Lesley Brown1, Rahena Mossabir1, Nicola Harrison1, Caroline Brundle1, Jane Smith1, Andrew Clegg2. 1. Academic Unit of Elderly Care & Rehabilitation, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK. 2. Academic Unit of Elderly Care & Rehabilitation, University of Leeds, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In response to the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic, the UK government introduced social distancing measures and identified specific populations at high risk from the virus. People ≥70 were deemed "Clinically Vulnerable." Distancing measures were introduced to reduce the risk of contracting COVID-19. However, these may have a negative impact on older people who are vulnerable to social isolation and may have challenges accessing services and provisions. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of COVID-19 lockdown measures on the lives of older people. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional telephone survey. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling older people, 76-97 years. OUTCOMES: Health anxiety; General health (RAND Short-form 36 Survey); Physical activity; Depression (PHQ-8); Anxiety (GAD-2); Loneliness; Access to services; Challenges, concerns and positive experiences. DATA ANALYSIS: Counts (%), means (SDs). Thematic analysis was used to identify themes from open questions. RESULTS: n = 142. 52% did not worry about their health; 76% rated their health as "good", "very good" or "excellent". < 10% met the criteria indicative of depression (PHQ-8), or anxiety (GAD-2). 42% were less active than before lockdown. 27% were lonely at least some of the time. Over half of participants identified positive aspects. CONCLUSIONS: Most participants reported good health with low levels of health anxiety, anxiety and depression. Many were able to identify positive aspects to lockdown and may be better equipped to deal with lockdown than anticipated. Strategies may be required to ameliorate the negative impact of loneliness for a minority of older people, and help some resume previous activity levels and pursuits.
BACKGROUND: In response to the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic, the UK government introduced social distancing measures and identified specific populations at high risk from the virus. People ≥70 were deemed "Clinically Vulnerable." Distancing measures were introduced to reduce the risk of contracting COVID-19. However, these may have a negative impact on older people who are vulnerable to social isolation and may have challenges accessing services and provisions. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of COVID-19 lockdown measures on the lives of older people. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional telephone survey. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling older people, 76-97 years. OUTCOMES: Health anxiety; General health (RAND Short-form 36 Survey); Physical activity; Depression (PHQ-8); Anxiety (GAD-2); Loneliness; Access to services; Challenges, concerns and positive experiences. DATA ANALYSIS: Counts (%), means (SDs). Thematic analysis was used to identify themes from open questions. RESULTS: n = 142. 52% did not worry about their health; 76% rated their health as "good", "very good" or "excellent". < 10% met the criteria indicative of depression (PHQ-8), or anxiety (GAD-2). 42% were less active than before lockdown. 27% were lonely at least some of the time. Over half of participants identified positive aspects. CONCLUSIONS: Most participants reported good health with low levels of health anxiety, anxiety and depression. Many were able to identify positive aspects to lockdown and may be better equipped to deal with lockdown than anticipated. Strategies may be required to ameliorate the negative impact of loneliness for a minority of older people, and help some resume previous activity levels and pursuits.
Authors: Siu-Ming Chan; Gary Ka-Ki Chung; Yat-Hang Chan; Jean Woo; Eng Kiong Yeoh; Roger Yat-Nork Chung; Samuel Yeung-Shan Wong; Michael Marmot; Richard Wai-Tong Lee; Hung Wong Journal: Curr Psychol Date: 2021-09-23
Authors: I S Moens; L J van Gerven; S M Debeij; C H Bakker; M J C Moester; S P Mooijaart; S van der Pas; M Vangeel; J Gussekloo; Y M Drewes; W P J den Elzen Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2022-01-13 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Lesley Brown; Anne Heaven; Catherine Quinn; Victoria Goodwin; Carolyn Chew-Graham; Farhat Mahmood; Sarah Hallas; Ikhlaq Jacob; Caroline Brundle; Kate Best; Amrit Daffu-O'Reilly; Karen Spilsbury; Tracey Anne Young; Rebecca Hawkins; Barbara Hanratty; Elizabeth Teale; Andrew Clegg Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-11-22 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Noah A Schuster; Sascha de Breij; Laura A Schaap; Natasja M van Schoor; Mike J L Peters; Renate T de Jongh; Martijn Huisman; Emiel O Hoogendijk Journal: Eur Geriatr Med Date: 2021-05-28 Impact factor: 3.269