Literature DB >> 33175279

Analysis of second mesiobuccal root canal instrumentation in maxillary first molars with three nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomographic study.

Yuerong Zhang1,2, Jie Liu1,2, Yongchun Gu3, Juan Wang1,4, Hai Xu5,6, Guangdong Zhang7,8.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the shaping characteristics of Protaper Universal (PTU; Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Johnson City, TN), Hero Shaper (HS; MicroMega, Besacon, France) and Hyflex CM (HCM; Coltene-Whaledent, Allstetten, Switzerland) nickel-titanium systems with various apical sizes and tapers in second mesiobuccal (MB2) canal instrumentation using micro-computed tomographic imaging. A total of 27 maxillary first molars with independent patent MB2 canals were selected and randomly assigned to three groups according to the 3-dimensional morphologic aspects obtained from preoperative micro-computed tomographic scans. Canals were first negotiated with a size 8 K-file and finally prepared to F1, F2, and F3 with PTU and to sizes 20.04 taper, 25.04 taper, and 30.04 taper with HS and HCM. Postoperative scans were performed after each instrumentation with the same parameters used in the initial scan. The canal volume, canal transportation, untouched canal surface and wall thickness were measured and calculated using Mimics 10.01 software (Image Works, Materialise, Belgium). Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance post hoc LSD tests. PTU removed more dentin than HS and HCM in all sections when instrumented to the same apical size (P < 0.05). HS and HCM presented a lower mean value of canal transportation than PTU in all measured sizes and sections. PTU presented a lower mean value of distal wall thickness than HS and HCM at the level of 1 and 2 mm below the furcation region in all measured sizes. In conclusion, for MB2 canal instrumentation, HS and HCM of 0.04 taper are safer than PTU.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Maxillary first molar; Micro-computed tomography; Second mesiobuccal root canal; Shaping ability

Year:  2020        PMID: 33175279     DOI: 10.1007/s10266-020-00564-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Odontology        ISSN: 1618-1247            Impact factor:   2.634


  3 in total

1.  Shaping ability of four single-file systems in the instrumentation of second mesiobuccal canals of three-dimensional printed maxillary first molars.

Authors:  Fulu Xu; Yuerong Zhang; Yongchun Gu; Yifan Ping; Ruyu Zhou; Juan Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-09

2.  Morphological characteristics of the mesiobuccal root in the presence of a second mesiobuccal canal: a micro-CT study.

Authors:  Lucas P Lopes Rosado; Matheus Lima Oliveira; Karla Rovaris; Deborah Queiroz Freitas; Frederico Sampaio Neves
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2022-01-18

3.  Shaping ability of three nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated L-shaped canals: OneShape, Hero Shaper, and Revo-S.

Authors:  Pouyan Vakili-Gilani; Saeid Tavanafar; Abdul Rahman Mohammad Saleh; Hamideh Karimpour
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 2.757

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.