| Literature DB >> 33175892 |
Ángel Cruz-Miralles1,2, Jesús M Avilés2, Olivier Chastel3, Mónica Expósito-Granados2,4, Deseada Parejo1,2.
Abstract
Individuals within populations often show consistent variation in behavioural and physiological traits which are frequently inter-correlated, potentially leading to phenotypic integration. Understanding the mechanisms behind such integration is a key task in evolutionary ecology, and melanin based colouration has been suggested to play a pivotal role. In birds, most of plumage colour variation is determined by two types of melanin, eumelanin and phaeomelanin, but the role of phaeomelanin in avian phenotype integration has been barely investigated. Here, we test for covariation between phaeomelanin-based colouration, behavioural traits (i.e. nest territoriality, aggressiveness, breath rate and parental behaviour) and corticosterone in feathers in the polymorphic scops owl Otus scops, a bird species in which more phaeomelanic individuals display reddish colourations. In males, we observed that reddish males took longer to return to their nests and showed higher levels of feather CORT than more greyish ones. Behaviour and feather CORT were not associated to plumage colour in females. The found associations between redness, behaviour and feather CORT in males, but not in females, might suggest the existence of a sex-specific integrated phaeomelanic phenotype in scops owls.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33175892 PMCID: PMC7657523 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241380
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Results of the statistical models analysing male territoriality in scops owls as latency of response against an intruder in relation to plumage colouration (N = 35 individuals).
| Colour score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Explanatory term | SE | df | ||||
| Intercept | -0.66 | 0.52 | 1.27 | 0.21 | ||
| Male colour | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.78 | 1, 27 | 0.384 | |
| Year | 2014 | 0.35 | 0.44 | 0.25 | 4, 27 | 0.908 |
| 2015 | 0.41 | 0.44 | ||||
| 2016 | 0.20 | 0.42 | ||||
| 2017 | 0.27 | 0.36 | ||||
| 2018 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| Date | -0.01 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 1, 27 | 0.961 | |
| Brood size | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 1, 27 | 0.980 | |
*The reference category for the year effect was 2018.
Results of the statistical models analysing female aggressiveness in relation to plumage colouration (N = 45 individuals).
| Colour score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Explanatory term | SE | df | ||||
| Intercept | -0.53 | 1.36 | 0.15 | 1 | 0.69 | |
| Female colour | -0.09 | 0.22 | 0.18 | 1 | 0.670 | |
| Hour | 0.58 | 0.41 | 2.20 | 1 | 0.138 | |
| Year | 2014 | 2.66 | 1.32 | 7.11 | 4 | 0.130 |
| 2015 | 0.87 | 1.21 | ||||
| 2016 | 0.17 | 1.10 | ||||
| 2017 | 1.89 | 1.11 | ||||
| 2018 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| Date | 1.03 | 0.59 | 3.47 | 1 | 0.063 | |
| Brood size | 0.09 | 0.32 | 0.08 | 1 | 0.775 | |
*The reference category for the year effect was 2018.
Results of statistical models analysing parental care in relation to plumage colouration.
