Literature DB >> 33174263

Updated Characterization of Outbreak Response Strategies for 2019-2029: Impacts of Using a Novel Type 2 Oral Poliovirus Vaccine Strain.

Dominika A Kalkowska1, Mark A Pallansch2, Amanda Wilkinson3, Ananda S Bandyopadhyay4, Jennifer L Konopka-Anstadt5, Cara C Burns5, M Steven Oberste5, Steven G F Wassilak3, Kamran Badizadegan1, Kimberly M Thompson1.   

Abstract

Delays in achieving the global eradication of wild poliovirus transmission continue to postpone subsequent cessation of all oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) use. Countries must stop OPV use to end all cases of poliomyelitis, including vaccine-associated paralytic polio (VAPP) and cases caused by vaccine-derived polioviruses (VDPVs). The Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) coordinated global cessation of all type 2 OPV (OPV2) use in routine immunization in 2016 but did not successfully end the transmission of type 2 VDPVs (VDPV2s), and consequently continues to use type 2 OPV (OPV2) for outbreak response activities. Using an updated global poliovirus transmission and OPV evolution model, we characterize outbreak response options for 2019-2029 related to responding to VDPV2 outbreaks with a genetically stabilized novel OPV (nOPV2) strain or with the currently licensed monovalent OPV2 (mOPV2). Given uncertainties about the properties of nOPV2, we model different assumptions that appear consistent with the evidence on nOPV2 to date. Using nOPV2 to respond to detected cases may reduce the expected VDPV and VAPP cases and the risk of needing to restart OPV2 use in routine immunization compared to mOPV2 use for outbreak response. The actual properties, availability, and use of nOPV2 will determine its effects on type 2 poliovirus transmission in populations. Even with optimal nOPV2 performance, countries and the GPEI would still likely need to restart OPV2 use in routine immunization in OPV-using countries if operational improvements in outbreak response to stop the transmission of cVDPV2s are not implemented effectively.
© 2020 Society for Risk Analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dynamic modeling; outbreak response; polio

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33174263      PMCID: PMC7887065          DOI: 10.1111/risa.13622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  57 in total

1.  Evolving epidemiology of poliovirus serotype 2 following withdrawal of the serotype 2 oral poliovirus vaccine.

Authors:  G R Macklin; K M O'Reilly; N C Grassly; W J Edmunds; O Mach; R Santhana Gopala Krishnan; A Voorman; J F Vertefeuille; J Abdelwahab; N Gumede; A Goel; S Sosler; J Sever; A S Bandyopadhyay; M A Pallansch; R Nandy; P Mkanda; O M Diop; R W Sutter
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Sabin Vaccine Reversion in the Field: a Comprehensive Analysis of Sabin-Like Poliovirus Isolates in Nigeria.

Authors:  Michael Famulare; Stewart Chang; Jane Iber; Kun Zhao; Johnson A Adeniji; David Bukbuk; Marycelin Baba; Matthew Behrend; Cara C Burns; M Steven Oberste
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  Polioviruses with natural recombinant genomes isolated from vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis.

Authors:  M Furione; S Guillot; D Otelea; J Balanant; A Candrea; R Crainic
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.616

4.  Serial recombination during circulation of type 1 wild-vaccine recombinant polioviruses in China.

Authors:  Hong-Mei Liu; Du-Ping Zheng; Li-Bi Zhang; M Steven Oberste; Olen M Kew; Mark A Pallansch
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Engineering attenuated virus vaccines by controlling replication fidelity.

Authors:  Marco Vignuzzi; Emily Wendt; Raul Andino
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2008-02-03       Impact factor: 53.440

6.  Global Transmission of Live Polioviruses: Updated Dynamic Modeling of the Polio Endgame.

Authors:  Dominika A Kalkowska; Mark A Pallansch; Steven G F Wassilak; Stephen L Cochi; Kimberly M Thompson
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 4.000

7.  Identification and manipulation of the molecular determinants influencing poliovirus recombination.

Authors:  Charles Runckel; Oscar Westesson; Raul Andino; Joseph L DeRisi
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 6.823

8.  Recombination between polioviruses and co-circulating Coxsackie A viruses: role in the emergence of pathogenic vaccine-derived polioviruses.

Authors:  Sophie Jegouic; Marie-Line Joffret; Claire Blanchard; Franck B Riquet; Céline Perret; Isabelle Pelletier; Florence Colbere-Garapin; Mala Rakoto-Andrianarivelo; Francis Delpeyroux
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 6.823

9.  Characterization of outbreak response strategies and potential vaccine stockpile needs for the polio endgame.

Authors:  Radboud J Duintjer Tebbens; Mark A Pallansch; Steven G F Wassilak; Stephen L Cochi; Kimberly M Thompson
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.090

10.  Engineering the Live-Attenuated Polio Vaccine to Prevent Reversion to Virulence.

Authors:  Ming Te Yeh; Erika Bujaki; Patrick T Dolan; Matthew Smith; Rahnuma Wahid; John Konz; Amy J Weiner; Ananda S Bandyopadhyay; Pierre Van Damme; Ilse De Coster; Hilde Revets; Andrew Macadam; Raul Andino
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 21.023

View more
  2 in total

1.  Health and Economic Outcomes Associated with Polio Vaccine Policy Options: 2019-2029.

Authors:  Dominika A Kalkowska; Kimberly M Thompson
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  The impact of surveillance and other factors on detection of emergent and circulating vaccine derived polioviruses.

Authors:  Megan Auzenbergs; Holly Fountain; Grace Macklin; Hil Lyons; Kathleen M O'Reilly
Journal:  Gates Open Res       Date:  2022-05-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.