Literature DB >> 33175242

Mechanisms underlying performance impairments following prolonged static stretching without a comprehensive warm-up.

David G Behm1, Anthony D Kay2, Gabriel S Trajano3, Anthony J Blazevich4.   

Abstract

Whereas a variety of pre-exercise activities have been incorporated as part of a "warm-up" prior to work, combat, and athletic activities for millennia, the inclusion of static stretching (SS) within a warm-up has lost favor in the last 25 years. Research emphasized the possibility of SS-induced impairments in subsequent performance following prolonged stretching without proper dynamic warm-up activities. Proposed mechanisms underlying stretch-induced deficits include both neural (i.e., decreased voluntary activation, persistent inward current effects on motoneuron excitability) and morphological (i.e., changes in the force-length relationship, decreased Ca2+ sensitivity, alterations in parallel elastic component) factors. Psychological influences such as a mental energy deficit and nocebo effects could also adversely affect performance. However, significant practical limitations exist within published studies, e.g., long-stretching durations, stretching exercises with little task specificity, lack of warm-up before/after stretching, testing performed immediately after stretch completion, and risk of investigator and participant bias. Recent research indicates that appropriate durations of static stretching performed within a full warm-up (i.e., aerobic activities before and task-specific dynamic stretching and intense physical activities after SS) have trivial effects on subsequent performance with some evidence of improved force output at longer muscle lengths. For conditions in which muscular force production is compromised by stretching, knowledge of the underlying mechanisms would aid development of mitigation strategies. However, these mechanisms are yet to be perfectly defined. More information is needed to better understand both the warm-up components and mechanisms that contribute to performance enhancements or impairments when SS is incorporated within a pre-activity warm-up.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flexibility; Muscle morphology; Neural; Range of motion; Sport; Warm-up

Year:  2020        PMID: 33175242     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-020-04538-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  14 in total

Review 1.  Non-local acute stretching effects on strength performance in healthy young adults.

Authors:  David G Behm; Shahab Alizadeh; Ben Drury; Urs Granacher; Jason Moran
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-03-14       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  The Accumulated Effects of Foam Rolling Combined with Stretching on Range of Motion and Physical Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Andreas Konrad; Masatoshi Nakamura; Daniel Bernsteiner; Markus Tilp
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Myofascial Treatment Techniques on the Plantar Surface Influence Functional Performance in the Dorsal Kinetic Chain.

Authors:  Anna Gabriel; Andreas Konrad; Anna Roidl; Jennifer Queisser; Robert Schleip; Thomas Horstmann; Torsten Pohl
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Comparison of A Single Vibration Foam Rolling and Static Stretching Exercise on the Muscle Function and Mechanical Properties of the Hamstring Muscles.

Authors:  Marina Maren Reiner; Markus Tilp; Gaël Guilhem; Antonio Morales-Artacho; Andreas Konrad
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.017

5.  An Intense Warm-Up Does Not Potentiate Performance Before or After a Single Bout of Foam Rolling.

Authors:  Andreas Konrad; Daniel Bernsteiner; Marina Maren Reiner; Masatoshi Nakamura; Markus Tilp
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.017

6.  The Time-Course Changes in Knee Flexion Range of Motion, Muscle Strength, and Rate of Force Development After Static Stretching.

Authors:  Masatoshi Nakamura; Yusuke Suzuki; Riku Yoshida; Kazuki Kasahara; Yuta Murakami; Tetsuya Hirono; Satoru Nishishita; Kosuke Takeuchi; Andreas Konrad
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 4.755

7.  Tissue Flossing Around the Thigh Does Not Provide Acute Enhancement of Neuromuscular Function.

Authors:  Armin H Paravlic; Jure Segula; Kristina Drole; Vedran Hadzic; Maja Pajek; Janez Vodicar
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 4.755

8.  Acute Hemodynamic Responses to Three Types of Hamstrings Stretching in Senior Athletes.

Authors:  Brent Feland; Andy C Hopkins; David G Behm
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 2.988

9.  A Survey on Stretching Practices in Women and Men from Various Sports or Physical Activity Programs.

Authors:  Nicolas Babault; Gaelyann Rodot; Marrain Champelovier; Carole Cometti
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Local and Non-local Effects of Foam Rolling on Passive Soft Tissue Properties and Spinal Excitability.

Authors:  Masatoshi Nakamura; Andreas Konrad; Ryosuke Kiyono; Shigeru Sato; Kaoru Yahata; Riku Yoshida; Koki Yasaka; Yuta Murakami; Futaba Sanuki; Jan Wilke
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.