Nicholas Lim1, Dupinder Singh1, Scott Jackson2, John R Lake1. 1. Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. 2. Fairview Health Services, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have revolutionized the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV). The impact of DAAs on recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation (LT) remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the risk of HCC recurrence in LT recipients cleared of HCV with DAAs at the time of LT compared to a control group of LT recipients who were viremic at the time of LT. METHODS: The study was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing LT for HCV-related HCC from 2002 to 2017. We compared time to post-LT HCC recurrence in patients with a sustained virological response (SVR) from DAAs prior to LT (DAA group) to patients who were viremic at LT (HCV+ group) using Kaplan-Meier analysis. We performed a secondary analysis comparing post-LT HCC recurrence in the DAA group to LT recipients with SVR from interferon-based treatment prior to LT (IFN group). RESULTS: One hundred fifty-one patients underwent LT for HCC related to HCV: 34 patients in DAA group, 95 patients in HCV+ group, and 22 in IFN group. Kaplan-Meier estimates of being HCC free were 96.2, 96.2, and 78.8% at 6, 12, and 24 months in DAA group, respectively, and 100, 98.6, and 95.8% at 6, 12, and 24 months in the HCV+ group, respectively; p = 0.08. There was no difference observed for HCC recurrence between the DAA and IFN groups. In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, DAA use increased the risk of post-LT HCC recurrence (HR 5.2, 95% CI 0.9-29.81, p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: A strong trend was observed on both Kaplan-Meier and multivariate analyses toward increased post-LT HCC recurrence in patients who achieved SVR prior to LT with DAAs compared to patients who were viremic at LT. Caution is required when considering pre-LT treatment of HCV with DAAs in patients with HCC.
BACKGROUND: Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have revolutionized the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV). The impact of DAAs on recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation (LT) remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the risk of HCC recurrence in LT recipients cleared of HCV with DAAs at the time of LT compared to a control group of LT recipients who were viremic at the time of LT. METHODS: The study was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing LT for HCV-related HCC from 2002 to 2017. We compared time to post-LT HCC recurrence in patients with a sustained virological response (SVR) from DAAs prior to LT (DAA group) to patients who were viremic at LT (HCV+ group) using Kaplan-Meier analysis. We performed a secondary analysis comparing post-LT HCC recurrence in the DAA group to LT recipients with SVR from interferon-based treatment prior to LT (IFN group). RESULTS: One hundred fifty-one patients underwent LT for HCC related to HCV: 34 patients in DAA group, 95 patients in HCV+ group, and 22 in IFN group. Kaplan-Meier estimates of being HCC free were 96.2, 96.2, and 78.8% at 6, 12, and 24 months in DAA group, respectively, and 100, 98.6, and 95.8% at 6, 12, and 24 months in the HCV+ group, respectively; p = 0.08. There was no difference observed for HCC recurrence between the DAA and IFN groups. In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, DAA use increased the risk of post-LT HCC recurrence (HR 5.2, 95% CI 0.9-29.81, p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: A strong trend was observed on both Kaplan-Meier and multivariate analyses toward increased post-LT HCC recurrence in patients who achieved SVR prior to LT with DAAs compared to patients who were viremic at LT. Caution is required when considering pre-LT treatment of HCV with DAAs in patients with HCC.
Authors: Vincenza Calvaruso; Giuseppe Cabibbo; Irene Cacciola; Salvatore Petta; Salvatore Madonia; Alessandro Bellia; Fabio Tinè; Marco Distefano; Anna Licata; Lydia Giannitrapani; Tullio Prestileo; Giovanni Mazzola; Maria Antonietta Di Rosolini; Licia Larocca; Gaetano Bertino; Antonio Digiacomo; Francesco Benanti; Luigi Guarneri; Alfonso Averna; Carmelo Iacobello; Antonio Magro; Ignazio Scalisi; Fabio Cartabellotta; Francesca Savalli; Marco Barbara; Antonio Davì; Maurizio Russello; Gaetano Scifo; Giovanni Squadrito; Calogero Cammà; Giovanni Raimondo; Antonio Craxì; Vito Di Marco Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2018-04-12 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: L M Kulik; R A Fisher; D R Rodrigo; R S Brown; C E Freise; A Shaked; J E Everhart; G T Everson; J C Hong; P H Hayashi; C L Berg; A S F Lok Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2012-09-20 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Michael Charlton; Gregory T Everson; Steven L Flamm; Princy Kumar; Charles Landis; Robert S Brown; Michael W Fried; Norah A Terrault; Jacqueline G O'Leary; Hugo E Vargas; Alexander Kuo; Eugene Schiff; Mark S Sulkowski; Richard Gilroy; Kymberly D Watt; Kimberly Brown; Paul Kwo; Surakit Pungpapong; Kevin M Korenblat; Andrew J Muir; Lewis Teperman; Robert J Fontana; Jill Denning; Sarah Arterburn; Hadas Dvory-Sobol; Theo Brandt-Sarif; Phillip S Pang; John G McHutchison; K Rajender Reddy; Nezam Afdhal Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2015-05-15 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Oxana V Makarova-Rusher; Sean F Altekruse; Tim S McNeel; Susanna Ulahannan; Austin G Duffy; Barry I Graubard; Tim F Greten; Katherine A McGlynn Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-03-21 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Wojciech Andrzej Straś; Dariusz Wasiak; Beata Łągiewska; Olga Tronina; Marta Hreńczuk; Joanna Gotlib; Wojciech Lisik; Piotr Małkowski Journal: Ann Transplant Date: 2022-01-26 Impact factor: 1.530