| Literature DB >> 33173724 |
Fang Liu1, Ye Yu2, Yuantao Zhang2, Xin Rong1, Tao Wang3, Xiantong Zheng1, Bowen Sheng1, Liuyun Yang1, Jiaqi Wei1, Xuepeng Wang2, Xianbin Li2, Xuelin Yang1, Fujun Xu1, Zhixin Qin1, Zhaohui Zhang1, Bo Shen1,4, Xinqiang Wang1,4.
Abstract
Epitaxial growth of III-nitrides on 2D materials enables the realization of flexible optoelectronic devices for next-generation wearable applications. Unfortunately, it is difficult to obtain high-quality III-nitride epilayers on 2D materials such as hexagonal BN (h-BN) due to different atom hybridizations. Here, the epitaxy of single-crystalline GaN films on the chemically activated h-BN/Al2O3 substrates is reported, paying attention to interface atomic configuration. It is found that chemical-activated h-BN provides B-O-N and N-O bonds, where the latter ones act as effective artificial dangling bonds for following GaN nucleation, leading to Ga-polar GaN films with a flat surface. The h-BN is also found to be effective in modifying the compressive strain in GaN film and thus improves indium incorporation during the growth of InGaN quantum wells, resulting in the achievement of pure green light-emitting diodes. This work provides an effective way for III-nitrides epitaxy on h-BN and a possible route to overcome the epitaxial bottleneck of high indium content III-nitride light-emitting devices.Entities:
Keywords: 2D materials; III‐nitrides; growth mechanisms; hexagonal boron nitride; light‐emitting diodes
Year: 2020 PMID: 33173724 PMCID: PMC7610270 DOI: 10.1002/advs.202000917
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Sci (Weinh) ISSN: 2198-3844 Impact factor: 16.806
Figure 1a) Raman scattering spectrum of 3‐nm‐thick annealed h‐BN on Al2O3. b) AFM image of 3‐nm‐thick annealed h‐BN on Al2O3. SEM images of c) 30‐nm‐thick LT‐GaN and d) subsequent 1.5‐µm‐thick HT‐GaN grown on untreated h‐BN/Al2O3 substrate. SEM images of e) 30‐nm‐thick LT‐GaN and f) subsequent 1.5‐µm‐thick HT‐GaN deposited on HCl‐activated h‐BN/Al2O3 substrate. These SEM results indicate that a drastically improved surface of HT‐GaN epilayer owes to the increasing of GaN nucleation density by HCl treatment of h‐BN.
Figure 2B 1s characteristic peak of h‐BN a) before and b) after HCl activation. The B 1s peak of activated h‐BN is consisted of B—N peak (190.8 eV) and B—O related peak (191.4 eV), showing the formation of O‐related defects bonding with B atoms. N 1s characteristic peak of h‐BN c) before and d) after HCl activation. The N 1s peak of activated h‐BN includes a contribution from peaks of B—N bond (396.5 eV) and N—O related bond (400.4 eV), which indicates some of newly formed O‐related defects bonding with N atoms. The thickness of h‐BN is about 3 nm.
Figure 3a) Top and b) side view of the four optimized structures of single O atom chemisorbed on an h‐BN monolayer: center (above the center of the h‐BN honeycomb lattice), B—O (only bonding with B), N—O (only bonding with N), and B—O—N (bonding with B and N in form of a bridge). Color coding: Cyan for B, gray for N, and red for O.
Calculated binding energy (E B) per O atom adsorbed on h‐BN surface. Here, E B is calculated by the following formula: E B = E BN‐O − E BN − E O, where E BN‐O, E BN = −439.350 eV, and E O = −1.606 eV are the energies of monolayer h‐BN adsorbed by one O atom, isolated monolayer h‐BN, and isolated O atom (i.e., a single O atom in the 5 × 5 × 1 supercell), respectively. Negative sign means exothermic
| Center | B—O | N—O | B—O—N | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| −441.272 | −442.098 | −442.522 | −443.057 |
|
| −439.350 | −439.350 | −439.350 | −439.350 |
|
| −1.606 | −1.606 | −1.606 | −1.606 |
|
| −0.316 | −1.142 | −1.566 | −2.101 |
Calculated E B of various cases of Ga or N atom absorption on h‐BN, where the N—O sites are considered as effective dangling bonds. The E B is estimated by E B = E Final − E Initial − E Ga/N + E Replaced, where E Final, E Initial, E Ga/N, and E Replaced are the energies of Ga or N atom absorption on h‐BN, h‐BN with N—O bond, single Ga or N atom, and the replaced O atom (for the N—Ga and N—N absorption without O). Negative sign means exothermic
| N—O—Ga | N—O—N | N—Ga | N—N | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| −446.253 | −451.654 | −439.75 | −442.793 |
|
| −442.522 | −442.522 | −442.522 | −442.522 |
|
| −0.263 | −3.124 | −0.263 | −3.124 |
|
| 0 | 0 | −1.606 | −1.606 |
|
| −3.468 | −6.008 | 1.429 | 1.247 |
Figure 4Schematic diagrams of activation of h‐BN and nucleation mechanism of GaN. a) Surface of h‐BN. b) Formation of B—O—N and N—O bonds on h‐BN surface by trapping OH— in HCl solution. c) Desorption of H atoms from activated h‐BN surface (i.e., from N—O—H bonds) during the temperature ramping of substrate. d) Generation of N—O—N bonds on N—O bonds by trapping N atoms. e) Formation of N—O—N—Ga (3) structures by binding three Ga atoms on every N—O—N, indicating the start of Ga‐polarity GaN epitaxy.
Figure 5FWHMs of a) (0002)‐ and b) (102)‐plane XRD ω‐rocking curves for 3‐µm‐thick GaN films grown on untreated h‐BN/Al2O3 and activated h‐BN/Al2O3 substrates. Raman shifts of the c) E2 (high) and d) A1 (LO) modes of GaN in 3‐µm‐thick GaN films grown on Al2O3 and activated h‐BN/Al2O3 substrates. The thickness of h‐BN interlayer is about 3 nm.
Figure 6XRD 2θ‐ω scans of symmetric (0002) plane for InGaN‐based LEDs grown on a) activated h‐BN/Al2O3 and b) Al2O3, respectively. RSM scans of the asymmetric (105) reflection for InGaN‐based LEDs grown on c) activated h‐BN/Al2O3 and d) Al2O3, respectively. The dashed lines show that InGaN/GaN MQWs coherently grow on n‐GaN layer. EL spectra of these InGaN‐based LEDs grown on e) activated h‐BN/Al2O3 and f) Al2O3 at different current densities. The insets show the EL images of these LEDs at the injection current density of 40 mA·mm−2.