immunol       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 2.850

9.  Human Cytomegalovirus Induces Cellular and Humoral Virus-specific Immune Responses in Humanized BLT Mice.

Authors:  Lindsey B Crawford; Rebecca Tempel; Daniel N Streblow; Craig Kreklywich; Patricia Smith; Louis J Picker; Jay A Nelson; Patrizia Caposio
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  An iPSC-Derived Myeloid Lineage Model of Herpes Virus Latency and Reactivation.

Authors:  Emma Poole; Christopher J Z Huang; Jessica Forbester; Miri Shnayder; Aharon Nachshon; Baraa Kweider; Anna Basaj; Daniel Smith; Sarah Elizabeth Jackson; Bin Liu; Joy Shih; Fedir N Kiskin; K Roche; E Murphy; Mark R Wills; Nicholas W Morrell; Gordon Dougan; Noam Stern-Ginossar; Amer A Rana; John Sinclair
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 5.640

View more
  1 in total

1.  Advances in Model Systems for Human Cytomegalovirus Latency and Reactivation.

Authors:  Lindsey B Crawford; Nicole L Diggins; Patrizia Caposio; Meaghan H Hancock
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 7.867

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.