| Literature DB >> 33176990 |
Julien Barra1, Marion Giroux1, Morgane Metral2, Corinne Cian3, Marion Luyat4, Anne Kavounoudias5, Michel Guerraz6.
Abstract
A person's internal representation of his/her body is not fixed. It can be substantially modified by neurological injuries and can also be extended (in healthy participants) to incorporate objects that have a corporeal appearance (such as fake body segments, e.g. a rubber hand), virtual whole bodies (e.g. avatars), and even objects that do not have a corporeal appearance (e.g. tools). Here, we report data from patients and healthy participants that emphasize the flexible nature of body representation and question the extent to which incorporated objects have the same functional properties as biological body parts. Our data shed new light by highlighting the involvement of visual motion information from incorporated objects (rubber hands, full body avatars and hand-held tools) in the perception of one's own movement (kinesthesia). On the basis of these findings, we argue that incorporated objects can be treated as body parts, especially when kinesthesia is involved.Entities:
Keywords: Body representation; Embodiment; Kinesthesia; Multisensory-Integration; Ownership
Year: 2020 PMID: 33176990 DOI: 10.1016/j.neucli.2020.10.011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurophysiol Clin ISSN: 0987-7053 Impact factor: 3.734