Literature DB >> 33176690

Novel domain expansion methods to improve the computational efficiency of the Chemical Master Equation solution for large biological networks.

Rahul Kosarwal1,2, Don Kulasiri3,4, Sandhya Samarasinghe1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Numerical solutions of the chemical master equation (CME) are important for understanding the stochasticity of biochemical systems. However, solving CMEs is a formidable task. This task is complicated due to the nonlinear nature of the reactions and the size of the networks which result in different realizations. Most importantly, the exponential growth of the size of the state-space, with respect to the number of different species in the system makes this a challenging assignment. When the biochemical system has a large number of variables, the CME solution becomes intractable. We introduce the intelligent state projection (ISP) method to use in the stochastic analysis of these systems. For any biochemical reaction network, it is important to capture more than one moment: this allows one to describe the system's dynamic behaviour. ISP is based on a state-space search and the data structure standards of artificial intelligence (AI). It can be used to explore and update the states of a biochemical system. To support the expansion in ISP, we also develop a Bayesian likelihood node projection (BLNP) function to predict the likelihood of the states.
RESULTS: To demonstrate the acceptability and effectiveness of our method, we apply the ISP method to several biological models discussed in prior literature. The results of our computational experiments reveal that the ISP method is effective both in terms of the speed and accuracy of the expansion, and the accuracy of the solution. This method also provides a better understanding of the state-space of the system in terms of blueprint patterns.
CONCLUSIONS: The ISP is the de-novo method which addresses both accuracy and performance problems for CME solutions. It systematically expands the projection space based on predefined inputs. This ensures accuracy in the approximation and an exact analytical solution for the time of interest. The ISP was more effective both in predicting the behavior of the state-space of the system and in performance management, which is a vital step towards modeling large biochemical systems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian likelihood node projection; Biochemical reaction networks; chemical master equation; intelligent state projection; stochastic

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33176690      PMCID: PMC7656229          DOI: 10.1186/s12859-020-03668-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1471-2105            Impact factor:   3.169


  17 in total

1.  Robustness of G1/S checkpoint pathways in cell cycle regulation based on probability of DNA-damaged cells passing as healthy cells.

Authors:  Hong Ling; Don Kulasiri; Sandhya Samarasinghe
Journal:  Biosystems       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Quasiequilibrium approximation of fast reaction kinetics in stochastic biochemical systems.

Authors:  John Goutsias
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2005-05-08       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Two classes of quasi-steady-state model reductions for stochastic kinetics.

Authors:  Ethan A Mastny; Eric L Haseltine; James B Rawlings
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Efficient step size selection for the tau-leaping simulation method.

Authors:  Yang Cao; Daniel T Gillespie; Linda R Petzold
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2006-01-28       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Stochastic chemical kinetics and the total quasi-steady-state assumption: application to the stochastic simulation algorithm and chemical master equation.

Authors:  Shev Macnamara; Alberto M Bersani; Kevin Burrage; Roger B Sidje
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  A dynamical low-rank approach to the chemical master equation.

Authors:  Tobias Jahnke; Wilhelm Huisinga
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 1.758

7.  Understanding the finite state projection and related methods for solving the chemical master equation.

Authors:  Khanh N Dinh; Roger B Sidje
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  An application of the Krylov-FSP-SSA method to parameter fitting with maximum likelihood.

Authors:  Khanh N Dinh; Roger B Sidje
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Solving the chemical master equation using sliding windows.

Authors:  Verena Wolf; Rushil Goel; Maria Mateescu; Thomas A Henzinger
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2010-04-08

10.  Mathematical modelling of the impact of haematopoietic stem cell-delivered gene therapy for HIV.

Authors:  John M Murray; Greg C Fanning; Janet L Macpherson; Louise A Evans; Susan M Pond; Geoff P Symonds
Journal:  J Gene Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.565

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.