| Males (N = 63) | Females (N = 39) | |||||||||||
| Latency | Intercept | 1.20 | 0.49 | 1.83 | 0.65 | |||||||
| Colour | 0.17 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 1, 31 | 0.968 | |||||
| Year | 2013 | 0.41 | 0.68 | 0.38 | 5, 54 | 0.545 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 2014 | 0.31 | 0.42 | 0.60 | 0.48 | 0.95 | 4, 31 | 0.449 | |||||
| 2015 | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.53 | 0.50 | ||||||||
| 2016 | 0.28 | 0.37 | 0.77 | 0.44 | ||||||||
| 2017 | 0.04 | 0.35 | 0.67 | 0.45 | ||||||||
| 2018 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||||
| Date | 0.25 | 0.15 | 2.87 | 1, 54 | 0.051 | 0.38 | 0.18 | |||||
| Brood size | -0.24 | 0.12 | 3.98 | 1, 54 | 0.096 | -0.08 | 0.14 | 0.29 | 1, 31 | 0.594 | ||
| Males (N = 69) | Females (N = 69) | |||||||||||
| Feeding rate | Intercept | 2.15 | 0.37 | 1.36 | 0.34 | |||||||
| Colour | -0.03 | 0.06 | 0.16 | 1, 58 | 0.692 | -0.04 | 0.05 | 0.81 | 1, 59 | 0.373 | ||
| Year | 2012 | - | - | - | - | - | -0.14 | 0.67 | 0.93 | 6, 59 | 0.482 | |
| 2013 | -0.57 | 0.45 | 0.84 | 5, 58 | 0.526 | -0.66 | 0.48 | |||||
| 2014 | -0.03 | 0.33 | -0.41 | 0.27 | ||||||||
| 2015 | -0.45 | 0.32 | -0.21 | 0.28 | ||||||||
| 2016 | -0.34 | 0.28 | -0.19 | 0.26 | ||||||||
| 2017 | -0.23 | 0.27 | 0.06 | 0.23 | ||||||||
| 2018 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||||
| Date | -0.19 | 0.11 | 2.81 | 1, 58 | 0.099 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 1.24 | 1, 59 | 0.270 | ||
| Brood size | 0.17 | 0.10 | 3.06 | 1, 58 | 0.086 | 0.11 | 0.08 | 1.87 | 1, 59 | 0.177 | ||
*The reference category for the year effect was 2018.
Fig 1Latency to enter the nest-box of male scops owls (mean with 95% confidence interval) after setting the microcamera in relation to plumage colouration scores (N = 63).
Results of GLMs to analyse breath rate and CORT in feathers in relation to plumage colouration in males and females scops owls.
| Males (N = 35) | Females (N = 52) | |||||||||||
| Breath rate | Intercept | 0.49 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.489 | 0.17 | 0.60 | 0.28 | 0.777 | |||
| Colour | -0.02 | 0.12 | 0.02 | 1, 27 | 0.894 | -0.01 | 0.10 | 0.02 | 1, 43 | 0.895 | ||
| Hour | -0.32 | 0.27 | 1.48 | 1, 27 | 0.234 | -0.39 | 0.16 | |||||
| Year | 2015 | -0.56 | 0.57 | 1.56 | 3, 27 | 0.222 | 0.22 | 0.49 | 0.20 | 3, 43 | 0.895 | |
| 2016 | -1.21 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.45 | ||||||||
| 2017 | -0.61 | 0.41 | -0.16 | 0.41 | ||||||||
| 2018 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||||
| Date | 0.22 | 0.20 | 1.25 | 1, 27 | 0.274 | -0.09 | 0.21 | 0.20 | 1, 43 | 0.660 | ||
| Brood size | -0.21 | 0.17 | 1.46 | 1, 27 | 0.238 | -0.21 | 0.13 | 2.60 | 1, 43 | 0.114 | ||
| Males (N = 28) | Females (N = 42) | |||||||||||
| CORT in feathers | Intercept | 0.89 | 0.09 | 1.14 | 0.05 | |||||||
| Colour | 0.03 | 0.01 | 4.13 | 1, 22 | 0.055 | -0.01 | 0.01 | 2.27 | 1, 36 | 0.140 | ||
| Year | 2012 | -0.07 | 0.10 | 0.34 | 3, 22 | 0.794 | -0.06 | 0.03 | 1.70 | 3, 36 | 0.184 | |
| 2013 | 0.00 | 0.05 | -0.04 | 0.03 | ||||||||
| 2014 | 0.02 | 0.04 | -0.06 | 0.03 | ||||||||
| 2015 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||||
*The reference categories for the year effect were 2018 for the models on breath rate, and 2015 for the models on CORT in feathers, respectively.
Fig 2Levels of CORT in feathers (mean with 95% confidence interval) in relation to plumage colouration in male (A) and female (B) scops owls.