Literature DB >> 33174824

Potato virus A isolates from three continents: their biological properties, phylogenetics and prehistory.

Segundo Fuentes1, Adrian Gibbs2, Ian Adams3, Calum R Wilson4, Marleen Botermans5, Adrian Fox6, Jan Kreuze7,8, Neil Boonham9, Monica Kehoe10, Roger Jones11.   

Abstract

Forty seven potato virus A (PVA) isolates from Europe, Australia and South America's Andean region were subjected to High Throughput Sequencing, and 46 complete genomes from Europe (9), Australia (2) and the Andes (35) obtained. These and 17 other genomes gave alignments of 63 open reading frames 9180 nucleotides long; nine were recombinants. The non-recombinants formed three tightly clustered, almost equidistant phylogroups; A comprised 14 Peruvian isolates, W comprised 37 from Peru, Argentina and elsewhere, and T contained three from New Zealand tamarillo. When five isolates were inoculated to a potato cultivar differential, three strain groups (= pathotypes) unrelated to phylogenetic groupings were recognized. No temporal signal was detected amongst the dated non-recombinant sequences, but PVA and potato virus Y (PVY) are from related lineages and ecologically similar, therefore 'relative dating' was obtained using a single maximum likelihood phylogeny of PVA and PVY sequences and PVY's well-supported 157 CE 'time to most common recent ancestor'. The PVA datings obtained were supported by several independent historical co-incidences. The PVA and PVY populations apparently arose in the Andes about 18 centuries ago, and were taken to Europe during the Columbian exchange, radiating there after the mid-19th century potato late blight pandemic. PVA's phylogroup A population diverged more recently in the Andean region, probably after new cultivars were bred locally using Solanum tuberosum spp. tuberosum as a parent. Such cultivars became widely grown, and apparently generated the A x W phylogroup recombinants. Phylogroup A, and its interphylogroup recombinants, might pose a biosecurity risk.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disease Resistance; Evolution; Genomics; Population Biology; Virology

Year:  2020        PMID: 33174824     DOI: 10.1094/PHYTO-08-20-0354-FI

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phytopathology        ISSN: 0031-949X            Impact factor:   4.025


  4 in total

1.  Eradication of Potato Virus S, Potato Virus A, and Potato Virus M From Infected in vitro-Grown Potato Shoots Using in vitro Therapies.

Authors:  Jean Carlos Bettoni; Liya Mathew; Ranjith Pathirana; Claudia Wiedow; Donald A Hunter; Andrew McLachlan; Subuhi Khan; Joe Tang; Jayanthi Nadarajan
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  The Phylogeography of Potato Virus X Shows the Fingerprints of Its Human Vector.

Authors:  Segundo Fuentes; Adrian J Gibbs; Mohammad Hajizadeh; Ana Perez; Ian P Adams; Cesar E Fribourg; Jan Kreuze; Adrian Fox; Neil Boonham; Roger A C Jones
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 3.  Global Plant Virus Disease Pandemics and Epidemics.

Authors:  Roger A C Jones
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-25

Review 4.  A Primer on the Analysis of High-Throughput Sequencing Data for Detection of Plant Viruses.

Authors:  Denis Kutnjak; Lucie Tamisier; Ian Adams; Neil Boonham; Thierry Candresse; Michela Chiumenti; Kris De Jonghe; Jan F Kreuze; Marie Lefebvre; Gonçalo Silva; Martha Malapi-Wight; Paolo Margaria; Irena Mavrič Pleško; Sam McGreig; Laura Miozzi; Benoit Remenant; Jean-Sebastien Reynard; Johan Rollin; Mike Rott; Olivier Schumpp; Sébastien Massart; Annelies Haegeman
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-04-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.