Literature DB >> 33174483

THE INFLUENCE OF TDCS INTENSITY ON DECISION-MAKING TRAINING AND TRANSFER OUTCOMES.

Shane E Ehrhardt1, Hannah L Filmer2, Yohan Wards2, Jason B Mattingley3, Paul E Dux2.   

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to improve single- and dual-task performance in healthy participants and enhance transferable training gains following multiple sessions of combined stimulation and task-practice. However, it has yet to be determined what the optimal stimulation dose is for facilitating such outcomes. We aimed to test the effects of different tDCS intensities, with a commonly used electrode montage, on performance outcomes in a multi-session single/dual-task training and transfer protocol. In a pre-registered study, 123 participants, who were pseudorandomised across four groups, each completed six sessions (pre- and post-training sessions and four combined tDCS and training sessions) and received 20 minutes of prefrontal anodal tDCS at 0.7 mA, 1.0 mA, 2.0 mA, or 15-second sham stimulation. Response time and accuracy were assessed in trained and untrained tasks. The 1.0 mA group showed substantial improvements in single-task reaction time and dual-task accuracy, with additional evidence for improvements in dual-task reaction times, relative to sham performance. This group also showed near transfer to the single-task component of an untrained multitasking paradigm. The 0.7 mA and 2.0 mA intensities varied in which performance measures they improved on the trained task, but in sum, the effects were less robust than for the 1.0 mA group and there was no evidence for the transfer of performance. Our study highlights that training performance gains are augmented by tDCS, but their magnitude and nature are not uniform across stimulation intensity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cognitive training; decision-making; multitasking; stimulation dosage (dose); tDCS (transcranial direct current stimulation)

Year:  2020        PMID: 33174483     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00423.2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  11 in total

Review 1.  Non-invasive brain stimulation and neuroenhancement.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Bruce Luber; Anna-Katharine Brem; Marom Bikson; Andre R Brunoni; Roi Cohen Kadosh; Veljko Dubljević; Shirley Fecteau; Florinda Ferreri; Agnes Flöel; Mark Hallett; Roy H Hamilton; Christoph S Herrmann; Michal Lavidor; Collen Loo; Caroline Lustenberger; Sergio Machado; Carlo Miniussi; Vera Moliadze; Michael A Nitsche; Simone Rossi; Paolo M Rossini; Emiliano Santarnecchi; Margitta Seeck; Gregor Thut; Zsolt Turi; Yoshikazu Ugawa; Ganesan Venkatasubramanian; Nicole Wenderoth; Anna Wexler; Ulf Ziemann; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2022-05-25

2.  Brain stimulation competes with ongoing oscillations for control of spike timing in the primate brain.

Authors:  Matthew R Krause; Pedro G Vieira; Jean-Philippe Thivierge; Christopher C Pack
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 9.593

3.  What transcranial direct current stimulation intensity is best for cognitive enhancement?

Authors:  Jason Smucny
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Transcranial direct current stimulation of the posterior parietal cortex biases human hand choice.

Authors:  Kento Hirayama; Takayuki Koga; Toru Takahashi; Rieko Osu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Brain Electrical Activity, Heart Rate Variability, and Dual-Task Performance in Healthy and Fibromyalgia Women: A Study Protocol.

Authors:  Mari Carmen Gomez-Alvaro; Santos Villafaina; Juan Luis Leon-Llamas; Alvaro Murillo-Garcia; María Melo-Alonso; Jesús Sánchez-Gómez; Pablo Molero; Ricardo Cano-Plasencia; Narcis Gusi
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-04

6.  Multitarget high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation improves response inhibition more than single-target high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy participants.

Authors:  Zhihua Guo; Yue Gong; Hongliang Lu; Rui Qiu; Xinlu Wang; Xia Zhu; Xuqun You
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 5.152

Review 7.  Applications of open-source software ROAST in clinical studies: A review.

Authors:  Mohigul Nasimova; Yu Huang
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 9.184

8.  The effect of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation intensity on motor performance in healthy adults: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ohad Lerner; Jason Friedman; Silvi Frenkel-Toledo
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Conventional and HD-tDCS May (or May Not) Modulate Overt Attentional Orienting: An Integrated Spatio-Temporal Approach and Methodological Reflections.

Authors:  Lorenzo Diana; Giulia Scotti; Edoardo N Aiello; Patrick Pilastro; Aleksandra K Eberhard-Moscicka; René M Müri; Nadia Bolognini
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-12-31

10.  Multichannel anodal tDCS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in a paediatric population.

Authors:  Maike Splittgerber; Christoph Borzikowsky; Ricardo Salvador; Oula Puonti; Kiriaki Papadimitriou; Christoph Merschformann; Maria Chiara Biagi; Tristan Stenner; Hannah Brauer; Carolin Breitling-Ziegler; Alexander Prehn-Kristensen; Kerstin Krauel; Giulio Ruffini; Anya Pedersen; Frauke Nees; Axel Thielscher; Astrid Dempfle; Michael Siniatchkin; Vera Moliadze
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.